Teaching sound principles about invalidity

Autores
Oller, Carlos A.
Año de publicación
2011
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
One of the aims of introductory logic courses for humanities students is to help them understand the structure of, and the evaluation criteria for, natural language arguments. In order to show that symbolic logic can help students achieve this understanding the relationship between natural language arguments and formal language arguments has to be clearly, and correctly, elucidated. The notions of logical form and formal (in)validity, and their relation with the (in)validity of natural language arguments, are essential for this elucidation. The purpose of this paper is to show and explain the fact that, notwithstanding James W. Oliver and Gerald Massey's warnings concerning invalidity verdicts, wrong conceptions about logic-based methods for determining invalidity of natural language arguments have a residual existence in some presentday introductory logic textbooks.
Fil: Oller, Carlos A.. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación; Argentina.
Fuente
Third International Congress on Tools for Teaching Logic; Salamanca, España, 1-4 de junio de 2011
Materia
Filosofía
Deductive invalidity
Natural language argument
Logical form
Logic-based methods
Argument evaluation
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Repositorio
Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
OAI Identificador
oai:memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar:snrd:Jev15347
Acceder
id MemAca_4e266c335f9239a4681093a6b9af13d9
oai_identifier_str oai:memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar:snrd:Jev15347
network_acronym_str MemAca
repository_id_str 1341
network_name_str Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)
spelling Teaching sound principles about invalidityOller, Carlos A.FilosofíaDeductive invalidityNatural language argumentLogical formLogic-based methodsArgument evaluationOne of the aims of introductory logic courses for humanities students is to help them understand the structure of, and the evaluation criteria for, natural language arguments. In order to show that symbolic logic can help students achieve this understanding the relationship between natural language arguments and formal language arguments has to be clearly, and correctly, elucidated. The notions of logical form and formal (in)validity, and their relation with the (in)validity of natural language arguments, are essential for this elucidation. The purpose of this paper is to show and explain the fact that, notwithstanding James W. Oliver and Gerald Massey's warnings concerning invalidity verdicts, wrong conceptions about logic-based methods for determining invalidity of natural language arguments have a residual existence in some presentday introductory logic textbooks.Fil: Oller, Carlos A.. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación; Argentina.2011info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttps://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/trab_eventos/ev.15347/ev.15347.pdfThird International Congress on Tools for Teaching Logic; Salamanca, España, 1-4 de junio de 2011reponame:Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educacióninstacron:UNLPspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/10915/134049info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/2025-10-16T09:28:46Zoai:memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar:snrd:Jev15347Institucionalhttps://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicahttps://www.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/oaiserver.cgimemoria@fahce.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13412025-10-16 09:28:46.997Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educaciónfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Teaching sound principles about invalidity
title Teaching sound principles about invalidity
spellingShingle Teaching sound principles about invalidity
Oller, Carlos A.
Filosofía
Deductive invalidity
Natural language argument
Logical form
Logic-based methods
Argument evaluation
title_short Teaching sound principles about invalidity
title_full Teaching sound principles about invalidity
title_fullStr Teaching sound principles about invalidity
title_full_unstemmed Teaching sound principles about invalidity
title_sort Teaching sound principles about invalidity
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Oller, Carlos A.
author Oller, Carlos A.
author_facet Oller, Carlos A.
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Filosofía
Deductive invalidity
Natural language argument
Logical form
Logic-based methods
Argument evaluation
topic Filosofía
Deductive invalidity
Natural language argument
Logical form
Logic-based methods
Argument evaluation
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv One of the aims of introductory logic courses for humanities students is to help them understand the structure of, and the evaluation criteria for, natural language arguments. In order to show that symbolic logic can help students achieve this understanding the relationship between natural language arguments and formal language arguments has to be clearly, and correctly, elucidated. The notions of logical form and formal (in)validity, and their relation with the (in)validity of natural language arguments, are essential for this elucidation. The purpose of this paper is to show and explain the fact that, notwithstanding James W. Oliver and Gerald Massey's warnings concerning invalidity verdicts, wrong conceptions about logic-based methods for determining invalidity of natural language arguments have a residual existence in some presentday introductory logic textbooks.
Fil: Oller, Carlos A.. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación; Argentina.
description One of the aims of introductory logic courses for humanities students is to help them understand the structure of, and the evaluation criteria for, natural language arguments. In order to show that symbolic logic can help students achieve this understanding the relationship between natural language arguments and formal language arguments has to be clearly, and correctly, elucidated. The notions of logical form and formal (in)validity, and their relation with the (in)validity of natural language arguments, are essential for this elucidation. The purpose of this paper is to show and explain the fact that, notwithstanding James W. Oliver and Gerald Massey's warnings concerning invalidity verdicts, wrong conceptions about logic-based methods for determining invalidity of natural language arguments have a residual existence in some presentday introductory logic textbooks.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/trab_eventos/ev.15347/ev.15347.pdf
url https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/trab_eventos/ev.15347/ev.15347.pdf
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/10915/134049
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Third International Congress on Tools for Teaching Logic; Salamanca, España, 1-4 de junio de 2011
reponame:Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)
collection Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Memoria Académica (UNLP-FAHCE) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación
repository.mail.fl_str_mv memoria@fahce.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1846143183999729664
score 12.982451

Publicaciones similares