25 Years of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: Why Some Intergovernmental C&I Processes Flourished While Others Faded

Autores
Linser, Stefanie; Wolfslehner, Bernhard; Asmar, Fady; Bridge, Simon Richard Jess; Gritten, David; Guadalupe, Vicente; Jafari, Mostafa; Johnson, Steven; Laclau, Pablo; Robertson, Guy
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The use of criteria and indicators (C&I) for data collection, monitoring, assessing and reporting on sustainable forest management (SFM) has been growing since the Earth Summit in 1992, supported by eleven intergovernmental, regional and international forest-related C&I processes. The initial effort led to varying levels of implementation across countries. Several processes never went much beyond the adoption of a first set of C&I while others have made substantial progress. In recent years, interest in C&I for SFM has again increased. In light of the Sustainable Development Goals and emerging global challenges the contribution of C&I to monitor, assess and report on forest conditions and trends is increasingly important. We compare and analyse the structure, activities and progress of the intergovernmental C&I processes. The work is based on document analysis and questionnaires sent to the secretariats of the processes and C&I experts. We found many similarities but also major differences in the structure and content of the C&I sets. The results provide a context for discussing and understanding why some of the C&I processes are successful in their work while others have stalled. Finally, we propose the required ingredients for success for the future activities of the forest-related intergovernmental C&I processes.
Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes
Fil: Linser, Stefanie. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences; Austria
Fil: Wolfslehner, Bernhard. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences. Vienna Regional Office of the European Forest Institute; Austria
Fil: Asmar, Fady. Consultor FAO; Líbano
Fil: Bridge, Simon Richard Jess. Canadian Forest Service. Natural Resources Canada; Canada
Fil: Gritten, David. The Center for People and Forests; Tailandia
Fil: Guadalupe, Vicente. Permanent Secretariat of the Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organization; Brasil
Fil: Jafari, Mostafa. Tehran Processes Secretariat for Low Forest Cover Countries; Irán
Fil: Johnson, Steven. International Tropical Timber Organization; Japón
Fil: Laclau, Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes; Argentina
Fil: Robertson, Guy. U.S. Forest Service, Research and Development; Estados Unidos
Fuente
Forests 9 (9) : 515 : 23 (2018)
Materia
Ordenación Forestal
Bosques
Indicadores
Forest Management
Forests
Indicators
Manejo Forestal
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/6495
Acceder
id INTADig_d60bef692fff46b2a8a9304c152defce
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/6495
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling 25 Years of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: Why Some Intergovernmental C&I Processes Flourished While Others FadedLinser, StefanieWolfslehner, BernhardAsmar, FadyBridge, Simon Richard JessGritten, DavidGuadalupe, VicenteJafari, MostafaJohnson, StevenLaclau, PabloRobertson, GuyOrdenación ForestalBosquesIndicadoresForest ManagementForestsIndicatorsManejo ForestalThe use of criteria and indicators (C&I) for data collection, monitoring, assessing and reporting on sustainable forest management (SFM) has been growing since the Earth Summit in 1992, supported by eleven intergovernmental, regional and international forest-related C&I processes. The initial effort led to varying levels of implementation across countries. Several processes never went much beyond the adoption of a first set of C&I while others have made substantial progress. In recent years, interest in C&I for SFM has again increased. In light of the Sustainable Development Goals and emerging global challenges the contribution of C&I to monitor, assess and report on forest conditions and trends is increasingly important. We compare and analyse the structure, activities and progress of the intergovernmental C&I processes. The work is based on document analysis and questionnaires sent to the secretariats of the processes and C&I experts. We found many similarities but also major differences in the structure and content of the C&I sets. The results provide a context for discussing and understanding why some of the C&I processes are successful in their work while others have stalled. Finally, we propose the required ingredients for success for the future activities of the forest-related intergovernmental C&I processes.Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los AndesFil: Linser, Stefanie. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences; AustriaFil: Wolfslehner, Bernhard. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences. Vienna Regional Office of the European Forest Institute; AustriaFil: Asmar, Fady. Consultor FAO; LíbanoFil: Bridge, Simon Richard Jess. Canadian Forest Service. Natural Resources Canada; CanadaFil: Gritten, David. The Center for People and Forests; TailandiaFil: Guadalupe, Vicente. Permanent Secretariat of the Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organization; BrasilFil: Jafari, Mostafa. Tehran Processes Secretariat for Low Forest Cover Countries; IránFil: Johnson, Steven. International Tropical Timber Organization; JapónFil: Laclau, Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes; ArgentinaFil: Robertson, Guy. U.S. Forest Service, Research and Development; Estados UnidosMDPI2019-12-12T14:19:57Z2019-12-12T14:19:57Z2018-08-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6495https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/9/9/5151999-4907https://doi.org/10.3390/f9090515Forests 9 (9) : 515 : 23 (2018)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-10-16T09:29:42Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/6495instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-16 09:29:42.931INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv 25 Years of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: Why Some Intergovernmental C&I Processes Flourished While Others Faded
title 25 Years of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: Why Some Intergovernmental C&I Processes Flourished While Others Faded
spellingShingle 25 Years of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: Why Some Intergovernmental C&I Processes Flourished While Others Faded
Linser, Stefanie
Ordenación Forestal
Bosques
Indicadores
Forest Management
Forests
Indicators
Manejo Forestal
title_short 25 Years of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: Why Some Intergovernmental C&I Processes Flourished While Others Faded
title_full 25 Years of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: Why Some Intergovernmental C&I Processes Flourished While Others Faded
title_fullStr 25 Years of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: Why Some Intergovernmental C&I Processes Flourished While Others Faded
title_full_unstemmed 25 Years of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: Why Some Intergovernmental C&I Processes Flourished While Others Faded
title_sort 25 Years of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: Why Some Intergovernmental C&I Processes Flourished While Others Faded
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Linser, Stefanie
Wolfslehner, Bernhard
Asmar, Fady
Bridge, Simon Richard Jess
Gritten, David
Guadalupe, Vicente
Jafari, Mostafa
Johnson, Steven
Laclau, Pablo
Robertson, Guy
author Linser, Stefanie
author_facet Linser, Stefanie
Wolfslehner, Bernhard
Asmar, Fady
Bridge, Simon Richard Jess
Gritten, David
Guadalupe, Vicente
Jafari, Mostafa
Johnson, Steven
Laclau, Pablo
Robertson, Guy
author_role author
author2 Wolfslehner, Bernhard
Asmar, Fady
Bridge, Simon Richard Jess
Gritten, David
Guadalupe, Vicente
Jafari, Mostafa
Johnson, Steven
Laclau, Pablo
Robertson, Guy
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ordenación Forestal
Bosques
Indicadores
Forest Management
Forests
Indicators
Manejo Forestal
topic Ordenación Forestal
Bosques
Indicadores
Forest Management
Forests
Indicators
Manejo Forestal
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The use of criteria and indicators (C&I) for data collection, monitoring, assessing and reporting on sustainable forest management (SFM) has been growing since the Earth Summit in 1992, supported by eleven intergovernmental, regional and international forest-related C&I processes. The initial effort led to varying levels of implementation across countries. Several processes never went much beyond the adoption of a first set of C&I while others have made substantial progress. In recent years, interest in C&I for SFM has again increased. In light of the Sustainable Development Goals and emerging global challenges the contribution of C&I to monitor, assess and report on forest conditions and trends is increasingly important. We compare and analyse the structure, activities and progress of the intergovernmental C&I processes. The work is based on document analysis and questionnaires sent to the secretariats of the processes and C&I experts. We found many similarities but also major differences in the structure and content of the C&I sets. The results provide a context for discussing and understanding why some of the C&I processes are successful in their work while others have stalled. Finally, we propose the required ingredients for success for the future activities of the forest-related intergovernmental C&I processes.
Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes
Fil: Linser, Stefanie. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences; Austria
Fil: Wolfslehner, Bernhard. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences. Vienna Regional Office of the European Forest Institute; Austria
Fil: Asmar, Fady. Consultor FAO; Líbano
Fil: Bridge, Simon Richard Jess. Canadian Forest Service. Natural Resources Canada; Canada
Fil: Gritten, David. The Center for People and Forests; Tailandia
Fil: Guadalupe, Vicente. Permanent Secretariat of the Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organization; Brasil
Fil: Jafari, Mostafa. Tehran Processes Secretariat for Low Forest Cover Countries; Irán
Fil: Johnson, Steven. International Tropical Timber Organization; Japón
Fil: Laclau, Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes; Argentina
Fil: Robertson, Guy. U.S. Forest Service, Research and Development; Estados Unidos
description The use of criteria and indicators (C&I) for data collection, monitoring, assessing and reporting on sustainable forest management (SFM) has been growing since the Earth Summit in 1992, supported by eleven intergovernmental, regional and international forest-related C&I processes. The initial effort led to varying levels of implementation across countries. Several processes never went much beyond the adoption of a first set of C&I while others have made substantial progress. In recent years, interest in C&I for SFM has again increased. In light of the Sustainable Development Goals and emerging global challenges the contribution of C&I to monitor, assess and report on forest conditions and trends is increasingly important. We compare and analyse the structure, activities and progress of the intergovernmental C&I processes. The work is based on document analysis and questionnaires sent to the secretariats of the processes and C&I experts. We found many similarities but also major differences in the structure and content of the C&I sets. The results provide a context for discussing and understanding why some of the C&I processes are successful in their work while others have stalled. Finally, we propose the required ingredients for success for the future activities of the forest-related intergovernmental C&I processes.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-25
2019-12-12T14:19:57Z
2019-12-12T14:19:57Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6495
https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/9/9/515
1999-4907
https://doi.org/10.3390/f9090515
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6495
https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/9/9/515
https://doi.org/10.3390/f9090515
identifier_str_mv 1999-4907
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Forests 9 (9) : 515 : 23 (2018)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1846143521436729344
score 12.712165

Publicaciones similares