Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest management: lessons learned in the Southern Cone
- Autores
- Laclau, Pablo; Meza, Andrés; Lima, Joaquín Garrido Soares de; Linser, Stefanie
- Año de publicación
- 2019
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The Southern Cone countries of Chile, Argentina and Uruguay have a common background regarding land use and land cover with a total of 46 million ha of forests whose benefits are prospering for the regional framework of the Southern Cone. The three countries do not articulate or interchange on their forest policies beyond circumstantial agreements. In this regard, and as our first research focus, we examined experiences while participating in the international Montréal Process on Criteria and Indicators for the Conservation and Management of Temperate and Boreal Forests. Secondly, we focused on the progress these processes have afforded regarding respective national implementation of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management (C&I for SFM) and uptake in forest policy. Thirdly, we examined also the obstacles experienced during participation and implementation. We based our findings on content analysis of key documents and author observations. Albeit the institutional and political frameworks between the countries differ, we found common constraints on budgeting, limited human resources and institutional capacity. Communication to society and policy makers’ commitment are also important weaknesses. The engagement of the three countries in the Montréal Process and the application of related national sets of C&I for SFM have provided solutions to recent land use conflicts. This also strengthened the quality and effectiveness of recently approved laws and regimes for a sustainable forest management. In conclusion, the forest dialogues of these countries, within and between each other, were reinforced by participation in C&I for SFM processes, helping to bridge the gap between decision-makers, national forest agencies, academia and other forest-related stakeholders. Common indicators and related national reports facilitated the identification of affinities for regional integration on a common basis and helped to raise the level of national forest policies increasing its strength and commitment to global forest challenges. The lessons learned should be considered to reach progress towards sustainability.
Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes
Fil: Laclau, Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes; Argentina
Fil: Meza, Andrés. Corporación Nacional Forestal; Chile
Fil: Lima, Joaquín Garrido Soares de. Uruguay. Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca. Dirección General Forestal; Uruguay
Fil: Linser, Stefanie. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences; Austria. Forest Policy Research Network. European Forest Institute; Austria - Fuente
- International Forestry Review 21 (3) : 315-323 (September 2019)
- Materia
-
Bosques
Indicadores
Ordenación Forestal
Forests
Indicators
Forest Management
América del Sur
Manejo Forestal - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso restringido
- Condiciones de uso
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/6513
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_ec5369d74fa71351f8c4c0c149240b9d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/6513 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest management: lessons learned in the Southern ConeLaclau, PabloMeza, AndrésLima, Joaquín Garrido Soares deLinser, StefanieBosquesIndicadoresOrdenación ForestalForestsIndicatorsForest ManagementAmérica del SurManejo ForestalThe Southern Cone countries of Chile, Argentina and Uruguay have a common background regarding land use and land cover with a total of 46 million ha of forests whose benefits are prospering for the regional framework of the Southern Cone. The three countries do not articulate or interchange on their forest policies beyond circumstantial agreements. In this regard, and as our first research focus, we examined experiences while participating in the international Montréal Process on Criteria and Indicators for the Conservation and Management of Temperate and Boreal Forests. Secondly, we focused on the progress these processes have afforded regarding respective national implementation of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management (C&I for SFM) and uptake in forest policy. Thirdly, we examined also the obstacles experienced during participation and implementation. We based our findings on content analysis of key documents and author observations. Albeit the institutional and political frameworks between the countries differ, we found common constraints on budgeting, limited human resources and institutional capacity. Communication to society and policy makers’ commitment are also important weaknesses. The engagement of the three countries in the Montréal Process and the application of related national sets of C&I for SFM have provided solutions to recent land use conflicts. This also strengthened the quality and effectiveness of recently approved laws and regimes for a sustainable forest management. In conclusion, the forest dialogues of these countries, within and between each other, were reinforced by participation in C&I for SFM processes, helping to bridge the gap between decision-makers, national forest agencies, academia and other forest-related stakeholders. Common indicators and related national reports facilitated the identification of affinities for regional integration on a common basis and helped to raise the level of national forest policies increasing its strength and commitment to global forest challenges. The lessons learned should be considered to reach progress towards sustainability.Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los AndesFil: Laclau, Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes; ArgentinaFil: Meza, Andrés. Corporación Nacional Forestal; ChileFil: Lima, Joaquín Garrido Soares de. Uruguay. Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca. Dirección General Forestal; UruguayFil: Linser, Stefanie. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences; Austria. Forest Policy Research Network. European Forest Institute; AustriaCommonwealth Forestry Association2019-12-16T10:56:21Z2019-12-16T10:56:21Z2019info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6513https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/cfa/ifr/2019/00000021/00000003/art000041465-5489https://doi.org/10.1505/146554819827293196International Forestry Review 21 (3) : 315-323 (September 2019)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-10-16T09:29:42Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/6513instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-16 09:29:42.959INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest management: lessons learned in the Southern Cone |
title |
Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest management: lessons learned in the Southern Cone |
spellingShingle |
Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest management: lessons learned in the Southern Cone Laclau, Pablo Bosques Indicadores Ordenación Forestal Forests Indicators Forest Management América del Sur Manejo Forestal |
title_short |
Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest management: lessons learned in the Southern Cone |
title_full |
Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest management: lessons learned in the Southern Cone |
title_fullStr |
Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest management: lessons learned in the Southern Cone |
title_full_unstemmed |
Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest management: lessons learned in the Southern Cone |
title_sort |
Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest management: lessons learned in the Southern Cone |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Laclau, Pablo Meza, Andrés Lima, Joaquín Garrido Soares de Linser, Stefanie |
author |
Laclau, Pablo |
author_facet |
Laclau, Pablo Meza, Andrés Lima, Joaquín Garrido Soares de Linser, Stefanie |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Meza, Andrés Lima, Joaquín Garrido Soares de Linser, Stefanie |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Bosques Indicadores Ordenación Forestal Forests Indicators Forest Management América del Sur Manejo Forestal |
topic |
Bosques Indicadores Ordenación Forestal Forests Indicators Forest Management América del Sur Manejo Forestal |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The Southern Cone countries of Chile, Argentina and Uruguay have a common background regarding land use and land cover with a total of 46 million ha of forests whose benefits are prospering for the regional framework of the Southern Cone. The three countries do not articulate or interchange on their forest policies beyond circumstantial agreements. In this regard, and as our first research focus, we examined experiences while participating in the international Montréal Process on Criteria and Indicators for the Conservation and Management of Temperate and Boreal Forests. Secondly, we focused on the progress these processes have afforded regarding respective national implementation of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management (C&I for SFM) and uptake in forest policy. Thirdly, we examined also the obstacles experienced during participation and implementation. We based our findings on content analysis of key documents and author observations. Albeit the institutional and political frameworks between the countries differ, we found common constraints on budgeting, limited human resources and institutional capacity. Communication to society and policy makers’ commitment are also important weaknesses. The engagement of the three countries in the Montréal Process and the application of related national sets of C&I for SFM have provided solutions to recent land use conflicts. This also strengthened the quality and effectiveness of recently approved laws and regimes for a sustainable forest management. In conclusion, the forest dialogues of these countries, within and between each other, were reinforced by participation in C&I for SFM processes, helping to bridge the gap between decision-makers, national forest agencies, academia and other forest-related stakeholders. Common indicators and related national reports facilitated the identification of affinities for regional integration on a common basis and helped to raise the level of national forest policies increasing its strength and commitment to global forest challenges. The lessons learned should be considered to reach progress towards sustainability. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes Fil: Laclau, Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes; Argentina Fil: Meza, Andrés. Corporación Nacional Forestal; Chile Fil: Lima, Joaquín Garrido Soares de. Uruguay. Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca. Dirección General Forestal; Uruguay Fil: Linser, Stefanie. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences; Austria. Forest Policy Research Network. European Forest Institute; Austria |
description |
The Southern Cone countries of Chile, Argentina and Uruguay have a common background regarding land use and land cover with a total of 46 million ha of forests whose benefits are prospering for the regional framework of the Southern Cone. The three countries do not articulate or interchange on their forest policies beyond circumstantial agreements. In this regard, and as our first research focus, we examined experiences while participating in the international Montréal Process on Criteria and Indicators for the Conservation and Management of Temperate and Boreal Forests. Secondly, we focused on the progress these processes have afforded regarding respective national implementation of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management (C&I for SFM) and uptake in forest policy. Thirdly, we examined also the obstacles experienced during participation and implementation. We based our findings on content analysis of key documents and author observations. Albeit the institutional and political frameworks between the countries differ, we found common constraints on budgeting, limited human resources and institutional capacity. Communication to society and policy makers’ commitment are also important weaknesses. The engagement of the three countries in the Montréal Process and the application of related national sets of C&I for SFM have provided solutions to recent land use conflicts. This also strengthened the quality and effectiveness of recently approved laws and regimes for a sustainable forest management. In conclusion, the forest dialogues of these countries, within and between each other, were reinforced by participation in C&I for SFM processes, helping to bridge the gap between decision-makers, national forest agencies, academia and other forest-related stakeholders. Common indicators and related national reports facilitated the identification of affinities for regional integration on a common basis and helped to raise the level of national forest policies increasing its strength and commitment to global forest challenges. The lessons learned should be considered to reach progress towards sustainability. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-16T10:56:21Z 2019-12-16T10:56:21Z 2019 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6513 https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/cfa/ifr/2019/00000021/00000003/art00004 1465-5489 https://doi.org/10.1505/146554819827293196 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6513 https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/cfa/ifr/2019/00000021/00000003/art00004 https://doi.org/10.1505/146554819827293196 |
identifier_str_mv |
1465-5489 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
restrictedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Commonwealth Forestry Association |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Commonwealth Forestry Association |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
International Forestry Review 21 (3) : 315-323 (September 2019) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1846143521452457984 |
score |
12.712165 |