Robust Evaluation of Attribution Maps with Morphology-Based Framework for Reliable Interpretability in Vision Models
- Autores
- Stanchi, Oscar Agustín; Ronchetti, Franco; Quiroga, Facundo Manuel; Dal Bianco, Pedro Alejandro; Hasperué, Waldo; Rashwan, Hatem; Puig, Domènec
- Año de publicación
- 2025
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Deep neural networks have achieved remarkable performance across computer vision tasks, but their opaque decision-making processes remain a significant barrier to trustworthy deployment in high-stakes domains. Attribution methods are a widely used approach in computer vision to generate importance maps to explain model behavior. However, to choose among the many attribution methods, researchers and practitioners typically choose methods in a subjective fashion, cherry picking results and lacking a robust evaluatuion of their performance. To address this critical gap, we introduce a morphology-based framework for rigorous assessment of attribution map robustness. Our approach establishes axiomatic safeguards against trivial explanation strategies and implements two complementary metrics: 1) Morph Erosion Score (MES), measuring preservation of critical features under morphological erosion; and 2) Least Important First (LIF) Score, evaluating tolerance to removal of unimportant pixels. Through comprehensive experiments on 1,143 ImageNet-1K images using ResNet-101, we demonstrate that our approach reveals previously obscured method characteristics: CB-RISE dominates spatial coherence (MES: 0.641), while Occlusion excels in importance ranking (LIF: 0.681). Crucially, trivial strategies fail catastrophically (LIF AUC ≤ 0.001), validating our axioms. By exposing inherent tradeoffs between attribution properties, our methodology provides actionable insights for selecting context-appropriate interpretability methods and advances progress toward certified-explainable vision systems.
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática
Instituto de Investigación en Informática - Materia
-
Ciencias Informáticas
Attribution
Computer Vision
Deep Learning
Feature Importance
Morphological Operations
Interpretability
Quantitative Metrics - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/191363
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
SEDICI_a247c9691555f2272890ebb92a0cec35 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/191363 |
| network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
| repository_id_str |
1329 |
| network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
| spelling |
Robust Evaluation of Attribution Maps with Morphology-Based Framework for Reliable Interpretability in Vision ModelsStanchi, Oscar AgustínRonchetti, FrancoQuiroga, Facundo ManuelDal Bianco, Pedro AlejandroHasperué, WaldoRashwan, HatemPuig, DomènecCiencias InformáticasAttributionComputer VisionDeep LearningFeature ImportanceMorphological OperationsInterpretabilityQuantitative MetricsDeep neural networks have achieved remarkable performance across computer vision tasks, but their opaque decision-making processes remain a significant barrier to trustworthy deployment in high-stakes domains. Attribution methods are a widely used approach in computer vision to generate importance maps to explain model behavior. However, to choose among the many attribution methods, researchers and practitioners typically choose methods in a subjective fashion, cherry picking results and lacking a robust evaluatuion of their performance. To address this critical gap, we introduce a morphology-based framework for rigorous assessment of attribution map robustness. Our approach establishes axiomatic safeguards against trivial explanation strategies and implements two complementary metrics: 1) Morph Erosion Score (MES), measuring preservation of critical features under morphological erosion; and 2) Least Important First (LIF) Score, evaluating tolerance to removal of unimportant pixels. Through comprehensive experiments on 1,143 ImageNet-1K images using ResNet-101, we demonstrate that our approach reveals previously obscured method characteristics: CB-RISE dominates spatial coherence (MES: 0.641), while Occlusion excels in importance ranking (LIF: 0.681). Crucially, trivial strategies fail catastrophically (LIF AUC ≤ 0.001), validating our axioms. By exposing inherent tradeoffs between attribution properties, our methodology provides actionable insights for selecting context-appropriate interpretability methods and advances progress toward certified-explainable vision systems.Red de Universidades con Carreras en InformáticaInstituto de Investigación en Informática2025-10info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdf155-164http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/191363enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/978-987-8258-99-7info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/hdl/10915/189846info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2026-05-27T11:46:59Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/191363Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292026-05-27 11:46:59.513SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Robust Evaluation of Attribution Maps with Morphology-Based Framework for Reliable Interpretability in Vision Models |
| title |
Robust Evaluation of Attribution Maps with Morphology-Based Framework for Reliable Interpretability in Vision Models |
| spellingShingle |
Robust Evaluation of Attribution Maps with Morphology-Based Framework for Reliable Interpretability in Vision Models Stanchi, Oscar Agustín Ciencias Informáticas Attribution Computer Vision Deep Learning Feature Importance Morphological Operations Interpretability Quantitative Metrics |
| title_short |
Robust Evaluation of Attribution Maps with Morphology-Based Framework for Reliable Interpretability in Vision Models |
| title_full |
Robust Evaluation of Attribution Maps with Morphology-Based Framework for Reliable Interpretability in Vision Models |
| title_fullStr |
Robust Evaluation of Attribution Maps with Morphology-Based Framework for Reliable Interpretability in Vision Models |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Robust Evaluation of Attribution Maps with Morphology-Based Framework for Reliable Interpretability in Vision Models |
| title_sort |
Robust Evaluation of Attribution Maps with Morphology-Based Framework for Reliable Interpretability in Vision Models |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Stanchi, Oscar Agustín Ronchetti, Franco Quiroga, Facundo Manuel Dal Bianco, Pedro Alejandro Hasperué, Waldo Rashwan, Hatem Puig, Domènec |
| author |
Stanchi, Oscar Agustín |
| author_facet |
Stanchi, Oscar Agustín Ronchetti, Franco Quiroga, Facundo Manuel Dal Bianco, Pedro Alejandro Hasperué, Waldo Rashwan, Hatem Puig, Domènec |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Ronchetti, Franco Quiroga, Facundo Manuel Dal Bianco, Pedro Alejandro Hasperué, Waldo Rashwan, Hatem Puig, Domènec |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciencias Informáticas Attribution Computer Vision Deep Learning Feature Importance Morphological Operations Interpretability Quantitative Metrics |
| topic |
Ciencias Informáticas Attribution Computer Vision Deep Learning Feature Importance Morphological Operations Interpretability Quantitative Metrics |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Deep neural networks have achieved remarkable performance across computer vision tasks, but their opaque decision-making processes remain a significant barrier to trustworthy deployment in high-stakes domains. Attribution methods are a widely used approach in computer vision to generate importance maps to explain model behavior. However, to choose among the many attribution methods, researchers and practitioners typically choose methods in a subjective fashion, cherry picking results and lacking a robust evaluatuion of their performance. To address this critical gap, we introduce a morphology-based framework for rigorous assessment of attribution map robustness. Our approach establishes axiomatic safeguards against trivial explanation strategies and implements two complementary metrics: 1) Morph Erosion Score (MES), measuring preservation of critical features under morphological erosion; and 2) Least Important First (LIF) Score, evaluating tolerance to removal of unimportant pixels. Through comprehensive experiments on 1,143 ImageNet-1K images using ResNet-101, we demonstrate that our approach reveals previously obscured method characteristics: CB-RISE dominates spatial coherence (MES: 0.641), while Occlusion excels in importance ranking (LIF: 0.681). Crucially, trivial strategies fail catastrophically (LIF AUC ≤ 0.001), validating our axioms. By exposing inherent tradeoffs between attribution properties, our methodology provides actionable insights for selecting context-appropriate interpretability methods and advances progress toward certified-explainable vision systems. Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática Instituto de Investigación en Informática |
| description |
Deep neural networks have achieved remarkable performance across computer vision tasks, but their opaque decision-making processes remain a significant barrier to trustworthy deployment in high-stakes domains. Attribution methods are a widely used approach in computer vision to generate importance maps to explain model behavior. However, to choose among the many attribution methods, researchers and practitioners typically choose methods in a subjective fashion, cherry picking results and lacking a robust evaluatuion of their performance. To address this critical gap, we introduce a morphology-based framework for rigorous assessment of attribution map robustness. Our approach establishes axiomatic safeguards against trivial explanation strategies and implements two complementary metrics: 1) Morph Erosion Score (MES), measuring preservation of critical features under morphological erosion; and 2) Least Important First (LIF) Score, evaluating tolerance to removal of unimportant pixels. Through comprehensive experiments on 1,143 ImageNet-1K images using ResNet-101, we demonstrate that our approach reveals previously obscured method characteristics: CB-RISE dominates spatial coherence (MES: 0.641), while Occlusion excels in importance ranking (LIF: 0.681). Crucially, trivial strategies fail catastrophically (LIF AUC ≤ 0.001), validating our axioms. By exposing inherent tradeoffs between attribution properties, our methodology provides actionable insights for selecting context-appropriate interpretability methods and advances progress toward certified-explainable vision systems. |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-10 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Objeto de conferencia http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
| format |
conferenceObject |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/191363 |
| url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/191363 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/978-987-8258-99-7 info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/hdl/10915/189846 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf 155-164 |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
| reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
| collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
| instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
| instacron_str |
UNLP |
| institution |
UNLP |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
| _version_ |
1866372196801183744 |
| score |
13.468372 |