Teaching sound principles about invalidity
- Autores
- Oller, Carlos A.
- Año de publicación
- 2011
- Idioma
- español castellano
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- One of the aims of introductory logic courses for humanities students is to help them understand the structure of, and the evaluation criteria for, natural language arguments. In order to show that symbolic logic can help students achieve this understanding the relationship between natural language arguments and formal language arguments has to be clearly, and correctly, elucidated. The notions of logical form and formal (in)validity, and their relation with the (in)validity of natural language arguments, are essential for this elucidation. The purpose of this paper is to show and explain the fact that, notwithstanding James W. Oliver and Gerald Massey's warnings concerning invalidity verdicts, wrong conceptions about logic-based methods for determining invalidity of natural language arguments have a residual existence in some presentday introductory logic textbooks.
Fil: Oller, Carlos A.. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación; Argentina. - Fuente
- Third International Congress on Tools for Teaching Logic; Salamanca, España, 1-4 de junio de 2011
- Materia
-
Filosofía
Deductive invalidity
Natural language argument
Logical form
Logic-based methods
Argument evaluation - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
- OAI Identificador
- oai:memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar:snrd:Jev15347
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
MemAca_4e266c335f9239a4681093a6b9af13d9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar:snrd:Jev15347 |
network_acronym_str |
MemAca |
repository_id_str |
1341 |
network_name_str |
Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE) |
spelling |
Teaching sound principles about invalidityOller, Carlos A.FilosofíaDeductive invalidityNatural language argumentLogical formLogic-based methodsArgument evaluationOne of the aims of introductory logic courses for humanities students is to help them understand the structure of, and the evaluation criteria for, natural language arguments. In order to show that symbolic logic can help students achieve this understanding the relationship between natural language arguments and formal language arguments has to be clearly, and correctly, elucidated. The notions of logical form and formal (in)validity, and their relation with the (in)validity of natural language arguments, are essential for this elucidation. The purpose of this paper is to show and explain the fact that, notwithstanding James W. Oliver and Gerald Massey's warnings concerning invalidity verdicts, wrong conceptions about logic-based methods for determining invalidity of natural language arguments have a residual existence in some presentday introductory logic textbooks.Fil: Oller, Carlos A.. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación; Argentina.2011info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttps://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/trab_eventos/ev.15347/ev.15347.pdfThird International Congress on Tools for Teaching Logic; Salamanca, España, 1-4 de junio de 2011reponame:Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educacióninstacron:UNLPspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/10915/134049info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/2025-09-29T11:54:56Zoai:memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar:snrd:Jev15347Institucionalhttps://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicahttps://www.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/oaiserver.cgimemoria@fahce.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13412025-09-29 11:54:57.502Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educaciónfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Teaching sound principles about invalidity |
title |
Teaching sound principles about invalidity |
spellingShingle |
Teaching sound principles about invalidity Oller, Carlos A. Filosofía Deductive invalidity Natural language argument Logical form Logic-based methods Argument evaluation |
title_short |
Teaching sound principles about invalidity |
title_full |
Teaching sound principles about invalidity |
title_fullStr |
Teaching sound principles about invalidity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Teaching sound principles about invalidity |
title_sort |
Teaching sound principles about invalidity |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Oller, Carlos A. |
author |
Oller, Carlos A. |
author_facet |
Oller, Carlos A. |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Filosofía Deductive invalidity Natural language argument Logical form Logic-based methods Argument evaluation |
topic |
Filosofía Deductive invalidity Natural language argument Logical form Logic-based methods Argument evaluation |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
One of the aims of introductory logic courses for humanities students is to help them understand the structure of, and the evaluation criteria for, natural language arguments. In order to show that symbolic logic can help students achieve this understanding the relationship between natural language arguments and formal language arguments has to be clearly, and correctly, elucidated. The notions of logical form and formal (in)validity, and their relation with the (in)validity of natural language arguments, are essential for this elucidation. The purpose of this paper is to show and explain the fact that, notwithstanding James W. Oliver and Gerald Massey's warnings concerning invalidity verdicts, wrong conceptions about logic-based methods for determining invalidity of natural language arguments have a residual existence in some presentday introductory logic textbooks. Fil: Oller, Carlos A.. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación; Argentina. |
description |
One of the aims of introductory logic courses for humanities students is to help them understand the structure of, and the evaluation criteria for, natural language arguments. In order to show that symbolic logic can help students achieve this understanding the relationship between natural language arguments and formal language arguments has to be clearly, and correctly, elucidated. The notions of logical form and formal (in)validity, and their relation with the (in)validity of natural language arguments, are essential for this elucidation. The purpose of this paper is to show and explain the fact that, notwithstanding James W. Oliver and Gerald Massey's warnings concerning invalidity verdicts, wrong conceptions about logic-based methods for determining invalidity of natural language arguments have a residual existence in some presentday introductory logic textbooks. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/trab_eventos/ev.15347/ev.15347.pdf |
url |
https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/trab_eventos/ev.15347/ev.15347.pdf |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/10915/134049 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Third International Congress on Tools for Teaching Logic; Salamanca, España, 1-4 de junio de 2011 reponame:Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación instacron:UNLP |
reponame_str |
Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE) |
collection |
Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE) |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación |
instacron_str |
UNLP |
institution |
UNLP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
memoria@fahce.unlp.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1844616498162696192 |
score |
13.070432 |