Comparing voting by committees according to their manipulability
- Autores
- Arribillaga, Roberto Pablo; Jordi, Massó Carreras
- Año de publicación
- 2017
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- We consider the class of voting by committees to be used by a society to collectively choose a subset from a given set of objects. We offer a simple criterion to compare two voting by committees without dummy agents according to their manipulability. This criterion is based on the set- inclusion relationships between the two corresponding pairs of sets of objects, those at which each agent is decisive and those at which each agent is vetoer. We show that the binary relation "to be as manipulable as" endows the set of equivalence classes of anonymous voting by committees (i.e., voting by quotas) with a complete upper semilattice structure, whose supremum is the equivalence class containing all voting by quotas with the property that the quota of each object is strictly larger than one and strictly lower than the number of agents. Finally, we extend the comparability criterion to the full class of all voting by committees.
Fil: Arribillaga, Roberto Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis ; Argentina
Fil: Jordi, Massó Carreras. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; España - Materia
-
STRATEGY-PROOFNESS
SEPARABLE PREFERENCES
VOTING BY COMMITTEES - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/65497
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_1a39e9348319615bcdb697d651d80caa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/65497 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Comparing voting by committees according to their manipulabilityArribillaga, Roberto PabloJordi, Massó CarrerasSTRATEGY-PROOFNESSSEPARABLE PREFERENCESVOTING BY COMMITTEEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5We consider the class of voting by committees to be used by a society to collectively choose a subset from a given set of objects. We offer a simple criterion to compare two voting by committees without dummy agents according to their manipulability. This criterion is based on the set- inclusion relationships between the two corresponding pairs of sets of objects, those at which each agent is decisive and those at which each agent is vetoer. We show that the binary relation "to be as manipulable as" endows the set of equivalence classes of anonymous voting by committees (i.e., voting by quotas) with a complete upper semilattice structure, whose supremum is the equivalence class containing all voting by quotas with the property that the quota of each object is strictly larger than one and strictly lower than the number of agents. Finally, we extend the comparability criterion to the full class of all voting by committees.Fil: Arribillaga, Roberto Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis ; ArgentinaFil: Jordi, Massó Carreras. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; EspañaAmerican Economic Association2017-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/65497Arribillaga, Roberto Pablo; Jordi, Massó Carreras; Comparing voting by committees according to their manipulability; American Economic Association; American Economic Journal: Microeconomics; 9; 4; 11-2017; 74-1071945-7685CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1257/mic.20160107info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/mic.20160107info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:20:03Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/65497instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:20:03.804CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparing voting by committees according to their manipulability |
title |
Comparing voting by committees according to their manipulability |
spellingShingle |
Comparing voting by committees according to their manipulability Arribillaga, Roberto Pablo STRATEGY-PROOFNESS SEPARABLE PREFERENCES VOTING BY COMMITTEES |
title_short |
Comparing voting by committees according to their manipulability |
title_full |
Comparing voting by committees according to their manipulability |
title_fullStr |
Comparing voting by committees according to their manipulability |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing voting by committees according to their manipulability |
title_sort |
Comparing voting by committees according to their manipulability |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Arribillaga, Roberto Pablo Jordi, Massó Carreras |
author |
Arribillaga, Roberto Pablo |
author_facet |
Arribillaga, Roberto Pablo Jordi, Massó Carreras |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Jordi, Massó Carreras |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
STRATEGY-PROOFNESS SEPARABLE PREFERENCES VOTING BY COMMITTEES |
topic |
STRATEGY-PROOFNESS SEPARABLE PREFERENCES VOTING BY COMMITTEES |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
We consider the class of voting by committees to be used by a society to collectively choose a subset from a given set of objects. We offer a simple criterion to compare two voting by committees without dummy agents according to their manipulability. This criterion is based on the set- inclusion relationships between the two corresponding pairs of sets of objects, those at which each agent is decisive and those at which each agent is vetoer. We show that the binary relation "to be as manipulable as" endows the set of equivalence classes of anonymous voting by committees (i.e., voting by quotas) with a complete upper semilattice structure, whose supremum is the equivalence class containing all voting by quotas with the property that the quota of each object is strictly larger than one and strictly lower than the number of agents. Finally, we extend the comparability criterion to the full class of all voting by committees. Fil: Arribillaga, Roberto Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis ; Argentina Fil: Jordi, Massó Carreras. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; España |
description |
We consider the class of voting by committees to be used by a society to collectively choose a subset from a given set of objects. We offer a simple criterion to compare two voting by committees without dummy agents according to their manipulability. This criterion is based on the set- inclusion relationships between the two corresponding pairs of sets of objects, those at which each agent is decisive and those at which each agent is vetoer. We show that the binary relation "to be as manipulable as" endows the set of equivalence classes of anonymous voting by committees (i.e., voting by quotas) with a complete upper semilattice structure, whose supremum is the equivalence class containing all voting by quotas with the property that the quota of each object is strictly larger than one and strictly lower than the number of agents. Finally, we extend the comparability criterion to the full class of all voting by committees. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-11 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/65497 Arribillaga, Roberto Pablo; Jordi, Massó Carreras; Comparing voting by committees according to their manipulability; American Economic Association; American Economic Journal: Microeconomics; 9; 4; 11-2017; 74-107 1945-7685 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/65497 |
identifier_str_mv |
Arribillaga, Roberto Pablo; Jordi, Massó Carreras; Comparing voting by committees according to their manipulability; American Economic Association; American Economic Journal: Microeconomics; 9; 4; 11-2017; 74-107 1945-7685 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1257/mic.20160107 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/mic.20160107 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Economic Association |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Economic Association |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614177326366720 |
score |
13.070432 |