Long-term effects of row orientation on oil yield and oil yield components of hedgerow olive orchards cv. Arbequina

Autores
Gómez del Campo, María; Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael; Connor, David J.
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Orchardists are adopting hedgerow systems of many horticultural tree crops to benefit from early and higher yield and to facilitate mechanical pruning and harvesting for more timely management at lower cost. In the case of olive, guidance in orchard design is available for the dimensions (height and width), spacing and porosity of hedgerows of the dominant super-high density (SHD) design but less so for hedgerow orientation. An analysis is presented of oil yield and its components of four olive hedgerows orchards (N–S, E–W, NE–SW and NW–SE) maintained at optimum dimensions during 7 years from the third year after planting. Oil yield was highly variable from year to year in a range 1.7–3.6 t oil/ha but average yield of NE–SW, although not different from NW–SE and N–S, was significantly greater than E–W by 12%. Yield of NE–SW exceeded those of other orientations in two of the seven years of observation by increase in fruit number without effect on fruit size or oil concentration. Analysis of the impact of orientation on yield excludes annual interception of solar radiation as an explanation because NE–SW has similar interception to NW–SE and N–S but greater yield. This identifies the importance of seasonal, and possibly diurnal, differences in radiation interception and associated microclimatic factors of temperature, VPD and water stress. In olive, determination of fruit number is a long stepwise process that commences in autumn with bud initiation and continues with bud formation, flowering, fruit set and fruit fall in the following spring. Concentration of effort on the role of orchard design and management in determination of fruit number emerges as the most useful step in unraveling the role of hedgerow orientation and yield variability in olive production systems.
EEA Junín
Fil: Gómez del Campo, María. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España
Fil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentina
Fil: Connor, David J. University of Melbourne. School of Agriculture and Food; Australia
Fuente
Scientia Horticulturae 294 : 110770 (February 2022)
Materia
Olea Europaea
Variedades
Rendimiento
Aceite de Oliva
Huerto Frutal
Espaciamiento
Varieties
Yields
Olive Oil
Orchards
Spacing
Olivo
Variedad Arbequina
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/11542

id INTADig_8f101df2e4c3c31e219ddef6c3891c9a
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/11542
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Long-term effects of row orientation on oil yield and oil yield components of hedgerow olive orchards cv. ArbequinaGómez del Campo, MaríaTrentacoste, Eduardo RafaelConnor, David J.Olea EuropaeaVariedadesRendimientoAceite de OlivaHuerto FrutalEspaciamientoVarietiesYieldsOlive OilOrchardsSpacingOlivoVariedad ArbequinaOrchardists are adopting hedgerow systems of many horticultural tree crops to benefit from early and higher yield and to facilitate mechanical pruning and harvesting for more timely management at lower cost. In the case of olive, guidance in orchard design is available for the dimensions (height and width), spacing and porosity of hedgerows of the dominant super-high density (SHD) design but less so for hedgerow orientation. An analysis is presented of oil yield and its components of four olive hedgerows orchards (N–S, E–W, NE–SW and NW–SE) maintained at optimum dimensions during 7 years from the third year after planting. Oil yield was highly variable from year to year in a range 1.7–3.6 t oil/ha but average yield of NE–SW, although not different from NW–SE and N–S, was significantly greater than E–W by 12%. Yield of NE–SW exceeded those of other orientations in two of the seven years of observation by increase in fruit number without effect on fruit size or oil concentration. Analysis of the impact of orientation on yield excludes annual interception of solar radiation as an explanation because NE–SW has similar interception to NW–SE and N–S but greater yield. This identifies the importance of seasonal, and possibly diurnal, differences in radiation interception and associated microclimatic factors of temperature, VPD and water stress. In olive, determination of fruit number is a long stepwise process that commences in autumn with bud initiation and continues with bud formation, flowering, fruit set and fruit fall in the following spring. Concentration of effort on the role of orchard design and management in determination of fruit number emerges as the most useful step in unraveling the role of hedgerow orientation and yield variability in olive production systems.EEA JunínFil: Gómez del Campo, María. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; EspañaFil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; ArgentinaFil: Connor, David J. University of Melbourne. School of Agriculture and Food; AustraliaElsevier2022-04-01T17:34:39Z2022-04-01T17:34:39Z2022-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11542https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S03044238210087730304-4238https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110770Scientia Horticulturae 294 : 110770 (February 2022)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-04T09:49:18Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/11542instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:49:18.95INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Long-term effects of row orientation on oil yield and oil yield components of hedgerow olive orchards cv. Arbequina
title Long-term effects of row orientation on oil yield and oil yield components of hedgerow olive orchards cv. Arbequina
spellingShingle Long-term effects of row orientation on oil yield and oil yield components of hedgerow olive orchards cv. Arbequina
Gómez del Campo, María
Olea Europaea
Variedades
Rendimiento
Aceite de Oliva
Huerto Frutal
Espaciamiento
Varieties
Yields
Olive Oil
Orchards
Spacing
Olivo
Variedad Arbequina
title_short Long-term effects of row orientation on oil yield and oil yield components of hedgerow olive orchards cv. Arbequina
title_full Long-term effects of row orientation on oil yield and oil yield components of hedgerow olive orchards cv. Arbequina
title_fullStr Long-term effects of row orientation on oil yield and oil yield components of hedgerow olive orchards cv. Arbequina
title_full_unstemmed Long-term effects of row orientation on oil yield and oil yield components of hedgerow olive orchards cv. Arbequina
title_sort Long-term effects of row orientation on oil yield and oil yield components of hedgerow olive orchards cv. Arbequina
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gómez del Campo, María
Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael
Connor, David J.
author Gómez del Campo, María
author_facet Gómez del Campo, María
Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael
Connor, David J.
author_role author
author2 Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael
Connor, David J.
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Olea Europaea
Variedades
Rendimiento
Aceite de Oliva
Huerto Frutal
Espaciamiento
Varieties
Yields
Olive Oil
Orchards
Spacing
Olivo
Variedad Arbequina
topic Olea Europaea
Variedades
Rendimiento
Aceite de Oliva
Huerto Frutal
Espaciamiento
Varieties
Yields
Olive Oil
Orchards
Spacing
Olivo
Variedad Arbequina
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Orchardists are adopting hedgerow systems of many horticultural tree crops to benefit from early and higher yield and to facilitate mechanical pruning and harvesting for more timely management at lower cost. In the case of olive, guidance in orchard design is available for the dimensions (height and width), spacing and porosity of hedgerows of the dominant super-high density (SHD) design but less so for hedgerow orientation. An analysis is presented of oil yield and its components of four olive hedgerows orchards (N–S, E–W, NE–SW and NW–SE) maintained at optimum dimensions during 7 years from the third year after planting. Oil yield was highly variable from year to year in a range 1.7–3.6 t oil/ha but average yield of NE–SW, although not different from NW–SE and N–S, was significantly greater than E–W by 12%. Yield of NE–SW exceeded those of other orientations in two of the seven years of observation by increase in fruit number without effect on fruit size or oil concentration. Analysis of the impact of orientation on yield excludes annual interception of solar radiation as an explanation because NE–SW has similar interception to NW–SE and N–S but greater yield. This identifies the importance of seasonal, and possibly diurnal, differences in radiation interception and associated microclimatic factors of temperature, VPD and water stress. In olive, determination of fruit number is a long stepwise process that commences in autumn with bud initiation and continues with bud formation, flowering, fruit set and fruit fall in the following spring. Concentration of effort on the role of orchard design and management in determination of fruit number emerges as the most useful step in unraveling the role of hedgerow orientation and yield variability in olive production systems.
EEA Junín
Fil: Gómez del Campo, María. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Departamento de Producción Agraria; España
Fil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentina
Fil: Connor, David J. University of Melbourne. School of Agriculture and Food; Australia
description Orchardists are adopting hedgerow systems of many horticultural tree crops to benefit from early and higher yield and to facilitate mechanical pruning and harvesting for more timely management at lower cost. In the case of olive, guidance in orchard design is available for the dimensions (height and width), spacing and porosity of hedgerows of the dominant super-high density (SHD) design but less so for hedgerow orientation. An analysis is presented of oil yield and its components of four olive hedgerows orchards (N–S, E–W, NE–SW and NW–SE) maintained at optimum dimensions during 7 years from the third year after planting. Oil yield was highly variable from year to year in a range 1.7–3.6 t oil/ha but average yield of NE–SW, although not different from NW–SE and N–S, was significantly greater than E–W by 12%. Yield of NE–SW exceeded those of other orientations in two of the seven years of observation by increase in fruit number without effect on fruit size or oil concentration. Analysis of the impact of orientation on yield excludes annual interception of solar radiation as an explanation because NE–SW has similar interception to NW–SE and N–S but greater yield. This identifies the importance of seasonal, and possibly diurnal, differences in radiation interception and associated microclimatic factors of temperature, VPD and water stress. In olive, determination of fruit number is a long stepwise process that commences in autumn with bud initiation and continues with bud formation, flowering, fruit set and fruit fall in the following spring. Concentration of effort on the role of orchard design and management in determination of fruit number emerges as the most useful step in unraveling the role of hedgerow orientation and yield variability in olive production systems.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-01T17:34:39Z
2022-04-01T17:34:39Z
2022-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11542
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304423821008773
0304-4238
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110770
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11542
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304423821008773
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110770
identifier_str_mv 0304-4238
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Horticulturae 294 : 110770 (February 2022)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1842341395286720512
score 12.623145