The CROWN initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health

Autores
Khan, Khalid; Belizan, Jose
Año de publicación
2014
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Clinical trials, systematic reviews and guidelines compare beneficial and non-beneficial outcomes following interventions. Often, however, various studies on a particular topic do not address the same outcomes, making it difficult to draw clinically useful conclusions when a group of studies is looked at as a whole. This problem was recently thrown into sharp focus by a systematic review of interventions for preterm birth prevention, which found that among 103 randomised trials, no fewer than 72 different outcomes were reported. There is a growing recognition among clinical researchers that this variability undermines consistent synthesis of the evidence, and that what is needed is an agreed standardised collection of outcomes - a "core outcomes set" - for all trials in a specific clinical area. Recognising that the current inconsistency is a serious hindrance to progress in our specialty, the editors of over 50 journals related to women's health have come together to support The CROWN (CoRe Outcomes in WomeN's health) Initiative.
Fil: Khan, Khalid. CROWN Initiative; Estados Unidos
Fil: Belizan, Jose. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
Women's health
Research design/standards
Treatment outcome
Clinical trials
Systematic reviews
Guidelines
Evidence-based medicine
Consensus
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/36024
Acceder
id CONICETDig_49799bc0ae55d45acc5ea5ae80581ace
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/36024
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The CROWN initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s healthKhan, KhalidBelizan, JoseWomen's healthResearch design/standardsTreatment outcomeClinical trialsSystematic reviewsGuidelinesEvidence-based medicineConsensushttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Clinical trials, systematic reviews and guidelines compare beneficial and non-beneficial outcomes following interventions. Often, however, various studies on a particular topic do not address the same outcomes, making it difficult to draw clinically useful conclusions when a group of studies is looked at as a whole. This problem was recently thrown into sharp focus by a systematic review of interventions for preterm birth prevention, which found that among 103 randomised trials, no fewer than 72 different outcomes were reported. There is a growing recognition among clinical researchers that this variability undermines consistent synthesis of the evidence, and that what is needed is an agreed standardised collection of outcomes - a "core outcomes set" - for all trials in a specific clinical area. Recognising that the current inconsistency is a serious hindrance to progress in our specialty, the editors of over 50 journals related to women's health have come together to support The CROWN (CoRe Outcomes in WomeN's health) Initiative.Fil: Khan, Khalid. CROWN Initiative; Estados UnidosFil: Belizan, Jose. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaBioMed Central2014-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/36024Khan, Khalid; Belizan, Jose; The CROWN initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health; BioMed Central; Reproductive Health; 11; 7-2014; 1-31742-4755CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-4755-11-42info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/1742-4755-11-42info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:09:11Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/36024instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:09:12.213CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The CROWN initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health
title The CROWN initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health
spellingShingle The CROWN initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health
Khan, Khalid
Women's health
Research design/standards
Treatment outcome
Clinical trials
Systematic reviews
Guidelines
Evidence-based medicine
Consensus
title_short The CROWN initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health
title_full The CROWN initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health
title_fullStr The CROWN initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health
title_full_unstemmed The CROWN initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health
title_sort The CROWN initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Khan, Khalid
Belizan, Jose
author Khan, Khalid
author_facet Khan, Khalid
Belizan, Jose
author_role author
author2 Belizan, Jose
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Women's health
Research design/standards
Treatment outcome
Clinical trials
Systematic reviews
Guidelines
Evidence-based medicine
Consensus
topic Women's health
Research design/standards
Treatment outcome
Clinical trials
Systematic reviews
Guidelines
Evidence-based medicine
Consensus
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Clinical trials, systematic reviews and guidelines compare beneficial and non-beneficial outcomes following interventions. Often, however, various studies on a particular topic do not address the same outcomes, making it difficult to draw clinically useful conclusions when a group of studies is looked at as a whole. This problem was recently thrown into sharp focus by a systematic review of interventions for preterm birth prevention, which found that among 103 randomised trials, no fewer than 72 different outcomes were reported. There is a growing recognition among clinical researchers that this variability undermines consistent synthesis of the evidence, and that what is needed is an agreed standardised collection of outcomes - a "core outcomes set" - for all trials in a specific clinical area. Recognising that the current inconsistency is a serious hindrance to progress in our specialty, the editors of over 50 journals related to women's health have come together to support The CROWN (CoRe Outcomes in WomeN's health) Initiative.
Fil: Khan, Khalid. CROWN Initiative; Estados Unidos
Fil: Belizan, Jose. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description Clinical trials, systematic reviews and guidelines compare beneficial and non-beneficial outcomes following interventions. Often, however, various studies on a particular topic do not address the same outcomes, making it difficult to draw clinically useful conclusions when a group of studies is looked at as a whole. This problem was recently thrown into sharp focus by a systematic review of interventions for preterm birth prevention, which found that among 103 randomised trials, no fewer than 72 different outcomes were reported. There is a growing recognition among clinical researchers that this variability undermines consistent synthesis of the evidence, and that what is needed is an agreed standardised collection of outcomes - a "core outcomes set" - for all trials in a specific clinical area. Recognising that the current inconsistency is a serious hindrance to progress in our specialty, the editors of over 50 journals related to women's health have come together to support The CROWN (CoRe Outcomes in WomeN's health) Initiative.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/36024
Khan, Khalid; Belizan, Jose; The CROWN initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health; BioMed Central; Reproductive Health; 11; 7-2014; 1-3
1742-4755
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/36024
identifier_str_mv Khan, Khalid; Belizan, Jose; The CROWN initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health; BioMed Central; Reproductive Health; 11; 7-2014; 1-3
1742-4755
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-4755-11-42
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/1742-4755-11-42
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv BioMed Central
publisher.none.fl_str_mv BioMed Central
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083239596261376
score 13.22299

Publicaciones similares