Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest management: lessons learned in the Southern Cone

Autores
Laclau, Pablo; Meza, Andrés; Lima, Joaquín Garrido Soares de; Linser, Stefanie
Año de publicación
2019
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The Southern Cone countries of Chile, Argentina and Uruguay have a common background regarding land use and land cover with a total of 46 million ha of forests whose benefits are prospering for the regional framework of the Southern Cone. The three countries do not articulate or interchange on their forest policies beyond circumstantial agreements. In this regard, and as our first research focus, we examined experiences while participating in the international Montréal Process on Criteria and Indicators for the Conservation and Management of Temperate and Boreal Forests. Secondly, we focused on the progress these processes have afforded regarding respective national implementation of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management (C&I for SFM) and uptake in forest policy. Thirdly, we examined also the obstacles experienced during participation and implementation. We based our findings on content analysis of key documents and author observations. Albeit the institutional and political frameworks between the countries differ, we found common constraints on budgeting, limited human resources and institutional capacity. Communication to society and policy makers’ commitment are also important weaknesses. The engagement of the three countries in the Montréal Process and the application of related national sets of C&I for SFM have provided solutions to recent land use conflicts. This also strengthened the quality and effectiveness of recently approved laws and regimes for a sustainable forest management. In conclusion, the forest dialogues of these countries, within and between each other, were reinforced by participation in C&I for SFM processes, helping to bridge the gap between decision-makers, national forest agencies, academia and other forest-related stakeholders. Common indicators and related national reports facilitated the identification of affinities for regional integration on a common basis and helped to raise the level of national forest policies increasing its strength and commitment to global forest challenges. The lessons learned should be considered to reach progress towards sustainability.
Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes
Fil: Laclau, Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes; Argentina
Fil: Meza, Andrés. Corporación Nacional Forestal; Chile
Fil: Lima, Joaquín Garrido Soares de. Uruguay. Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca. Dirección General Forestal; Uruguay
Fil: Linser, Stefanie. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences; Austria. Forest Policy Research Network. European Forest Institute; Austria
Fuente
International Forestry Review 21 (3) : 315-323 (September 2019)
Materia
Bosques
Indicadores
Ordenación Forestal
Forests
Indicators
Forest Management
América del Sur
Manejo Forestal
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/6513

id INTADig_ec5369d74fa71351f8c4c0c149240b9d
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/6513
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest management: lessons learned in the Southern ConeLaclau, PabloMeza, AndrésLima, Joaquín Garrido Soares deLinser, StefanieBosquesIndicadoresOrdenación ForestalForestsIndicatorsForest ManagementAmérica del SurManejo ForestalThe Southern Cone countries of Chile, Argentina and Uruguay have a common background regarding land use and land cover with a total of 46 million ha of forests whose benefits are prospering for the regional framework of the Southern Cone. The three countries do not articulate or interchange on their forest policies beyond circumstantial agreements. In this regard, and as our first research focus, we examined experiences while participating in the international Montréal Process on Criteria and Indicators for the Conservation and Management of Temperate and Boreal Forests. Secondly, we focused on the progress these processes have afforded regarding respective national implementation of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management (C&I for SFM) and uptake in forest policy. Thirdly, we examined also the obstacles experienced during participation and implementation. We based our findings on content analysis of key documents and author observations. Albeit the institutional and political frameworks between the countries differ, we found common constraints on budgeting, limited human resources and institutional capacity. Communication to society and policy makers’ commitment are also important weaknesses. The engagement of the three countries in the Montréal Process and the application of related national sets of C&I for SFM have provided solutions to recent land use conflicts. This also strengthened the quality and effectiveness of recently approved laws and regimes for a sustainable forest management. In conclusion, the forest dialogues of these countries, within and between each other, were reinforced by participation in C&I for SFM processes, helping to bridge the gap between decision-makers, national forest agencies, academia and other forest-related stakeholders. Common indicators and related national reports facilitated the identification of affinities for regional integration on a common basis and helped to raise the level of national forest policies increasing its strength and commitment to global forest challenges. The lessons learned should be considered to reach progress towards sustainability.Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los AndesFil: Laclau, Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes; ArgentinaFil: Meza, Andrés. Corporación Nacional Forestal; ChileFil: Lima, Joaquín Garrido Soares de. Uruguay. Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca. Dirección General Forestal; UruguayFil: Linser, Stefanie. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences; Austria. Forest Policy Research Network. European Forest Institute; AustriaCommonwealth Forestry Association2019-12-16T10:56:21Z2019-12-16T10:56:21Z2019info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6513https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/cfa/ifr/2019/00000021/00000003/art000041465-5489https://doi.org/10.1505/146554819827293196International Forestry Review 21 (3) : 315-323 (September 2019)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-10-16T09:29:42Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/6513instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-16 09:29:42.959INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest management: lessons learned in the Southern Cone
title Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest management: lessons learned in the Southern Cone
spellingShingle Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest management: lessons learned in the Southern Cone
Laclau, Pablo
Bosques
Indicadores
Ordenación Forestal
Forests
Indicators
Forest Management
América del Sur
Manejo Forestal
title_short Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest management: lessons learned in the Southern Cone
title_full Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest management: lessons learned in the Southern Cone
title_fullStr Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest management: lessons learned in the Southern Cone
title_full_unstemmed Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest management: lessons learned in the Southern Cone
title_sort Criteria and Indicators for sustainable forest management: lessons learned in the Southern Cone
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Laclau, Pablo
Meza, Andrés
Lima, Joaquín Garrido Soares de
Linser, Stefanie
author Laclau, Pablo
author_facet Laclau, Pablo
Meza, Andrés
Lima, Joaquín Garrido Soares de
Linser, Stefanie
author_role author
author2 Meza, Andrés
Lima, Joaquín Garrido Soares de
Linser, Stefanie
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Bosques
Indicadores
Ordenación Forestal
Forests
Indicators
Forest Management
América del Sur
Manejo Forestal
topic Bosques
Indicadores
Ordenación Forestal
Forests
Indicators
Forest Management
América del Sur
Manejo Forestal
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The Southern Cone countries of Chile, Argentina and Uruguay have a common background regarding land use and land cover with a total of 46 million ha of forests whose benefits are prospering for the regional framework of the Southern Cone. The three countries do not articulate or interchange on their forest policies beyond circumstantial agreements. In this regard, and as our first research focus, we examined experiences while participating in the international Montréal Process on Criteria and Indicators for the Conservation and Management of Temperate and Boreal Forests. Secondly, we focused on the progress these processes have afforded regarding respective national implementation of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management (C&I for SFM) and uptake in forest policy. Thirdly, we examined also the obstacles experienced during participation and implementation. We based our findings on content analysis of key documents and author observations. Albeit the institutional and political frameworks between the countries differ, we found common constraints on budgeting, limited human resources and institutional capacity. Communication to society and policy makers’ commitment are also important weaknesses. The engagement of the three countries in the Montréal Process and the application of related national sets of C&I for SFM have provided solutions to recent land use conflicts. This also strengthened the quality and effectiveness of recently approved laws and regimes for a sustainable forest management. In conclusion, the forest dialogues of these countries, within and between each other, were reinforced by participation in C&I for SFM processes, helping to bridge the gap between decision-makers, national forest agencies, academia and other forest-related stakeholders. Common indicators and related national reports facilitated the identification of affinities for regional integration on a common basis and helped to raise the level of national forest policies increasing its strength and commitment to global forest challenges. The lessons learned should be considered to reach progress towards sustainability.
Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes
Fil: Laclau, Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes; Argentina
Fil: Meza, Andrés. Corporación Nacional Forestal; Chile
Fil: Lima, Joaquín Garrido Soares de. Uruguay. Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca. Dirección General Forestal; Uruguay
Fil: Linser, Stefanie. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences; Austria. Forest Policy Research Network. European Forest Institute; Austria
description The Southern Cone countries of Chile, Argentina and Uruguay have a common background regarding land use and land cover with a total of 46 million ha of forests whose benefits are prospering for the regional framework of the Southern Cone. The three countries do not articulate or interchange on their forest policies beyond circumstantial agreements. In this regard, and as our first research focus, we examined experiences while participating in the international Montréal Process on Criteria and Indicators for the Conservation and Management of Temperate and Boreal Forests. Secondly, we focused on the progress these processes have afforded regarding respective national implementation of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management (C&I for SFM) and uptake in forest policy. Thirdly, we examined also the obstacles experienced during participation and implementation. We based our findings on content analysis of key documents and author observations. Albeit the institutional and political frameworks between the countries differ, we found common constraints on budgeting, limited human resources and institutional capacity. Communication to society and policy makers’ commitment are also important weaknesses. The engagement of the three countries in the Montréal Process and the application of related national sets of C&I for SFM have provided solutions to recent land use conflicts. This also strengthened the quality and effectiveness of recently approved laws and regimes for a sustainable forest management. In conclusion, the forest dialogues of these countries, within and between each other, were reinforced by participation in C&I for SFM processes, helping to bridge the gap between decision-makers, national forest agencies, academia and other forest-related stakeholders. Common indicators and related national reports facilitated the identification of affinities for regional integration on a common basis and helped to raise the level of national forest policies increasing its strength and commitment to global forest challenges. The lessons learned should be considered to reach progress towards sustainability.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-16T10:56:21Z
2019-12-16T10:56:21Z
2019
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6513
https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/cfa/ifr/2019/00000021/00000003/art00004
1465-5489
https://doi.org/10.1505/146554819827293196
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6513
https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/cfa/ifr/2019/00000021/00000003/art00004
https://doi.org/10.1505/146554819827293196
identifier_str_mv 1465-5489
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Commonwealth Forestry Association
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Commonwealth Forestry Association
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International Forestry Review 21 (3) : 315-323 (September 2019)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1846143521452457984
score 12.712165