Effects of fertilizer type on nitrous oxide emission and ammonia volatilization in wheat and maize crops

Autores
Vangeli, Sebastián; Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela; Beget, Maria Eugenia; Otero Estrada, Edit; Valdettaro, Roció Antonella; Oricchio, Patricio; Kandus, Mariana Virginia; Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
About half of the applied nitrogen (N) is not consumed by crops, causing environmental and economic costs. This N can be lost as ammonia (NH3) volatilization, nitrous oxide (N2O) emission or leaching, among others. This work aimed to compare the amount of gaseous N losses using three different fertilizers on two consecutive experiments: one summer crop (maize) and one winter crop (wheat) in the Rolling Pampa, Argentina. The fertilizers used were urea ammonium nitrate (UAN), calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and AN+DMPP (ammonium nitrate-based NPK fertilizer with DMPP nitrification inhibitor). NH3 emissions were estimated using a semi open-static absorption system during the first month after fertilization for each experiment. N2O emissions were estimated using vented static chambers during the growing season of each crop. Results show that CAN or AN+DMPP fertilizers used instead of UAN helped to reduce NH3 volatilization by 45–50% and 62–63% on maize and wheat experiments respectively, but failed to reduce N2O emissions. In addition, contrary to the expected, AN+DMPP increased N2O emissions during the maize experiment. The majority of the gaseous N losses occurred at specific moments of the crop cycle (after N fertilization and around leaf senescence). Losses as NH3 volatilization were higher than N2O emissions in the maize experiment, as expected because of the warmer temperature during this summer crop. However, N2O emissions were higher during the wheat crop, emphasizing the importance of factors such as meteorological conditions, previous land-use, residual soil nitrate and stubble quality on the soil.
Fil: Vangeli, Sebastián. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto De Investigación Clima y Agua; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Ingeniería Agrícola y Uso de la Tierra. Cátedra de Manejo y Conservación de Suelo; Argentina
Fil: Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina
Fil: Beget, Maria Eugenia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información; Argentina
Fil: Otero Estrada, Edit. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Suelos; Argentina
Fil: Valdettaro, Roció Antonella. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Suelos; Argentina
Fil: Oricchio, Patricio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina
Fil: Kandus, Patricia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética; Argentina
Fil: Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información; Argentina
Fuente
Soil Use Management 38 (2) : 1-13 (First published: 28 January 2022)
Materia
Ammonia
Volatilization
Fertilizer Application
Nitrous Oxide
Soil Fertility
Wheat
Maize
Volatilización
Aplicación de Abonos
Amoníaco
Óxido Nitroso
Fertilidad del Suelo
Trigo
Maíz
Fertilización
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/11795

id INTADig_92909522e1593029b0b4094c8c1787bc
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/11795
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Effects of fertilizer type on nitrous oxide emission and ammonia volatilization in wheat and maize cropsVangeli, SebastiánPosse Beaulieu, GabrielaBeget, Maria EugeniaOtero Estrada, EditValdettaro, Roció AntonellaOricchio, PatricioKandus, Mariana VirginiaDi Bella, Carlos MarceloAmmoniaVolatilizationFertilizer ApplicationNitrous OxideSoil FertilityWheatMaizeVolatilizaciónAplicación de AbonosAmoníacoÓxido NitrosoFertilidad del SueloTrigoMaízFertilizaciónAbout half of the applied nitrogen (N) is not consumed by crops, causing environmental and economic costs. This N can be lost as ammonia (NH3) volatilization, nitrous oxide (N2O) emission or leaching, among others. This work aimed to compare the amount of gaseous N losses using three different fertilizers on two consecutive experiments: one summer crop (maize) and one winter crop (wheat) in the Rolling Pampa, Argentina. The fertilizers used were urea ammonium nitrate (UAN), calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and AN+DMPP (ammonium nitrate-based NPK fertilizer with DMPP nitrification inhibitor). NH3 emissions were estimated using a semi open-static absorption system during the first month after fertilization for each experiment. N2O emissions were estimated using vented static chambers during the growing season of each crop. Results show that CAN or AN+DMPP fertilizers used instead of UAN helped to reduce NH3 volatilization by 45–50% and 62–63% on maize and wheat experiments respectively, but failed to reduce N2O emissions. In addition, contrary to the expected, AN+DMPP increased N2O emissions during the maize experiment. The majority of the gaseous N losses occurred at specific moments of the crop cycle (after N fertilization and around leaf senescence). Losses as NH3 volatilization were higher than N2O emissions in the maize experiment, as expected because of the warmer temperature during this summer crop. However, N2O emissions were higher during the wheat crop, emphasizing the importance of factors such as meteorological conditions, previous land-use, residual soil nitrate and stubble quality on the soil.Fil: Vangeli, Sebastián. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto De Investigación Clima y Agua; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Ingeniería Agrícola y Uso de la Tierra. Cátedra de Manejo y Conservación de Suelo; ArgentinaFil: Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; ArgentinaFil: Beget, Maria Eugenia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información; ArgentinaFil: Otero Estrada, Edit. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Suelos; ArgentinaFil: Valdettaro, Roció Antonella. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Suelos; ArgentinaFil: Oricchio, Patricio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; ArgentinaFil: Kandus, Patricia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética; ArgentinaFil: Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información; ArgentinaWiley2022-05-03T15:58:36Z2022-05-03T15:58:36Z2022-01-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11795https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sum.127881475-2743https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12788Soil Use Management 38 (2) : 1-13 (First published: 28 January 2022)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/PNNAT-1128023/AR./Emisiones de gases con efecto invernadero.info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-10-16T09:30:43Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/11795instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-16 09:30:43.947INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effects of fertilizer type on nitrous oxide emission and ammonia volatilization in wheat and maize crops
title Effects of fertilizer type on nitrous oxide emission and ammonia volatilization in wheat and maize crops
spellingShingle Effects of fertilizer type on nitrous oxide emission and ammonia volatilization in wheat and maize crops
Vangeli, Sebastián
Ammonia
Volatilization
Fertilizer Application
Nitrous Oxide
Soil Fertility
Wheat
Maize
Volatilización
Aplicación de Abonos
Amoníaco
Óxido Nitroso
Fertilidad del Suelo
Trigo
Maíz
Fertilización
title_short Effects of fertilizer type on nitrous oxide emission and ammonia volatilization in wheat and maize crops
title_full Effects of fertilizer type on nitrous oxide emission and ammonia volatilization in wheat and maize crops
title_fullStr Effects of fertilizer type on nitrous oxide emission and ammonia volatilization in wheat and maize crops
title_full_unstemmed Effects of fertilizer type on nitrous oxide emission and ammonia volatilization in wheat and maize crops
title_sort Effects of fertilizer type on nitrous oxide emission and ammonia volatilization in wheat and maize crops
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Vangeli, Sebastián
Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela
Beget, Maria Eugenia
Otero Estrada, Edit
Valdettaro, Roció Antonella
Oricchio, Patricio
Kandus, Mariana Virginia
Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo
author Vangeli, Sebastián
author_facet Vangeli, Sebastián
Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela
Beget, Maria Eugenia
Otero Estrada, Edit
Valdettaro, Roció Antonella
Oricchio, Patricio
Kandus, Mariana Virginia
Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo
author_role author
author2 Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela
Beget, Maria Eugenia
Otero Estrada, Edit
Valdettaro, Roció Antonella
Oricchio, Patricio
Kandus, Mariana Virginia
Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ammonia
Volatilization
Fertilizer Application
Nitrous Oxide
Soil Fertility
Wheat
Maize
Volatilización
Aplicación de Abonos
Amoníaco
Óxido Nitroso
Fertilidad del Suelo
Trigo
Maíz
Fertilización
topic Ammonia
Volatilization
Fertilizer Application
Nitrous Oxide
Soil Fertility
Wheat
Maize
Volatilización
Aplicación de Abonos
Amoníaco
Óxido Nitroso
Fertilidad del Suelo
Trigo
Maíz
Fertilización
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv About half of the applied nitrogen (N) is not consumed by crops, causing environmental and economic costs. This N can be lost as ammonia (NH3) volatilization, nitrous oxide (N2O) emission or leaching, among others. This work aimed to compare the amount of gaseous N losses using three different fertilizers on two consecutive experiments: one summer crop (maize) and one winter crop (wheat) in the Rolling Pampa, Argentina. The fertilizers used were urea ammonium nitrate (UAN), calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and AN+DMPP (ammonium nitrate-based NPK fertilizer with DMPP nitrification inhibitor). NH3 emissions were estimated using a semi open-static absorption system during the first month after fertilization for each experiment. N2O emissions were estimated using vented static chambers during the growing season of each crop. Results show that CAN or AN+DMPP fertilizers used instead of UAN helped to reduce NH3 volatilization by 45–50% and 62–63% on maize and wheat experiments respectively, but failed to reduce N2O emissions. In addition, contrary to the expected, AN+DMPP increased N2O emissions during the maize experiment. The majority of the gaseous N losses occurred at specific moments of the crop cycle (after N fertilization and around leaf senescence). Losses as NH3 volatilization were higher than N2O emissions in the maize experiment, as expected because of the warmer temperature during this summer crop. However, N2O emissions were higher during the wheat crop, emphasizing the importance of factors such as meteorological conditions, previous land-use, residual soil nitrate and stubble quality on the soil.
Fil: Vangeli, Sebastián. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto De Investigación Clima y Agua; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Ingeniería Agrícola y Uso de la Tierra. Cátedra de Manejo y Conservación de Suelo; Argentina
Fil: Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina
Fil: Beget, Maria Eugenia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información; Argentina
Fil: Otero Estrada, Edit. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Suelos; Argentina
Fil: Valdettaro, Roció Antonella. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Suelos; Argentina
Fil: Oricchio, Patricio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina
Fil: Kandus, Patricia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética; Argentina
Fil: Di Bella, Carlos Marcelo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información; Argentina
description About half of the applied nitrogen (N) is not consumed by crops, causing environmental and economic costs. This N can be lost as ammonia (NH3) volatilization, nitrous oxide (N2O) emission or leaching, among others. This work aimed to compare the amount of gaseous N losses using three different fertilizers on two consecutive experiments: one summer crop (maize) and one winter crop (wheat) in the Rolling Pampa, Argentina. The fertilizers used were urea ammonium nitrate (UAN), calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and AN+DMPP (ammonium nitrate-based NPK fertilizer with DMPP nitrification inhibitor). NH3 emissions were estimated using a semi open-static absorption system during the first month after fertilization for each experiment. N2O emissions were estimated using vented static chambers during the growing season of each crop. Results show that CAN or AN+DMPP fertilizers used instead of UAN helped to reduce NH3 volatilization by 45–50% and 62–63% on maize and wheat experiments respectively, but failed to reduce N2O emissions. In addition, contrary to the expected, AN+DMPP increased N2O emissions during the maize experiment. The majority of the gaseous N losses occurred at specific moments of the crop cycle (after N fertilization and around leaf senescence). Losses as NH3 volatilization were higher than N2O emissions in the maize experiment, as expected because of the warmer temperature during this summer crop. However, N2O emissions were higher during the wheat crop, emphasizing the importance of factors such as meteorological conditions, previous land-use, residual soil nitrate and stubble quality on the soil.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-03T15:58:36Z
2022-05-03T15:58:36Z
2022-01-28
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11795
https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sum.12788
1475-2743
https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12788
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11795
https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sum.12788
https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12788
identifier_str_mv 1475-2743
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/PNNAT-1128023/AR./Emisiones de gases con efecto invernadero.
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Soil Use Management 38 (2) : 1-13 (First published: 28 January 2022)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1846143546197803008
score 12.712165