Foraging Behavior of Heritage versus Desert-Adapted Commercial Rangeland Beef Cows in Relation to Dam-Offspring Contact Patterns

Autores
Nyamuryekung’e, Shelemia; Cibils, Andres Francisco; Estell, Richard E.; McIntosh, Matthew; VanLeeuwen, Dawn; Steele, Caitriana; González, Alfredo; Spiegal, Sheri; Continanza, Fatima Guadalupe
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
We compared cow-calf contacts, as well as movement, activity, and pasture use patterns of heritage Raramuri Criollo (RC) and desert-adapted commercial Angus Hereford crossbred (AH) beef cattle grazing Chihuahuan Desert pastures during 4 wk in the summers of 2016 and 2017. Within each herd of 11 cow-calf pairs, a group of 7−9 randomly selected cows were fitted with Global Positioning System collars that recorded animal position at 10-min intervals. Proximity loggers configured to record contact events (< 1-m radius) were fitted on a subset of five cow-calf pairs of each breed. The effect of breed on cow-calf contacts, as well as the dams’ movement, activity, and pasture use patterns were analyzed via mixed analysis of variance models. A higher number of RC cow-calf contacts occurred while the dam was grazing and traveling compared with AH counterparts (P ≤ 0.05). No breed-related differences were observed in the overall number and duration of cow-calf contact events. Compared with AH dams, RC cows traveled farther each day (RC: 7.51 vs. AH: 4.85 km, P < 0.01) at higher movement velocities (5.46 vs. 3.53 m. min−1, P < 0.01) and spent more time traveling (1.05 vs. 0.48 h, P < 0.01), more time grazing (9.37 vs. 7.45 h, P < 0.01), and less time resting (13.07 vs. 15.68 h, P < 0.01). RC cows explored almost three times more daily area than AH (152.30 vs. 57.69 ha, P = 0.01) but spent similar amounts of time within 200 m and 100 m of a drinker. RC calves explored larger daily areas than their AH counterparts (83.0 vs. 20.8 ha, P = 0.05), but no breed differences were detected in the number of contact events near drinkers. RC calves possibly impose fewer constraints on their dams’ movement and activity patterns compared with commonly used British crossbreds when grazing the Chihuahuan Desert during summer.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: Nyamuryekung’e, Shelemia. New Mexico State University. Department of Animal and Range Sciences; Estados Unidos.
Fil: Cibils, Andres F. New Mexico State University. Department of Animal and Range Sciences; Estados Unidos.
Fil: Estell, Richard E. US Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service; Estados Unidos.
Fil: McIntosh, Matthew. New Mexico State University. Department of Animal and Range Sciences; Estados Unidos.
Fil: VanLeeuwen, Dawn. New Mexico State University. Department of Agricultural Extension Education; Estados Unidos.
Fil: Steele, Caitriana. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fil: González, Alfredo. New Mexico State University. Department of Agricultural Extension Education; Estados Unidos.
Fil: Spiegal, Sheri. Agricultural Research Service, Department of Agriculture; Estados Unidos.
Fil: Continanza, Fátima Guadalupe. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fuente
Rangeland Ecology & Management 74 : 43-49 (January 2021)
Materia
Pastoreo
Comportamiento Animal
Razas de Ganado
Herencia Genética
Grazing
Animal Behaviour
Livestock Breeds
Genetic Inheritance
Raza Angus
Rarámuris Criollos
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/13452

id INTADig_8ddc8b49574143b5545b3bd1bf44d91c
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/13452
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Foraging Behavior of Heritage versus Desert-Adapted Commercial Rangeland Beef Cows in Relation to Dam-Offspring Contact PatternsNyamuryekung’e, ShelemiaCibils, Andres FranciscoEstell, Richard E.McIntosh, MatthewVanLeeuwen, DawnSteele, CaitrianaGonzález, AlfredoSpiegal, SheriContinanza, Fatima GuadalupePastoreoComportamiento AnimalRazas de GanadoHerencia GenéticaGrazingAnimal BehaviourLivestock BreedsGenetic InheritanceRaza AngusRarámuris CriollosWe compared cow-calf contacts, as well as movement, activity, and pasture use patterns of heritage Raramuri Criollo (RC) and desert-adapted commercial Angus Hereford crossbred (AH) beef cattle grazing Chihuahuan Desert pastures during 4 wk in the summers of 2016 and 2017. Within each herd of 11 cow-calf pairs, a group of 7−9 randomly selected cows were fitted with Global Positioning System collars that recorded animal position at 10-min intervals. Proximity loggers configured to record contact events (< 1-m radius) were fitted on a subset of five cow-calf pairs of each breed. The effect of breed on cow-calf contacts, as well as the dams’ movement, activity, and pasture use patterns were analyzed via mixed analysis of variance models. A higher number of RC cow-calf contacts occurred while the dam was grazing and traveling compared with AH counterparts (P ≤ 0.05). No breed-related differences were observed in the overall number and duration of cow-calf contact events. Compared with AH dams, RC cows traveled farther each day (RC: 7.51 vs. AH: 4.85 km, P < 0.01) at higher movement velocities (5.46 vs. 3.53 m. min−1, P < 0.01) and spent more time traveling (1.05 vs. 0.48 h, P < 0.01), more time grazing (9.37 vs. 7.45 h, P < 0.01), and less time resting (13.07 vs. 15.68 h, P < 0.01). RC cows explored almost three times more daily area than AH (152.30 vs. 57.69 ha, P = 0.01) but spent similar amounts of time within 200 m and 100 m of a drinker. RC calves explored larger daily areas than their AH counterparts (83.0 vs. 20.8 ha, P = 0.05), but no breed differences were detected in the number of contact events near drinkers. RC calves possibly impose fewer constraints on their dams’ movement and activity patterns compared with commonly used British crossbreds when grazing the Chihuahuan Desert during summer.EEA BalcarceFil: Nyamuryekung’e, Shelemia. New Mexico State University. Department of Animal and Range Sciences; Estados Unidos.Fil: Cibils, Andres F. New Mexico State University. Department of Animal and Range Sciences; Estados Unidos.Fil: Estell, Richard E. US Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service; Estados Unidos.Fil: McIntosh, Matthew. New Mexico State University. Department of Animal and Range Sciences; Estados Unidos.Fil: VanLeeuwen, Dawn. New Mexico State University. Department of Agricultural Extension Education; Estados Unidos.Fil: Steele, Caitriana. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.Fil: González, Alfredo. New Mexico State University. Department of Agricultural Extension Education; Estados Unidos.Fil: Spiegal, Sheri. Agricultural Research Service, Department of Agriculture; Estados Unidos.Fil: Continanza, Fátima Guadalupe. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.Elsevier2022-11-28T10:09:06Z2022-11-28T10:09:06Z2021-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/13452https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S15507424203012991550-7424https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2020.11.001Rangeland Ecology & Management 74 : 43-49 (January 2021)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-04T09:49:38Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/13452instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:49:38.99INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Foraging Behavior of Heritage versus Desert-Adapted Commercial Rangeland Beef Cows in Relation to Dam-Offspring Contact Patterns
title Foraging Behavior of Heritage versus Desert-Adapted Commercial Rangeland Beef Cows in Relation to Dam-Offspring Contact Patterns
spellingShingle Foraging Behavior of Heritage versus Desert-Adapted Commercial Rangeland Beef Cows in Relation to Dam-Offspring Contact Patterns
Nyamuryekung’e, Shelemia
Pastoreo
Comportamiento Animal
Razas de Ganado
Herencia Genética
Grazing
Animal Behaviour
Livestock Breeds
Genetic Inheritance
Raza Angus
Rarámuris Criollos
title_short Foraging Behavior of Heritage versus Desert-Adapted Commercial Rangeland Beef Cows in Relation to Dam-Offspring Contact Patterns
title_full Foraging Behavior of Heritage versus Desert-Adapted Commercial Rangeland Beef Cows in Relation to Dam-Offspring Contact Patterns
title_fullStr Foraging Behavior of Heritage versus Desert-Adapted Commercial Rangeland Beef Cows in Relation to Dam-Offspring Contact Patterns
title_full_unstemmed Foraging Behavior of Heritage versus Desert-Adapted Commercial Rangeland Beef Cows in Relation to Dam-Offspring Contact Patterns
title_sort Foraging Behavior of Heritage versus Desert-Adapted Commercial Rangeland Beef Cows in Relation to Dam-Offspring Contact Patterns
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Nyamuryekung’e, Shelemia
Cibils, Andres Francisco
Estell, Richard E.
McIntosh, Matthew
VanLeeuwen, Dawn
Steele, Caitriana
González, Alfredo
Spiegal, Sheri
Continanza, Fatima Guadalupe
author Nyamuryekung’e, Shelemia
author_facet Nyamuryekung’e, Shelemia
Cibils, Andres Francisco
Estell, Richard E.
McIntosh, Matthew
VanLeeuwen, Dawn
Steele, Caitriana
González, Alfredo
Spiegal, Sheri
Continanza, Fatima Guadalupe
author_role author
author2 Cibils, Andres Francisco
Estell, Richard E.
McIntosh, Matthew
VanLeeuwen, Dawn
Steele, Caitriana
González, Alfredo
Spiegal, Sheri
Continanza, Fatima Guadalupe
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Pastoreo
Comportamiento Animal
Razas de Ganado
Herencia Genética
Grazing
Animal Behaviour
Livestock Breeds
Genetic Inheritance
Raza Angus
Rarámuris Criollos
topic Pastoreo
Comportamiento Animal
Razas de Ganado
Herencia Genética
Grazing
Animal Behaviour
Livestock Breeds
Genetic Inheritance
Raza Angus
Rarámuris Criollos
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv We compared cow-calf contacts, as well as movement, activity, and pasture use patterns of heritage Raramuri Criollo (RC) and desert-adapted commercial Angus Hereford crossbred (AH) beef cattle grazing Chihuahuan Desert pastures during 4 wk in the summers of 2016 and 2017. Within each herd of 11 cow-calf pairs, a group of 7−9 randomly selected cows were fitted with Global Positioning System collars that recorded animal position at 10-min intervals. Proximity loggers configured to record contact events (< 1-m radius) were fitted on a subset of five cow-calf pairs of each breed. The effect of breed on cow-calf contacts, as well as the dams’ movement, activity, and pasture use patterns were analyzed via mixed analysis of variance models. A higher number of RC cow-calf contacts occurred while the dam was grazing and traveling compared with AH counterparts (P ≤ 0.05). No breed-related differences were observed in the overall number and duration of cow-calf contact events. Compared with AH dams, RC cows traveled farther each day (RC: 7.51 vs. AH: 4.85 km, P < 0.01) at higher movement velocities (5.46 vs. 3.53 m. min−1, P < 0.01) and spent more time traveling (1.05 vs. 0.48 h, P < 0.01), more time grazing (9.37 vs. 7.45 h, P < 0.01), and less time resting (13.07 vs. 15.68 h, P < 0.01). RC cows explored almost three times more daily area than AH (152.30 vs. 57.69 ha, P = 0.01) but spent similar amounts of time within 200 m and 100 m of a drinker. RC calves explored larger daily areas than their AH counterparts (83.0 vs. 20.8 ha, P = 0.05), but no breed differences were detected in the number of contact events near drinkers. RC calves possibly impose fewer constraints on their dams’ movement and activity patterns compared with commonly used British crossbreds when grazing the Chihuahuan Desert during summer.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: Nyamuryekung’e, Shelemia. New Mexico State University. Department of Animal and Range Sciences; Estados Unidos.
Fil: Cibils, Andres F. New Mexico State University. Department of Animal and Range Sciences; Estados Unidos.
Fil: Estell, Richard E. US Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service; Estados Unidos.
Fil: McIntosh, Matthew. New Mexico State University. Department of Animal and Range Sciences; Estados Unidos.
Fil: VanLeeuwen, Dawn. New Mexico State University. Department of Agricultural Extension Education; Estados Unidos.
Fil: Steele, Caitriana. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fil: González, Alfredo. New Mexico State University. Department of Agricultural Extension Education; Estados Unidos.
Fil: Spiegal, Sheri. Agricultural Research Service, Department of Agriculture; Estados Unidos.
Fil: Continanza, Fátima Guadalupe. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
description We compared cow-calf contacts, as well as movement, activity, and pasture use patterns of heritage Raramuri Criollo (RC) and desert-adapted commercial Angus Hereford crossbred (AH) beef cattle grazing Chihuahuan Desert pastures during 4 wk in the summers of 2016 and 2017. Within each herd of 11 cow-calf pairs, a group of 7−9 randomly selected cows were fitted with Global Positioning System collars that recorded animal position at 10-min intervals. Proximity loggers configured to record contact events (< 1-m radius) were fitted on a subset of five cow-calf pairs of each breed. The effect of breed on cow-calf contacts, as well as the dams’ movement, activity, and pasture use patterns were analyzed via mixed analysis of variance models. A higher number of RC cow-calf contacts occurred while the dam was grazing and traveling compared with AH counterparts (P ≤ 0.05). No breed-related differences were observed in the overall number and duration of cow-calf contact events. Compared with AH dams, RC cows traveled farther each day (RC: 7.51 vs. AH: 4.85 km, P < 0.01) at higher movement velocities (5.46 vs. 3.53 m. min−1, P < 0.01) and spent more time traveling (1.05 vs. 0.48 h, P < 0.01), more time grazing (9.37 vs. 7.45 h, P < 0.01), and less time resting (13.07 vs. 15.68 h, P < 0.01). RC cows explored almost three times more daily area than AH (152.30 vs. 57.69 ha, P = 0.01) but spent similar amounts of time within 200 m and 100 m of a drinker. RC calves explored larger daily areas than their AH counterparts (83.0 vs. 20.8 ha, P = 0.05), but no breed differences were detected in the number of contact events near drinkers. RC calves possibly impose fewer constraints on their dams’ movement and activity patterns compared with commonly used British crossbreds when grazing the Chihuahuan Desert during summer.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01
2022-11-28T10:09:06Z
2022-11-28T10:09:06Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/13452
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1550742420301299
1550-7424
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2020.11.001
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/13452
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1550742420301299
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2020.11.001
identifier_str_mv 1550-7424
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Rangeland Ecology & Management 74 : 43-49 (January 2021)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1842341405568008192
score 12.885934