Sistemas Tutores Inteligentes: propuesta de categorías de análisis para evaluación

Autores
Cataldi, Zulma; Lage, Fernando Javier
Año de publicación
2011
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Categories for evaluation of educative software by different authors are analyzed. For STI theoretical basis are: learn by doing, construction of knowledge, mental conflict, zone of proximal development, learning by discovery, conceptual change, and learning for the understanding and the standards for interfaces. A proposal of evaluation based on the usability criteria is presented and is add new criteria to the existing categories and new categories of analysis are generated. The application dominion causes that some special characteristics are due to have in account as the design of the exercises and problems and in the system of self-evaluation and evaluation
Presentado en el IX Workshop Tecnología Informática aplicada en Educación (WTIAE)
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)
Materia
Ciencias Informáticas
Evaluación
Sistema Tutor Inteligente (STI)
Indicadores
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/18715
Acceder
id SEDICI_726643c5046c8eb5f95ea28943ee1606
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/18715
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Sistemas Tutores Inteligentes: propuesta de categorías de análisis para evaluaciónCataldi, ZulmaLage, Fernando JavierCiencias InformáticasEvaluaciónSistema Tutor Inteligente (STI)IndicadoresCategories for evaluation of educative software by different authors are analyzed. For STI theoretical basis are: learn by doing, construction of knowledge, mental conflict, zone of proximal development, learning by discovery, conceptual change, and learning for the understanding and the standards for interfaces. A proposal of evaluation based on the usability criteria is presented and is add new criteria to the existing categories and new categories of analysis are generated. The application dominion causes that some special characteristics are due to have in account as the design of the exercises and problems and in the system of self-evaluation and evaluationPresentado en el IX Workshop Tecnología Informática aplicada en Educación (WTIAE)Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)2011-10info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdf602-609http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/18715spainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-10-15T10:46:14Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/18715Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-10-15 10:46:14.739SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sistemas Tutores Inteligentes: propuesta de categorías de análisis para evaluación
title Sistemas Tutores Inteligentes: propuesta de categorías de análisis para evaluación
spellingShingle Sistemas Tutores Inteligentes: propuesta de categorías de análisis para evaluación
Cataldi, Zulma
Ciencias Informáticas
Evaluación
Sistema Tutor Inteligente (STI)
Indicadores
title_short Sistemas Tutores Inteligentes: propuesta de categorías de análisis para evaluación
title_full Sistemas Tutores Inteligentes: propuesta de categorías de análisis para evaluación
title_fullStr Sistemas Tutores Inteligentes: propuesta de categorías de análisis para evaluación
title_full_unstemmed Sistemas Tutores Inteligentes: propuesta de categorías de análisis para evaluación
title_sort Sistemas Tutores Inteligentes: propuesta de categorías de análisis para evaluación
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cataldi, Zulma
Lage, Fernando Javier
author Cataldi, Zulma
author_facet Cataldi, Zulma
Lage, Fernando Javier
author_role author
author2 Lage, Fernando Javier
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Informáticas
Evaluación
Sistema Tutor Inteligente (STI)
Indicadores
topic Ciencias Informáticas
Evaluación
Sistema Tutor Inteligente (STI)
Indicadores
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Categories for evaluation of educative software by different authors are analyzed. For STI theoretical basis are: learn by doing, construction of knowledge, mental conflict, zone of proximal development, learning by discovery, conceptual change, and learning for the understanding and the standards for interfaces. A proposal of evaluation based on the usability criteria is presented and is add new criteria to the existing categories and new categories of analysis are generated. The application dominion causes that some special characteristics are due to have in account as the design of the exercises and problems and in the system of self-evaluation and evaluation
Presentado en el IX Workshop Tecnología Informática aplicada en Educación (WTIAE)
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)
description Categories for evaluation of educative software by different authors are analyzed. For STI theoretical basis are: learn by doing, construction of knowledge, mental conflict, zone of proximal development, learning by discovery, conceptual change, and learning for the understanding and the standards for interfaces. A proposal of evaluation based on the usability criteria is presented and is add new criteria to the existing categories and new categories of analysis are generated. The application dominion causes that some special characteristics are due to have in account as the design of the exercises and problems and in the system of self-evaluation and evaluation
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-10
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Objeto de conferencia
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/18715
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/18715
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
602-609
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1846063885166051328
score 13.22299

Publicaciones similares