Effects of fertilizer type on nitrous oxide emission and ammonia volatilization in wheat and maize crops
- Autores
- Vangeli, Sebastián; Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela; Beget, Maria Eugenia; Otero Estrada, Edit; Valdettaro, Roció Antonella; Oricchio, Patricio; Kandus, Mariana Virginia; Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo
- Año de publicación
- 2022
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- About half of the applied nitrogen (N) is not consumed by crops, causing environmental and economic costs. This N can be lost as ammonia (NH3) volatilization, nitrous oxide (N2O) emission or leaching, among others. This work aimed to compare the amount of gaseous N losses using three different fertilizers on two consecutive experiments: one summer crop (maize) and one winter crop (wheat) in the Rolling Pampa, Argentina. The fertilizers used were urea ammonium nitrate (UAN), calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and AN+DMPP (ammonium nitrate-based NPK fertilizer with DMPP nitrification inhibitor). NH3 emissions were estimated using a semi open-static absorption system during the first month after fertilization for each experiment. N2O emissions were estimated using vented static chambers during the growing season of each crop. Results show that CAN or AN+DMPP fertilizers used instead of UAN helped to reduce NH3 volatilization by 45–50% and 62–63% on maize and wheat experiments respectively, but failed to reduce N2O emissions. In addition, contrary to the expected, AN+DMPP increased N2O emissions during the maize experiment. The majority of the gaseous N losses occurred at specific moments of the crop cycle (after N fertilization and around leaf senescence). Losses as NH3 volatilization were higher than N2O emissions in the maize experiment, as expected because of the warmer temperature during this summer crop. However, N2O emissions were higher during the wheat crop, emphasizing the importance of factors such as meteorological conditions, previous land-use, residual soil nitrate and stubble quality on the soil.
Fil: Vangeli, Sebastián. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto De Investigación Clima y Agua; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Ingeniería Agrícola y Uso de la Tierra. Cátedra de Manejo y Conservación de Suelo; Argentina
Fil: Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina
Fil: Beget, Maria Eugenia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información; Argentina
Fil: Otero Estrada, Edit. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Suelos; Argentina
Fil: Valdettaro, Roció Antonella. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Suelos; Argentina
Fil: Oricchio, Patricio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina
Fil: Kandus, Patricia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética; Argentina
Fil: Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información; Argentina - Fuente
- Soil Use Management 38 (2) : 1-13 (First published: 28 January 2022)
- Materia
-
Ammonia
Volatilization
Fertilizer Application
Nitrous Oxide
Soil Fertility
Wheat
Maize
Volatilización
Aplicación de Abonos
Amoníaco
Óxido Nitroso
Fertilidad del Suelo
Trigo
Maíz
Fertilización - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso restringido
- Condiciones de uso
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/11795
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_92909522e1593029b0b4094c8c1787bc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/11795 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Effects of fertilizer type on nitrous oxide emission and ammonia volatilization in wheat and maize cropsVangeli, SebastiánPosse Beaulieu, GabrielaBeget, Maria EugeniaOtero Estrada, EditValdettaro, Roció AntonellaOricchio, PatricioKandus, Mariana VirginiaDi Bella, Carlos MarceloAmmoniaVolatilizationFertilizer ApplicationNitrous OxideSoil FertilityWheatMaizeVolatilizaciónAplicación de AbonosAmoníacoÓxido NitrosoFertilidad del SueloTrigoMaízFertilizaciónAbout half of the applied nitrogen (N) is not consumed by crops, causing environmental and economic costs. This N can be lost as ammonia (NH3) volatilization, nitrous oxide (N2O) emission or leaching, among others. This work aimed to compare the amount of gaseous N losses using three different fertilizers on two consecutive experiments: one summer crop (maize) and one winter crop (wheat) in the Rolling Pampa, Argentina. The fertilizers used were urea ammonium nitrate (UAN), calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and AN+DMPP (ammonium nitrate-based NPK fertilizer with DMPP nitrification inhibitor). NH3 emissions were estimated using a semi open-static absorption system during the first month after fertilization for each experiment. N2O emissions were estimated using vented static chambers during the growing season of each crop. Results show that CAN or AN+DMPP fertilizers used instead of UAN helped to reduce NH3 volatilization by 45–50% and 62–63% on maize and wheat experiments respectively, but failed to reduce N2O emissions. In addition, contrary to the expected, AN+DMPP increased N2O emissions during the maize experiment. The majority of the gaseous N losses occurred at specific moments of the crop cycle (after N fertilization and around leaf senescence). Losses as NH3 volatilization were higher than N2O emissions in the maize experiment, as expected because of the warmer temperature during this summer crop. However, N2O emissions were higher during the wheat crop, emphasizing the importance of factors such as meteorological conditions, previous land-use, residual soil nitrate and stubble quality on the soil.Fil: Vangeli, Sebastián. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto De Investigación Clima y Agua; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Ingeniería Agrícola y Uso de la Tierra. Cátedra de Manejo y Conservación de Suelo; ArgentinaFil: Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; ArgentinaFil: Beget, Maria Eugenia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información; ArgentinaFil: Otero Estrada, Edit. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Suelos; ArgentinaFil: Valdettaro, Roció Antonella. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Suelos; ArgentinaFil: Oricchio, Patricio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; ArgentinaFil: Kandus, Patricia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética; ArgentinaFil: Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información; ArgentinaWiley2022-05-03T15:58:36Z2022-05-03T15:58:36Z2022-01-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11795https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sum.127881475-2743https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12788Soil Use Management 38 (2) : 1-13 (First published: 28 January 2022)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/PNNAT-1128023/AR./Emisiones de gases con efecto invernadero.info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-10-16T09:30:43Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/11795instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-16 09:30:43.947INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effects of fertilizer type on nitrous oxide emission and ammonia volatilization in wheat and maize crops |
title |
Effects of fertilizer type on nitrous oxide emission and ammonia volatilization in wheat and maize crops |
spellingShingle |
Effects of fertilizer type on nitrous oxide emission and ammonia volatilization in wheat and maize crops Vangeli, Sebastián Ammonia Volatilization Fertilizer Application Nitrous Oxide Soil Fertility Wheat Maize Volatilización Aplicación de Abonos Amoníaco Óxido Nitroso Fertilidad del Suelo Trigo Maíz Fertilización |
title_short |
Effects of fertilizer type on nitrous oxide emission and ammonia volatilization in wheat and maize crops |
title_full |
Effects of fertilizer type on nitrous oxide emission and ammonia volatilization in wheat and maize crops |
title_fullStr |
Effects of fertilizer type on nitrous oxide emission and ammonia volatilization in wheat and maize crops |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of fertilizer type on nitrous oxide emission and ammonia volatilization in wheat and maize crops |
title_sort |
Effects of fertilizer type on nitrous oxide emission and ammonia volatilization in wheat and maize crops |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Vangeli, Sebastián Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela Beget, Maria Eugenia Otero Estrada, Edit Valdettaro, Roció Antonella Oricchio, Patricio Kandus, Mariana Virginia Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo |
author |
Vangeli, Sebastián |
author_facet |
Vangeli, Sebastián Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela Beget, Maria Eugenia Otero Estrada, Edit Valdettaro, Roció Antonella Oricchio, Patricio Kandus, Mariana Virginia Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela Beget, Maria Eugenia Otero Estrada, Edit Valdettaro, Roció Antonella Oricchio, Patricio Kandus, Mariana Virginia Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ammonia Volatilization Fertilizer Application Nitrous Oxide Soil Fertility Wheat Maize Volatilización Aplicación de Abonos Amoníaco Óxido Nitroso Fertilidad del Suelo Trigo Maíz Fertilización |
topic |
Ammonia Volatilization Fertilizer Application Nitrous Oxide Soil Fertility Wheat Maize Volatilización Aplicación de Abonos Amoníaco Óxido Nitroso Fertilidad del Suelo Trigo Maíz Fertilización |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
About half of the applied nitrogen (N) is not consumed by crops, causing environmental and economic costs. This N can be lost as ammonia (NH3) volatilization, nitrous oxide (N2O) emission or leaching, among others. This work aimed to compare the amount of gaseous N losses using three different fertilizers on two consecutive experiments: one summer crop (maize) and one winter crop (wheat) in the Rolling Pampa, Argentina. The fertilizers used were urea ammonium nitrate (UAN), calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and AN+DMPP (ammonium nitrate-based NPK fertilizer with DMPP nitrification inhibitor). NH3 emissions were estimated using a semi open-static absorption system during the first month after fertilization for each experiment. N2O emissions were estimated using vented static chambers during the growing season of each crop. Results show that CAN or AN+DMPP fertilizers used instead of UAN helped to reduce NH3 volatilization by 45–50% and 62–63% on maize and wheat experiments respectively, but failed to reduce N2O emissions. In addition, contrary to the expected, AN+DMPP increased N2O emissions during the maize experiment. The majority of the gaseous N losses occurred at specific moments of the crop cycle (after N fertilization and around leaf senescence). Losses as NH3 volatilization were higher than N2O emissions in the maize experiment, as expected because of the warmer temperature during this summer crop. However, N2O emissions were higher during the wheat crop, emphasizing the importance of factors such as meteorological conditions, previous land-use, residual soil nitrate and stubble quality on the soil. Fil: Vangeli, Sebastián. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto De Investigación Clima y Agua; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Ingeniería Agrícola y Uso de la Tierra. Cátedra de Manejo y Conservación de Suelo; Argentina Fil: Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina Fil: Beget, Maria Eugenia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información; Argentina Fil: Otero Estrada, Edit. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Suelos; Argentina Fil: Valdettaro, Roció Antonella. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Suelos; Argentina Fil: Oricchio, Patricio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina Fil: Kandus, Patricia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética; Argentina Fil: Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información; Argentina |
description |
About half of the applied nitrogen (N) is not consumed by crops, causing environmental and economic costs. This N can be lost as ammonia (NH3) volatilization, nitrous oxide (N2O) emission or leaching, among others. This work aimed to compare the amount of gaseous N losses using three different fertilizers on two consecutive experiments: one summer crop (maize) and one winter crop (wheat) in the Rolling Pampa, Argentina. The fertilizers used were urea ammonium nitrate (UAN), calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and AN+DMPP (ammonium nitrate-based NPK fertilizer with DMPP nitrification inhibitor). NH3 emissions were estimated using a semi open-static absorption system during the first month after fertilization for each experiment. N2O emissions were estimated using vented static chambers during the growing season of each crop. Results show that CAN or AN+DMPP fertilizers used instead of UAN helped to reduce NH3 volatilization by 45–50% and 62–63% on maize and wheat experiments respectively, but failed to reduce N2O emissions. In addition, contrary to the expected, AN+DMPP increased N2O emissions during the maize experiment. The majority of the gaseous N losses occurred at specific moments of the crop cycle (after N fertilization and around leaf senescence). Losses as NH3 volatilization were higher than N2O emissions in the maize experiment, as expected because of the warmer temperature during this summer crop. However, N2O emissions were higher during the wheat crop, emphasizing the importance of factors such as meteorological conditions, previous land-use, residual soil nitrate and stubble quality on the soil. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-03T15:58:36Z 2022-05-03T15:58:36Z 2022-01-28 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11795 https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sum.12788 1475-2743 https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12788 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11795 https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sum.12788 https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12788 |
identifier_str_mv |
1475-2743 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/PNNAT-1128023/AR./Emisiones de gases con efecto invernadero. |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
restrictedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Soil Use Management 38 (2) : 1-13 (First published: 28 January 2022) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1846143546197803008 |
score |
12.712165 |