Robustness in <i>Escherichia coli</i> glutamate and glutamine synthesis studied by a kinetic model

Autores
Lodeiro, Aníbal Roberto; Melgarejo, Augusto Argentino
Año de publicación
2008
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Metabolic control of glutamine and glutamate synthesis from ammonia and oxoglutarate in Escherichia coli is tight and complex. In this work, the role of glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) regulation in this control was studied. Both enzymes form a linear pathway, which can also have a cyclic topology if glutamate–oxoglutarate amino transferase (GOGAT) activity is included. We modelled the metabolic pathways in the linear or cyclic topologies using a coupled nonlinear differential equations system. To simulate GS regulation by covalent modification, we introduced a relationship that took into account the levels of oxoglutarate and glutamine as signal inputs, as well as the ultrasensitive response of enzyme adenylylation. Thus, by including this relationship or not, we were able to model the system with or without GS regulation. In addition, GS and GDH activities were changed manually. The response of the model in different stationary states, or under the influence of N-input exhaustion or oscillation, was analyzed in both pathway topologies. Our results indicate a metabolic control coefficient for GDH ranging from 0.94 in the linear pathway with GS regulation to 0.24 in the cyclic pathway without regulation, employing a default GDH concentration of 8 μM. Thus, in these conditions, GDH seemed to have a high degree of control in the linear pathway while having limited influence in the cyclic one. When GS was regulated, system responses to N-input perturbations were more sensitive, especially in the cyclic pathway. Furthermore, we found that effects of regulation against perturbations depended on the relative values of the glutamine and glutamate output first-order kinetic constants, which we named k6 and k7, respectively. Effects of regulation grew exponentially with a factor around 2, with linear increases of (k7 − k6). These trends were sustained but with lower differences at higher GS concentration. Hence, GS regulation seemed important for metabolic stability in a changing environment, depending on the cell’s metabolic status.
Instituto de Biotecnologia y Biologia Molecular
Facultad de Ingeniería
Materia
Ciencias Exactas
Glutamine synthetase
Pathway topology
Regulation
Kinetic model
Metabolic control
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/107234

id SEDICI_dcfc68c358f0f2dc82a9bef5c68142f4
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/107234
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Robustness in <i>Escherichia coli</i> glutamate and glutamine synthesis studied by a kinetic modelLodeiro, Aníbal RobertoMelgarejo, Augusto ArgentinoCiencias ExactasGlutamine synthetasePathway topologyRegulationKinetic modelMetabolic controlMetabolic control of glutamine and glutamate synthesis from ammonia and oxoglutarate in Escherichia coli is tight and complex. In this work, the role of glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) regulation in this control was studied. Both enzymes form a linear pathway, which can also have a cyclic topology if glutamate–oxoglutarate amino transferase (GOGAT) activity is included. We modelled the metabolic pathways in the linear or cyclic topologies using a coupled nonlinear differential equations system. To simulate GS regulation by covalent modification, we introduced a relationship that took into account the levels of oxoglutarate and glutamine as signal inputs, as well as the ultrasensitive response of enzyme adenylylation. Thus, by including this relationship or not, we were able to model the system with or without GS regulation. In addition, GS and GDH activities were changed manually. The response of the model in different stationary states, or under the influence of N-input exhaustion or oscillation, was analyzed in both pathway topologies. Our results indicate a metabolic control coefficient for GDH ranging from 0.94 in the linear pathway with GS regulation to 0.24 in the cyclic pathway without regulation, employing a default GDH concentration of 8 μM. Thus, in these conditions, GDH seemed to have a high degree of control in the linear pathway while having limited influence in the cyclic one. When GS was regulated, system responses to N-input perturbations were more sensitive, especially in the cyclic pathway. Furthermore, we found that effects of regulation against perturbations depended on the relative values of the glutamine and glutamate output first-order kinetic constants, which we named k6 and k7, respectively. Effects of regulation grew exponentially with a factor around 2, with linear increases of (k7 − k6). These trends were sustained but with lower differences at higher GS concentration. Hence, GS regulation seemed important for metabolic stability in a changing environment, depending on the cell’s metabolic status.Instituto de Biotecnologia y Biologia MolecularFacultad de Ingeniería2008info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdf91-106http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/107234spainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC2577740&blobtype=pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1573-0689info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/19669495info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10867-008-9109-9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-10T12:26:36Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/107234Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-10 12:26:36.963SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Robustness in <i>Escherichia coli</i> glutamate and glutamine synthesis studied by a kinetic model
title Robustness in <i>Escherichia coli</i> glutamate and glutamine synthesis studied by a kinetic model
spellingShingle Robustness in <i>Escherichia coli</i> glutamate and glutamine synthesis studied by a kinetic model
Lodeiro, Aníbal Roberto
Ciencias Exactas
Glutamine synthetase
Pathway topology
Regulation
Kinetic model
Metabolic control
title_short Robustness in <i>Escherichia coli</i> glutamate and glutamine synthesis studied by a kinetic model
title_full Robustness in <i>Escherichia coli</i> glutamate and glutamine synthesis studied by a kinetic model
title_fullStr Robustness in <i>Escherichia coli</i> glutamate and glutamine synthesis studied by a kinetic model
title_full_unstemmed Robustness in <i>Escherichia coli</i> glutamate and glutamine synthesis studied by a kinetic model
title_sort Robustness in <i>Escherichia coli</i> glutamate and glutamine synthesis studied by a kinetic model
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Lodeiro, Aníbal Roberto
Melgarejo, Augusto Argentino
author Lodeiro, Aníbal Roberto
author_facet Lodeiro, Aníbal Roberto
Melgarejo, Augusto Argentino
author_role author
author2 Melgarejo, Augusto Argentino
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Exactas
Glutamine synthetase
Pathway topology
Regulation
Kinetic model
Metabolic control
topic Ciencias Exactas
Glutamine synthetase
Pathway topology
Regulation
Kinetic model
Metabolic control
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Metabolic control of glutamine and glutamate synthesis from ammonia and oxoglutarate in Escherichia coli is tight and complex. In this work, the role of glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) regulation in this control was studied. Both enzymes form a linear pathway, which can also have a cyclic topology if glutamate–oxoglutarate amino transferase (GOGAT) activity is included. We modelled the metabolic pathways in the linear or cyclic topologies using a coupled nonlinear differential equations system. To simulate GS regulation by covalent modification, we introduced a relationship that took into account the levels of oxoglutarate and glutamine as signal inputs, as well as the ultrasensitive response of enzyme adenylylation. Thus, by including this relationship or not, we were able to model the system with or without GS regulation. In addition, GS and GDH activities were changed manually. The response of the model in different stationary states, or under the influence of N-input exhaustion or oscillation, was analyzed in both pathway topologies. Our results indicate a metabolic control coefficient for GDH ranging from 0.94 in the linear pathway with GS regulation to 0.24 in the cyclic pathway without regulation, employing a default GDH concentration of 8 μM. Thus, in these conditions, GDH seemed to have a high degree of control in the linear pathway while having limited influence in the cyclic one. When GS was regulated, system responses to N-input perturbations were more sensitive, especially in the cyclic pathway. Furthermore, we found that effects of regulation against perturbations depended on the relative values of the glutamine and glutamate output first-order kinetic constants, which we named k6 and k7, respectively. Effects of regulation grew exponentially with a factor around 2, with linear increases of (k7 − k6). These trends were sustained but with lower differences at higher GS concentration. Hence, GS regulation seemed important for metabolic stability in a changing environment, depending on the cell’s metabolic status.
Instituto de Biotecnologia y Biologia Molecular
Facultad de Ingeniería
description Metabolic control of glutamine and glutamate synthesis from ammonia and oxoglutarate in Escherichia coli is tight and complex. In this work, the role of glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) regulation in this control was studied. Both enzymes form a linear pathway, which can also have a cyclic topology if glutamate–oxoglutarate amino transferase (GOGAT) activity is included. We modelled the metabolic pathways in the linear or cyclic topologies using a coupled nonlinear differential equations system. To simulate GS regulation by covalent modification, we introduced a relationship that took into account the levels of oxoglutarate and glutamine as signal inputs, as well as the ultrasensitive response of enzyme adenylylation. Thus, by including this relationship or not, we were able to model the system with or without GS regulation. In addition, GS and GDH activities were changed manually. The response of the model in different stationary states, or under the influence of N-input exhaustion or oscillation, was analyzed in both pathway topologies. Our results indicate a metabolic control coefficient for GDH ranging from 0.94 in the linear pathway with GS regulation to 0.24 in the cyclic pathway without regulation, employing a default GDH concentration of 8 μM. Thus, in these conditions, GDH seemed to have a high degree of control in the linear pathway while having limited influence in the cyclic one. When GS was regulated, system responses to N-input perturbations were more sensitive, especially in the cyclic pathway. Furthermore, we found that effects of regulation against perturbations depended on the relative values of the glutamine and glutamate output first-order kinetic constants, which we named k6 and k7, respectively. Effects of regulation grew exponentially with a factor around 2, with linear increases of (k7 − k6). These trends were sustained but with lower differences at higher GS concentration. Hence, GS regulation seemed important for metabolic stability in a changing environment, depending on the cell’s metabolic status.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articulo
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/107234
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/107234
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC2577740&blobtype=pdf
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1573-0689
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/19669495
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10867-008-9109-9
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
91-106
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1842904322526937088
score 12.993085