Comercio internacional, industrialización y desarrollo económico

Autores
Domínguez, Loreto M.
Año de publicación
1958
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The classical and neo-classical theories of international trade are subject to critical analysis. Thus it is shown that policy recommendations based on such theories are not justified because rigidities in the economic systems would prevent many countries from attaining the degree of diversification which according to theory should follow under free trade conditions. Specialization along primary producing lines is desirable only if it assures countries adopting it, full employment of human resources or, at least, an equitable share of world income-conditions attained only under exceptional and transitory circumstances. It follows that beyond certain point further economic progress in such countries requires industrialization and protection. This part of the study supplies a logical and theoretical justification for policies which most underdeveloped countries have already adopted against the recommendations of many orthodox economists. A statistical section shows that certain well known empirical generalizations abput the development of international trade following industrialization are not valid. International trade appears as a prerequisite of industrialization rather than its result or by product. The historical expansion in the trade of the older industrial countries is only an index of their success in obtaining access to resources without which industrialization would not have been possible. Also the common belief that trade somehow will increase whenever a country industrializes –or attempts- is unwarranted and proven by the fact that the reciprocal trade of the older industrial nations has tended to decline, both in absolute and relative terms, while their trade with primary producing countries has steadily expanded. The role of international trade in economic growth is then re appraised. Trade is shown to be an essential part of industrialization as its effects is that of supplementing domestic resources and making diversification possible. Since most countries have unbalanced bases of natural resources, their industrialization is dependent on attaining minimum levels of international trade. This conclusion is important for underdeveloped countries bent on industrializing, Economic integration with countries having complementary resources is shown to be the answer whenever the trade prospects of a country indicate that industrialization may be infeasible
Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas
Materia
Ciencias Económicas
Teoría del comercio internacional
Comercio internacional
Crecimiento económico
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/8893

id SEDICI_355e2258a791be7fb44aa858e724f0b8
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/8893
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Comercio internacional, industrialización y desarrollo económicoDomínguez, Loreto M.Ciencias EconómicasTeoría del comercio internacionalComercio internacionalCrecimiento económicoThe classical and neo-classical theories of international trade are subject to critical analysis. Thus it is shown that policy recommendations based on such theories are not justified because rigidities in the economic systems would prevent many countries from attaining the degree of diversification which according to theory should follow under free trade conditions. Specialization along primary producing lines is desirable only if it assures countries adopting it, full employment of human resources or, at least, an equitable share of world income-conditions attained only under exceptional and transitory circumstances. It follows that beyond certain point further economic progress in such countries requires industrialization and protection. This part of the study supplies a logical and theoretical justification for policies which most underdeveloped countries have already adopted against the recommendations of many orthodox economists. A statistical section shows that certain well known empirical generalizations abput the development of international trade following industrialization are not valid. International trade appears as a prerequisite of industrialization rather than its result or by product. The historical expansion in the trade of the older industrial countries is only an index of their success in obtaining access to resources without which industrialization would not have been possible. Also the common belief that trade somehow will increase whenever a country industrializes –or attempts- is unwarranted and proven by the fact that the reciprocal trade of the older industrial nations has tended to decline, both in absolute and relative terms, while their trade with primary producing countries has steadily expanded. The role of international trade in economic growth is then re appraised. Trade is shown to be an essential part of industrialization as its effects is that of supplementing domestic resources and making diversification possible. Since most countries have unbalanced bases of natural resources, their industrialization is dependent on attaining minimum levels of international trade. This conclusion is important for underdeveloped countries bent on industrializing, Economic integration with countries having complementary resources is shown to be the answer whenever the trade prospects of a country indicate that industrialization may be infeasibleInstituto de Investigaciones Económicas1958-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdf3-102http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/8893spainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1852-1649info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-10T11:53:49Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/8893Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-10 11:53:49.775SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comercio internacional, industrialización y desarrollo económico
title Comercio internacional, industrialización y desarrollo económico
spellingShingle Comercio internacional, industrialización y desarrollo económico
Domínguez, Loreto M.
Ciencias Económicas
Teoría del comercio internacional
Comercio internacional
Crecimiento económico
title_short Comercio internacional, industrialización y desarrollo económico
title_full Comercio internacional, industrialización y desarrollo económico
title_fullStr Comercio internacional, industrialización y desarrollo económico
title_full_unstemmed Comercio internacional, industrialización y desarrollo económico
title_sort Comercio internacional, industrialización y desarrollo económico
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Domínguez, Loreto M.
author Domínguez, Loreto M.
author_facet Domínguez, Loreto M.
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Económicas
Teoría del comercio internacional
Comercio internacional
Crecimiento económico
topic Ciencias Económicas
Teoría del comercio internacional
Comercio internacional
Crecimiento económico
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The classical and neo-classical theories of international trade are subject to critical analysis. Thus it is shown that policy recommendations based on such theories are not justified because rigidities in the economic systems would prevent many countries from attaining the degree of diversification which according to theory should follow under free trade conditions. Specialization along primary producing lines is desirable only if it assures countries adopting it, full employment of human resources or, at least, an equitable share of world income-conditions attained only under exceptional and transitory circumstances. It follows that beyond certain point further economic progress in such countries requires industrialization and protection. This part of the study supplies a logical and theoretical justification for policies which most underdeveloped countries have already adopted against the recommendations of many orthodox economists. A statistical section shows that certain well known empirical generalizations abput the development of international trade following industrialization are not valid. International trade appears as a prerequisite of industrialization rather than its result or by product. The historical expansion in the trade of the older industrial countries is only an index of their success in obtaining access to resources without which industrialization would not have been possible. Also the common belief that trade somehow will increase whenever a country industrializes –or attempts- is unwarranted and proven by the fact that the reciprocal trade of the older industrial nations has tended to decline, both in absolute and relative terms, while their trade with primary producing countries has steadily expanded. The role of international trade in economic growth is then re appraised. Trade is shown to be an essential part of industrialization as its effects is that of supplementing domestic resources and making diversification possible. Since most countries have unbalanced bases of natural resources, their industrialization is dependent on attaining minimum levels of international trade. This conclusion is important for underdeveloped countries bent on industrializing, Economic integration with countries having complementary resources is shown to be the answer whenever the trade prospects of a country indicate that industrialization may be infeasible
Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas
description The classical and neo-classical theories of international trade are subject to critical analysis. Thus it is shown that policy recommendations based on such theories are not justified because rigidities in the economic systems would prevent many countries from attaining the degree of diversification which according to theory should follow under free trade conditions. Specialization along primary producing lines is desirable only if it assures countries adopting it, full employment of human resources or, at least, an equitable share of world income-conditions attained only under exceptional and transitory circumstances. It follows that beyond certain point further economic progress in such countries requires industrialization and protection. This part of the study supplies a logical and theoretical justification for policies which most underdeveloped countries have already adopted against the recommendations of many orthodox economists. A statistical section shows that certain well known empirical generalizations abput the development of international trade following industrialization are not valid. International trade appears as a prerequisite of industrialization rather than its result or by product. The historical expansion in the trade of the older industrial countries is only an index of their success in obtaining access to resources without which industrialization would not have been possible. Also the common belief that trade somehow will increase whenever a country industrializes –or attempts- is unwarranted and proven by the fact that the reciprocal trade of the older industrial nations has tended to decline, both in absolute and relative terms, while their trade with primary producing countries has steadily expanded. The role of international trade in economic growth is then re appraised. Trade is shown to be an essential part of industrialization as its effects is that of supplementing domestic resources and making diversification possible. Since most countries have unbalanced bases of natural resources, their industrialization is dependent on attaining minimum levels of international trade. This conclusion is important for underdeveloped countries bent on industrializing, Economic integration with countries having complementary resources is shown to be the answer whenever the trade prospects of a country indicate that industrialization may be infeasible
publishDate 1958
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1958-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articulo
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/8893
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/8893
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1852-1649
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
3-102
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1842903686978732032
score 12.993085