On-farm assessment of yield and quality traits in durum wheat
- Autores
- Tabbita, Facundo; Ortiz-Monasterio, Iván; Piñera-Chavez, Francisco J.; Ibba, María Itria; Guzmán, Carlos
- Año de publicación
- 2023
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Durum wheat is key source of calories and nutrients for many regions of the world. Demand for it is predicted toincrease. Further efforts are therefore needed to develop new cultivars adapted to different future scenarios. Developing anovel cultivar takes, on average, 10 years and advanced lines are tested during the process, in general, under standardized con-ditions. Although evaluating candidate genotypes for commercial release under different on-farm conditions is a strategy thatis strongly recommended, its application for durum wheat and particularly for quality traits has been limited. This study eval-uated the grain yield and quality performance of eight different genotypes acrossfive contrasting farmers’fields over two sea-sons. Combining different analysis strategies, the most outstanding and stable genotypes were identified.RESULTS: The analyses revealed that some traits were mainly explained by the genotype effect (thousand kernel weight,flour sodiumdodecyl sulfate sedimentation volume, andflour yellowness), others by the management practices (yield and grain protein content),and others (test weight) by the year effect. In general, yield showed the highest range of variation across genotypes, managementpractices, and years and test weight the narrowest range. Flour yellowness was the most stable traitacross management conditions,while yield-related traits were the most unstable. We also determined the most representative and discriminativefield conditions,which is a beneficial strategy when breeders are constrained in their ability to develop multi-environment experiments.CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that assessing genotypes in different farming systems is a valid and complementary strategy foron-station trials for determining the performance of future commercial cultivars in heterogeneous environments to improvethe breeding process and resources.
Fil: Tabbita, Facundo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina. Universidad de Córdoba, Departamento de Genética. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y de Montes; España
Fil: Ortiz-Monasterio, Iván. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); México
Fil: Piñera-Chávez, Francisco J. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); México
Fil: Ibba, María Itria. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); México
Fil: Guzman, Carlos. Universidad de Córdoba. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y de Montes. Departamento de Genética; España - Fuente
- Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 103 (10) : 5108-5115. (August 2023)
- Materia
-
Wheat
Quality
Trigo
Calidad
On-farm
GGE Analysis
En la Granja
Análisis GGE - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso restringido
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/15253
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_48213e891827040b411d0b2d3b573f83 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/15253 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
On-farm assessment of yield and quality traits in durum wheatTabbita, FacundoOrtiz-Monasterio, IvánPiñera-Chavez, Francisco J.Ibba, María ItriaGuzmán, CarlosWheatQualityTrigoCalidadOn-farmGGE AnalysisEn la GranjaAnálisis GGEDurum wheat is key source of calories and nutrients for many regions of the world. Demand for it is predicted toincrease. Further efforts are therefore needed to develop new cultivars adapted to different future scenarios. Developing anovel cultivar takes, on average, 10 years and advanced lines are tested during the process, in general, under standardized con-ditions. Although evaluating candidate genotypes for commercial release under different on-farm conditions is a strategy thatis strongly recommended, its application for durum wheat and particularly for quality traits has been limited. This study eval-uated the grain yield and quality performance of eight different genotypes acrossfive contrasting farmers’fields over two sea-sons. Combining different analysis strategies, the most outstanding and stable genotypes were identified.RESULTS: The analyses revealed that some traits were mainly explained by the genotype effect (thousand kernel weight,flour sodiumdodecyl sulfate sedimentation volume, andflour yellowness), others by the management practices (yield and grain protein content),and others (test weight) by the year effect. In general, yield showed the highest range of variation across genotypes, managementpractices, and years and test weight the narrowest range. Flour yellowness was the most stable traitacross management conditions,while yield-related traits were the most unstable. We also determined the most representative and discriminativefield conditions,which is a beneficial strategy when breeders are constrained in their ability to develop multi-environment experiments.CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that assessing genotypes in different farming systems is a valid and complementary strategy foron-station trials for determining the performance of future commercial cultivars in heterogeneous environments to improvethe breeding process and resources.Fil: Tabbita, Facundo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina. Universidad de Córdoba, Departamento de Genética. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y de Montes; EspañaFil: Ortiz-Monasterio, Iván. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); MéxicoFil: Piñera-Chávez, Francisco J. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); MéxicoFil: Ibba, María Itria. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); MéxicoFil: Guzman, Carlos. Universidad de Córdoba. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y de Montes. Departamento de Genética; EspañaWiley2023-09-19T18:12:44Z2023-09-19T18:12:44Z2023-08-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/15253https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsfa.125800022-51421097-0010https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.12580Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 103 (10) : 5108-5115. (August 2023)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-29T13:46:06Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/15253instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:46:07.163INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
On-farm assessment of yield and quality traits in durum wheat |
title |
On-farm assessment of yield and quality traits in durum wheat |
spellingShingle |
On-farm assessment of yield and quality traits in durum wheat Tabbita, Facundo Wheat Quality Trigo Calidad On-farm GGE Analysis En la Granja Análisis GGE |
title_short |
On-farm assessment of yield and quality traits in durum wheat |
title_full |
On-farm assessment of yield and quality traits in durum wheat |
title_fullStr |
On-farm assessment of yield and quality traits in durum wheat |
title_full_unstemmed |
On-farm assessment of yield and quality traits in durum wheat |
title_sort |
On-farm assessment of yield and quality traits in durum wheat |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Tabbita, Facundo Ortiz-Monasterio, Iván Piñera-Chavez, Francisco J. Ibba, María Itria Guzmán, Carlos |
author |
Tabbita, Facundo |
author_facet |
Tabbita, Facundo Ortiz-Monasterio, Iván Piñera-Chavez, Francisco J. Ibba, María Itria Guzmán, Carlos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ortiz-Monasterio, Iván Piñera-Chavez, Francisco J. Ibba, María Itria Guzmán, Carlos |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Wheat Quality Trigo Calidad On-farm GGE Analysis En la Granja Análisis GGE |
topic |
Wheat Quality Trigo Calidad On-farm GGE Analysis En la Granja Análisis GGE |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Durum wheat is key source of calories and nutrients for many regions of the world. Demand for it is predicted toincrease. Further efforts are therefore needed to develop new cultivars adapted to different future scenarios. Developing anovel cultivar takes, on average, 10 years and advanced lines are tested during the process, in general, under standardized con-ditions. Although evaluating candidate genotypes for commercial release under different on-farm conditions is a strategy thatis strongly recommended, its application for durum wheat and particularly for quality traits has been limited. This study eval-uated the grain yield and quality performance of eight different genotypes acrossfive contrasting farmers’fields over two sea-sons. Combining different analysis strategies, the most outstanding and stable genotypes were identified.RESULTS: The analyses revealed that some traits were mainly explained by the genotype effect (thousand kernel weight,flour sodiumdodecyl sulfate sedimentation volume, andflour yellowness), others by the management practices (yield and grain protein content),and others (test weight) by the year effect. In general, yield showed the highest range of variation across genotypes, managementpractices, and years and test weight the narrowest range. Flour yellowness was the most stable traitacross management conditions,while yield-related traits were the most unstable. We also determined the most representative and discriminativefield conditions,which is a beneficial strategy when breeders are constrained in their ability to develop multi-environment experiments.CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that assessing genotypes in different farming systems is a valid and complementary strategy foron-station trials for determining the performance of future commercial cultivars in heterogeneous environments to improvethe breeding process and resources. Fil: Tabbita, Facundo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina. Universidad de Córdoba, Departamento de Genética. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y de Montes; España Fil: Ortiz-Monasterio, Iván. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); México Fil: Piñera-Chávez, Francisco J. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); México Fil: Ibba, María Itria. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT); México Fil: Guzman, Carlos. Universidad de Córdoba. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y de Montes. Departamento de Genética; España |
description |
Durum wheat is key source of calories and nutrients for many regions of the world. Demand for it is predicted toincrease. Further efforts are therefore needed to develop new cultivars adapted to different future scenarios. Developing anovel cultivar takes, on average, 10 years and advanced lines are tested during the process, in general, under standardized con-ditions. Although evaluating candidate genotypes for commercial release under different on-farm conditions is a strategy thatis strongly recommended, its application for durum wheat and particularly for quality traits has been limited. This study eval-uated the grain yield and quality performance of eight different genotypes acrossfive contrasting farmers’fields over two sea-sons. Combining different analysis strategies, the most outstanding and stable genotypes were identified.RESULTS: The analyses revealed that some traits were mainly explained by the genotype effect (thousand kernel weight,flour sodiumdodecyl sulfate sedimentation volume, andflour yellowness), others by the management practices (yield and grain protein content),and others (test weight) by the year effect. In general, yield showed the highest range of variation across genotypes, managementpractices, and years and test weight the narrowest range. Flour yellowness was the most stable traitacross management conditions,while yield-related traits were the most unstable. We also determined the most representative and discriminativefield conditions,which is a beneficial strategy when breeders are constrained in their ability to develop multi-environment experiments.CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that assessing genotypes in different farming systems is a valid and complementary strategy foron-station trials for determining the performance of future commercial cultivars in heterogeneous environments to improvethe breeding process and resources. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-09-19T18:12:44Z 2023-09-19T18:12:44Z 2023-08-15 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/15253 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsfa.12580 0022-5142 1097-0010 https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.12580 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/15253 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsfa.12580 https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.12580 |
identifier_str_mv |
0022-5142 1097-0010 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
restrictedAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 103 (10) : 5108-5115. (August 2023) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1844619179240456192 |
score |
12.559606 |