Two Dogmas of Coherentism
- Autores
- Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique
- Año de publicación
- 2012
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- This paper discusses two dogmas attributed to Davidson's coherentism. The first dogma says that experience is only a causal link between experience and beliefs. The second one says that only beliefs justify other beliefs. Against these two stataments it is argued that the conception of expeirence as a mere causal link between the world and our beliefs makes the world unknowable. Moreover, the article presents some additional reasons against that conception: it misses the phenomenological and perspectival character of perception, and its independence of belief. Finally, Davidsonian externalism is considered. It is shown here that Davidson's conception of experience makes it impossible to individuate the contents of beliefs. The article concludes rehabilitating the empiricist idea according to which perceptual experience can be used to justify beliefs.
Fil: Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades; Argentina - Materia
-
Coherentism
Davidson
Experience
Belief - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/69277
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_d675f09ee1079e32262c62650445d351 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/69277 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Two Dogmas of CoherentismKalpokas, Daniel EnriqueCoherentismDavidsonExperienceBeliefhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6This paper discusses two dogmas attributed to Davidson's coherentism. The first dogma says that experience is only a causal link between experience and beliefs. The second one says that only beliefs justify other beliefs. Against these two stataments it is argued that the conception of expeirence as a mere causal link between the world and our beliefs makes the world unknowable. Moreover, the article presents some additional reasons against that conception: it misses the phenomenological and perspectival character of perception, and its independence of belief. Finally, Davidsonian externalism is considered. It is shown here that Davidson's conception of experience makes it impossible to individuate the contents of beliefs. The article concludes rehabilitating the empiricist idea according to which perceptual experience can be used to justify beliefs. Fil: Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades; ArgentinaBrill Academic Publishers2012-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/69277Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique; Two Dogmas of Coherentism; Brill Academic Publishers; Grazer Philosophische Studien; 85; 1; 5-2012; 213-2360165-9227CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://brill.com/abstract/journals/gps/85/1/article-p213_10.xmlinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1163/9789401208338_010info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:59:38Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/69277instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:59:38.41CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Two Dogmas of Coherentism |
title |
Two Dogmas of Coherentism |
spellingShingle |
Two Dogmas of Coherentism Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique Coherentism Davidson Experience Belief |
title_short |
Two Dogmas of Coherentism |
title_full |
Two Dogmas of Coherentism |
title_fullStr |
Two Dogmas of Coherentism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Two Dogmas of Coherentism |
title_sort |
Two Dogmas of Coherentism |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique |
author |
Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique |
author_facet |
Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Coherentism Davidson Experience Belief |
topic |
Coherentism Davidson Experience Belief |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
This paper discusses two dogmas attributed to Davidson's coherentism. The first dogma says that experience is only a causal link between experience and beliefs. The second one says that only beliefs justify other beliefs. Against these two stataments it is argued that the conception of expeirence as a mere causal link between the world and our beliefs makes the world unknowable. Moreover, the article presents some additional reasons against that conception: it misses the phenomenological and perspectival character of perception, and its independence of belief. Finally, Davidsonian externalism is considered. It is shown here that Davidson's conception of experience makes it impossible to individuate the contents of beliefs. The article concludes rehabilitating the empiricist idea according to which perceptual experience can be used to justify beliefs. Fil: Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades; Argentina |
description |
This paper discusses two dogmas attributed to Davidson's coherentism. The first dogma says that experience is only a causal link between experience and beliefs. The second one says that only beliefs justify other beliefs. Against these two stataments it is argued that the conception of expeirence as a mere causal link between the world and our beliefs makes the world unknowable. Moreover, the article presents some additional reasons against that conception: it misses the phenomenological and perspectival character of perception, and its independence of belief. Finally, Davidsonian externalism is considered. It is shown here that Davidson's conception of experience makes it impossible to individuate the contents of beliefs. The article concludes rehabilitating the empiricist idea according to which perceptual experience can be used to justify beliefs. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-05 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/69277 Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique; Two Dogmas of Coherentism; Brill Academic Publishers; Grazer Philosophische Studien; 85; 1; 5-2012; 213-236 0165-9227 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/69277 |
identifier_str_mv |
Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique; Two Dogmas of Coherentism; Brill Academic Publishers; Grazer Philosophische Studien; 85; 1; 5-2012; 213-236 0165-9227 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://brill.com/abstract/journals/gps/85/1/article-p213_10.xml info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1163/9789401208338_010 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brill Academic Publishers |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brill Academic Publishers |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1846782317505282048 |
score |
12.982451 |