Effect of olive hedgerow orientation on vegetative growth, fruit characteristics and productivity
- Autores
- Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael; Connor, David J.; Gómez del Campo, María
- Año de publicación
- 2015
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The effect of row orientation on oil production and fruit characteristics was studied, during years 3–6 after planting of the super-high density olive hedgerows (1923 tree/ha) planted at the same row spacing (4 m) in four orientations (N–S, NE–SW, NW–SE and E–W). During the last two years of observations the hedgerows were maintained by lateral pruning and topping at the same row width (1 m) and height (2.5 m). In those years, maximum fruit yield was achieved by NE–SW and NW–SE (15.7 t/ha). Of these, NE–SW achieved the highest oil yield (2.7 t/ha). There were no differences in fruit or oil yield between N–S (2.5 t oil/ha) and E–W (2.3 t oil/ha) orientations. Fruit density was the most important component to explain these differences, by previous influence on number of buds developed and fruit set. Analyses of profiles of yield components and yield on opposing sides of hedgerows revealed many differences that contributed to overall hedgerow performance. Regardless of row orientation, fruit density was highest from 1.0 to 2.0 m height, decreasing to the top and to the base. In both sides of N–S and also in N side of the E–W hedgerows, fruit weight decreased linearly from top to base, whereas on both sides of NE–SW and NW–SE and S side of E–W hedgerows, fruit weight decreased linearly from the top layer to 1.4 m height and remained stable to depth. Fruit ripening was also highest in the top layers and decreased linearly to the base in all orientations, but was more evenly distributed in the S and SW sides of E–W and NW–SE hedgerows. Fruit water content increased linearly from top to base in all orientations, more sharply in NE–SW, NW–SE and N–S hedgerows. The discussion explores the role of light relations in the determination of yield in olive hedgerows and options for future study and selection of optimal hedgerow designs.
EEA Junín
Fil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentina
Fil: Connor, David J. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España. University of Melbourne. Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences; Australia
Fil: Gómez del Campo, María. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España - Fuente
- Scientia Horticulturae 192 : 60-69 (August 2015)
- Materia
-
Olea Europaea
Aceituna
Plantas para Cercas Vivas
Fruto
Orientación
Olives
Hedging Plants
Fruit
Orientation - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso restringido
- Condiciones de uso
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2670
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_9b9caa74f905ac3a4dd34edc28e1628c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2670 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Effect of olive hedgerow orientation on vegetative growth, fruit characteristics and productivityTrentacoste, Eduardo RafaelConnor, David J.Gómez del Campo, MaríaOlea EuropaeaAceitunaPlantas para Cercas VivasFrutoOrientaciónOlivesHedging PlantsFruitOrientationThe effect of row orientation on oil production and fruit characteristics was studied, during years 3–6 after planting of the super-high density olive hedgerows (1923 tree/ha) planted at the same row spacing (4 m) in four orientations (N–S, NE–SW, NW–SE and E–W). During the last two years of observations the hedgerows were maintained by lateral pruning and topping at the same row width (1 m) and height (2.5 m). In those years, maximum fruit yield was achieved by NE–SW and NW–SE (15.7 t/ha). Of these, NE–SW achieved the highest oil yield (2.7 t/ha). There were no differences in fruit or oil yield between N–S (2.5 t oil/ha) and E–W (2.3 t oil/ha) orientations. Fruit density was the most important component to explain these differences, by previous influence on number of buds developed and fruit set. Analyses of profiles of yield components and yield on opposing sides of hedgerows revealed many differences that contributed to overall hedgerow performance. Regardless of row orientation, fruit density was highest from 1.0 to 2.0 m height, decreasing to the top and to the base. In both sides of N–S and also in N side of the E–W hedgerows, fruit weight decreased linearly from top to base, whereas on both sides of NE–SW and NW–SE and S side of E–W hedgerows, fruit weight decreased linearly from the top layer to 1.4 m height and remained stable to depth. Fruit ripening was also highest in the top layers and decreased linearly to the base in all orientations, but was more evenly distributed in the S and SW sides of E–W and NW–SE hedgerows. Fruit water content increased linearly from top to base in all orientations, more sharply in NE–SW, NW–SE and N–S hedgerows. The discussion explores the role of light relations in the determination of yield in olive hedgerows and options for future study and selection of optimal hedgerow designs.EEA JunínFil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; ArgentinaFil: Connor, David J. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España. University of Melbourne. Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences; AustraliaFil: Gómez del Campo, María. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España2018-06-22T11:39:53Z2018-06-22T11:39:53Z2015-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2670https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S03044238153001080304-4238https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.05.021Scientia Horticulturae 192 : 60-69 (August 2015)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-11T10:22:25Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/2670instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-11 10:22:26.052INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of olive hedgerow orientation on vegetative growth, fruit characteristics and productivity |
title |
Effect of olive hedgerow orientation on vegetative growth, fruit characteristics and productivity |
spellingShingle |
Effect of olive hedgerow orientation on vegetative growth, fruit characteristics and productivity Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael Olea Europaea Aceituna Plantas para Cercas Vivas Fruto Orientación Olives Hedging Plants Fruit Orientation |
title_short |
Effect of olive hedgerow orientation on vegetative growth, fruit characteristics and productivity |
title_full |
Effect of olive hedgerow orientation on vegetative growth, fruit characteristics and productivity |
title_fullStr |
Effect of olive hedgerow orientation on vegetative growth, fruit characteristics and productivity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of olive hedgerow orientation on vegetative growth, fruit characteristics and productivity |
title_sort |
Effect of olive hedgerow orientation on vegetative growth, fruit characteristics and productivity |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael Connor, David J. Gómez del Campo, María |
author |
Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael |
author_facet |
Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael Connor, David J. Gómez del Campo, María |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Connor, David J. Gómez del Campo, María |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Olea Europaea Aceituna Plantas para Cercas Vivas Fruto Orientación Olives Hedging Plants Fruit Orientation |
topic |
Olea Europaea Aceituna Plantas para Cercas Vivas Fruto Orientación Olives Hedging Plants Fruit Orientation |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The effect of row orientation on oil production and fruit characteristics was studied, during years 3–6 after planting of the super-high density olive hedgerows (1923 tree/ha) planted at the same row spacing (4 m) in four orientations (N–S, NE–SW, NW–SE and E–W). During the last two years of observations the hedgerows were maintained by lateral pruning and topping at the same row width (1 m) and height (2.5 m). In those years, maximum fruit yield was achieved by NE–SW and NW–SE (15.7 t/ha). Of these, NE–SW achieved the highest oil yield (2.7 t/ha). There were no differences in fruit or oil yield between N–S (2.5 t oil/ha) and E–W (2.3 t oil/ha) orientations. Fruit density was the most important component to explain these differences, by previous influence on number of buds developed and fruit set. Analyses of profiles of yield components and yield on opposing sides of hedgerows revealed many differences that contributed to overall hedgerow performance. Regardless of row orientation, fruit density was highest from 1.0 to 2.0 m height, decreasing to the top and to the base. In both sides of N–S and also in N side of the E–W hedgerows, fruit weight decreased linearly from top to base, whereas on both sides of NE–SW and NW–SE and S side of E–W hedgerows, fruit weight decreased linearly from the top layer to 1.4 m height and remained stable to depth. Fruit ripening was also highest in the top layers and decreased linearly to the base in all orientations, but was more evenly distributed in the S and SW sides of E–W and NW–SE hedgerows. Fruit water content increased linearly from top to base in all orientations, more sharply in NE–SW, NW–SE and N–S hedgerows. The discussion explores the role of light relations in the determination of yield in olive hedgerows and options for future study and selection of optimal hedgerow designs. EEA Junín Fil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentina Fil: Connor, David J. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España. University of Melbourne. Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences; Australia Fil: Gómez del Campo, María. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España |
description |
The effect of row orientation on oil production and fruit characteristics was studied, during years 3–6 after planting of the super-high density olive hedgerows (1923 tree/ha) planted at the same row spacing (4 m) in four orientations (N–S, NE–SW, NW–SE and E–W). During the last two years of observations the hedgerows were maintained by lateral pruning and topping at the same row width (1 m) and height (2.5 m). In those years, maximum fruit yield was achieved by NE–SW and NW–SE (15.7 t/ha). Of these, NE–SW achieved the highest oil yield (2.7 t/ha). There were no differences in fruit or oil yield between N–S (2.5 t oil/ha) and E–W (2.3 t oil/ha) orientations. Fruit density was the most important component to explain these differences, by previous influence on number of buds developed and fruit set. Analyses of profiles of yield components and yield on opposing sides of hedgerows revealed many differences that contributed to overall hedgerow performance. Regardless of row orientation, fruit density was highest from 1.0 to 2.0 m height, decreasing to the top and to the base. In both sides of N–S and also in N side of the E–W hedgerows, fruit weight decreased linearly from top to base, whereas on both sides of NE–SW and NW–SE and S side of E–W hedgerows, fruit weight decreased linearly from the top layer to 1.4 m height and remained stable to depth. Fruit ripening was also highest in the top layers and decreased linearly to the base in all orientations, but was more evenly distributed in the S and SW sides of E–W and NW–SE hedgerows. Fruit water content increased linearly from top to base in all orientations, more sharply in NE–SW, NW–SE and N–S hedgerows. The discussion explores the role of light relations in the determination of yield in olive hedgerows and options for future study and selection of optimal hedgerow designs. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-08-31 2018-06-22T11:39:53Z 2018-06-22T11:39:53Z |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2670 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423815300108 0304-4238 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.05.021 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2670 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423815300108 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.05.021 |
identifier_str_mv |
0304-4238 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
restrictedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Horticulturae 192 : 60-69 (August 2015) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1842975469367984128 |
score |
12.993085 |