A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin
- Autores
- Casciano, R.; Malangone, Elisabetta; Ramachandran, A.; Gagliardino, Juan Jose
- Año de publicación
- 2011
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Aim: To assess diabetes treatment preferences with a focus on patient barriers to insulin treatment. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire using indirect and direct methods was administered as part of the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS). Discrete choice modelling was used to assess how product attributes influence patients' preferences for diabetes treatment. A multinomial logit model was used to find the odds ratio for each parameter, representing the probability of selecting a chosen alternative given a choice set. This allowed for the derivation of relative attribute importance, an indication of how influential product attributes are in the respondents' choices. Results: The IDMPS questionnaire was administered to 14,033 individuals with diabetes in 18 countries. The majority of respondents were women (53%) and had Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; 85%). Across subgroups, administration (i.e. oral vs. injection) was a driver of preference. Patient preferences varied according to diabetes type; individuals with T2DM assigned much higher relative importance to administration than those with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM; 30.86% vs. 4.99%; p < 0.0001). Individuals with T2DM treated with insulin placed less importance on administration than insulin-naïve T2DM patients (3.09% vs. 47.48%; p < 0.0001). Diabetes education also had a significant effect on the priority given to administration between T2DM patients who received diabetes training and those who did not (28.21% vs. 33.68%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: The insulin barriers perceived by patients with diabetes evolved with their disease experience. While administration was the primary preference driver for insulin-naïve patients, patients were increasingly concerned with more clinically relevant barriers as they gained experience with insulin. This finding suggests that patients using insulin understand the importance of achieving an optimal balance between safety and efficacy.
Fil: Casciano, R.. Analytica International; Estados Unidos
Fil: Malangone, Elisabetta. Analytica International; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ramachandran, A.. Dr. A. Ramachandran’s Diabetes Hospitals; India
Fil: Gagliardino, Juan Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico La Plata. Centro de Endocrinología Experimental y Aplicada (i); Argentina - Materia
-
diabetes
insulin treatment
patient barriers - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/96673
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_3276f77d2726378ddc5cf7272aa1aaa1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/96673 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulinCasciano, R.Malangone, ElisabettaRamachandran, A.Gagliardino, Juan Josediabetesinsulin treatmentpatient barriershttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Aim: To assess diabetes treatment preferences with a focus on patient barriers to insulin treatment. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire using indirect and direct methods was administered as part of the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS). Discrete choice modelling was used to assess how product attributes influence patients' preferences for diabetes treatment. A multinomial logit model was used to find the odds ratio for each parameter, representing the probability of selecting a chosen alternative given a choice set. This allowed for the derivation of relative attribute importance, an indication of how influential product attributes are in the respondents' choices. Results: The IDMPS questionnaire was administered to 14,033 individuals with diabetes in 18 countries. The majority of respondents were women (53%) and had Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; 85%). Across subgroups, administration (i.e. oral vs. injection) was a driver of preference. Patient preferences varied according to diabetes type; individuals with T2DM assigned much higher relative importance to administration than those with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM; 30.86% vs. 4.99%; p < 0.0001). Individuals with T2DM treated with insulin placed less importance on administration than insulin-naïve T2DM patients (3.09% vs. 47.48%; p < 0.0001). Diabetes education also had a significant effect on the priority given to administration between T2DM patients who received diabetes training and those who did not (28.21% vs. 33.68%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: The insulin barriers perceived by patients with diabetes evolved with their disease experience. While administration was the primary preference driver for insulin-naïve patients, patients were increasingly concerned with more clinically relevant barriers as they gained experience with insulin. This finding suggests that patients using insulin understand the importance of achieving an optimal balance between safety and efficacy.Fil: Casciano, R.. Analytica International; Estados UnidosFil: Malangone, Elisabetta. Analytica International; Estados UnidosFil: Ramachandran, A.. Dr. A. Ramachandran’s Diabetes Hospitals; IndiaFil: Gagliardino, Juan Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico La Plata. Centro de Endocrinología Experimental y Aplicada (i); ArgentinaWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2011-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/96673Casciano, R.; Malangone, Elisabetta; Ramachandran, A.; Gagliardino, Juan Jose; A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; International Journal of Clinical Practice; 65; 4; 4-2011; 408-4141742-12411368-5031CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02590.xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1742info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:01:44Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/96673instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:01:45.145CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin |
title |
A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin |
spellingShingle |
A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin Casciano, R. diabetes insulin treatment patient barriers |
title_short |
A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin |
title_full |
A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin |
title_fullStr |
A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin |
title_full_unstemmed |
A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin |
title_sort |
A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Casciano, R. Malangone, Elisabetta Ramachandran, A. Gagliardino, Juan Jose |
author |
Casciano, R. |
author_facet |
Casciano, R. Malangone, Elisabetta Ramachandran, A. Gagliardino, Juan Jose |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Malangone, Elisabetta Ramachandran, A. Gagliardino, Juan Jose |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
diabetes insulin treatment patient barriers |
topic |
diabetes insulin treatment patient barriers |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Aim: To assess diabetes treatment preferences with a focus on patient barriers to insulin treatment. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire using indirect and direct methods was administered as part of the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS). Discrete choice modelling was used to assess how product attributes influence patients' preferences for diabetes treatment. A multinomial logit model was used to find the odds ratio for each parameter, representing the probability of selecting a chosen alternative given a choice set. This allowed for the derivation of relative attribute importance, an indication of how influential product attributes are in the respondents' choices. Results: The IDMPS questionnaire was administered to 14,033 individuals with diabetes in 18 countries. The majority of respondents were women (53%) and had Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; 85%). Across subgroups, administration (i.e. oral vs. injection) was a driver of preference. Patient preferences varied according to diabetes type; individuals with T2DM assigned much higher relative importance to administration than those with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM; 30.86% vs. 4.99%; p < 0.0001). Individuals with T2DM treated with insulin placed less importance on administration than insulin-naïve T2DM patients (3.09% vs. 47.48%; p < 0.0001). Diabetes education also had a significant effect on the priority given to administration between T2DM patients who received diabetes training and those who did not (28.21% vs. 33.68%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: The insulin barriers perceived by patients with diabetes evolved with their disease experience. While administration was the primary preference driver for insulin-naïve patients, patients were increasingly concerned with more clinically relevant barriers as they gained experience with insulin. This finding suggests that patients using insulin understand the importance of achieving an optimal balance between safety and efficacy. Fil: Casciano, R.. Analytica International; Estados Unidos Fil: Malangone, Elisabetta. Analytica International; Estados Unidos Fil: Ramachandran, A.. Dr. A. Ramachandran’s Diabetes Hospitals; India Fil: Gagliardino, Juan Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico La Plata. Centro de Endocrinología Experimental y Aplicada (i); Argentina |
description |
Aim: To assess diabetes treatment preferences with a focus on patient barriers to insulin treatment. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire using indirect and direct methods was administered as part of the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS). Discrete choice modelling was used to assess how product attributes influence patients' preferences for diabetes treatment. A multinomial logit model was used to find the odds ratio for each parameter, representing the probability of selecting a chosen alternative given a choice set. This allowed for the derivation of relative attribute importance, an indication of how influential product attributes are in the respondents' choices. Results: The IDMPS questionnaire was administered to 14,033 individuals with diabetes in 18 countries. The majority of respondents were women (53%) and had Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; 85%). Across subgroups, administration (i.e. oral vs. injection) was a driver of preference. Patient preferences varied according to diabetes type; individuals with T2DM assigned much higher relative importance to administration than those with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM; 30.86% vs. 4.99%; p < 0.0001). Individuals with T2DM treated with insulin placed less importance on administration than insulin-naïve T2DM patients (3.09% vs. 47.48%; p < 0.0001). Diabetes education also had a significant effect on the priority given to administration between T2DM patients who received diabetes training and those who did not (28.21% vs. 33.68%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: The insulin barriers perceived by patients with diabetes evolved with their disease experience. While administration was the primary preference driver for insulin-naïve patients, patients were increasingly concerned with more clinically relevant barriers as they gained experience with insulin. This finding suggests that patients using insulin understand the importance of achieving an optimal balance between safety and efficacy. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-04 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/96673 Casciano, R.; Malangone, Elisabetta; Ramachandran, A.; Gagliardino, Juan Jose; A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; International Journal of Clinical Practice; 65; 4; 4-2011; 408-414 1742-1241 1368-5031 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/96673 |
identifier_str_mv |
Casciano, R.; Malangone, Elisabetta; Ramachandran, A.; Gagliardino, Juan Jose; A quantitative assessment of patient barriers to insulin; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; International Journal of Clinical Practice; 65; 4; 4-2011; 408-414 1742-1241 1368-5031 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02590.x info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1742 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269714816958464 |
score |
13.13397 |