Some Problems with Robert Alexy's Account of Legal Validity: The Relevance of the Participant's Perspective

Autores
Gaido, Paula Marina
Año de publicación
2012
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This article examines Robert Alexy's account of legal validity. It concludes that Alexy's account of legal validity lacks sufficient support given the author's methodological commitments. To reach that conclusion, it assesses the plausibility of simultaneously maintaining that the participant's perspective has conceptual privilege in the explanation of the nature of law, that legal discourse is a special case of general practical discourse, and that unjust considerations can be legally valid norms.
Fil: Gaido, Paula Marina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina
Materia
LEGAL METHODOLOGY
CONCEPT OF LAW
LEGAL VALIDITY
PARTICIPANT'S PERSPECTIVE
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/197118

id CONICETDig_9c8d22528be5f6bd4999c426ad0f161b
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/197118
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Some Problems with Robert Alexy's Account of Legal Validity: The Relevance of the Participant's PerspectiveGaido, Paula MarinaLEGAL METHODOLOGYCONCEPT OF LAWLEGAL VALIDITYPARTICIPANT'S PERSPECTIVEhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5This article examines Robert Alexy's account of legal validity. It concludes that Alexy's account of legal validity lacks sufficient support given the author's methodological commitments. To reach that conclusion, it assesses the plausibility of simultaneously maintaining that the participant's perspective has conceptual privilege in the explanation of the nature of law, that legal discourse is a special case of general practical discourse, and that unjust considerations can be legally valid norms.Fil: Gaido, Paula Marina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; ArgentinaWiley2012-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/197118Gaido, Paula Marina; Some Problems with Robert Alexy's Account of Legal Validity: The Relevance of the Participant's Perspective; Wiley; Ratio Juris; 25; 3; 9-2012; 381-3920952-1917CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2012.00519.xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2012.00519.xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:55:25Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/197118instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:55:25.341CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Some Problems with Robert Alexy's Account of Legal Validity: The Relevance of the Participant's Perspective
title Some Problems with Robert Alexy's Account of Legal Validity: The Relevance of the Participant's Perspective
spellingShingle Some Problems with Robert Alexy's Account of Legal Validity: The Relevance of the Participant's Perspective
Gaido, Paula Marina
LEGAL METHODOLOGY
CONCEPT OF LAW
LEGAL VALIDITY
PARTICIPANT'S PERSPECTIVE
title_short Some Problems with Robert Alexy's Account of Legal Validity: The Relevance of the Participant's Perspective
title_full Some Problems with Robert Alexy's Account of Legal Validity: The Relevance of the Participant's Perspective
title_fullStr Some Problems with Robert Alexy's Account of Legal Validity: The Relevance of the Participant's Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Some Problems with Robert Alexy's Account of Legal Validity: The Relevance of the Participant's Perspective
title_sort Some Problems with Robert Alexy's Account of Legal Validity: The Relevance of the Participant's Perspective
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gaido, Paula Marina
author Gaido, Paula Marina
author_facet Gaido, Paula Marina
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv LEGAL METHODOLOGY
CONCEPT OF LAW
LEGAL VALIDITY
PARTICIPANT'S PERSPECTIVE
topic LEGAL METHODOLOGY
CONCEPT OF LAW
LEGAL VALIDITY
PARTICIPANT'S PERSPECTIVE
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This article examines Robert Alexy's account of legal validity. It concludes that Alexy's account of legal validity lacks sufficient support given the author's methodological commitments. To reach that conclusion, it assesses the plausibility of simultaneously maintaining that the participant's perspective has conceptual privilege in the explanation of the nature of law, that legal discourse is a special case of general practical discourse, and that unjust considerations can be legally valid norms.
Fil: Gaido, Paula Marina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina
description This article examines Robert Alexy's account of legal validity. It concludes that Alexy's account of legal validity lacks sufficient support given the author's methodological commitments. To reach that conclusion, it assesses the plausibility of simultaneously maintaining that the participant's perspective has conceptual privilege in the explanation of the nature of law, that legal discourse is a special case of general practical discourse, and that unjust considerations can be legally valid norms.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/197118
Gaido, Paula Marina; Some Problems with Robert Alexy's Account of Legal Validity: The Relevance of the Participant's Perspective; Wiley; Ratio Juris; 25; 3; 9-2012; 381-392
0952-1917
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/197118
identifier_str_mv Gaido, Paula Marina; Some Problems with Robert Alexy's Account of Legal Validity: The Relevance of the Participant's Perspective; Wiley; Ratio Juris; 25; 3; 9-2012; 381-392
0952-1917
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2012.00519.x
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2012.00519.x
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613671293026304
score 13.069144