The dynamic interface of bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology

Autores
Ubelaker, Douglas H.
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión aceptada
Descripción
The disciplines of bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology pursue somewhat different goals but they share considerable methodology and basic scientific information. Experience and research in each of these endeavors enhances the practice of the other. The symbiotic and dynamic relationship of these academic areas greatly improves the quality of the applications of each. The shared information impacts in positive ways all areas of both fields, but is especially important in several key components. Within bioarchaeology, information from forensic practice is vital to the proper interpretation of traumatic and other alterations, especially in the assessment of the timing (antemortem, perimortem, postmortem) of the event producing the alteration. Within forensic anthropology, data gleaned from the practice of bioarchaeology augment techniques of detection, recovery and assessment of the postmortem interval and taphonomic factors that may be involved. Currently, both fields are experiencing a surge in professional activity and student interest, as well as a rapid increase in published research, casework and technology. While the volume of available information presents challenges, practitioners in each field need to remain cognizant of professional activity and research results in the other.
Fil: Ubelaker, Douglas H. Smithsonian Institution; Estados Unidos.
Materia
Bioarqueología
Antropología forense
Trauma
Restos humanos
Taponomía
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
RIDAA (UNICEN)
Institución
Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires
OAI Identificador
oai:ridaa.unicen.edu.ar:123456789/1121

id RIDUNICEN_75c389dda75cbf5241bb18433672a999
oai_identifier_str oai:ridaa.unicen.edu.ar:123456789/1121
network_acronym_str RIDUNICEN
repository_id_str a
network_name_str RIDAA (UNICEN)
spelling The dynamic interface of bioarchaeology and forensic anthropologyUbelaker, Douglas H.BioarqueologíaAntropología forenseTraumaRestos humanosTaponomíaThe disciplines of bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology pursue somewhat different goals but they share considerable methodology and basic scientific information. Experience and research in each of these endeavors enhances the practice of the other. The symbiotic and dynamic relationship of these academic areas greatly improves the quality of the applications of each. The shared information impacts in positive ways all areas of both fields, but is especially important in several key components. Within bioarchaeology, information from forensic practice is vital to the proper interpretation of traumatic and other alterations, especially in the assessment of the timing (antemortem, perimortem, postmortem) of the event producing the alteration. Within forensic anthropology, data gleaned from the practice of bioarchaeology augment techniques of detection, recovery and assessment of the postmortem interval and taphonomic factors that may be involved. Currently, both fields are experiencing a surge in professional activity and student interest, as well as a rapid increase in published research, casework and technology. While the volume of available information presents challenges, practitioners in each field need to remain cognizant of professional activity and research results in the other.Fil: Ubelaker, Douglas H. Smithsonian Institution; Estados Unidos.Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales20162017-03-22T16:49:33Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://www.ridaa.unicen.edu.ar/xmlui/handle/123456789/1121https://www.ridaa.unicen.edu.ar/handle/123456789/1121eng1850-373Xhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:RIDAA (UNICEN)instname:Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires2025-10-16T09:28:39Zoai:ridaa.unicen.edu.ar:123456789/1121instacron:UNICENInstitucionalhttps://www.ridaa.unicen.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttps://www.ridaa.unicen.edu.ar/oailleiboff@rec.unicen.edu.ar;gimeroni@rec.unicen.edu.ar;lvarela@rec.unicen.edu.ar ;ArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:a2025-10-16 09:28:40.044RIDAA (UNICEN) - Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Airesfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The dynamic interface of bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology
title The dynamic interface of bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology
spellingShingle The dynamic interface of bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology
Ubelaker, Douglas H.
Bioarqueología
Antropología forense
Trauma
Restos humanos
Taponomía
title_short The dynamic interface of bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology
title_full The dynamic interface of bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology
title_fullStr The dynamic interface of bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology
title_full_unstemmed The dynamic interface of bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology
title_sort The dynamic interface of bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ubelaker, Douglas H.
author Ubelaker, Douglas H.
author_facet Ubelaker, Douglas H.
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Bioarqueología
Antropología forense
Trauma
Restos humanos
Taponomía
topic Bioarqueología
Antropología forense
Trauma
Restos humanos
Taponomía
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The disciplines of bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology pursue somewhat different goals but they share considerable methodology and basic scientific information. Experience and research in each of these endeavors enhances the practice of the other. The symbiotic and dynamic relationship of these academic areas greatly improves the quality of the applications of each. The shared information impacts in positive ways all areas of both fields, but is especially important in several key components. Within bioarchaeology, information from forensic practice is vital to the proper interpretation of traumatic and other alterations, especially in the assessment of the timing (antemortem, perimortem, postmortem) of the event producing the alteration. Within forensic anthropology, data gleaned from the practice of bioarchaeology augment techniques of detection, recovery and assessment of the postmortem interval and taphonomic factors that may be involved. Currently, both fields are experiencing a surge in professional activity and student interest, as well as a rapid increase in published research, casework and technology. While the volume of available information presents challenges, practitioners in each field need to remain cognizant of professional activity and research results in the other.
Fil: Ubelaker, Douglas H. Smithsonian Institution; Estados Unidos.
description The disciplines of bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology pursue somewhat different goals but they share considerable methodology and basic scientific information. Experience and research in each of these endeavors enhances the practice of the other. The symbiotic and dynamic relationship of these academic areas greatly improves the quality of the applications of each. The shared information impacts in positive ways all areas of both fields, but is especially important in several key components. Within bioarchaeology, information from forensic practice is vital to the proper interpretation of traumatic and other alterations, especially in the assessment of the timing (antemortem, perimortem, postmortem) of the event producing the alteration. Within forensic anthropology, data gleaned from the practice of bioarchaeology augment techniques of detection, recovery and assessment of the postmortem interval and taphonomic factors that may be involved. Currently, both fields are experiencing a surge in professional activity and student interest, as well as a rapid increase in published research, casework and technology. While the volume of available information presents challenges, practitioners in each field need to remain cognizant of professional activity and research results in the other.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
2017-03-22T16:49:33Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://www.ridaa.unicen.edu.ar/xmlui/handle/123456789/1121
https://www.ridaa.unicen.edu.ar/handle/123456789/1121
url http://www.ridaa.unicen.edu.ar/xmlui/handle/123456789/1121
https://www.ridaa.unicen.edu.ar/handle/123456789/1121
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1850-373X
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:RIDAA (UNICEN)
instname:Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires
reponame_str RIDAA (UNICEN)
collection RIDAA (UNICEN)
instname_str Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires
repository.name.fl_str_mv RIDAA (UNICEN) - Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires
repository.mail.fl_str_mv lleiboff@rec.unicen.edu.ar;gimeroni@rec.unicen.edu.ar;lvarela@rec.unicen.edu.ar ;
_version_ 1846143038051581952
score 12.712165