The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo
- Autores
- Gaido, Paula Marina
- Año de publicación
- 2022
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- In ‘Internal’ Legal Positivism, Cristina Redondo attempts to articulate the metatheoretical presuppositions of an approach directed to the study of law that explains its specific normative character. In doing so, she argues for, among others, two main theses: (i) legal norms necessarily constitute reasons in a formal sense, regardless of the substantive correctness of the content they express; (ii) legal theory can be morally neutral with respect to its object. This means that, according to Redondo, it is possible to formulate purely descriptive statements that refer to the content of law; that is, it is possible to formulate them from a point of view that does not presuppose the acceptance of that content. The expression "´internal´ legal positivism" is the terminology chosen by Redondo to account for the type of methodological approach necessary for a positivist theory of law à la Hart to be possible. In this article, I will summarize the main theses defended by the author in her book and trace the central questions that have been at the heart of the discussion at the Symposium on ‘Internal’ Legal Positivism published in this journal.
Fil: Gaido, Paula Marina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales; Argentina - Materia
-
INTERNAL POINT OF VIEW
LEGAL METHODOLOGY
LEGAL NORMATIVITY
LEGAL REASONS - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202069
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_e53e83851d994a18612d3b72d428afcc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202069 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina RedondoGaido, Paula MarinaINTERNAL POINT OF VIEWLEGAL METHODOLOGYLEGAL NORMATIVITYLEGAL REASONShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5In ‘Internal’ Legal Positivism, Cristina Redondo attempts to articulate the metatheoretical presuppositions of an approach directed to the study of law that explains its specific normative character. In doing so, she argues for, among others, two main theses: (i) legal norms necessarily constitute reasons in a formal sense, regardless of the substantive correctness of the content they express; (ii) legal theory can be morally neutral with respect to its object. This means that, according to Redondo, it is possible to formulate purely descriptive statements that refer to the content of law; that is, it is possible to formulate them from a point of view that does not presuppose the acceptance of that content. The expression "´internal´ legal positivism" is the terminology chosen by Redondo to account for the type of methodological approach necessary for a positivist theory of law à la Hart to be possible. In this article, I will summarize the main theses defended by the author in her book and trace the central questions that have been at the heart of the discussion at the Symposium on ‘Internal’ Legal Positivism published in this journal.Fil: Gaido, Paula Marina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales; ArgentinaKlub Revus Centre for Studies on Democracy and European Constitutionality2022-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/202069Gaido, Paula Marina; The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo; Klub Revus Centre for Studies on Democracy and European Constitutionality; Revus; 48; 6-2022; 1-111581-76521855-7112CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://journals.openedition.org/revus/8597info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4000/revus.8597info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:19:32Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202069instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:19:33.293CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo |
title |
The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo |
spellingShingle |
The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo Gaido, Paula Marina INTERNAL POINT OF VIEW LEGAL METHODOLOGY LEGAL NORMATIVITY LEGAL REASONS |
title_short |
The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo |
title_full |
The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo |
title_fullStr |
The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo |
title_full_unstemmed |
The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo |
title_sort |
The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Gaido, Paula Marina |
author |
Gaido, Paula Marina |
author_facet |
Gaido, Paula Marina |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
INTERNAL POINT OF VIEW LEGAL METHODOLOGY LEGAL NORMATIVITY LEGAL REASONS |
topic |
INTERNAL POINT OF VIEW LEGAL METHODOLOGY LEGAL NORMATIVITY LEGAL REASONS |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
In ‘Internal’ Legal Positivism, Cristina Redondo attempts to articulate the metatheoretical presuppositions of an approach directed to the study of law that explains its specific normative character. In doing so, she argues for, among others, two main theses: (i) legal norms necessarily constitute reasons in a formal sense, regardless of the substantive correctness of the content they express; (ii) legal theory can be morally neutral with respect to its object. This means that, according to Redondo, it is possible to formulate purely descriptive statements that refer to the content of law; that is, it is possible to formulate them from a point of view that does not presuppose the acceptance of that content. The expression "´internal´ legal positivism" is the terminology chosen by Redondo to account for the type of methodological approach necessary for a positivist theory of law à la Hart to be possible. In this article, I will summarize the main theses defended by the author in her book and trace the central questions that have been at the heart of the discussion at the Symposium on ‘Internal’ Legal Positivism published in this journal. Fil: Gaido, Paula Marina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales; Argentina |
description |
In ‘Internal’ Legal Positivism, Cristina Redondo attempts to articulate the metatheoretical presuppositions of an approach directed to the study of law that explains its specific normative character. In doing so, she argues for, among others, two main theses: (i) legal norms necessarily constitute reasons in a formal sense, regardless of the substantive correctness of the content they express; (ii) legal theory can be morally neutral with respect to its object. This means that, according to Redondo, it is possible to formulate purely descriptive statements that refer to the content of law; that is, it is possible to formulate them from a point of view that does not presuppose the acceptance of that content. The expression "´internal´ legal positivism" is the terminology chosen by Redondo to account for the type of methodological approach necessary for a positivist theory of law à la Hart to be possible. In this article, I will summarize the main theses defended by the author in her book and trace the central questions that have been at the heart of the discussion at the Symposium on ‘Internal’ Legal Positivism published in this journal. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/202069 Gaido, Paula Marina; The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo; Klub Revus Centre for Studies on Democracy and European Constitutionality; Revus; 48; 6-2022; 1-11 1581-7652 1855-7112 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/202069 |
identifier_str_mv |
Gaido, Paula Marina; The method and object of legal theory according to Cristina Redondo; Klub Revus Centre for Studies on Democracy and European Constitutionality; Revus; 48; 6-2022; 1-11 1581-7652 1855-7112 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://journals.openedition.org/revus/8597 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4000/revus.8597 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Klub Revus Centre for Studies on Democracy and European Constitutionality |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Klub Revus Centre for Studies on Democracy and European Constitutionality |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1846083344408772608 |
score |
13.22299 |