Teaching sound principles about invalidity
- Autores
- Oller, Carlos Alejandro
- Año de publicación
- 2011
- Idioma
- español castellano
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- One of the aims of introductory logic courses for humanities students is to help them understand the structure of, and the evaluation criteria for, natural language arguments. In order to show that symbolic logic can help students achieve this understanding the relationship between natural language arguments and formal language arguments has to be clearly, and correctly, elucidated. The notions of logical form and formal (in)validity, and their relation with the (in)validity of natural language arguments, are essential for this elucidation. The purpose of this paper is to show and explain the fact that, notwithstanding James W. Oliver and Gerald Massey's warnings concerning invalidity verdicts, wrong conceptions about logic-based methods for determining invalidity of natural language arguments have a residual existence in some presentday introductory logic textbooks.
Parte de la serie "Lecture Notes in Computer Science" (vol. 6680) y la sub-serie "Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence" (vol. 6680)
Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación - Materia
-
Filosofía
Humanidades
deductive invalidity
natural language argument
logical form
logic-based methods
argument evaluation - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/134049
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
SEDICI_871c8588835560a18bdac9ea0f79bf27 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/134049 |
| network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
| repository_id_str |
1329 |
| network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
| spelling |
Teaching sound principles about invalidityOller, Carlos AlejandroFilosofíaHumanidadesdeductive invaliditynatural language argumentlogical formlogic-based methodsargument evaluationOne of the aims of introductory logic courses for humanities students is to help them understand the structure of, and the evaluation criteria for, natural language arguments. In order to show that symbolic logic can help students achieve this understanding the relationship between natural language arguments and formal language arguments has to be clearly, and correctly, elucidated. The notions of logical form and formal (in)validity, and their relation with the (in)validity of natural language arguments, are essential for this elucidation. The purpose of this paper is to show and explain the fact that, notwithstanding James W. Oliver and Gerald Massey's warnings concerning invalidity verdicts, wrong conceptions about logic-based methods for determining invalidity of natural language arguments have a residual existence in some presentday introductory logic textbooks.Parte de la serie "Lecture Notes in Computer Science" (vol. 6680) y la sub-serie "Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence" (vol. 6680)Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la EducaciónBlackburn, Patrickvan Ditmarsch, HansManzano, MaríaSoler-Toscano, Fernando2011info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdf178-182http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/134049spainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/978-3-642-21350-2info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/978-3-642-21350-2_21info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-10-22T17:12:42Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/134049Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-10-22 17:12:42.73SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Teaching sound principles about invalidity |
| title |
Teaching sound principles about invalidity |
| spellingShingle |
Teaching sound principles about invalidity Oller, Carlos Alejandro Filosofía Humanidades deductive invalidity natural language argument logical form logic-based methods argument evaluation |
| title_short |
Teaching sound principles about invalidity |
| title_full |
Teaching sound principles about invalidity |
| title_fullStr |
Teaching sound principles about invalidity |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Teaching sound principles about invalidity |
| title_sort |
Teaching sound principles about invalidity |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Oller, Carlos Alejandro |
| author |
Oller, Carlos Alejandro |
| author_facet |
Oller, Carlos Alejandro |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Blackburn, Patrick van Ditmarsch, Hans Manzano, María Soler-Toscano, Fernando |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Filosofía Humanidades deductive invalidity natural language argument logical form logic-based methods argument evaluation |
| topic |
Filosofía Humanidades deductive invalidity natural language argument logical form logic-based methods argument evaluation |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
One of the aims of introductory logic courses for humanities students is to help them understand the structure of, and the evaluation criteria for, natural language arguments. In order to show that symbolic logic can help students achieve this understanding the relationship between natural language arguments and formal language arguments has to be clearly, and correctly, elucidated. The notions of logical form and formal (in)validity, and their relation with the (in)validity of natural language arguments, are essential for this elucidation. The purpose of this paper is to show and explain the fact that, notwithstanding James W. Oliver and Gerald Massey's warnings concerning invalidity verdicts, wrong conceptions about logic-based methods for determining invalidity of natural language arguments have a residual existence in some presentday introductory logic textbooks. Parte de la serie "Lecture Notes in Computer Science" (vol. 6680) y la sub-serie "Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence" (vol. 6680) Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación |
| description |
One of the aims of introductory logic courses for humanities students is to help them understand the structure of, and the evaluation criteria for, natural language arguments. In order to show that symbolic logic can help students achieve this understanding the relationship between natural language arguments and formal language arguments has to be clearly, and correctly, elucidated. The notions of logical form and formal (in)validity, and their relation with the (in)validity of natural language arguments, are essential for this elucidation. The purpose of this paper is to show and explain the fact that, notwithstanding James W. Oliver and Gerald Massey's warnings concerning invalidity verdicts, wrong conceptions about logic-based methods for determining invalidity of natural language arguments have a residual existence in some presentday introductory logic textbooks. |
| publishDate |
2011 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Objeto de conferencia http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
| format |
conferenceObject |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/134049 |
| url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/134049 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/978-3-642-21350-2 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/978-3-642-21350-2_21 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf 178-182 |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
| reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
| collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
| instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
| instacron_str |
UNLP |
| institution |
UNLP |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
| _version_ |
1846783490365849600 |
| score |
12.982451 |