Effect of row spacing on vegetative structure, fruit characteristics and oil productivity of N–S and E–W oriented olive hedgerows

Autores
Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael; Connor, David J.; Gómez del Campo, María
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The effect of row spacing on fruit characteristics and production was studied in two super-high density olive hedgerow orchards planted at three row spacings (5.0, 4.0 and 2.5 m) with the same intra-row tree spacing, one with rows N–S and the other E–W. For both row orientations, reduction of spacing from 5.0 to 4.0 and 2.5 m added on average 39 and 107% more canopy volume and external surface area per hectare, respectively. In N–S hedgerows, cumulative oil production per ha during the first five years increased significantly by 14 and 52% in 4.0- and 2.5-m relative to 5.0-m spacing. In E–W hedgerows, accumulated oil production per ha did not respond to row spacing. The explanation was found in significantly fewer fruits per unit length of hedgerow and smaller oil content at 2.5 m than 5.0 m spacing in E–W but not in N–S. In N–S hedgerows, there were no differences in oil production and fruit characteristics between opposing sides in all row spacings. In E–W hedgerows spaced at 5.0 m, fruit characteristics were similar between opposing sides, but at 4.0 m and 2.5 m spacings, fruits on S sides were heavier and more mature than on N sides, revealing the impact of lower transmission of irradiance through the hedgerow in closer spacings. Optimal spacing for maximum production depends on row orientation. In N–S hedgerows, the most productive orchard, during the first five years was that planted at 2.5 m, but in E–W hedgerows 5.0 m spacing was the more profitable option.
EEA Junín
Fil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentina
Fil: Connor, David J. University of Melbourne. Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences; Australia
Fil: Gómez del Campo, María. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España
Fuente
Scientia Horticulturae 193 : 240-248 (September 2015)
Materia
Olea Europaea
Aceituna
Espaciamiento
Plantas para Cercas Vivas
Huerto Frutal
Orchards
Olives
Spacing
Hedging Plants
Orientation
Orientación
Densidad de Plantación
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2667
Acceder
id INTADig_76a3d8a09f3397aa8b3e7faf70f9fe9f
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2667
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Effect of row spacing on vegetative structure, fruit characteristics and oil productivity of N–S and E–W oriented olive hedgerowsTrentacoste, Eduardo RafaelConnor, David J.Gómez del Campo, MaríaOlea EuropaeaAceitunaEspaciamientoPlantas para Cercas VivasHuerto FrutalOrchardsOlivesSpacingHedging PlantsOrientationOrientaciónDensidad de PlantaciónThe effect of row spacing on fruit characteristics and production was studied in two super-high density olive hedgerow orchards planted at three row spacings (5.0, 4.0 and 2.5 m) with the same intra-row tree spacing, one with rows N–S and the other E–W. For both row orientations, reduction of spacing from 5.0 to 4.0 and 2.5 m added on average 39 and 107% more canopy volume and external surface area per hectare, respectively. In N–S hedgerows, cumulative oil production per ha during the first five years increased significantly by 14 and 52% in 4.0- and 2.5-m relative to 5.0-m spacing. In E–W hedgerows, accumulated oil production per ha did not respond to row spacing. The explanation was found in significantly fewer fruits per unit length of hedgerow and smaller oil content at 2.5 m than 5.0 m spacing in E–W but not in N–S. In N–S hedgerows, there were no differences in oil production and fruit characteristics between opposing sides in all row spacings. In E–W hedgerows spaced at 5.0 m, fruit characteristics were similar between opposing sides, but at 4.0 m and 2.5 m spacings, fruits on S sides were heavier and more mature than on N sides, revealing the impact of lower transmission of irradiance through the hedgerow in closer spacings. Optimal spacing for maximum production depends on row orientation. In N–S hedgerows, the most productive orchard, during the first five years was that planted at 2.5 m, but in E–W hedgerows 5.0 m spacing was the more profitable option.EEA JunínFil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; ArgentinaFil: Connor, David J. University of Melbourne. Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences; AustraliaFil: Gómez del Campo, María. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España2018-06-21T13:49:26Z2018-06-21T13:49:26Z2015-09-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2667https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S03044238153008930304-4238https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.07.013Scientia Horticulturae 193 : 240-248 (September 2015)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-29T13:44:21Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/2667instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:44:21.332INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of row spacing on vegetative structure, fruit characteristics and oil productivity of N–S and E–W oriented olive hedgerows
title Effect of row spacing on vegetative structure, fruit characteristics and oil productivity of N–S and E–W oriented olive hedgerows
spellingShingle Effect of row spacing on vegetative structure, fruit characteristics and oil productivity of N–S and E–W oriented olive hedgerows
Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael
Olea Europaea
Aceituna
Espaciamiento
Plantas para Cercas Vivas
Huerto Frutal
Orchards
Olives
Spacing
Hedging Plants
Orientation
Orientación
Densidad de Plantación
title_short Effect of row spacing on vegetative structure, fruit characteristics and oil productivity of N–S and E–W oriented olive hedgerows
title_full Effect of row spacing on vegetative structure, fruit characteristics and oil productivity of N–S and E–W oriented olive hedgerows
title_fullStr Effect of row spacing on vegetative structure, fruit characteristics and oil productivity of N–S and E–W oriented olive hedgerows
title_full_unstemmed Effect of row spacing on vegetative structure, fruit characteristics and oil productivity of N–S and E–W oriented olive hedgerows
title_sort Effect of row spacing on vegetative structure, fruit characteristics and oil productivity of N–S and E–W oriented olive hedgerows
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael
Connor, David J.
Gómez del Campo, María
author Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael
author_facet Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael
Connor, David J.
Gómez del Campo, María
author_role author
author2 Connor, David J.
Gómez del Campo, María
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Olea Europaea
Aceituna
Espaciamiento
Plantas para Cercas Vivas
Huerto Frutal
Orchards
Olives
Spacing
Hedging Plants
Orientation
Orientación
Densidad de Plantación
topic Olea Europaea
Aceituna
Espaciamiento
Plantas para Cercas Vivas
Huerto Frutal
Orchards
Olives
Spacing
Hedging Plants
Orientation
Orientación
Densidad de Plantación
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The effect of row spacing on fruit characteristics and production was studied in two super-high density olive hedgerow orchards planted at three row spacings (5.0, 4.0 and 2.5 m) with the same intra-row tree spacing, one with rows N–S and the other E–W. For both row orientations, reduction of spacing from 5.0 to 4.0 and 2.5 m added on average 39 and 107% more canopy volume and external surface area per hectare, respectively. In N–S hedgerows, cumulative oil production per ha during the first five years increased significantly by 14 and 52% in 4.0- and 2.5-m relative to 5.0-m spacing. In E–W hedgerows, accumulated oil production per ha did not respond to row spacing. The explanation was found in significantly fewer fruits per unit length of hedgerow and smaller oil content at 2.5 m than 5.0 m spacing in E–W but not in N–S. In N–S hedgerows, there were no differences in oil production and fruit characteristics between opposing sides in all row spacings. In E–W hedgerows spaced at 5.0 m, fruit characteristics were similar between opposing sides, but at 4.0 m and 2.5 m spacings, fruits on S sides were heavier and more mature than on N sides, revealing the impact of lower transmission of irradiance through the hedgerow in closer spacings. Optimal spacing for maximum production depends on row orientation. In N–S hedgerows, the most productive orchard, during the first five years was that planted at 2.5 m, but in E–W hedgerows 5.0 m spacing was the more profitable option.
EEA Junín
Fil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentina
Fil: Connor, David J. University of Melbourne. Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences; Australia
Fil: Gómez del Campo, María. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España
description The effect of row spacing on fruit characteristics and production was studied in two super-high density olive hedgerow orchards planted at three row spacings (5.0, 4.0 and 2.5 m) with the same intra-row tree spacing, one with rows N–S and the other E–W. For both row orientations, reduction of spacing from 5.0 to 4.0 and 2.5 m added on average 39 and 107% more canopy volume and external surface area per hectare, respectively. In N–S hedgerows, cumulative oil production per ha during the first five years increased significantly by 14 and 52% in 4.0- and 2.5-m relative to 5.0-m spacing. In E–W hedgerows, accumulated oil production per ha did not respond to row spacing. The explanation was found in significantly fewer fruits per unit length of hedgerow and smaller oil content at 2.5 m than 5.0 m spacing in E–W but not in N–S. In N–S hedgerows, there were no differences in oil production and fruit characteristics between opposing sides in all row spacings. In E–W hedgerows spaced at 5.0 m, fruit characteristics were similar between opposing sides, but at 4.0 m and 2.5 m spacings, fruits on S sides were heavier and more mature than on N sides, revealing the impact of lower transmission of irradiance through the hedgerow in closer spacings. Optimal spacing for maximum production depends on row orientation. In N–S hedgerows, the most productive orchard, during the first five years was that planted at 2.5 m, but in E–W hedgerows 5.0 m spacing was the more profitable option.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-09-22
2018-06-21T13:49:26Z
2018-06-21T13:49:26Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2667
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423815300893
0304-4238
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.07.013
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2667
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423815300893
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.07.013
identifier_str_mv 0304-4238
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Horticulturae 193 : 240-248 (September 2015)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1844619123387006976
score 12.558318

Publicaciones similares