Foraging behavior of Argentine Criollo and Angus cows grazing semi-desert rangelands in the Arid Gran Chaco region of Argentina
- Autores
- Herrera Conegliano, Oscar Ariel; Blanco, Lisandro Javier; Utsumi, Santiago A.; Cibils, Andrés Francisco; Cendoya, Maria Gabriela; Jaimes, Florencia; Moltoni, Andres Fernando; Ricci, Patricia
- Año de publicación
- 2022
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- We monitored grazing behavior and habitat selection of Argentine Criollo (AC), South American heritage cattle breed, and Angus (AA) cows during summer and winter of 2016 (wetter year) and 2017 (drier year) at a site in La Rioja, Argentina. In each year and season, five AC and five AA cows were fitted with GPS collars configured to log animal position at 10-min intervals for 40 days. Movement, activity, and vegetation use patterns of each breed were derived from the GPS data. In summer, AC cows traveled similar daily distances, explored smaller (wetter year) or slightly larger (drier year) areas of the pasture, tended to move along more sinuous path trajectories, and showed stronger selection of the vegetation unit with higher forage quality and lowest woody cover compared to AA counterparts. AC cows allocated similar (wetter year) or more time to graze (drier year), allocated roughly the same amount of time to travel, and spent similar (wetter year) or less time resting (drier year) than AA cows. In winter, foraging behavior differences between breeds were only observed in the drier year. AC cows traveled farther and spent less time resting than AA counterparts that year. When comparing summer vs. winter movement patterns of each breed, AC cows showed an apparent greater ability to adapt to changing forage conditions (foraging plasticity) compared to AA counterparts which appeared to exhibit more rigid foraging patterns. Criollo cattle could be a tool to increase the resilience of Arid Chaco beef systems in the face of climate change. The rangeland conservation implications of raising Criollo vs. British beef cattle require further investigation.
EEA Catamarca
Fil: Herrera Conegliano, Oscar Ariel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Catamarca; Argentina
Fil: Herrera Conegliano, Oscar Ariel. Universidad Nacional de Catamarca. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: Blanco, Lisandro Javier. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Rioja; Argentina
Fil: Utsumi, Santiago A. New Mexico State University. Department of Animal and Range Sciences; Estados Unidos
Fil: Cibils, Andrés Francisco. New Mexico State University. Department of Animal and Range Sciences; Estados Unidos
Fil: Cendoya, Gabriela. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Jaimes, Florencia. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Moltoni, Andrés Fernando. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Ingeniería Rural; Argentina
Fil: Ricci, Patricia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fil: Ricci, Patricia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Innovación Para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina. - Fuente
- Journal of Arid Environments 206 : 104827 (November 2022)
- Materia
-
Ganado Bovino
Razas (animales)
Pastoreo
Búsqueda de Alimento
Tierras de Pastos
Cattle
Breeds (animals)
Grazing
Foraging
Rangelands
Raza Criolla Argentina
Raza Angus
Región Chaco Semiárido
Foraging Behaviour - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso restringido
- Condiciones de uso
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/12469
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_cf32b2f7496e23698bdbb4c298c8bdd5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/12469 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Foraging behavior of Argentine Criollo and Angus cows grazing semi-desert rangelands in the Arid Gran Chaco region of ArgentinaHerrera Conegliano, Oscar ArielBlanco, Lisandro JavierUtsumi, Santiago A.Cibils, Andrés FranciscoCendoya, Maria GabrielaJaimes, FlorenciaMoltoni, Andres FernandoRicci, PatriciaGanado BovinoRazas (animales)PastoreoBúsqueda de AlimentoTierras de PastosCattleBreeds (animals)GrazingForagingRangelandsRaza Criolla ArgentinaRaza AngusRegión Chaco SemiáridoForaging BehaviourWe monitored grazing behavior and habitat selection of Argentine Criollo (AC), South American heritage cattle breed, and Angus (AA) cows during summer and winter of 2016 (wetter year) and 2017 (drier year) at a site in La Rioja, Argentina. In each year and season, five AC and five AA cows were fitted with GPS collars configured to log animal position at 10-min intervals for 40 days. Movement, activity, and vegetation use patterns of each breed were derived from the GPS data. In summer, AC cows traveled similar daily distances, explored smaller (wetter year) or slightly larger (drier year) areas of the pasture, tended to move along more sinuous path trajectories, and showed stronger selection of the vegetation unit with higher forage quality and lowest woody cover compared to AA counterparts. AC cows allocated similar (wetter year) or more time to graze (drier year), allocated roughly the same amount of time to travel, and spent similar (wetter year) or less time resting (drier year) than AA cows. In winter, foraging behavior differences between breeds were only observed in the drier year. AC cows traveled farther and spent less time resting than AA counterparts that year. When comparing summer vs. winter movement patterns of each breed, AC cows showed an apparent greater ability to adapt to changing forage conditions (foraging plasticity) compared to AA counterparts which appeared to exhibit more rigid foraging patterns. Criollo cattle could be a tool to increase the resilience of Arid Chaco beef systems in the face of climate change. The rangeland conservation implications of raising Criollo vs. British beef cattle require further investigation.EEA CatamarcaFil: Herrera Conegliano, Oscar Ariel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Catamarca; ArgentinaFil: Herrera Conegliano, Oscar Ariel. Universidad Nacional de Catamarca. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; ArgentinaFil: Blanco, Lisandro Javier. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Rioja; ArgentinaFil: Utsumi, Santiago A. New Mexico State University. Department of Animal and Range Sciences; Estados UnidosFil: Cibils, Andrés Francisco. New Mexico State University. Department of Animal and Range Sciences; Estados UnidosFil: Cendoya, Gabriela. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.Fil: Jaimes, Florencia. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.Fil: Moltoni, Andrés Fernando. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Ingeniería Rural; ArgentinaFil: Ricci, Patricia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.Fil: Ricci, Patricia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Innovación Para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina.Elsevier2022-08-02T12:53:27Z2022-08-02T12:53:27Z2022-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/12469https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S01401963220012270140-1963https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2022.104827Journal of Arid Environments 206 : 104827 (November 2022)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-11T10:24:17Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/12469instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-11 10:24:17.668INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Foraging behavior of Argentine Criollo and Angus cows grazing semi-desert rangelands in the Arid Gran Chaco region of Argentina |
title |
Foraging behavior of Argentine Criollo and Angus cows grazing semi-desert rangelands in the Arid Gran Chaco region of Argentina |
spellingShingle |
Foraging behavior of Argentine Criollo and Angus cows grazing semi-desert rangelands in the Arid Gran Chaco region of Argentina Herrera Conegliano, Oscar Ariel Ganado Bovino Razas (animales) Pastoreo Búsqueda de Alimento Tierras de Pastos Cattle Breeds (animals) Grazing Foraging Rangelands Raza Criolla Argentina Raza Angus Región Chaco Semiárido Foraging Behaviour |
title_short |
Foraging behavior of Argentine Criollo and Angus cows grazing semi-desert rangelands in the Arid Gran Chaco region of Argentina |
title_full |
Foraging behavior of Argentine Criollo and Angus cows grazing semi-desert rangelands in the Arid Gran Chaco region of Argentina |
title_fullStr |
Foraging behavior of Argentine Criollo and Angus cows grazing semi-desert rangelands in the Arid Gran Chaco region of Argentina |
title_full_unstemmed |
Foraging behavior of Argentine Criollo and Angus cows grazing semi-desert rangelands in the Arid Gran Chaco region of Argentina |
title_sort |
Foraging behavior of Argentine Criollo and Angus cows grazing semi-desert rangelands in the Arid Gran Chaco region of Argentina |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Herrera Conegliano, Oscar Ariel Blanco, Lisandro Javier Utsumi, Santiago A. Cibils, Andrés Francisco Cendoya, Maria Gabriela Jaimes, Florencia Moltoni, Andres Fernando Ricci, Patricia |
author |
Herrera Conegliano, Oscar Ariel |
author_facet |
Herrera Conegliano, Oscar Ariel Blanco, Lisandro Javier Utsumi, Santiago A. Cibils, Andrés Francisco Cendoya, Maria Gabriela Jaimes, Florencia Moltoni, Andres Fernando Ricci, Patricia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Blanco, Lisandro Javier Utsumi, Santiago A. Cibils, Andrés Francisco Cendoya, Maria Gabriela Jaimes, Florencia Moltoni, Andres Fernando Ricci, Patricia |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ganado Bovino Razas (animales) Pastoreo Búsqueda de Alimento Tierras de Pastos Cattle Breeds (animals) Grazing Foraging Rangelands Raza Criolla Argentina Raza Angus Región Chaco Semiárido Foraging Behaviour |
topic |
Ganado Bovino Razas (animales) Pastoreo Búsqueda de Alimento Tierras de Pastos Cattle Breeds (animals) Grazing Foraging Rangelands Raza Criolla Argentina Raza Angus Región Chaco Semiárido Foraging Behaviour |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
We monitored grazing behavior and habitat selection of Argentine Criollo (AC), South American heritage cattle breed, and Angus (AA) cows during summer and winter of 2016 (wetter year) and 2017 (drier year) at a site in La Rioja, Argentina. In each year and season, five AC and five AA cows were fitted with GPS collars configured to log animal position at 10-min intervals for 40 days. Movement, activity, and vegetation use patterns of each breed were derived from the GPS data. In summer, AC cows traveled similar daily distances, explored smaller (wetter year) or slightly larger (drier year) areas of the pasture, tended to move along more sinuous path trajectories, and showed stronger selection of the vegetation unit with higher forage quality and lowest woody cover compared to AA counterparts. AC cows allocated similar (wetter year) or more time to graze (drier year), allocated roughly the same amount of time to travel, and spent similar (wetter year) or less time resting (drier year) than AA cows. In winter, foraging behavior differences between breeds were only observed in the drier year. AC cows traveled farther and spent less time resting than AA counterparts that year. When comparing summer vs. winter movement patterns of each breed, AC cows showed an apparent greater ability to adapt to changing forage conditions (foraging plasticity) compared to AA counterparts which appeared to exhibit more rigid foraging patterns. Criollo cattle could be a tool to increase the resilience of Arid Chaco beef systems in the face of climate change. The rangeland conservation implications of raising Criollo vs. British beef cattle require further investigation. EEA Catamarca Fil: Herrera Conegliano, Oscar Ariel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Catamarca; Argentina Fil: Herrera Conegliano, Oscar Ariel. Universidad Nacional de Catamarca. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina Fil: Blanco, Lisandro Javier. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Rioja; Argentina Fil: Utsumi, Santiago A. New Mexico State University. Department of Animal and Range Sciences; Estados Unidos Fil: Cibils, Andrés Francisco. New Mexico State University. Department of Animal and Range Sciences; Estados Unidos Fil: Cendoya, Gabriela. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Fil: Jaimes, Florencia. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Fil: Moltoni, Andrés Fernando. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Ingeniería Rural; Argentina Fil: Ricci, Patricia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Fil: Ricci, Patricia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Innovación Para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina. |
description |
We monitored grazing behavior and habitat selection of Argentine Criollo (AC), South American heritage cattle breed, and Angus (AA) cows during summer and winter of 2016 (wetter year) and 2017 (drier year) at a site in La Rioja, Argentina. In each year and season, five AC and five AA cows were fitted with GPS collars configured to log animal position at 10-min intervals for 40 days. Movement, activity, and vegetation use patterns of each breed were derived from the GPS data. In summer, AC cows traveled similar daily distances, explored smaller (wetter year) or slightly larger (drier year) areas of the pasture, tended to move along more sinuous path trajectories, and showed stronger selection of the vegetation unit with higher forage quality and lowest woody cover compared to AA counterparts. AC cows allocated similar (wetter year) or more time to graze (drier year), allocated roughly the same amount of time to travel, and spent similar (wetter year) or less time resting (drier year) than AA cows. In winter, foraging behavior differences between breeds were only observed in the drier year. AC cows traveled farther and spent less time resting than AA counterparts that year. When comparing summer vs. winter movement patterns of each breed, AC cows showed an apparent greater ability to adapt to changing forage conditions (foraging plasticity) compared to AA counterparts which appeared to exhibit more rigid foraging patterns. Criollo cattle could be a tool to increase the resilience of Arid Chaco beef systems in the face of climate change. The rangeland conservation implications of raising Criollo vs. British beef cattle require further investigation. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-02T12:53:27Z 2022-08-02T12:53:27Z 2022-11 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/12469 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140196322001227 0140-1963 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2022.104827 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/12469 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140196322001227 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2022.104827 |
identifier_str_mv |
0140-1963 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
restrictedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Arid Environments 206 : 104827 (November 2022) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1842975509268398080 |
score |
12.993085 |