Row orientation: applications to productivity and design of hedgerows in horticultural and olive orchards
- Autores
- Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael; Connor, David J.; Gómez del Campo, María
- Año de publicación
- 2015
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Hedgerow systems, that have been established in various crops to facilitate mechanical harvesting to reduce costs and more rapid management, are a recent innovation in olive production. They were introduced two decades ago after the crop was grown for centuries as open trees in low-density orchards. The review reveals that N–S oriented hedgerows are the most common and are promoted because each side receives equal daily irradiance under both sunny and cloudy conditions. Conventional wisdom concludes that this leads to higher yield. Plantings away from N–S are justified as adaptations to shape of terrain to achieve more efficient use of land, or to avoid hazards from soil erosion, frost or waterlogging. A central question asks if row orientation could be a design strategy to achieve advantages in management, water use, production and quality, and if so under what combinations of hedgerow dimensions and environmental conditions? The review analyses existing information on the impact of row orientation on quantity and pattern of irradiance on hedgerow surfaces for a wide range of latitudes and structures. The consequent influences on photosynthesis, transpiration and temperature are discussed in relation to hedgerow management, productivity and quality. A summary of 11 studies in various hedgerow crops established that N–S out-yielded E–W by ∼20% in eight cases, while E–W out-yielded N–S in two. There are also reports of advantages and disadvantages to fruit quality, seemingly mediated by responses to higher irradiance and temperature on sunlit hedgerow walls. The evergreen growth habit of olive, together with biannual reproductive cycle and the long period of fruit growth, suggest, among these examples, a potential for a different response to other horticultural crops. E–W or intermediate orientations could be a design tool to manipulate canopy microclimate in temperature and water limited. Testing this hypothesis will require improve the definition of hedgerow foliage structure including porosity, the consequent hedgerow microclimate and its impact on vegetative and reproductive processes that would be aided by development and application of models of hedgerow energy and water exchanges and associated crop responses.
EEA Junín
Fil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentina
Fil: Connor, David J. University of Melbourne. Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences; Australia
Fil: Gómez del Campo, María. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España - Fuente
- Scientia Horticulturae 187 : 15-29 (May 2015)
- Materia
-
Olea Europaea
Horticultura
Huerto Frutal
Plantas para Cercas Vivas
Orientación
Horticulture
Orchards
Hedging Plants
Orientation - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso restringido
- Condiciones de uso
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2672
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_a236dd087b16a41ca77fdc09141ea0c4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2672 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Row orientation: applications to productivity and design of hedgerows in horticultural and olive orchardsTrentacoste, Eduardo RafaelConnor, David J.Gómez del Campo, MaríaOlea EuropaeaHorticulturaHuerto FrutalPlantas para Cercas VivasOrientaciónHorticultureOrchardsHedging PlantsOrientationHedgerow systems, that have been established in various crops to facilitate mechanical harvesting to reduce costs and more rapid management, are a recent innovation in olive production. They were introduced two decades ago after the crop was grown for centuries as open trees in low-density orchards. The review reveals that N–S oriented hedgerows are the most common and are promoted because each side receives equal daily irradiance under both sunny and cloudy conditions. Conventional wisdom concludes that this leads to higher yield. Plantings away from N–S are justified as adaptations to shape of terrain to achieve more efficient use of land, or to avoid hazards from soil erosion, frost or waterlogging. A central question asks if row orientation could be a design strategy to achieve advantages in management, water use, production and quality, and if so under what combinations of hedgerow dimensions and environmental conditions? The review analyses existing information on the impact of row orientation on quantity and pattern of irradiance on hedgerow surfaces for a wide range of latitudes and structures. The consequent influences on photosynthesis, transpiration and temperature are discussed in relation to hedgerow management, productivity and quality. A summary of 11 studies in various hedgerow crops established that N–S out-yielded E–W by ∼20% in eight cases, while E–W out-yielded N–S in two. There are also reports of advantages and disadvantages to fruit quality, seemingly mediated by responses to higher irradiance and temperature on sunlit hedgerow walls. The evergreen growth habit of olive, together with biannual reproductive cycle and the long period of fruit growth, suggest, among these examples, a potential for a different response to other horticultural crops. E–W or intermediate orientations could be a design tool to manipulate canopy microclimate in temperature and water limited. Testing this hypothesis will require improve the definition of hedgerow foliage structure including porosity, the consequent hedgerow microclimate and its impact on vegetative and reproductive processes that would be aided by development and application of models of hedgerow energy and water exchanges and associated crop responses.EEA JunínFil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; ArgentinaFil: Connor, David J. University of Melbourne. Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences; AustraliaFil: Gómez del Campo, María. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España2018-06-22T12:26:09Z2018-06-22T12:26:09Z2015-05-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423815001053http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/26720304-4238https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.02.032Scientia Horticulturae 187 : 15-29 (May 2015)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-10-16T09:29:13Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/2672instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-16 09:29:13.496INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Row orientation: applications to productivity and design of hedgerows in horticultural and olive orchards |
title |
Row orientation: applications to productivity and design of hedgerows in horticultural and olive orchards |
spellingShingle |
Row orientation: applications to productivity and design of hedgerows in horticultural and olive orchards Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael Olea Europaea Horticultura Huerto Frutal Plantas para Cercas Vivas Orientación Horticulture Orchards Hedging Plants Orientation |
title_short |
Row orientation: applications to productivity and design of hedgerows in horticultural and olive orchards |
title_full |
Row orientation: applications to productivity and design of hedgerows in horticultural and olive orchards |
title_fullStr |
Row orientation: applications to productivity and design of hedgerows in horticultural and olive orchards |
title_full_unstemmed |
Row orientation: applications to productivity and design of hedgerows in horticultural and olive orchards |
title_sort |
Row orientation: applications to productivity and design of hedgerows in horticultural and olive orchards |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael Connor, David J. Gómez del Campo, María |
author |
Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael |
author_facet |
Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael Connor, David J. Gómez del Campo, María |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Connor, David J. Gómez del Campo, María |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Olea Europaea Horticultura Huerto Frutal Plantas para Cercas Vivas Orientación Horticulture Orchards Hedging Plants Orientation |
topic |
Olea Europaea Horticultura Huerto Frutal Plantas para Cercas Vivas Orientación Horticulture Orchards Hedging Plants Orientation |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Hedgerow systems, that have been established in various crops to facilitate mechanical harvesting to reduce costs and more rapid management, are a recent innovation in olive production. They were introduced two decades ago after the crop was grown for centuries as open trees in low-density orchards. The review reveals that N–S oriented hedgerows are the most common and are promoted because each side receives equal daily irradiance under both sunny and cloudy conditions. Conventional wisdom concludes that this leads to higher yield. Plantings away from N–S are justified as adaptations to shape of terrain to achieve more efficient use of land, or to avoid hazards from soil erosion, frost or waterlogging. A central question asks if row orientation could be a design strategy to achieve advantages in management, water use, production and quality, and if so under what combinations of hedgerow dimensions and environmental conditions? The review analyses existing information on the impact of row orientation on quantity and pattern of irradiance on hedgerow surfaces for a wide range of latitudes and structures. The consequent influences on photosynthesis, transpiration and temperature are discussed in relation to hedgerow management, productivity and quality. A summary of 11 studies in various hedgerow crops established that N–S out-yielded E–W by ∼20% in eight cases, while E–W out-yielded N–S in two. There are also reports of advantages and disadvantages to fruit quality, seemingly mediated by responses to higher irradiance and temperature on sunlit hedgerow walls. The evergreen growth habit of olive, together with biannual reproductive cycle and the long period of fruit growth, suggest, among these examples, a potential for a different response to other horticultural crops. E–W or intermediate orientations could be a design tool to manipulate canopy microclimate in temperature and water limited. Testing this hypothesis will require improve the definition of hedgerow foliage structure including porosity, the consequent hedgerow microclimate and its impact on vegetative and reproductive processes that would be aided by development and application of models of hedgerow energy and water exchanges and associated crop responses. EEA Junín Fil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentina Fil: Connor, David J. University of Melbourne. Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences; Australia Fil: Gómez del Campo, María. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España |
description |
Hedgerow systems, that have been established in various crops to facilitate mechanical harvesting to reduce costs and more rapid management, are a recent innovation in olive production. They were introduced two decades ago after the crop was grown for centuries as open trees in low-density orchards. The review reveals that N–S oriented hedgerows are the most common and are promoted because each side receives equal daily irradiance under both sunny and cloudy conditions. Conventional wisdom concludes that this leads to higher yield. Plantings away from N–S are justified as adaptations to shape of terrain to achieve more efficient use of land, or to avoid hazards from soil erosion, frost or waterlogging. A central question asks if row orientation could be a design strategy to achieve advantages in management, water use, production and quality, and if so under what combinations of hedgerow dimensions and environmental conditions? The review analyses existing information on the impact of row orientation on quantity and pattern of irradiance on hedgerow surfaces for a wide range of latitudes and structures. The consequent influences on photosynthesis, transpiration and temperature are discussed in relation to hedgerow management, productivity and quality. A summary of 11 studies in various hedgerow crops established that N–S out-yielded E–W by ∼20% in eight cases, while E–W out-yielded N–S in two. There are also reports of advantages and disadvantages to fruit quality, seemingly mediated by responses to higher irradiance and temperature on sunlit hedgerow walls. The evergreen growth habit of olive, together with biannual reproductive cycle and the long period of fruit growth, suggest, among these examples, a potential for a different response to other horticultural crops. E–W or intermediate orientations could be a design tool to manipulate canopy microclimate in temperature and water limited. Testing this hypothesis will require improve the definition of hedgerow foliage structure including porosity, the consequent hedgerow microclimate and its impact on vegetative and reproductive processes that would be aided by development and application of models of hedgerow energy and water exchanges and associated crop responses. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-05-13 2018-06-22T12:26:09Z 2018-06-22T12:26:09Z |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423815001053 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2672 0304-4238 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.02.032 |
url |
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423815001053 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2672 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.02.032 |
identifier_str_mv |
0304-4238 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
restrictedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Horticulturae 187 : 15-29 (May 2015) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1846143502082113536 |
score |
12.712165 |