Archaic thought and sophistry in herodotus’ histories 3.38.1 some remarks on the concept of νομος
- Autores
- Barrionuevo, Sergio Javier
- Año de publicación
- 2017
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The concepts of νόμος and φύσις were key to sophistical thinking. The sophistical opposition between the two concepts exerted a great influence in the fifth century BC. The objective of this contribution is to identify the presence of sophistical elements in Herodotus? Histories, taking a historical perspective. The approach will include an analysis of the notion of νόμος (?custom?). This examination is intended to demonstrate the thesis that Herodotus uses intellectual discussions from the fifth century BC but also transposes the concept of sophistry in order to restore an archaic conception of νόμος.
Fil: Barrionuevo, Sergio Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Historia Antigua y Medieval "Prof. José Luis Romero"; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento. Instituto de Ciencias; Argentina - Materia
-
HERODOTUS
PROTAGORAS
HERACLITUS
SOPHISTRY
NOMOS - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/75127
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
CONICETDig_847974df0ed7e26af3946303bd8745a6 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/75127 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
| repository_id_str |
3498 |
| network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| spelling |
Archaic thought and sophistry in herodotus’ histories 3.38.1 some remarks on the concept of νομοςBarrionuevo, Sergio JavierHERODOTUSPROTAGORASHERACLITUSSOPHISTRYNOMOShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6The concepts of νόμος and φύσις were key to sophistical thinking. The sophistical opposition between the two concepts exerted a great influence in the fifth century BC. The objective of this contribution is to identify the presence of sophistical elements in Herodotus? Histories, taking a historical perspective. The approach will include an analysis of the notion of νόμος (?custom?). This examination is intended to demonstrate the thesis that Herodotus uses intellectual discussions from the fifth century BC but also transposes the concept of sophistry in order to restore an archaic conception of νόμος.Fil: Barrionuevo, Sergio Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Historia Antigua y Medieval "Prof. José Luis Romero"; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento. Instituto de Ciencias; ArgentinaInstituto per il Lessico Intellettuale Europeo e Storia delle Idee2017-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/75127Barrionuevo, Sergio Javier; Archaic thought and sophistry in herodotus’ histories 3.38.1 some remarks on the concept of νομος; Instituto per il Lessico Intellettuale Europeo e Storia delle Idee; Lexicon Philosophicum: International Journal for the History of Texts and Ideas; 5; 10-2017; 79-952283-7833CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://lexicon.cnr.it/index.php/LP/article/view/513info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:08:14Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/75127instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:08:14.883CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Archaic thought and sophistry in herodotus’ histories 3.38.1 some remarks on the concept of νομος |
| title |
Archaic thought and sophistry in herodotus’ histories 3.38.1 some remarks on the concept of νομος |
| spellingShingle |
Archaic thought and sophistry in herodotus’ histories 3.38.1 some remarks on the concept of νομος Barrionuevo, Sergio Javier HERODOTUS PROTAGORAS HERACLITUS SOPHISTRY NOMOS |
| title_short |
Archaic thought and sophistry in herodotus’ histories 3.38.1 some remarks on the concept of νομος |
| title_full |
Archaic thought and sophistry in herodotus’ histories 3.38.1 some remarks on the concept of νομος |
| title_fullStr |
Archaic thought and sophistry in herodotus’ histories 3.38.1 some remarks on the concept of νομος |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Archaic thought and sophistry in herodotus’ histories 3.38.1 some remarks on the concept of νομος |
| title_sort |
Archaic thought and sophistry in herodotus’ histories 3.38.1 some remarks on the concept of νομος |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Barrionuevo, Sergio Javier |
| author |
Barrionuevo, Sergio Javier |
| author_facet |
Barrionuevo, Sergio Javier |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
HERODOTUS PROTAGORAS HERACLITUS SOPHISTRY NOMOS |
| topic |
HERODOTUS PROTAGORAS HERACLITUS SOPHISTRY NOMOS |
| purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The concepts of νόμος and φύσις were key to sophistical thinking. The sophistical opposition between the two concepts exerted a great influence in the fifth century BC. The objective of this contribution is to identify the presence of sophistical elements in Herodotus? Histories, taking a historical perspective. The approach will include an analysis of the notion of νόμος (?custom?). This examination is intended to demonstrate the thesis that Herodotus uses intellectual discussions from the fifth century BC but also transposes the concept of sophistry in order to restore an archaic conception of νόμος. Fil: Barrionuevo, Sergio Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Historia Antigua y Medieval "Prof. José Luis Romero"; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento. Instituto de Ciencias; Argentina |
| description |
The concepts of νόμος and φύσις were key to sophistical thinking. The sophistical opposition between the two concepts exerted a great influence in the fifth century BC. The objective of this contribution is to identify the presence of sophistical elements in Herodotus? Histories, taking a historical perspective. The approach will include an analysis of the notion of νόμος (?custom?). This examination is intended to demonstrate the thesis that Herodotus uses intellectual discussions from the fifth century BC but also transposes the concept of sophistry in order to restore an archaic conception of νόμος. |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-10 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/75127 Barrionuevo, Sergio Javier; Archaic thought and sophistry in herodotus’ histories 3.38.1 some remarks on the concept of νομος; Instituto per il Lessico Intellettuale Europeo e Storia delle Idee; Lexicon Philosophicum: International Journal for the History of Texts and Ideas; 5; 10-2017; 79-95 2283-7833 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/75127 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Barrionuevo, Sergio Javier; Archaic thought and sophistry in herodotus’ histories 3.38.1 some remarks on the concept of νομος; Instituto per il Lessico Intellettuale Europeo e Storia delle Idee; Lexicon Philosophicum: International Journal for the History of Texts and Ideas; 5; 10-2017; 79-95 2283-7833 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://lexicon.cnr.it/index.php/LP/article/view/513 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto per il Lessico Intellettuale Europeo e Storia delle Idee |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto per il Lessico Intellettuale Europeo e Storia delle Idee |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
| _version_ |
1842270037012905984 |
| score |
13.13397 |