The scope of the participant's perspective in Joseph Raz's Theory of Law

Autores
Gaido, Paula Marina
Año de publicación
2012
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This article explores Joseph Raz's methodological thesis about the conceptual priority of the participants of legal practices in the understanding of law. In particular, it contends that given the participant's conceptual priority in the understanding of law we must conclude that legitimate authority is a necessary property of law. It argues that to maintain that a claim to legitimate authority is the necessary property of law, and not legitimate authority itself, as Raz does, we must abandon the participant's perspective. It defends that Raz introduces his thesis of the claim to legitimate authority of law without further justification, and deprives it from support from a methodological point of view.
Fil: Gaido, Paula Marina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales; Argentina
Materia
LEGAL METHODOLOGY
LEGAL THEORY
PARTICIPANT'S PERSPECTIVE
CONCEPT OF LAW
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/196789
Acceder
id CONICETDig_4a8fa2e051226b8038284be4b9961157
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/196789
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The scope of the participant's perspective in Joseph Raz's Theory of LawGaido, Paula MarinaLEGAL METHODOLOGYLEGAL THEORYPARTICIPANT'S PERSPECTIVECONCEPT OF LAWhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5This article explores Joseph Raz's methodological thesis about the conceptual priority of the participants of legal practices in the understanding of law. In particular, it contends that given the participant's conceptual priority in the understanding of law we must conclude that legitimate authority is a necessary property of law. It argues that to maintain that a claim to legitimate authority is the necessary property of law, and not legitimate authority itself, as Raz does, we must abandon the participant's perspective. It defends that Raz introduces his thesis of the claim to legitimate authority of law without further justification, and deprives it from support from a methodological point of view.Fil: Gaido, Paula Marina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales; ArgentinaCambridge University Press2012-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/196789Gaido, Paula Marina; The scope of the participant's perspective in Joseph Raz's Theory of Law; Cambridge University Press; Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence; 25; 2; 7-2012; 347-3572056-42600841-8209CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1017/S0841820900005841info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:35:17Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/196789instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:35:17.723CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The scope of the participant's perspective in Joseph Raz's Theory of Law
title The scope of the participant's perspective in Joseph Raz's Theory of Law
spellingShingle The scope of the participant's perspective in Joseph Raz's Theory of Law
Gaido, Paula Marina
LEGAL METHODOLOGY
LEGAL THEORY
PARTICIPANT'S PERSPECTIVE
CONCEPT OF LAW
title_short The scope of the participant's perspective in Joseph Raz's Theory of Law
title_full The scope of the participant's perspective in Joseph Raz's Theory of Law
title_fullStr The scope of the participant's perspective in Joseph Raz's Theory of Law
title_full_unstemmed The scope of the participant's perspective in Joseph Raz's Theory of Law
title_sort The scope of the participant's perspective in Joseph Raz's Theory of Law
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gaido, Paula Marina
author Gaido, Paula Marina
author_facet Gaido, Paula Marina
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv LEGAL METHODOLOGY
LEGAL THEORY
PARTICIPANT'S PERSPECTIVE
CONCEPT OF LAW
topic LEGAL METHODOLOGY
LEGAL THEORY
PARTICIPANT'S PERSPECTIVE
CONCEPT OF LAW
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This article explores Joseph Raz's methodological thesis about the conceptual priority of the participants of legal practices in the understanding of law. In particular, it contends that given the participant's conceptual priority in the understanding of law we must conclude that legitimate authority is a necessary property of law. It argues that to maintain that a claim to legitimate authority is the necessary property of law, and not legitimate authority itself, as Raz does, we must abandon the participant's perspective. It defends that Raz introduces his thesis of the claim to legitimate authority of law without further justification, and deprives it from support from a methodological point of view.
Fil: Gaido, Paula Marina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales; Argentina
description This article explores Joseph Raz's methodological thesis about the conceptual priority of the participants of legal practices in the understanding of law. In particular, it contends that given the participant's conceptual priority in the understanding of law we must conclude that legitimate authority is a necessary property of law. It argues that to maintain that a claim to legitimate authority is the necessary property of law, and not legitimate authority itself, as Raz does, we must abandon the participant's perspective. It defends that Raz introduces his thesis of the claim to legitimate authority of law without further justification, and deprives it from support from a methodological point of view.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/196789
Gaido, Paula Marina; The scope of the participant's perspective in Joseph Raz's Theory of Law; Cambridge University Press; Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence; 25; 2; 7-2012; 347-357
2056-4260
0841-8209
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/196789
identifier_str_mv Gaido, Paula Marina; The scope of the participant's perspective in Joseph Raz's Theory of Law; Cambridge University Press; Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence; 25; 2; 7-2012; 347-357
2056-4260
0841-8209
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1017/S0841820900005841
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cambridge University Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cambridge University Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613098088955904
score 13.069144

Publicaciones similares