Olive floral development in different hedgerow positions and orientations as affected by irradiance

Autores
Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael; Moreno Alías, I.; Gómez del Campo, María; Beyá-Marshall, Victor; Rapoport, Hava F.
Año de publicación
2017
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Irradiance received within the olive hedgerow canopy varies with respect to row orientation, spacing and hedge dimensions. These orchard management criteria offer the opportunity for improving productivity based on understanding the responses of yield-determining processes to irradiance. How irradiance influences inflorescence and flower development, the initial steps in fruit formation, are fundamental components of these processes. In this study we evaluated flowering and fruiting parameters in 5 hedgerow positions (defined by hedgerow side and vertical layer above soil) for N–S (North-South) and E–W (East–West) olive hedgerows (cv. Arbequina). The canopy layers and orientations provided a wide gradient of irradiance received and the relationship of estimated mean daily irradiance for annual and for short periods during floral development and initial fruit set was explored. The numbers of inflorescences and fruits per layer increased from the less illuminated base to more illuminated upper canopy layers. Axillary bud number per shoot also increased toward more illuminated positions, while the proportion of floral buds was unresponsive to the irradiance microenvironment at different positions within the hedgerows. Inflorescence length, node and flower number per inflorescence, and perfect flower percentage increased with position illumination. Ovary quality, indicated by ovule differentiation, was consistently high, independent of position, but ovary size showed some slight significant increases with illumination, mainly in the endocarp. Flowers/inflorescence, fruits/fruiting inflorescence and inflorescence and fruit number per position correlated positively and significantly with estimated irradiance similarly for annual and short periods (r range from 0.49 to 0.86). Despite improved flowering parameters with greater irradiance, no consistent differences among positions were found for percentage of inflorescences bearing fruit and fruit number per inflorescence. Instead, our results indicated that different fruit numbers among canopy positions were primarily due to an irradiance effect on vegetative growth, causing more and longer fruiting shoots and therefore more total flowering sites (nodes) per layer, with only a small contribution by inflorescence structure and flower quality.
EEA Junín
Fil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC). Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible; España. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. CEIGRAM; España. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentina
Fil: Moreno Alías, I. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC). Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible; España
Fil: Gómez del Campo, María. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. CEIGRAM; España
Fil: Beyá-Marshall, V. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC). Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible; España. Universidad de Chile. Departamento de Producción Agrícola; Chile
Fil: Rapoport, Hava F. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC). Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible; España
Fuente
Scientia Horticulturae 225 : 226-234 (November 2017)
Materia
Olea Europaea
Aceituna
Floración
Plantas para Cercas Vivas
Inflorescencias
Olives
Flowering
Hedging Plants
Inflorescences
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2666

id INTADig_53a66569d47645f07cbefc0678bc7445
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2666
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Olive floral development in different hedgerow positions and orientations as affected by irradianceTrentacoste, Eduardo RafaelMoreno Alías, I.Gómez del Campo, MaríaBeyá-Marshall, VictorRapoport, Hava F.Olea EuropaeaAceitunaFloraciónPlantas para Cercas VivasInflorescenciasOlivesFloweringHedging PlantsInflorescencesIrradiance received within the olive hedgerow canopy varies with respect to row orientation, spacing and hedge dimensions. These orchard management criteria offer the opportunity for improving productivity based on understanding the responses of yield-determining processes to irradiance. How irradiance influences inflorescence and flower development, the initial steps in fruit formation, are fundamental components of these processes. In this study we evaluated flowering and fruiting parameters in 5 hedgerow positions (defined by hedgerow side and vertical layer above soil) for N–S (North-South) and E–W (East–West) olive hedgerows (cv. Arbequina). The canopy layers and orientations provided a wide gradient of irradiance received and the relationship of estimated mean daily irradiance for annual and for short periods during floral development and initial fruit set was explored. The numbers of inflorescences and fruits per layer increased from the less illuminated base to more illuminated upper canopy layers. Axillary bud number per shoot also increased toward more illuminated positions, while the proportion of floral buds was unresponsive to the irradiance microenvironment at different positions within the hedgerows. Inflorescence length, node and flower number per inflorescence, and perfect flower percentage increased with position illumination. Ovary quality, indicated by ovule differentiation, was consistently high, independent of position, but ovary size showed some slight significant increases with illumination, mainly in the endocarp. Flowers/inflorescence, fruits/fruiting inflorescence and inflorescence and fruit number per position correlated positively and significantly with estimated irradiance similarly for annual and short periods (r range from 0.49 to 0.86). Despite improved flowering parameters with greater irradiance, no consistent differences among positions were found for percentage of inflorescences bearing fruit and fruit number per inflorescence. Instead, our results indicated that different fruit numbers among canopy positions were primarily due to an irradiance effect on vegetative growth, causing more and longer fruiting shoots and therefore more total flowering sites (nodes) per layer, with only a small contribution by inflorescence structure and flower quality.EEA JunínFil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC). Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible; España. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. CEIGRAM; España. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; ArgentinaFil: Moreno Alías, I. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC). Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible; EspañaFil: Gómez del Campo, María. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. CEIGRAM; EspañaFil: Beyá-Marshall, V. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC). Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible; España. Universidad de Chile. Departamento de Producción Agrícola; ChileFil: Rapoport, Hava F. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC). Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible; España2018-06-21T13:19:17Z2018-06-21T13:19:17Z2017-11-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423817303680http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/26660304-4238https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.06.029Scientia Horticulturae 225 : 226-234 (November 2017)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-10-16T09:29:13Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/2666instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-16 09:29:13.477INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Olive floral development in different hedgerow positions and orientations as affected by irradiance
title Olive floral development in different hedgerow positions and orientations as affected by irradiance
spellingShingle Olive floral development in different hedgerow positions and orientations as affected by irradiance
Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael
Olea Europaea
Aceituna
Floración
Plantas para Cercas Vivas
Inflorescencias
Olives
Flowering
Hedging Plants
Inflorescences
title_short Olive floral development in different hedgerow positions and orientations as affected by irradiance
title_full Olive floral development in different hedgerow positions and orientations as affected by irradiance
title_fullStr Olive floral development in different hedgerow positions and orientations as affected by irradiance
title_full_unstemmed Olive floral development in different hedgerow positions and orientations as affected by irradiance
title_sort Olive floral development in different hedgerow positions and orientations as affected by irradiance
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael
Moreno Alías, I.
Gómez del Campo, María
Beyá-Marshall, Victor
Rapoport, Hava F.
author Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael
author_facet Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael
Moreno Alías, I.
Gómez del Campo, María
Beyá-Marshall, Victor
Rapoport, Hava F.
author_role author
author2 Moreno Alías, I.
Gómez del Campo, María
Beyá-Marshall, Victor
Rapoport, Hava F.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Olea Europaea
Aceituna
Floración
Plantas para Cercas Vivas
Inflorescencias
Olives
Flowering
Hedging Plants
Inflorescences
topic Olea Europaea
Aceituna
Floración
Plantas para Cercas Vivas
Inflorescencias
Olives
Flowering
Hedging Plants
Inflorescences
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Irradiance received within the olive hedgerow canopy varies with respect to row orientation, spacing and hedge dimensions. These orchard management criteria offer the opportunity for improving productivity based on understanding the responses of yield-determining processes to irradiance. How irradiance influences inflorescence and flower development, the initial steps in fruit formation, are fundamental components of these processes. In this study we evaluated flowering and fruiting parameters in 5 hedgerow positions (defined by hedgerow side and vertical layer above soil) for N–S (North-South) and E–W (East–West) olive hedgerows (cv. Arbequina). The canopy layers and orientations provided a wide gradient of irradiance received and the relationship of estimated mean daily irradiance for annual and for short periods during floral development and initial fruit set was explored. The numbers of inflorescences and fruits per layer increased from the less illuminated base to more illuminated upper canopy layers. Axillary bud number per shoot also increased toward more illuminated positions, while the proportion of floral buds was unresponsive to the irradiance microenvironment at different positions within the hedgerows. Inflorescence length, node and flower number per inflorescence, and perfect flower percentage increased with position illumination. Ovary quality, indicated by ovule differentiation, was consistently high, independent of position, but ovary size showed some slight significant increases with illumination, mainly in the endocarp. Flowers/inflorescence, fruits/fruiting inflorescence and inflorescence and fruit number per position correlated positively and significantly with estimated irradiance similarly for annual and short periods (r range from 0.49 to 0.86). Despite improved flowering parameters with greater irradiance, no consistent differences among positions were found for percentage of inflorescences bearing fruit and fruit number per inflorescence. Instead, our results indicated that different fruit numbers among canopy positions were primarily due to an irradiance effect on vegetative growth, causing more and longer fruiting shoots and therefore more total flowering sites (nodes) per layer, with only a small contribution by inflorescence structure and flower quality.
EEA Junín
Fil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC). Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible; España. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. CEIGRAM; España. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentina
Fil: Moreno Alías, I. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC). Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible; España
Fil: Gómez del Campo, María. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. CEIGRAM; España
Fil: Beyá-Marshall, V. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC). Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible; España. Universidad de Chile. Departamento de Producción Agrícola; Chile
Fil: Rapoport, Hava F. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC). Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible; España
description Irradiance received within the olive hedgerow canopy varies with respect to row orientation, spacing and hedge dimensions. These orchard management criteria offer the opportunity for improving productivity based on understanding the responses of yield-determining processes to irradiance. How irradiance influences inflorescence and flower development, the initial steps in fruit formation, are fundamental components of these processes. In this study we evaluated flowering and fruiting parameters in 5 hedgerow positions (defined by hedgerow side and vertical layer above soil) for N–S (North-South) and E–W (East–West) olive hedgerows (cv. Arbequina). The canopy layers and orientations provided a wide gradient of irradiance received and the relationship of estimated mean daily irradiance for annual and for short periods during floral development and initial fruit set was explored. The numbers of inflorescences and fruits per layer increased from the less illuminated base to more illuminated upper canopy layers. Axillary bud number per shoot also increased toward more illuminated positions, while the proportion of floral buds was unresponsive to the irradiance microenvironment at different positions within the hedgerows. Inflorescence length, node and flower number per inflorescence, and perfect flower percentage increased with position illumination. Ovary quality, indicated by ovule differentiation, was consistently high, independent of position, but ovary size showed some slight significant increases with illumination, mainly in the endocarp. Flowers/inflorescence, fruits/fruiting inflorescence and inflorescence and fruit number per position correlated positively and significantly with estimated irradiance similarly for annual and short periods (r range from 0.49 to 0.86). Despite improved flowering parameters with greater irradiance, no consistent differences among positions were found for percentage of inflorescences bearing fruit and fruit number per inflorescence. Instead, our results indicated that different fruit numbers among canopy positions were primarily due to an irradiance effect on vegetative growth, causing more and longer fruiting shoots and therefore more total flowering sites (nodes) per layer, with only a small contribution by inflorescence structure and flower quality.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-11-18
2018-06-21T13:19:17Z
2018-06-21T13:19:17Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423817303680
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2666
0304-4238
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.06.029
url https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423817303680
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2666
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.06.029
identifier_str_mv 0304-4238
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Horticulturae 225 : 226-234 (November 2017)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1846143502069530624
score 12.712165