A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin

Autores
Casciano, R.; Malangone, Elisabetta; Ramachandran, A.; Gagliardino, Juan Jose
Año de publicación
2011
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Aim: To assess diabetes treatment preferences with a focus on patient barriers to insulin treatment. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire using indirect and direct methods was administered as part of the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS). Discrete choice modelling was used to assess how product attributes influence patients' preferences for diabetes treatment. A multinomial logit model was used to find the odds ratio for each parameter, representing the probability of selecting a chosen alternative given a choice set. This allowed for the derivation of relative attribute importance, an indication of how influential product attributes are in the respondents' choices. Results: The IDMPS questionnaire was administered to 14,033 individuals with diabetes in 18 countries. The majority of respondents were women (53%) and had Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; 85%). Across subgroups, administration (i.e. oral vs. injection) was a driver of preference. Patient preferences varied according to diabetes type; individuals with T2DM assigned much higher relative importance to administration than those with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM; 30.86% vs. 4.99%; p < 0.0001). Individuals with T2DM treated with insulin placed less importance on administration than insulin-naïve T2DM patients (3.09% vs. 47.48%; p < 0.0001). Diabetes education also had a significant effect on the priority given to administration between T2DM patients who received diabetes training and those who did not (28.21% vs. 33.68%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: The insulin barriers perceived by patients with diabetes evolved with their disease experience. While administration was the primary preference driver for insulin-naïve patients, patients were increasingly concerned with more clinically relevant barriers as they gained experience with insulin. This finding suggests that patients using insulin understand the importance of achieving an optimal balance between safety and efficacy.
Fil: Casciano, R.. Analytica International; Estados Unidos
Fil: Malangone, Elisabetta. Analytica International; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ramachandran, A.. Dr. A. Ramachandran’s Diabetes Hospitals; India
Fil: Gagliardino, Juan Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico La Plata. Centro de Endocrinología Experimental y Aplicada (i); Argentina
Materia
diabetes
insulin treatment
patient barriers
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/96673

id CONICETDig_3276f77d2726378ddc5cf7272aa1aaa1
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/96673
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulinCasciano, R.Malangone, ElisabettaRamachandran, A.Gagliardino, Juan Josediabetesinsulin treatmentpatient barriershttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Aim: To assess diabetes treatment preferences with a focus on patient barriers to insulin treatment. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire using indirect and direct methods was administered as part of the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS). Discrete choice modelling was used to assess how product attributes influence patients' preferences for diabetes treatment. A multinomial logit model was used to find the odds ratio for each parameter, representing the probability of selecting a chosen alternative given a choice set. This allowed for the derivation of relative attribute importance, an indication of how influential product attributes are in the respondents' choices. Results: The IDMPS questionnaire was administered to 14,033 individuals with diabetes in 18 countries. The majority of respondents were women (53%) and had Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; 85%). Across subgroups, administration (i.e. oral vs. injection) was a driver of preference. Patient preferences varied according to diabetes type; individuals with T2DM assigned much higher relative importance to administration than those with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM; 30.86% vs. 4.99%; p < 0.0001). Individuals with T2DM treated with insulin placed less importance on administration than insulin-naïve T2DM patients (3.09% vs. 47.48%; p < 0.0001). Diabetes education also had a significant effect on the priority given to administration between T2DM patients who received diabetes training and those who did not (28.21% vs. 33.68%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: The insulin barriers perceived by patients with diabetes evolved with their disease experience. While administration was the primary preference driver for insulin-naïve patients, patients were increasingly concerned with more clinically relevant barriers as they gained experience with insulin. This finding suggests that patients using insulin understand the importance of achieving an optimal balance between safety and efficacy.Fil: Casciano, R.. Analytica International; Estados UnidosFil: Malangone, Elisabetta. Analytica International; Estados UnidosFil: Ramachandran, A.. Dr. A. Ramachandran’s Diabetes Hospitals; IndiaFil: Gagliardino, Juan Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico La Plata. Centro de Endocrinología Experimental y Aplicada (i); ArgentinaWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2011-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/96673Casciano, R.; Malangone, Elisabetta; Ramachandran, A.; Gagliardino, Juan Jose; A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; International Journal of Clinical Practice; 65; 4; 4-2011; 408-4141742-12411368-5031CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02590.xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1742info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:01:44Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/96673instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:01:45.145CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin
title A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin
spellingShingle A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin
Casciano, R.
diabetes
insulin treatment
patient barriers
title_short A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin
title_full A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin
title_fullStr A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin
title_full_unstemmed A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin
title_sort A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Casciano, R.
Malangone, Elisabetta
Ramachandran, A.
Gagliardino, Juan Jose
author Casciano, R.
author_facet Casciano, R.
Malangone, Elisabetta
Ramachandran, A.
Gagliardino, Juan Jose
author_role author
author2 Malangone, Elisabetta
Ramachandran, A.
Gagliardino, Juan Jose
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv diabetes
insulin treatment
patient barriers
topic diabetes
insulin treatment
patient barriers
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Aim: To assess diabetes treatment preferences with a focus on patient barriers to insulin treatment. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire using indirect and direct methods was administered as part of the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS). Discrete choice modelling was used to assess how product attributes influence patients' preferences for diabetes treatment. A multinomial logit model was used to find the odds ratio for each parameter, representing the probability of selecting a chosen alternative given a choice set. This allowed for the derivation of relative attribute importance, an indication of how influential product attributes are in the respondents' choices. Results: The IDMPS questionnaire was administered to 14,033 individuals with diabetes in 18 countries. The majority of respondents were women (53%) and had Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; 85%). Across subgroups, administration (i.e. oral vs. injection) was a driver of preference. Patient preferences varied according to diabetes type; individuals with T2DM assigned much higher relative importance to administration than those with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM; 30.86% vs. 4.99%; p < 0.0001). Individuals with T2DM treated with insulin placed less importance on administration than insulin-naïve T2DM patients (3.09% vs. 47.48%; p < 0.0001). Diabetes education also had a significant effect on the priority given to administration between T2DM patients who received diabetes training and those who did not (28.21% vs. 33.68%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: The insulin barriers perceived by patients with diabetes evolved with their disease experience. While administration was the primary preference driver for insulin-naïve patients, patients were increasingly concerned with more clinically relevant barriers as they gained experience with insulin. This finding suggests that patients using insulin understand the importance of achieving an optimal balance between safety and efficacy.
Fil: Casciano, R.. Analytica International; Estados Unidos
Fil: Malangone, Elisabetta. Analytica International; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ramachandran, A.. Dr. A. Ramachandran’s Diabetes Hospitals; India
Fil: Gagliardino, Juan Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico La Plata. Centro de Endocrinología Experimental y Aplicada (i); Argentina
description Aim: To assess diabetes treatment preferences with a focus on patient barriers to insulin treatment. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire using indirect and direct methods was administered as part of the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS). Discrete choice modelling was used to assess how product attributes influence patients' preferences for diabetes treatment. A multinomial logit model was used to find the odds ratio for each parameter, representing the probability of selecting a chosen alternative given a choice set. This allowed for the derivation of relative attribute importance, an indication of how influential product attributes are in the respondents' choices. Results: The IDMPS questionnaire was administered to 14,033 individuals with diabetes in 18 countries. The majority of respondents were women (53%) and had Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; 85%). Across subgroups, administration (i.e. oral vs. injection) was a driver of preference. Patient preferences varied according to diabetes type; individuals with T2DM assigned much higher relative importance to administration than those with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM; 30.86% vs. 4.99%; p < 0.0001). Individuals with T2DM treated with insulin placed less importance on administration than insulin-naïve T2DM patients (3.09% vs. 47.48%; p < 0.0001). Diabetes education also had a significant effect on the priority given to administration between T2DM patients who received diabetes training and those who did not (28.21% vs. 33.68%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: The insulin barriers perceived by patients with diabetes evolved with their disease experience. While administration was the primary preference driver for insulin-naïve patients, patients were increasingly concerned with more clinically relevant barriers as they gained experience with insulin. This finding suggests that patients using insulin understand the importance of achieving an optimal balance between safety and efficacy.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/96673
Casciano, R.; Malangone, Elisabetta; Ramachandran, A.; Gagliardino, Juan Jose; A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; International Journal of Clinical Practice; 65; 4; 4-2011; 408-414
1742-1241
1368-5031
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/96673
identifier_str_mv Casciano, R.; Malangone, Elisabetta; Ramachandran, A.; Gagliardino, Juan Jose; A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; International Journal of Clinical Practice; 65; 4; 4-2011; 408-414
1742-1241
1368-5031
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02590.x
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1742
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269714816958464
score 13.13397