On-farm assessment of yield and quality traits in durum wheat

Autores
Tabbita, Facundo; Ortiz-Monasterio, Iván; Piñera-Chavez, Francisco J.; Ibba, María Itria; Guzmán, Carlos
Año de publicación
2023
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Durum wheat is key source of calories and nutrients for many regions of the world. Demand for it is predicted toincrease. Further efforts are therefore needed to develop new cultivars adapted to different future scenarios. Developing anovel cultivar takes, on average, 10 years and advanced lines are tested during the process, in general, under standardized con-ditions. Although evaluating candidate genotypes for commercial release under different on-farm conditions is a strategy thatis strongly recommended, its application for durum wheat and particularly for quality traits has been limited. This study eval-uated the grain yield and quality performance of eight different genotypes acrossfive contrasting farmers’fields over two sea-sons. Combining different analysis strategies, the most outstanding and stable genotypes were identified.RESULTS: The analyses revealed that some traits were mainly explained by the genotype effect (thousand kernel weight,flour sodiumdodecyl sulfate sedimentation volume, andflour yellowness), others by the management practices (yield and grain protein content),and others (test weight) by the year effect. In general, yield showed the highest range of variation across genotypes, managementpractices, and years and test weight the narrowest range. Flour yellowness was the most stable traitacross management conditions,while yield-related traits were the most unstable. We also determined the most representative and discriminativefield conditions,which is a beneficial strategy when breeders are constrained in their ability to develop multi-environment experiments.CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that assessing genotypes in different farming systems is a valid and complementary strategy foron-station trials for determining the performance of future commercial cultivars in heterogeneous environments to improvethe breeding process and resources.
Fil: Tabbita, Facundo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina. Universidad de Córdoba, Departamento de Genética. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y de Montes; España
Fil: Ortiz-Monasterio, Iván. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); México
Fil: Piñera-Chávez, Francisco J. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); México
Fil: Ibba, María Itria. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); México
Fil: Guzman, Carlos. Universidad de Córdoba. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y de Montes. Departamento de Genética; España
Fuente
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 103 (10) : 5108-5115. (August 2023)
Materia
Wheat
Quality
Trigo
Calidad
On-farm
GGE Analysis
En la Granja
Análisis GGE
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/15253

id INTADig_48213e891827040b411d0b2d3b573f83
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/15253
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling On-farm assessment of yield and quality traits in durum wheatTabbita, FacundoOrtiz-Monasterio, IvánPiñera-Chavez, Francisco J.Ibba, María ItriaGuzmán, CarlosWheatQualityTrigoCalidadOn-farmGGE AnalysisEn la GranjaAnálisis GGEDurum wheat is key source of calories and nutrients for many regions of the world. Demand for it is predicted toincrease. Further efforts are therefore needed to develop new cultivars adapted to different future scenarios. Developing anovel cultivar takes, on average, 10 years and advanced lines are tested during the process, in general, under standardized con-ditions. Although evaluating candidate genotypes for commercial release under different on-farm conditions is a strategy thatis strongly recommended, its application for durum wheat and particularly for quality traits has been limited. This study eval-uated the grain yield and quality performance of eight different genotypes acrossfive contrasting farmers’fields over two sea-sons. Combining different analysis strategies, the most outstanding and stable genotypes were identified.RESULTS: The analyses revealed that some traits were mainly explained by the genotype effect (thousand kernel weight,flour sodiumdodecyl sulfate sedimentation volume, andflour yellowness), others by the management practices (yield and grain protein content),and others (test weight) by the year effect. In general, yield showed the highest range of variation across genotypes, managementpractices, and years and test weight the narrowest range. Flour yellowness was the most stable traitacross management conditions,while yield-related traits were the most unstable. We also determined the most representative and discriminativefield conditions,which is a beneficial strategy when breeders are constrained in their ability to develop multi-environment experiments.CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that assessing genotypes in different farming systems is a valid and complementary strategy foron-station trials for determining the performance of future commercial cultivars in heterogeneous environments to improvethe breeding process and resources.Fil: Tabbita, Facundo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina. Universidad de Córdoba, Departamento de Genética. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y de Montes; EspañaFil: Ortiz-Monasterio, Iván. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); MéxicoFil: Piñera-Chávez, Francisco J. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); MéxicoFil: Ibba, María Itria. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); MéxicoFil: Guzman, Carlos. Universidad de Córdoba. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y de Montes. Departamento de Genética; EspañaWiley2023-09-19T18:12:44Z2023-09-19T18:12:44Z2023-08-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/15253https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsfa.125800022-51421097-0010https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.12580Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 103 (10) : 5108-5115. (August 2023)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-29T13:46:06Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/15253instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:46:07.163INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv On-farm assessment of yield and quality traits in durum wheat
title On-farm assessment of yield and quality traits in durum wheat
spellingShingle On-farm assessment of yield and quality traits in durum wheat
Tabbita, Facundo
Wheat
Quality
Trigo
Calidad
On-farm
GGE Analysis
En la Granja
Análisis GGE
title_short On-farm assessment of yield and quality traits in durum wheat
title_full On-farm assessment of yield and quality traits in durum wheat
title_fullStr On-farm assessment of yield and quality traits in durum wheat
title_full_unstemmed On-farm assessment of yield and quality traits in durum wheat
title_sort On-farm assessment of yield and quality traits in durum wheat
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Tabbita, Facundo
Ortiz-Monasterio, Iván
Piñera-Chavez, Francisco J.
Ibba, María Itria
Guzmán, Carlos
author Tabbita, Facundo
author_facet Tabbita, Facundo
Ortiz-Monasterio, Iván
Piñera-Chavez, Francisco J.
Ibba, María Itria
Guzmán, Carlos
author_role author
author2 Ortiz-Monasterio, Iván
Piñera-Chavez, Francisco J.
Ibba, María Itria
Guzmán, Carlos
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Wheat
Quality
Trigo
Calidad
On-farm
GGE Analysis
En la Granja
Análisis GGE
topic Wheat
Quality
Trigo
Calidad
On-farm
GGE Analysis
En la Granja
Análisis GGE
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Durum wheat is key source of calories and nutrients for many regions of the world. Demand for it is predicted toincrease. Further efforts are therefore needed to develop new cultivars adapted to different future scenarios. Developing anovel cultivar takes, on average, 10 years and advanced lines are tested during the process, in general, under standardized con-ditions. Although evaluating candidate genotypes for commercial release under different on-farm conditions is a strategy thatis strongly recommended, its application for durum wheat and particularly for quality traits has been limited. This study eval-uated the grain yield and quality performance of eight different genotypes acrossfive contrasting farmers’fields over two sea-sons. Combining different analysis strategies, the most outstanding and stable genotypes were identified.RESULTS: The analyses revealed that some traits were mainly explained by the genotype effect (thousand kernel weight,flour sodiumdodecyl sulfate sedimentation volume, andflour yellowness), others by the management practices (yield and grain protein content),and others (test weight) by the year effect. In general, yield showed the highest range of variation across genotypes, managementpractices, and years and test weight the narrowest range. Flour yellowness was the most stable traitacross management conditions,while yield-related traits were the most unstable. We also determined the most representative and discriminativefield conditions,which is a beneficial strategy when breeders are constrained in their ability to develop multi-environment experiments.CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that assessing genotypes in different farming systems is a valid and complementary strategy foron-station trials for determining the performance of future commercial cultivars in heterogeneous environments to improvethe breeding process and resources.
Fil: Tabbita, Facundo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina. Universidad de Córdoba, Departamento de Genética. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y de Montes; España
Fil: Ortiz-Monasterio, Iván. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); México
Fil: Piñera-Chávez, Francisco J. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); México
Fil: Ibba, María Itria. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); México
Fil: Guzman, Carlos. Universidad de Córdoba. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y de Montes. Departamento de Genética; España
description Durum wheat is key source of calories and nutrients for many regions of the world. Demand for it is predicted toincrease. Further efforts are therefore needed to develop new cultivars adapted to different future scenarios. Developing anovel cultivar takes, on average, 10 years and advanced lines are tested during the process, in general, under standardized con-ditions. Although evaluating candidate genotypes for commercial release under different on-farm conditions is a strategy thatis strongly recommended, its application for durum wheat and particularly for quality traits has been limited. This study eval-uated the grain yield and quality performance of eight different genotypes acrossfive contrasting farmers’fields over two sea-sons. Combining different analysis strategies, the most outstanding and stable genotypes were identified.RESULTS: The analyses revealed that some traits were mainly explained by the genotype effect (thousand kernel weight,flour sodiumdodecyl sulfate sedimentation volume, andflour yellowness), others by the management practices (yield and grain protein content),and others (test weight) by the year effect. In general, yield showed the highest range of variation across genotypes, managementpractices, and years and test weight the narrowest range. Flour yellowness was the most stable traitacross management conditions,while yield-related traits were the most unstable. We also determined the most representative and discriminativefield conditions,which is a beneficial strategy when breeders are constrained in their ability to develop multi-environment experiments.CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that assessing genotypes in different farming systems is a valid and complementary strategy foron-station trials for determining the performance of future commercial cultivars in heterogeneous environments to improvethe breeding process and resources.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-19T18:12:44Z
2023-09-19T18:12:44Z
2023-08-15
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/15253
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsfa.12580
0022-5142
1097-0010
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.12580
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/15253
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsfa.12580
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.12580
identifier_str_mv 0022-5142
1097-0010
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 103 (10) : 5108-5115. (August 2023)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1844619179240456192
score 12.559606