Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification
- Autores
- Bruneau, Anne; Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano; Ringelberg, Jens J.; Borges, Leonardo M.; Lopes da Costa Bortoluzzi, Roseli; Brown, Gillian K.; Cardoso, Domingos B. O. S.; Clark, Ruth P.; de Souza Conceição, Adilva; Martins Teixeira Cota, Matheus; Demeulenaere, Else; de Stefano, Rodrigo Duno; Ebinger, John E.; Fonseca-Cortés, Andrés; Grether, Rosaura; Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, Isau; Luckow, Melissa; Morales, Matias; Murphy, Daniel J.; Seigler, David S.
- Año de publicación
- 2024
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Caesalpinioideae is the second largest subfamily of legumes (Leguminosae) with ca. 4680 species and 163 genera. It is an ecologically and economically important group formed of mostly woody perennials that range from large canopy emergent trees to functionally herbaceous geoxyles, lianas and shrubs, and which has a global distribution, occurring on every continent except Antarctica. Following the recent re-circumscription of 15 Caesalpinioideae genera as presented in Advances in Legume Systematics 14, Part 1, and using as a basis a phylogenomic analysis of 997 nuclear gene sequences for 420 species and all but five of the genera currently recognised in the subfamily, we present a new higher-level classification for the subfamily. The new classification of Caesalpinioideae comprises eleven tribes, all of which are either new, reinstated or re-circumscribed at this rank: Caesalpinieae Rchb. (27 genera / ca. 223 species), Campsiandreae LPWG (2 / 5–22), Cassieae Bronn (7 / 695), Ceratonieae Rchb. (4 / 6), Dimorphandreae Benth. (4 / 35), Erythrophleeae LPWG (2 /13), Gleditsieae Nakai (3 / 20), Mimoseae Bronn (100 / ca. 3510), Pterogyneae LPWG (1 / 1), Schizolobieae Nakai (8 / 42–43), Sclerolobieae Benth. & Hook. f. (5 / ca. 113). Although many of these lineages have been recognised and named in the past, either as tribes or informal generic groups, their circumscriptions have varied widely and changed over the past decades, such that all the tribes described here differ in generic membership from those previously recognised. Importantly, the approximately 3500 species and 100 genera of the former subfamily Mimosoideae are now placed in the reinstated, but newly circumscribed, tribe Mimoseae. Because of the large size and ecological importance of the tribe, we also provide a clade-based classification system for Mimoseae that includes 17 named lower-level clades. Fourteen of the 100 Mimoseae genera remain unplaced in these lower-level clades: eight are resolved in two grades and six are phylogenetically isolated monogeneric lineages. In addition to the new classification, we provide a key to genera, morphological descriptions and notes for all 163 genera, all tribes, and all named clades. The diversity of growth forms, foliage, flowers and fruits are illustrated for all genera, and for each genus we also provide a distribution map, based on quality-controlled herbarium specimen localities. A glossary for specialised terms used in legume morphology is provided. This new phylogenetically based classification of Caesalpinioideae provides a solid system for communication and a framework for downstream analyses of biogeography, trait evolution and diversification, as well as for taxonomic revision of still understudied genera.
Instituto de Recursos Biológicos
Fil: Bruneau, Anne. Université de Montréal. Institut de recherche en biologie végétale and Département de Sciences biologiques; Canadá
Fil: Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano. Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana. Departamento de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil
Fil: Ringelberg, Jens J. University of Zurich. Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany; Suiza. University of Zurich. School of Geosciences, Suiza
Fil: Borges, Leonardo M. Universidade Federal de São Carlos. Departamento de Botânica; Brasil
Fil: Lopes da Costa Bortoluzzi, Roseli. Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina. Programa de Pós-graduação em Produção Vegetal; Brasil
Fil: Brown, Gillian K. Queensland Herbarium and Biodiversity Science. Department of Environment and Science; Australia
Fil: Cardozo, Domingos B. O. S. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Pesquisas, Río de Janeiro; Brasil. Universidade Federal de Bahia. Instituto de Biologia. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Evolução (PPGBioEvo); Brasil
Fil: Clark, Ruth P. Royal Botanic Gardens. Accelerated Taxonomy Department,; Reino Unido
Fil: de Souza Conceição, Adilva. Universidade do Estado da Bahia. Herbário HUNEB. Programa de Pós-graduação em Diversidade Vegetal; Brasil
Fil: Martins Teixeira Cota, Matheus. Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana. Departamento de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil
Fil: Demeulenaere, Else. University of Guam. UOG Station. Center for Island Sustainability and Sea Grant; Guam
Fil: de Stefano, Rodrigo Duno. Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán; México
Fil: Ebinger, John E. Eastern Illinois University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Fonseca-Cortés, Andrés. Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana. Departamento de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil
Fil: Grether, Rosaura. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa. Departamento de Biología; México
Fil: Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, Isau. Universidad Nacional Amazónica de Madre de Dios. Herbario Alwyn Gentry; Perú
Fil: Luckow, Melissa. Cornell University. School of Integrative Plant Science. Plant Biology Section; Estados Unidos
Fil: Morales, Matías. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Murphy, Daniel J. Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria; Australia
Fil: Seigler, David S. University of Illinois. Department of Plant Biology; Estados Unidos - Fuente
- Phytokeys 240 : 1-552 (2024)
- Materia
-
Species Diversity
Fabaceae
Mimosoideae
Taxonomy (Information Management)
Caesalpinioideae
Legumes
Diversidad de Especies
Taxonomía (Gestión de la Información)
Leguminosa - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/18457
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_def984c323666c6876fcb806a1b6fa64 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/18457 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classificationBruneau, AnnePaganucci de Queiroz, LucianoRingelberg, Jens J.Borges, Leonardo M.Lopes da Costa Bortoluzzi, RoseliBrown, Gillian K.Cardoso, Domingos B. O. S.Clark, Ruth P.de Souza Conceição, AdilvaMartins Teixeira Cota, MatheusDemeulenaere, Elsede Stefano, Rodrigo DunoEbinger, John E.Fonseca-Cortés, AndrésGrether, RosauraHuamantupa-Chuquimaco, IsauLuckow, MelissaMorales, MatiasMurphy, Daniel J.Seigler, David S.Species DiversityFabaceaeMimosoideaeTaxonomy (Information Management)CaesalpinioideaeLegumesDiversidad de EspeciesTaxonomía (Gestión de la Información)LeguminosaCaesalpinioideae is the second largest subfamily of legumes (Leguminosae) with ca. 4680 species and 163 genera. It is an ecologically and economically important group formed of mostly woody perennials that range from large canopy emergent trees to functionally herbaceous geoxyles, lianas and shrubs, and which has a global distribution, occurring on every continent except Antarctica. Following the recent re-circumscription of 15 Caesalpinioideae genera as presented in Advances in Legume Systematics 14, Part 1, and using as a basis a phylogenomic analysis of 997 nuclear gene sequences for 420 species and all but five of the genera currently recognised in the subfamily, we present a new higher-level classification for the subfamily. The new classification of Caesalpinioideae comprises eleven tribes, all of which are either new, reinstated or re-circumscribed at this rank: Caesalpinieae Rchb. (27 genera / ca. 223 species), Campsiandreae LPWG (2 / 5–22), Cassieae Bronn (7 / 695), Ceratonieae Rchb. (4 / 6), Dimorphandreae Benth. (4 / 35), Erythrophleeae LPWG (2 /13), Gleditsieae Nakai (3 / 20), Mimoseae Bronn (100 / ca. 3510), Pterogyneae LPWG (1 / 1), Schizolobieae Nakai (8 / 42–43), Sclerolobieae Benth. & Hook. f. (5 / ca. 113). Although many of these lineages have been recognised and named in the past, either as tribes or informal generic groups, their circumscriptions have varied widely and changed over the past decades, such that all the tribes described here differ in generic membership from those previously recognised. Importantly, the approximately 3500 species and 100 genera of the former subfamily Mimosoideae are now placed in the reinstated, but newly circumscribed, tribe Mimoseae. Because of the large size and ecological importance of the tribe, we also provide a clade-based classification system for Mimoseae that includes 17 named lower-level clades. Fourteen of the 100 Mimoseae genera remain unplaced in these lower-level clades: eight are resolved in two grades and six are phylogenetically isolated monogeneric lineages. In addition to the new classification, we provide a key to genera, morphological descriptions and notes for all 163 genera, all tribes, and all named clades. The diversity of growth forms, foliage, flowers and fruits are illustrated for all genera, and for each genus we also provide a distribution map, based on quality-controlled herbarium specimen localities. A glossary for specialised terms used in legume morphology is provided. This new phylogenetically based classification of Caesalpinioideae provides a solid system for communication and a framework for downstream analyses of biogeography, trait evolution and diversification, as well as for taxonomic revision of still understudied genera.Instituto de Recursos BiológicosFil: Bruneau, Anne. Université de Montréal. Institut de recherche en biologie végétale and Département de Sciences biologiques; CanadáFil: Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano. Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana. Departamento de Ciências Biológicas; BrasilFil: Ringelberg, Jens J. University of Zurich. Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany; Suiza. University of Zurich. School of Geosciences, SuizaFil: Borges, Leonardo M. Universidade Federal de São Carlos. Departamento de Botânica; BrasilFil: Lopes da Costa Bortoluzzi, Roseli. Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina. Programa de Pós-graduação em Produção Vegetal; BrasilFil: Brown, Gillian K. Queensland Herbarium and Biodiversity Science. Department of Environment and Science; AustraliaFil: Cardozo, Domingos B. O. S. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Pesquisas, Río de Janeiro; Brasil. Universidade Federal de Bahia. Instituto de Biologia. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Evolução (PPGBioEvo); BrasilFil: Clark, Ruth P. Royal Botanic Gardens. Accelerated Taxonomy Department,; Reino UnidoFil: de Souza Conceição, Adilva. Universidade do Estado da Bahia. Herbário HUNEB. Programa de Pós-graduação em Diversidade Vegetal; BrasilFil: Martins Teixeira Cota, Matheus. Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana. Departamento de Ciências Biológicas; BrasilFil: Demeulenaere, Else. University of Guam. UOG Station. Center for Island Sustainability and Sea Grant; GuamFil: de Stefano, Rodrigo Duno. Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán; MéxicoFil: Ebinger, John E. Eastern Illinois University; Estados UnidosFil: Fonseca-Cortés, Andrés. Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana. Departamento de Ciências Biológicas; BrasilFil: Grether, Rosaura. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa. Departamento de Biología; MéxicoFil: Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, Isau. Universidad Nacional Amazónica de Madre de Dios. Herbario Alwyn Gentry; PerúFil: Luckow, Melissa. Cornell University. School of Integrative Plant Science. Plant Biology Section; Estados UnidosFil: Morales, Matías. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Murphy, Daniel J. Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria; AustraliaFil: Seigler, David S. University of Illinois. Department of Plant Biology; Estados UnidosPensoft Publishers2024-07-11T10:02:32Z2024-07-11T10:02:32Z2024-04-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/18457https://phytokeys.pensoft.net/issue/4809/1314-2003 (online)1314-2011 (print)https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.240.101716Phytokeys 240 : 1-552 (2024)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-10-23T11:18:58Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/18457instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-23 11:18:58.603INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification |
title |
Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification |
spellingShingle |
Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification Bruneau, Anne Species Diversity Fabaceae Mimosoideae Taxonomy (Information Management) Caesalpinioideae Legumes Diversidad de Especies Taxonomía (Gestión de la Información) Leguminosa |
title_short |
Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification |
title_full |
Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification |
title_fullStr |
Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification |
title_full_unstemmed |
Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification |
title_sort |
Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Bruneau, Anne Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano Ringelberg, Jens J. Borges, Leonardo M. Lopes da Costa Bortoluzzi, Roseli Brown, Gillian K. Cardoso, Domingos B. O. S. Clark, Ruth P. de Souza Conceição, Adilva Martins Teixeira Cota, Matheus Demeulenaere, Else de Stefano, Rodrigo Duno Ebinger, John E. Fonseca-Cortés, Andrés Grether, Rosaura Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, Isau Luckow, Melissa Morales, Matias Murphy, Daniel J. Seigler, David S. |
author |
Bruneau, Anne |
author_facet |
Bruneau, Anne Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano Ringelberg, Jens J. Borges, Leonardo M. Lopes da Costa Bortoluzzi, Roseli Brown, Gillian K. Cardoso, Domingos B. O. S. Clark, Ruth P. de Souza Conceição, Adilva Martins Teixeira Cota, Matheus Demeulenaere, Else de Stefano, Rodrigo Duno Ebinger, John E. Fonseca-Cortés, Andrés Grether, Rosaura Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, Isau Luckow, Melissa Morales, Matias Murphy, Daniel J. Seigler, David S. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano Ringelberg, Jens J. Borges, Leonardo M. Lopes da Costa Bortoluzzi, Roseli Brown, Gillian K. Cardoso, Domingos B. O. S. Clark, Ruth P. de Souza Conceição, Adilva Martins Teixeira Cota, Matheus Demeulenaere, Else de Stefano, Rodrigo Duno Ebinger, John E. Fonseca-Cortés, Andrés Grether, Rosaura Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, Isau Luckow, Melissa Morales, Matias Murphy, Daniel J. Seigler, David S. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Species Diversity Fabaceae Mimosoideae Taxonomy (Information Management) Caesalpinioideae Legumes Diversidad de Especies Taxonomía (Gestión de la Información) Leguminosa |
topic |
Species Diversity Fabaceae Mimosoideae Taxonomy (Information Management) Caesalpinioideae Legumes Diversidad de Especies Taxonomía (Gestión de la Información) Leguminosa |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Caesalpinioideae is the second largest subfamily of legumes (Leguminosae) with ca. 4680 species and 163 genera. It is an ecologically and economically important group formed of mostly woody perennials that range from large canopy emergent trees to functionally herbaceous geoxyles, lianas and shrubs, and which has a global distribution, occurring on every continent except Antarctica. Following the recent re-circumscription of 15 Caesalpinioideae genera as presented in Advances in Legume Systematics 14, Part 1, and using as a basis a phylogenomic analysis of 997 nuclear gene sequences for 420 species and all but five of the genera currently recognised in the subfamily, we present a new higher-level classification for the subfamily. The new classification of Caesalpinioideae comprises eleven tribes, all of which are either new, reinstated or re-circumscribed at this rank: Caesalpinieae Rchb. (27 genera / ca. 223 species), Campsiandreae LPWG (2 / 5–22), Cassieae Bronn (7 / 695), Ceratonieae Rchb. (4 / 6), Dimorphandreae Benth. (4 / 35), Erythrophleeae LPWG (2 /13), Gleditsieae Nakai (3 / 20), Mimoseae Bronn (100 / ca. 3510), Pterogyneae LPWG (1 / 1), Schizolobieae Nakai (8 / 42–43), Sclerolobieae Benth. & Hook. f. (5 / ca. 113). Although many of these lineages have been recognised and named in the past, either as tribes or informal generic groups, their circumscriptions have varied widely and changed over the past decades, such that all the tribes described here differ in generic membership from those previously recognised. Importantly, the approximately 3500 species and 100 genera of the former subfamily Mimosoideae are now placed in the reinstated, but newly circumscribed, tribe Mimoseae. Because of the large size and ecological importance of the tribe, we also provide a clade-based classification system for Mimoseae that includes 17 named lower-level clades. Fourteen of the 100 Mimoseae genera remain unplaced in these lower-level clades: eight are resolved in two grades and six are phylogenetically isolated monogeneric lineages. In addition to the new classification, we provide a key to genera, morphological descriptions and notes for all 163 genera, all tribes, and all named clades. The diversity of growth forms, foliage, flowers and fruits are illustrated for all genera, and for each genus we also provide a distribution map, based on quality-controlled herbarium specimen localities. A glossary for specialised terms used in legume morphology is provided. This new phylogenetically based classification of Caesalpinioideae provides a solid system for communication and a framework for downstream analyses of biogeography, trait evolution and diversification, as well as for taxonomic revision of still understudied genera. Instituto de Recursos Biológicos Fil: Bruneau, Anne. Université de Montréal. Institut de recherche en biologie végétale and Département de Sciences biologiques; Canadá Fil: Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano. Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana. Departamento de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil Fil: Ringelberg, Jens J. University of Zurich. Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany; Suiza. University of Zurich. School of Geosciences, Suiza Fil: Borges, Leonardo M. Universidade Federal de São Carlos. Departamento de Botânica; Brasil Fil: Lopes da Costa Bortoluzzi, Roseli. Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina. Programa de Pós-graduação em Produção Vegetal; Brasil Fil: Brown, Gillian K. Queensland Herbarium and Biodiversity Science. Department of Environment and Science; Australia Fil: Cardozo, Domingos B. O. S. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Pesquisas, Río de Janeiro; Brasil. Universidade Federal de Bahia. Instituto de Biologia. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Evolução (PPGBioEvo); Brasil Fil: Clark, Ruth P. Royal Botanic Gardens. Accelerated Taxonomy Department,; Reino Unido Fil: de Souza Conceição, Adilva. Universidade do Estado da Bahia. Herbário HUNEB. Programa de Pós-graduação em Diversidade Vegetal; Brasil Fil: Martins Teixeira Cota, Matheus. Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana. Departamento de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil Fil: Demeulenaere, Else. University of Guam. UOG Station. Center for Island Sustainability and Sea Grant; Guam Fil: de Stefano, Rodrigo Duno. Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán; México Fil: Ebinger, John E. Eastern Illinois University; Estados Unidos Fil: Fonseca-Cortés, Andrés. Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana. Departamento de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil Fil: Grether, Rosaura. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa. Departamento de Biología; México Fil: Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, Isau. Universidad Nacional Amazónica de Madre de Dios. Herbario Alwyn Gentry; Perú Fil: Luckow, Melissa. Cornell University. School of Integrative Plant Science. Plant Biology Section; Estados Unidos Fil: Morales, Matías. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Murphy, Daniel J. Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria; Australia Fil: Seigler, David S. University of Illinois. Department of Plant Biology; Estados Unidos |
description |
Caesalpinioideae is the second largest subfamily of legumes (Leguminosae) with ca. 4680 species and 163 genera. It is an ecologically and economically important group formed of mostly woody perennials that range from large canopy emergent trees to functionally herbaceous geoxyles, lianas and shrubs, and which has a global distribution, occurring on every continent except Antarctica. Following the recent re-circumscription of 15 Caesalpinioideae genera as presented in Advances in Legume Systematics 14, Part 1, and using as a basis a phylogenomic analysis of 997 nuclear gene sequences for 420 species and all but five of the genera currently recognised in the subfamily, we present a new higher-level classification for the subfamily. The new classification of Caesalpinioideae comprises eleven tribes, all of which are either new, reinstated or re-circumscribed at this rank: Caesalpinieae Rchb. (27 genera / ca. 223 species), Campsiandreae LPWG (2 / 5–22), Cassieae Bronn (7 / 695), Ceratonieae Rchb. (4 / 6), Dimorphandreae Benth. (4 / 35), Erythrophleeae LPWG (2 /13), Gleditsieae Nakai (3 / 20), Mimoseae Bronn (100 / ca. 3510), Pterogyneae LPWG (1 / 1), Schizolobieae Nakai (8 / 42–43), Sclerolobieae Benth. & Hook. f. (5 / ca. 113). Although many of these lineages have been recognised and named in the past, either as tribes or informal generic groups, their circumscriptions have varied widely and changed over the past decades, such that all the tribes described here differ in generic membership from those previously recognised. Importantly, the approximately 3500 species and 100 genera of the former subfamily Mimosoideae are now placed in the reinstated, but newly circumscribed, tribe Mimoseae. Because of the large size and ecological importance of the tribe, we also provide a clade-based classification system for Mimoseae that includes 17 named lower-level clades. Fourteen of the 100 Mimoseae genera remain unplaced in these lower-level clades: eight are resolved in two grades and six are phylogenetically isolated monogeneric lineages. In addition to the new classification, we provide a key to genera, morphological descriptions and notes for all 163 genera, all tribes, and all named clades. The diversity of growth forms, foliage, flowers and fruits are illustrated for all genera, and for each genus we also provide a distribution map, based on quality-controlled herbarium specimen localities. A glossary for specialised terms used in legume morphology is provided. This new phylogenetically based classification of Caesalpinioideae provides a solid system for communication and a framework for downstream analyses of biogeography, trait evolution and diversification, as well as for taxonomic revision of still understudied genera. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-07-11T10:02:32Z 2024-07-11T10:02:32Z 2024-04-03 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/18457 https://phytokeys.pensoft.net/issue/4809/ 1314-2003 (online) 1314-2011 (print) https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.240.101716 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/18457 https://phytokeys.pensoft.net/issue/4809/ https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.240.101716 |
identifier_str_mv |
1314-2003 (online) 1314-2011 (print) |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pensoft Publishers |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pensoft Publishers |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Phytokeys 240 : 1-552 (2024) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1846787587833856000 |
score |
12.982451 |