Depth profiling by confocal Raman microspectroscopy: Semi-empirical modeling of the Raman response
- Autores
- Tomba, Juan Pablo; Arzondo, Luis M.; Pastor, José M.
- Año de publicación
- 2007
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- It has been well documented that the use of dry optics in depth profiling by confocal Raman microspectroscopy significantly distorts the laser focal volume, thus negatively affecting the spatial resolution of the measurements. In that case, the resulting in-depth confocal profile is an outcome of several contributions: the broadening of the laser spot due to instrumental factors and diffraction, the spreading of the illuminated region due to refraction of the laser beam at the sample surface, and the influence of the confocal aperture in the collection path of the laser beam. Everall and Batchelder et al. developed simple models that describe the effect of the last two factors, i.e., laser refraction and the diameter of the pinhole aperture, on the confocal profile. In this work, we compare these theoretical predictions with experimental data obtained on a series of well-defined planar interfaces, generated by contact between thin polyethylene (PE) films (35, 53, 75, and 105 μm thickness) and a much thicker polylmethyl methacrylate) (PMMA) piece. We included two refinements in the above-mentioned models: the broadening of the laser spot due to instrumental factors and diffraction and a correction for the overestimation in the decay rate of collection efficiency predicted by Batchelder et al. These refinements were included through a semiempirical approach, consisting of independently measuring the Raman step-response in the absence of refraction by using a silicon wafer and the actual intensity decay of a thick and transparent polymer film. With these improvements, the model reliably reproduces fine features of the confocal profiles for both PE films and PMMA substrates. The results of this work show that these simple models can not only be used to assist data interpretation, but can also be used to quantitatively predict in-depth confocal profiles in experiments carried out with dry optics.
Fil: Tomba, Juan Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales; Argentina
Fil: Arzondo, Luis M.. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; Argentina
Fil: Pastor, José M.. Universidad de Valladolid; España - Materia
-
Confocal Raman Microspectroscopy
Depth Resolution
Dry Objectives
Polymer Films
Refraction - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/75596
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_959245ba6177fd869b31cb43e51e94f0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/75596 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Depth profiling by confocal Raman microspectroscopy: Semi-empirical modeling of the Raman responseTomba, Juan PabloArzondo, Luis M.Pastor, José M.Confocal Raman MicrospectroscopyDepth ResolutionDry ObjectivesPolymer FilmsRefractionhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2It has been well documented that the use of dry optics in depth profiling by confocal Raman microspectroscopy significantly distorts the laser focal volume, thus negatively affecting the spatial resolution of the measurements. In that case, the resulting in-depth confocal profile is an outcome of several contributions: the broadening of the laser spot due to instrumental factors and diffraction, the spreading of the illuminated region due to refraction of the laser beam at the sample surface, and the influence of the confocal aperture in the collection path of the laser beam. Everall and Batchelder et al. developed simple models that describe the effect of the last two factors, i.e., laser refraction and the diameter of the pinhole aperture, on the confocal profile. In this work, we compare these theoretical predictions with experimental data obtained on a series of well-defined planar interfaces, generated by contact between thin polyethylene (PE) films (35, 53, 75, and 105 μm thickness) and a much thicker polylmethyl methacrylate) (PMMA) piece. We included two refinements in the above-mentioned models: the broadening of the laser spot due to instrumental factors and diffraction and a correction for the overestimation in the decay rate of collection efficiency predicted by Batchelder et al. These refinements were included through a semiempirical approach, consisting of independently measuring the Raman step-response in the absence of refraction by using a silicon wafer and the actual intensity decay of a thick and transparent polymer film. With these improvements, the model reliably reproduces fine features of the confocal profiles for both PE films and PMMA substrates. The results of this work show that these simple models can not only be used to assist data interpretation, but can also be used to quantitatively predict in-depth confocal profiles in experiments carried out with dry optics.Fil: Tomba, Juan Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales; ArgentinaFil: Arzondo, Luis M.. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; ArgentinaFil: Pastor, José M.. Universidad de Valladolid; EspañaSAGE Publications2007-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/75596Tomba, Juan Pablo; Arzondo, Luis M.; Pastor, José M.; Depth profiling by confocal Raman microspectroscopy: Semi-empirical modeling of the Raman response; SAGE Publications; Applied Spectroscopy; 61; 2; 2-2007; 177-1850003-7028CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1366/000370207779947477info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1366/000370207779947477info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:51:53Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/75596instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:51:53.801CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Depth profiling by confocal Raman microspectroscopy: Semi-empirical modeling of the Raman response |
title |
Depth profiling by confocal Raman microspectroscopy: Semi-empirical modeling of the Raman response |
spellingShingle |
Depth profiling by confocal Raman microspectroscopy: Semi-empirical modeling of the Raman response Tomba, Juan Pablo Confocal Raman Microspectroscopy Depth Resolution Dry Objectives Polymer Films Refraction |
title_short |
Depth profiling by confocal Raman microspectroscopy: Semi-empirical modeling of the Raman response |
title_full |
Depth profiling by confocal Raman microspectroscopy: Semi-empirical modeling of the Raman response |
title_fullStr |
Depth profiling by confocal Raman microspectroscopy: Semi-empirical modeling of the Raman response |
title_full_unstemmed |
Depth profiling by confocal Raman microspectroscopy: Semi-empirical modeling of the Raman response |
title_sort |
Depth profiling by confocal Raman microspectroscopy: Semi-empirical modeling of the Raman response |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Tomba, Juan Pablo Arzondo, Luis M. Pastor, José M. |
author |
Tomba, Juan Pablo |
author_facet |
Tomba, Juan Pablo Arzondo, Luis M. Pastor, José M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Arzondo, Luis M. Pastor, José M. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Confocal Raman Microspectroscopy Depth Resolution Dry Objectives Polymer Films Refraction |
topic |
Confocal Raman Microspectroscopy Depth Resolution Dry Objectives Polymer Films Refraction |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.5 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
It has been well documented that the use of dry optics in depth profiling by confocal Raman microspectroscopy significantly distorts the laser focal volume, thus negatively affecting the spatial resolution of the measurements. In that case, the resulting in-depth confocal profile is an outcome of several contributions: the broadening of the laser spot due to instrumental factors and diffraction, the spreading of the illuminated region due to refraction of the laser beam at the sample surface, and the influence of the confocal aperture in the collection path of the laser beam. Everall and Batchelder et al. developed simple models that describe the effect of the last two factors, i.e., laser refraction and the diameter of the pinhole aperture, on the confocal profile. In this work, we compare these theoretical predictions with experimental data obtained on a series of well-defined planar interfaces, generated by contact between thin polyethylene (PE) films (35, 53, 75, and 105 μm thickness) and a much thicker polylmethyl methacrylate) (PMMA) piece. We included two refinements in the above-mentioned models: the broadening of the laser spot due to instrumental factors and diffraction and a correction for the overestimation in the decay rate of collection efficiency predicted by Batchelder et al. These refinements were included through a semiempirical approach, consisting of independently measuring the Raman step-response in the absence of refraction by using a silicon wafer and the actual intensity decay of a thick and transparent polymer film. With these improvements, the model reliably reproduces fine features of the confocal profiles for both PE films and PMMA substrates. The results of this work show that these simple models can not only be used to assist data interpretation, but can also be used to quantitatively predict in-depth confocal profiles in experiments carried out with dry optics. Fil: Tomba, Juan Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales; Argentina Fil: Arzondo, Luis M.. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; Argentina Fil: Pastor, José M.. Universidad de Valladolid; España |
description |
It has been well documented that the use of dry optics in depth profiling by confocal Raman microspectroscopy significantly distorts the laser focal volume, thus negatively affecting the spatial resolution of the measurements. In that case, the resulting in-depth confocal profile is an outcome of several contributions: the broadening of the laser spot due to instrumental factors and diffraction, the spreading of the illuminated region due to refraction of the laser beam at the sample surface, and the influence of the confocal aperture in the collection path of the laser beam. Everall and Batchelder et al. developed simple models that describe the effect of the last two factors, i.e., laser refraction and the diameter of the pinhole aperture, on the confocal profile. In this work, we compare these theoretical predictions with experimental data obtained on a series of well-defined planar interfaces, generated by contact between thin polyethylene (PE) films (35, 53, 75, and 105 μm thickness) and a much thicker polylmethyl methacrylate) (PMMA) piece. We included two refinements in the above-mentioned models: the broadening of the laser spot due to instrumental factors and diffraction and a correction for the overestimation in the decay rate of collection efficiency predicted by Batchelder et al. These refinements were included through a semiempirical approach, consisting of independently measuring the Raman step-response in the absence of refraction by using a silicon wafer and the actual intensity decay of a thick and transparent polymer film. With these improvements, the model reliably reproduces fine features of the confocal profiles for both PE films and PMMA substrates. The results of this work show that these simple models can not only be used to assist data interpretation, but can also be used to quantitatively predict in-depth confocal profiles in experiments carried out with dry optics. |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007-02 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/75596 Tomba, Juan Pablo; Arzondo, Luis M.; Pastor, José M.; Depth profiling by confocal Raman microspectroscopy: Semi-empirical modeling of the Raman response; SAGE Publications; Applied Spectroscopy; 61; 2; 2-2007; 177-185 0003-7028 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/75596 |
identifier_str_mv |
Tomba, Juan Pablo; Arzondo, Luis M.; Pastor, José M.; Depth profiling by confocal Raman microspectroscopy: Semi-empirical modeling of the Raman response; SAGE Publications; Applied Spectroscopy; 61; 2; 2-2007; 177-185 0003-7028 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1366/000370207779947477 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1366/000370207779947477 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SAGE Publications |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SAGE Publications |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269123394928640 |
score |
13.13397 |