The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo

Autores
Gaido, Paula Marina
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In ‘Internal’ Legal Positivism, Cristina Redondo attempts to articulate the metatheoretical presuppositions of an approach directed to the study of law that explains its specific normative character. In doing so, she argues for, among others, two main theses: (i) legal norms necessarily constitute reasons in a formal sense, regardless of the substantive correctness of the content they express; (ii) legal theory can be morally neutral with respect to its object. This means that, according to Redondo, it is possible to formulate purely descriptive statements that refer to the content of law; that is, it is possible to formulate them from a point of view that does not presuppose the acceptance of that content. The expression "´internal´ legal positivism" is the terminology chosen by Redondo to account for the type of methodological approach necessary for a positivist theory of law à la Hart to be possible. In this article, I will summarize the main theses defended by the author in her book and trace the central questions that have been at the heart of the discussion at the Symposium on ‘Internal’ Legal Positivism published in this journal.
Fil: Gaido, Paula Marina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales; Argentina
Materia
INTERNAL POINT OF VIEW
LEGAL METHODOLOGY
LEGAL NORMATIVITY
LEGAL REASONS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202069
Acceder
id CONICETDig_e53e83851d994a18612d3b72d428afcc
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202069
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina RedondoGaido, Paula MarinaINTERNAL POINT OF VIEWLEGAL METHODOLOGYLEGAL NORMATIVITYLEGAL REASONShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5In ‘Internal’ Legal Positivism, Cristina Redondo attempts to articulate the metatheoretical presuppositions of an approach directed to the study of law that explains its specific normative character. In doing so, she argues for, among others, two main theses: (i) legal norms necessarily constitute reasons in a formal sense, regardless of the substantive correctness of the content they express; (ii) legal theory can be morally neutral with respect to its object. This means that, according to Redondo, it is possible to formulate purely descriptive statements that refer to the content of law; that is, it is possible to formulate them from a point of view that does not presuppose the acceptance of that content. The expression "´internal´ legal positivism" is the terminology chosen by Redondo to account for the type of methodological approach necessary for a positivist theory of law à la Hart to be possible. In this article, I will summarize the main theses defended by the author in her book and trace the central questions that have been at the heart of the discussion at the Symposium on ‘Internal’ Legal Positivism published in this journal.Fil: Gaido, Paula Marina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales; ArgentinaKlub Revus Centre for Studies on Democracy and European Constitutionality2022-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/202069Gaido, Paula Marina; The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo; Klub Revus Centre for Studies on Democracy and European Constitutionality; Revus; 48; 6-2022; 1-111581-76521855-7112CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://journals.openedition.org/revus/8597info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4000/revus.8597info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:19:32Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202069instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:19:33.293CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo
title The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo
spellingShingle The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo
Gaido, Paula Marina
INTERNAL POINT OF VIEW
LEGAL METHODOLOGY
LEGAL NORMATIVITY
LEGAL REASONS
title_short The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo
title_full The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo
title_fullStr The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo
title_full_unstemmed The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo
title_sort The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gaido, Paula Marina
author Gaido, Paula Marina
author_facet Gaido, Paula Marina
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv INTERNAL POINT OF VIEW
LEGAL METHODOLOGY
LEGAL NORMATIVITY
LEGAL REASONS
topic INTERNAL POINT OF VIEW
LEGAL METHODOLOGY
LEGAL NORMATIVITY
LEGAL REASONS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In ‘Internal’ Legal Positivism, Cristina Redondo attempts to articulate the metatheoretical presuppositions of an approach directed to the study of law that explains its specific normative character. In doing so, she argues for, among others, two main theses: (i) legal norms necessarily constitute reasons in a formal sense, regardless of the substantive correctness of the content they express; (ii) legal theory can be morally neutral with respect to its object. This means that, according to Redondo, it is possible to formulate purely descriptive statements that refer to the content of law; that is, it is possible to formulate them from a point of view that does not presuppose the acceptance of that content. The expression "´internal´ legal positivism" is the terminology chosen by Redondo to account for the type of methodological approach necessary for a positivist theory of law à la Hart to be possible. In this article, I will summarize the main theses defended by the author in her book and trace the central questions that have been at the heart of the discussion at the Symposium on ‘Internal’ Legal Positivism published in this journal.
Fil: Gaido, Paula Marina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales; Argentina
description In ‘Internal’ Legal Positivism, Cristina Redondo attempts to articulate the metatheoretical presuppositions of an approach directed to the study of law that explains its specific normative character. In doing so, she argues for, among others, two main theses: (i) legal norms necessarily constitute reasons in a formal sense, regardless of the substantive correctness of the content they express; (ii) legal theory can be morally neutral with respect to its object. This means that, according to Redondo, it is possible to formulate purely descriptive statements that refer to the content of law; that is, it is possible to formulate them from a point of view that does not presuppose the acceptance of that content. The expression "´internal´ legal positivism" is the terminology chosen by Redondo to account for the type of methodological approach necessary for a positivist theory of law à la Hart to be possible. In this article, I will summarize the main theses defended by the author in her book and trace the central questions that have been at the heart of the discussion at the Symposium on ‘Internal’ Legal Positivism published in this journal.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/202069
Gaido, Paula Marina; The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo; Klub Revus Centre for Studies on Democracy and European Constitutionality; Revus; 48; 6-2022; 1-11
1581-7652
1855-7112
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/202069
identifier_str_mv Gaido, Paula Marina; The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo; Klub Revus Centre for Studies on Democracy and European Constitutionality; Revus; 48; 6-2022; 1-11
1581-7652
1855-7112
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://journals.openedition.org/revus/8597
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4000/revus.8597
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Klub Revus Centre for Studies on Democracy and European Constitutionality
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Klub Revus Centre for Studies on Democracy and European Constitutionality
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083344408772608
score 13.22299

Publicaciones similares