Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification

Autores
Bruneau, Anne; Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano; Ringelberg, Jens J.; Borges, Leonardo M.; Lopes da Costa Bortoluzzi, Roseli; Brown, Gillian K.; Cardoso, Domingos B. O. S.; Clark, Ruth P.; de Souza Conceição, Adilva; Martins Teixeira Cota, Matheus; Demeulenaere, Else; de Stefano, Rodrigo Duno; Ebinger, John E.; Fonseca-Cortés, Andrés; Grether, Rosaura; Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, Isau; Luckow, Melissa; Morales, Matias; Murphy, Daniel J.; Seigler, David S.
Año de publicación
2024
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Caesalpinioideae is the second largest subfamily of legumes (Leguminosae) with ca. 4680 species and 163 genera. It is an ecologically and economically important group formed of mostly woody perennials that range from large canopy emergent trees to functionally herbaceous geoxyles, lianas and shrubs, and which has a global distribution, occurring on every continent except Antarctica. Following the recent re-circumscription of 15 Caesalpinioideae genera as presented in Advances in Legume Systematics 14, Part 1, and using as a basis a phylogenomic analysis of 997 nuclear gene sequences for 420 species and all but five of the genera currently recognised in the subfamily, we present a new higher-level classification for the subfamily. The new classification of Caesalpinioideae comprises eleven tribes, all of which are either new, reinstated or re-circumscribed at this rank: Caesalpinieae Rchb. (27 genera / ca. 223 species), Campsiandreae LPWG (2 / 5–22), Cassieae Bronn (7 / 695), Ceratonieae Rchb. (4 / 6), Dimorphandreae Benth. (4 / 35), Erythrophleeae LPWG (2 /13), Gleditsieae Nakai (3 / 20), Mimoseae Bronn (100 / ca. 3510), Pterogyneae LPWG (1 / 1), Schizolobieae Nakai (8 / 42–43), Sclerolobieae Benth. & Hook. f. (5 / ca. 113). Although many of these lineages have been recognised and named in the past, either as tribes or informal generic groups, their circumscriptions have varied widely and changed over the past decades, such that all the tribes described here differ in generic membership from those previously recognised. Importantly, the approximately 3500 species and 100 genera of the former subfamily Mimosoideae are now placed in the reinstated, but newly circumscribed, tribe Mimoseae. Because of the large size and ecological importance of the tribe, we also provide a clade-based classification system for Mimoseae that includes 17 named lower-level clades. Fourteen of the 100 Mimoseae genera remain unplaced in these lower-level clades: eight are resolved in two grades and six are phylogenetically isolated monogeneric lineages. In addition to the new classification, we provide a key to genera, morphological descriptions and notes for all 163 genera, all tribes, and all named clades. The diversity of growth forms, foliage, flowers and fruits are illustrated for all genera, and for each genus we also provide a distribution map, based on quality-controlled herbarium specimen localities. A glossary for specialised terms used in legume morphology is provided. This new phylogenetically based classification of Caesalpinioideae provides a solid system for communication and a framework for downstream analyses of biogeography, trait evolution and diversification, as well as for taxonomic revision of still understudied genera.
Instituto de Recursos Biológicos
Fil: Bruneau, Anne. Université de Montréal. Institut de recherche en biologie végétale and Département de Sciences biologiques; Canadá
Fil: Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano. Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana. Departamento de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil
Fil: Ringelberg, Jens J. University of Zurich. Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany; Suiza. University of Zurich. School of Geosciences, Suiza
Fil: Borges, Leonardo M. Universidade Federal de São Carlos. Departamento de Botânica; Brasil
Fil: Lopes da Costa Bortoluzzi, Roseli. Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina. Programa de Pós-graduação em Produção Vegetal; Brasil
Fil: Brown, Gillian K. Queensland Herbarium and Biodiversity Science. Department of Environment and Science; Australia
Fil: Cardozo, Domingos B. O. S. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Pesquisas, Río de Janeiro; Brasil. Universidade Federal de Bahia. Instituto de Biologia. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Evolução (PPGBioEvo); Brasil
Fil: Clark, Ruth P. Royal Botanic Gardens. Accelerated Taxonomy Department,; Reino Unido
Fil: de Souza Conceição, Adilva. Universidade do Estado da Bahia. Herbário HUNEB. Programa de Pós-graduação em Diversidade Vegetal; Brasil
Fil: Martins Teixeira Cota, Matheus. Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana. Departamento de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil
Fil: Demeulenaere, Else. University of Guam. UOG Station. Center for Island Sustainability and Sea Grant; Guam
Fil: de Stefano, Rodrigo Duno. Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán; México
Fil: Ebinger, John E. Eastern Illinois University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Fonseca-Cortés, Andrés. Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana. Departamento de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil
Fil: Grether, Rosaura. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa. Departamento de Biología; México
Fil: Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, Isau. Universidad Nacional Amazónica de Madre de Dios. Herbario Alwyn Gentry; Perú
Fil: Luckow, Melissa. Cornell University. School of Integrative Plant Science. Plant Biology Section; Estados Unidos
Fil: Morales, Matías. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Murphy, Daniel J. Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria; Australia
Fil: Seigler, David S. University of Illinois. Department of Plant Biology; Estados Unidos
Fuente
Phytokeys 240 : 1-552 (2024)
Materia
Species Diversity
Fabaceae
Mimosoideae
Taxonomy (Information Management)
Caesalpinioideae
Legumes
Diversidad de Especies
Taxonomía (Gestión de la Información)
Leguminosa
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/18457

id INTADig_def984c323666c6876fcb806a1b6fa64
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/18457
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classificationBruneau, AnnePaganucci de Queiroz, LucianoRingelberg, Jens J.Borges, Leonardo M.Lopes da Costa Bortoluzzi, RoseliBrown, Gillian K.Cardoso, Domingos B. O. S.Clark, Ruth P.de Souza Conceição, AdilvaMartins Teixeira Cota, MatheusDemeulenaere, Elsede Stefano, Rodrigo DunoEbinger, John E.Fonseca-Cortés, AndrésGrether, RosauraHuamantupa-Chuquimaco, IsauLuckow, MelissaMorales, MatiasMurphy, Daniel J.Seigler, David S.Species DiversityFabaceaeMimosoideaeTaxonomy (Information Management)CaesalpinioideaeLegumesDiversidad de EspeciesTaxonomía (Gestión de la Información)LeguminosaCaesalpinioideae is the second largest subfamily of legumes (Leguminosae) with ca. 4680 species and 163 genera. It is an ecologically and economically important group formed of mostly woody perennials that range from large canopy emergent trees to functionally herbaceous geoxyles, lianas and shrubs, and which has a global distribution, occurring on every continent except Antarctica. Following the recent re-circumscription of 15 Caesalpinioideae genera as presented in Advances in Legume Systematics 14, Part 1, and using as a basis a phylogenomic analysis of 997 nuclear gene sequences for 420 species and all but five of the genera currently recognised in the subfamily, we present a new higher-level classification for the subfamily. The new classification of Caesalpinioideae comprises eleven tribes, all of which are either new, reinstated or re-circumscribed at this rank: Caesalpinieae Rchb. (27 genera / ca. 223 species), Campsiandreae LPWG (2 / 5–22), Cassieae Bronn (7 / 695), Ceratonieae Rchb. (4 / 6), Dimorphandreae Benth. (4 / 35), Erythrophleeae LPWG (2 /13), Gleditsieae Nakai (3 / 20), Mimoseae Bronn (100 / ca. 3510), Pterogyneae LPWG (1 / 1), Schizolobieae Nakai (8 / 42–43), Sclerolobieae Benth. & Hook. f. (5 / ca. 113). Although many of these lineages have been recognised and named in the past, either as tribes or informal generic groups, their circumscriptions have varied widely and changed over the past decades, such that all the tribes described here differ in generic membership from those previously recognised. Importantly, the approximately 3500 species and 100 genera of the former subfamily Mimosoideae are now placed in the reinstated, but newly circumscribed, tribe Mimoseae. Because of the large size and ecological importance of the tribe, we also provide a clade-based classification system for Mimoseae that includes 17 named lower-level clades. Fourteen of the 100 Mimoseae genera remain unplaced in these lower-level clades: eight are resolved in two grades and six are phylogenetically isolated monogeneric lineages. In addition to the new classification, we provide a key to genera, morphological descriptions and notes for all 163 genera, all tribes, and all named clades. The diversity of growth forms, foliage, flowers and fruits are illustrated for all genera, and for each genus we also provide a distribution map, based on quality-controlled herbarium specimen localities. A glossary for specialised terms used in legume morphology is provided. This new phylogenetically based classification of Caesalpinioideae provides a solid system for communication and a framework for downstream analyses of biogeography, trait evolution and diversification, as well as for taxonomic revision of still understudied genera.Instituto de Recursos BiológicosFil: Bruneau, Anne. Université de Montréal. Institut de recherche en biologie végétale and Département de Sciences biologiques; CanadáFil: Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano. Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana. Departamento de Ciências Biológicas; BrasilFil: Ringelberg, Jens J. University of Zurich. Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany; Suiza. University of Zurich. School of Geosciences, SuizaFil: Borges, Leonardo M. Universidade Federal de São Carlos. Departamento de Botânica; BrasilFil: Lopes da Costa Bortoluzzi, Roseli. Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina. Programa de Pós-graduação em Produção Vegetal; BrasilFil: Brown, Gillian K. Queensland Herbarium and Biodiversity Science. Department of Environment and Science; AustraliaFil: Cardozo, Domingos B. O. S. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Pesquisas, Río de Janeiro; Brasil. Universidade Federal de Bahia. Instituto de Biologia. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Evolução (PPGBioEvo); BrasilFil: Clark, Ruth P. Royal Botanic Gardens. Accelerated Taxonomy Department,; Reino UnidoFil: de Souza Conceição, Adilva. Universidade do Estado da Bahia. Herbário HUNEB. Programa de Pós-graduação em Diversidade Vegetal; BrasilFil: Martins Teixeira Cota, Matheus. Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana. Departamento de Ciências Biológicas; BrasilFil: Demeulenaere, Else. University of Guam. UOG Station. Center for Island Sustainability and Sea Grant; GuamFil: de Stefano, Rodrigo Duno. Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán; MéxicoFil: Ebinger, John E. Eastern Illinois University; Estados UnidosFil: Fonseca-Cortés, Andrés. Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana. Departamento de Ciências Biológicas; BrasilFil: Grether, Rosaura. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa. Departamento de Biología; MéxicoFil: Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, Isau. Universidad Nacional Amazónica de Madre de Dios. Herbario Alwyn Gentry; PerúFil: Luckow, Melissa. Cornell University. School of Integrative Plant Science. Plant Biology Section; Estados UnidosFil: Morales, Matías. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Murphy, Daniel J. Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria; AustraliaFil: Seigler, David S. University of Illinois. Department of Plant Biology; Estados UnidosPensoft Publishers2024-07-11T10:02:32Z2024-07-11T10:02:32Z2024-04-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/18457https://phytokeys.pensoft.net/issue/4809/1314-2003 (online)1314-2011 (print)https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.240.101716Phytokeys 240 : 1-552 (2024)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-10-23T11:18:58Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/18457instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-23 11:18:58.603INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification
title Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification
spellingShingle Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification
Bruneau, Anne
Species Diversity
Fabaceae
Mimosoideae
Taxonomy (Information Management)
Caesalpinioideae
Legumes
Diversidad de Especies
Taxonomía (Gestión de la Información)
Leguminosa
title_short Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification
title_full Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification
title_fullStr Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification
title_full_unstemmed Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification
title_sort Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Bruneau, Anne
Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano
Ringelberg, Jens J.
Borges, Leonardo M.
Lopes da Costa Bortoluzzi, Roseli
Brown, Gillian K.
Cardoso, Domingos B. O. S.
Clark, Ruth P.
de Souza Conceição, Adilva
Martins Teixeira Cota, Matheus
Demeulenaere, Else
de Stefano, Rodrigo Duno
Ebinger, John E.
Fonseca-Cortés, Andrés
Grether, Rosaura
Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, Isau
Luckow, Melissa
Morales, Matias
Murphy, Daniel J.
Seigler, David S.
author Bruneau, Anne
author_facet Bruneau, Anne
Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano
Ringelberg, Jens J.
Borges, Leonardo M.
Lopes da Costa Bortoluzzi, Roseli
Brown, Gillian K.
Cardoso, Domingos B. O. S.
Clark, Ruth P.
de Souza Conceição, Adilva
Martins Teixeira Cota, Matheus
Demeulenaere, Else
de Stefano, Rodrigo Duno
Ebinger, John E.
Fonseca-Cortés, Andrés
Grether, Rosaura
Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, Isau
Luckow, Melissa
Morales, Matias
Murphy, Daniel J.
Seigler, David S.
author_role author
author2 Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano
Ringelberg, Jens J.
Borges, Leonardo M.
Lopes da Costa Bortoluzzi, Roseli
Brown, Gillian K.
Cardoso, Domingos B. O. S.
Clark, Ruth P.
de Souza Conceição, Adilva
Martins Teixeira Cota, Matheus
Demeulenaere, Else
de Stefano, Rodrigo Duno
Ebinger, John E.
Fonseca-Cortés, Andrés
Grether, Rosaura
Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, Isau
Luckow, Melissa
Morales, Matias
Murphy, Daniel J.
Seigler, David S.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Species Diversity
Fabaceae
Mimosoideae
Taxonomy (Information Management)
Caesalpinioideae
Legumes
Diversidad de Especies
Taxonomía (Gestión de la Información)
Leguminosa
topic Species Diversity
Fabaceae
Mimosoideae
Taxonomy (Information Management)
Caesalpinioideae
Legumes
Diversidad de Especies
Taxonomía (Gestión de la Información)
Leguminosa
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Caesalpinioideae is the second largest subfamily of legumes (Leguminosae) with ca. 4680 species and 163 genera. It is an ecologically and economically important group formed of mostly woody perennials that range from large canopy emergent trees to functionally herbaceous geoxyles, lianas and shrubs, and which has a global distribution, occurring on every continent except Antarctica. Following the recent re-circumscription of 15 Caesalpinioideae genera as presented in Advances in Legume Systematics 14, Part 1, and using as a basis a phylogenomic analysis of 997 nuclear gene sequences for 420 species and all but five of the genera currently recognised in the subfamily, we present a new higher-level classification for the subfamily. The new classification of Caesalpinioideae comprises eleven tribes, all of which are either new, reinstated or re-circumscribed at this rank: Caesalpinieae Rchb. (27 genera / ca. 223 species), Campsiandreae LPWG (2 / 5–22), Cassieae Bronn (7 / 695), Ceratonieae Rchb. (4 / 6), Dimorphandreae Benth. (4 / 35), Erythrophleeae LPWG (2 /13), Gleditsieae Nakai (3 / 20), Mimoseae Bronn (100 / ca. 3510), Pterogyneae LPWG (1 / 1), Schizolobieae Nakai (8 / 42–43), Sclerolobieae Benth. & Hook. f. (5 / ca. 113). Although many of these lineages have been recognised and named in the past, either as tribes or informal generic groups, their circumscriptions have varied widely and changed over the past decades, such that all the tribes described here differ in generic membership from those previously recognised. Importantly, the approximately 3500 species and 100 genera of the former subfamily Mimosoideae are now placed in the reinstated, but newly circumscribed, tribe Mimoseae. Because of the large size and ecological importance of the tribe, we also provide a clade-based classification system for Mimoseae that includes 17 named lower-level clades. Fourteen of the 100 Mimoseae genera remain unplaced in these lower-level clades: eight are resolved in two grades and six are phylogenetically isolated monogeneric lineages. In addition to the new classification, we provide a key to genera, morphological descriptions and notes for all 163 genera, all tribes, and all named clades. The diversity of growth forms, foliage, flowers and fruits are illustrated for all genera, and for each genus we also provide a distribution map, based on quality-controlled herbarium specimen localities. A glossary for specialised terms used in legume morphology is provided. This new phylogenetically based classification of Caesalpinioideae provides a solid system for communication and a framework for downstream analyses of biogeography, trait evolution and diversification, as well as for taxonomic revision of still understudied genera.
Instituto de Recursos Biológicos
Fil: Bruneau, Anne. Université de Montréal. Institut de recherche en biologie végétale and Département de Sciences biologiques; Canadá
Fil: Paganucci de Queiroz, Luciano. Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana. Departamento de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil
Fil: Ringelberg, Jens J. University of Zurich. Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany; Suiza. University of Zurich. School of Geosciences, Suiza
Fil: Borges, Leonardo M. Universidade Federal de São Carlos. Departamento de Botânica; Brasil
Fil: Lopes da Costa Bortoluzzi, Roseli. Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina. Programa de Pós-graduação em Produção Vegetal; Brasil
Fil: Brown, Gillian K. Queensland Herbarium and Biodiversity Science. Department of Environment and Science; Australia
Fil: Cardozo, Domingos B. O. S. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Pesquisas, Río de Janeiro; Brasil. Universidade Federal de Bahia. Instituto de Biologia. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Evolução (PPGBioEvo); Brasil
Fil: Clark, Ruth P. Royal Botanic Gardens. Accelerated Taxonomy Department,; Reino Unido
Fil: de Souza Conceição, Adilva. Universidade do Estado da Bahia. Herbário HUNEB. Programa de Pós-graduação em Diversidade Vegetal; Brasil
Fil: Martins Teixeira Cota, Matheus. Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana. Departamento de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil
Fil: Demeulenaere, Else. University of Guam. UOG Station. Center for Island Sustainability and Sea Grant; Guam
Fil: de Stefano, Rodrigo Duno. Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán; México
Fil: Ebinger, John E. Eastern Illinois University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Fonseca-Cortés, Andrés. Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana. Departamento de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil
Fil: Grether, Rosaura. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa. Departamento de Biología; México
Fil: Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, Isau. Universidad Nacional Amazónica de Madre de Dios. Herbario Alwyn Gentry; Perú
Fil: Luckow, Melissa. Cornell University. School of Integrative Plant Science. Plant Biology Section; Estados Unidos
Fil: Morales, Matías. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Murphy, Daniel J. Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria; Australia
Fil: Seigler, David S. University of Illinois. Department of Plant Biology; Estados Unidos
description Caesalpinioideae is the second largest subfamily of legumes (Leguminosae) with ca. 4680 species and 163 genera. It is an ecologically and economically important group formed of mostly woody perennials that range from large canopy emergent trees to functionally herbaceous geoxyles, lianas and shrubs, and which has a global distribution, occurring on every continent except Antarctica. Following the recent re-circumscription of 15 Caesalpinioideae genera as presented in Advances in Legume Systematics 14, Part 1, and using as a basis a phylogenomic analysis of 997 nuclear gene sequences for 420 species and all but five of the genera currently recognised in the subfamily, we present a new higher-level classification for the subfamily. The new classification of Caesalpinioideae comprises eleven tribes, all of which are either new, reinstated or re-circumscribed at this rank: Caesalpinieae Rchb. (27 genera / ca. 223 species), Campsiandreae LPWG (2 / 5–22), Cassieae Bronn (7 / 695), Ceratonieae Rchb. (4 / 6), Dimorphandreae Benth. (4 / 35), Erythrophleeae LPWG (2 /13), Gleditsieae Nakai (3 / 20), Mimoseae Bronn (100 / ca. 3510), Pterogyneae LPWG (1 / 1), Schizolobieae Nakai (8 / 42–43), Sclerolobieae Benth. & Hook. f. (5 / ca. 113). Although many of these lineages have been recognised and named in the past, either as tribes or informal generic groups, their circumscriptions have varied widely and changed over the past decades, such that all the tribes described here differ in generic membership from those previously recognised. Importantly, the approximately 3500 species and 100 genera of the former subfamily Mimosoideae are now placed in the reinstated, but newly circumscribed, tribe Mimoseae. Because of the large size and ecological importance of the tribe, we also provide a clade-based classification system for Mimoseae that includes 17 named lower-level clades. Fourteen of the 100 Mimoseae genera remain unplaced in these lower-level clades: eight are resolved in two grades and six are phylogenetically isolated monogeneric lineages. In addition to the new classification, we provide a key to genera, morphological descriptions and notes for all 163 genera, all tribes, and all named clades. The diversity of growth forms, foliage, flowers and fruits are illustrated for all genera, and for each genus we also provide a distribution map, based on quality-controlled herbarium specimen localities. A glossary for specialised terms used in legume morphology is provided. This new phylogenetically based classification of Caesalpinioideae provides a solid system for communication and a framework for downstream analyses of biogeography, trait evolution and diversification, as well as for taxonomic revision of still understudied genera.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-11T10:02:32Z
2024-07-11T10:02:32Z
2024-04-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/18457
https://phytokeys.pensoft.net/issue/4809/
1314-2003 (online)
1314-2011 (print)
https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.240.101716
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/18457
https://phytokeys.pensoft.net/issue/4809/
https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.240.101716
identifier_str_mv 1314-2003 (online)
1314-2011 (print)
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pensoft Publishers
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pensoft Publishers
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Phytokeys 240 : 1-552 (2024)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1846787587833856000
score 12.982451