Effect of olive hedgerow orientation on vegetative growth, fruit characteristics and productivity

Autores
Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael; Connor, David J.; Gómez del Campo, María
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The effect of row orientation on oil production and fruit characteristics was studied, during years 3–6 after planting of the super-high density olive hedgerows (1923 tree/ha) planted at the same row spacing (4 m) in four orientations (N–S, NE–SW, NW–SE and E–W). During the last two years of observations the hedgerows were maintained by lateral pruning and topping at the same row width (1 m) and height (2.5 m). In those years, maximum fruit yield was achieved by NE–SW and NW–SE (15.7 t/ha). Of these, NE–SW achieved the highest oil yield (2.7 t/ha). There were no differences in fruit or oil yield between N–S (2.5 t oil/ha) and E–W (2.3 t oil/ha) orientations. Fruit density was the most important component to explain these differences, by previous influence on number of buds developed and fruit set. Analyses of profiles of yield components and yield on opposing sides of hedgerows revealed many differences that contributed to overall hedgerow performance. Regardless of row orientation, fruit density was highest from 1.0 to 2.0 m height, decreasing to the top and to the base. In both sides of N–S and also in N side of the E–W hedgerows, fruit weight decreased linearly from top to base, whereas on both sides of NE–SW and NW–SE and S side of E–W hedgerows, fruit weight decreased linearly from the top layer to 1.4 m height and remained stable to depth. Fruit ripening was also highest in the top layers and decreased linearly to the base in all orientations, but was more evenly distributed in the S and SW sides of E–W and NW–SE hedgerows. Fruit water content increased linearly from top to base in all orientations, more sharply in NE–SW, NW–SE and N–S hedgerows. The discussion explores the role of light relations in the determination of yield in olive hedgerows and options for future study and selection of optimal hedgerow designs.
EEA Junín
Fil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentina
Fil: Connor, David J. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España. University of Melbourne. Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences; Australia
Fil: Gómez del Campo, María. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España
Fuente
Scientia Horticulturae 192 : 60-69 (August 2015)
Materia
Olea Europaea
Aceituna
Plantas para Cercas Vivas
Fruto
Orientación
Olives
Hedging Plants
Fruit
Orientation
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2670

id INTADig_9b9caa74f905ac3a4dd34edc28e1628c
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2670
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Effect of olive hedgerow orientation on vegetative growth, fruit characteristics and productivityTrentacoste, Eduardo RafaelConnor, David J.Gómez del Campo, MaríaOlea EuropaeaAceitunaPlantas para Cercas VivasFrutoOrientaciónOlivesHedging PlantsFruitOrientationThe effect of row orientation on oil production and fruit characteristics was studied, during years 3–6 after planting of the super-high density olive hedgerows (1923 tree/ha) planted at the same row spacing (4 m) in four orientations (N–S, NE–SW, NW–SE and E–W). During the last two years of observations the hedgerows were maintained by lateral pruning and topping at the same row width (1 m) and height (2.5 m). In those years, maximum fruit yield was achieved by NE–SW and NW–SE (15.7 t/ha). Of these, NE–SW achieved the highest oil yield (2.7 t/ha). There were no differences in fruit or oil yield between N–S (2.5 t oil/ha) and E–W (2.3 t oil/ha) orientations. Fruit density was the most important component to explain these differences, by previous influence on number of buds developed and fruit set. Analyses of profiles of yield components and yield on opposing sides of hedgerows revealed many differences that contributed to overall hedgerow performance. Regardless of row orientation, fruit density was highest from 1.0 to 2.0 m height, decreasing to the top and to the base. In both sides of N–S and also in N side of the E–W hedgerows, fruit weight decreased linearly from top to base, whereas on both sides of NE–SW and NW–SE and S side of E–W hedgerows, fruit weight decreased linearly from the top layer to 1.4 m height and remained stable to depth. Fruit ripening was also highest in the top layers and decreased linearly to the base in all orientations, but was more evenly distributed in the S and SW sides of E–W and NW–SE hedgerows. Fruit water content increased linearly from top to base in all orientations, more sharply in NE–SW, NW–SE and N–S hedgerows. The discussion explores the role of light relations in the determination of yield in olive hedgerows and options for future study and selection of optimal hedgerow designs.EEA JunínFil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; ArgentinaFil: Connor, David J. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España. University of Melbourne. Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences; AustraliaFil: Gómez del Campo, María. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España2018-06-22T11:39:53Z2018-06-22T11:39:53Z2015-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2670https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S03044238153001080304-4238https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.05.021Scientia Horticulturae 192 : 60-69 (August 2015)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-11T10:22:25Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/2670instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-11 10:22:26.052INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of olive hedgerow orientation on vegetative growth, fruit characteristics and productivity
title Effect of olive hedgerow orientation on vegetative growth, fruit characteristics and productivity
spellingShingle Effect of olive hedgerow orientation on vegetative growth, fruit characteristics and productivity
Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael
Olea Europaea
Aceituna
Plantas para Cercas Vivas
Fruto
Orientación
Olives
Hedging Plants
Fruit
Orientation
title_short Effect of olive hedgerow orientation on vegetative growth, fruit characteristics and productivity
title_full Effect of olive hedgerow orientation on vegetative growth, fruit characteristics and productivity
title_fullStr Effect of olive hedgerow orientation on vegetative growth, fruit characteristics and productivity
title_full_unstemmed Effect of olive hedgerow orientation on vegetative growth, fruit characteristics and productivity
title_sort Effect of olive hedgerow orientation on vegetative growth, fruit characteristics and productivity
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael
Connor, David J.
Gómez del Campo, María
author Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael
author_facet Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael
Connor, David J.
Gómez del Campo, María
author_role author
author2 Connor, David J.
Gómez del Campo, María
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Olea Europaea
Aceituna
Plantas para Cercas Vivas
Fruto
Orientación
Olives
Hedging Plants
Fruit
Orientation
topic Olea Europaea
Aceituna
Plantas para Cercas Vivas
Fruto
Orientación
Olives
Hedging Plants
Fruit
Orientation
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The effect of row orientation on oil production and fruit characteristics was studied, during years 3–6 after planting of the super-high density olive hedgerows (1923 tree/ha) planted at the same row spacing (4 m) in four orientations (N–S, NE–SW, NW–SE and E–W). During the last two years of observations the hedgerows were maintained by lateral pruning and topping at the same row width (1 m) and height (2.5 m). In those years, maximum fruit yield was achieved by NE–SW and NW–SE (15.7 t/ha). Of these, NE–SW achieved the highest oil yield (2.7 t/ha). There were no differences in fruit or oil yield between N–S (2.5 t oil/ha) and E–W (2.3 t oil/ha) orientations. Fruit density was the most important component to explain these differences, by previous influence on number of buds developed and fruit set. Analyses of profiles of yield components and yield on opposing sides of hedgerows revealed many differences that contributed to overall hedgerow performance. Regardless of row orientation, fruit density was highest from 1.0 to 2.0 m height, decreasing to the top and to the base. In both sides of N–S and also in N side of the E–W hedgerows, fruit weight decreased linearly from top to base, whereas on both sides of NE–SW and NW–SE and S side of E–W hedgerows, fruit weight decreased linearly from the top layer to 1.4 m height and remained stable to depth. Fruit ripening was also highest in the top layers and decreased linearly to the base in all orientations, but was more evenly distributed in the S and SW sides of E–W and NW–SE hedgerows. Fruit water content increased linearly from top to base in all orientations, more sharply in NE–SW, NW–SE and N–S hedgerows. The discussion explores the role of light relations in the determination of yield in olive hedgerows and options for future study and selection of optimal hedgerow designs.
EEA Junín
Fil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentina
Fil: Connor, David J. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España. University of Melbourne. Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences; Australia
Fil: Gómez del Campo, María. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España
description The effect of row orientation on oil production and fruit characteristics was studied, during years 3–6 after planting of the super-high density olive hedgerows (1923 tree/ha) planted at the same row spacing (4 m) in four orientations (N–S, NE–SW, NW–SE and E–W). During the last two years of observations the hedgerows were maintained by lateral pruning and topping at the same row width (1 m) and height (2.5 m). In those years, maximum fruit yield was achieved by NE–SW and NW–SE (15.7 t/ha). Of these, NE–SW achieved the highest oil yield (2.7 t/ha). There were no differences in fruit or oil yield between N–S (2.5 t oil/ha) and E–W (2.3 t oil/ha) orientations. Fruit density was the most important component to explain these differences, by previous influence on number of buds developed and fruit set. Analyses of profiles of yield components and yield on opposing sides of hedgerows revealed many differences that contributed to overall hedgerow performance. Regardless of row orientation, fruit density was highest from 1.0 to 2.0 m height, decreasing to the top and to the base. In both sides of N–S and also in N side of the E–W hedgerows, fruit weight decreased linearly from top to base, whereas on both sides of NE–SW and NW–SE and S side of E–W hedgerows, fruit weight decreased linearly from the top layer to 1.4 m height and remained stable to depth. Fruit ripening was also highest in the top layers and decreased linearly to the base in all orientations, but was more evenly distributed in the S and SW sides of E–W and NW–SE hedgerows. Fruit water content increased linearly from top to base in all orientations, more sharply in NE–SW, NW–SE and N–S hedgerows. The discussion explores the role of light relations in the determination of yield in olive hedgerows and options for future study and selection of optimal hedgerow designs.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-08-31
2018-06-22T11:39:53Z
2018-06-22T11:39:53Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2670
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423815300108
0304-4238
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.05.021
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2670
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423815300108
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.05.021
identifier_str_mv 0304-4238
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Horticulturae 192 : 60-69 (August 2015)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1842975469367984128
score 12.993085