Multiple-Herbicide resistance in a 2,4-D–Resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population from Nebraska

Autores
Crespo, Roberto J.; Wingeyer, Ana Beatriz; Kruger, Greg R.; Riggins, Chance W.; Tranel, Patrick J.; Bernards, Mark L.
Año de publicación
2017
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
A 2,4-D-resistant tall waterhemp population (FS) from Nebraska was evaluated for resistance to other TIR1 auxin receptor herbicides and to herbicides having alternative mechanisms of action using greenhouse bioassays and genetic markers. Atrazine, imazethapyr, lactofen, mesotrione, glufosinate, and glyphosate were applied in a single-dose bioassay, and tissue was collected from marked plants for genetic analysis. The FS population was not injured by atrazine or by imazethapyr. Approximately 50% of the plants survived lactofen and were actively growing 28 d after treatment. The population was susceptible to mesotrione, glufosinate, and glyphosate. Ametryn, chlorimuron-ethyl, 2,4-D, aminocyclopyraclor, aminopyralid, and picloram were applied in dose–response studies. The FS population was sensitive to ametryn, and the Ser-264-Gly substitution in the D1 protein was not detected, suggesting the lack of response to atrazine is not due to a target-site mutation. The FS population exhibited less than 50% injury to chlorimuron-ethyl at application rates 20 times the labeled use rate. The Ser-653-Asn acetolactate synthase (ALS) substitution, which confers resistance to imidazolinone herbicides, was present in the FS population. However, this does not explain the lack of response to the sulfonylurea herbicide, chlorimuron-ethyl. Sequencing of a portion of the PPX2L gene did not show the ΔG210 mutation that confers resistance to protoporphyrinogen oxidase–inhibiting herbicides, suggesting that other factors were responsible for waterhemp survival after lactofen application. The FS population was confirmed to be at least 30-fold resistant to 2,4-D relative to the susceptible populations. In addition, it was at least 3-fold less sensitive to aminopyralid and picloram, two other TIR1 auxin receptor herbicides, than the 2,4-D-susceptible populations were. These data indicated that the FS population contains both target and non–target site mechanisms conferring resistance to herbicides spanning at least three mechanisms of action: TIR1 auxin receptors, ALS inhibitors, and photosystem II inhibitors.
EEA Paraná
Fil: Crespo, Roberto J. University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Department of Agronomy and Horticulture; Estados Unidos
Fil: Wingeyer, Ana Beatriz. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Kruger, Greg R. University of Nebraska–Lincoln. West Central Research and Extension Center; Estados Unidos
Fil: Riggins, Chance W. University of Illinois. Department of Crop Sciences; Estados Unidos
Fil: Tranel, Patrick J. University of Illinois. Department of Crop Sciences; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bernards, Mark L. University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Department of Agronomy and Horticulture; Estados Unidos
Fuente
Weed Science 65 (6) :743–754. (November 2017)
Materia
Resistencia a los Herbicidas
Resistencia Cruzada
Atrazina
Mesotriona
Glufosinato
Glifosato
Resistance to Herbicides
Cross Resistance
Atrazine
Mesotrione
Glufosinate
Glyphosate
Amaranthus Tuberculatus
Nebraska, Estados Unidos
Cáñamo de Agua
2,4-D
Waterhemp
Imazethapyr
Lactofen
Aminocyclopyrachlor
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/5698

id INTADig_27e733003bff9f6c6448de7684ddb50f
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/5698
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Multiple-Herbicide resistance in a 2,4-D–Resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population from NebraskaCrespo, Roberto J.Wingeyer, Ana BeatrizKruger, Greg R.Riggins, Chance W.Tranel, Patrick J.Bernards, Mark L.Resistencia a los HerbicidasResistencia CruzadaAtrazinaMesotrionaGlufosinatoGlifosatoResistance to HerbicidesCross ResistanceAtrazineMesotrioneGlufosinateGlyphosateAmaranthus TuberculatusNebraska, Estados UnidosCáñamo de Agua2,4-DWaterhempImazethapyrLactofenAminocyclopyrachlorA 2,4-D-resistant tall waterhemp population (FS) from Nebraska was evaluated for resistance to other TIR1 auxin receptor herbicides and to herbicides having alternative mechanisms of action using greenhouse bioassays and genetic markers. Atrazine, imazethapyr, lactofen, mesotrione, glufosinate, and glyphosate were applied in a single-dose bioassay, and tissue was collected from marked plants for genetic analysis. The FS population was not injured by atrazine or by imazethapyr. Approximately 50% of the plants survived lactofen and were actively growing 28 d after treatment. The population was susceptible to mesotrione, glufosinate, and glyphosate. Ametryn, chlorimuron-ethyl, 2,4-D, aminocyclopyraclor, aminopyralid, and picloram were applied in dose–response studies. The FS population was sensitive to ametryn, and the Ser-264-Gly substitution in the D1 protein was not detected, suggesting the lack of response to atrazine is not due to a target-site mutation. The FS population exhibited less than 50% injury to chlorimuron-ethyl at application rates 20 times the labeled use rate. The Ser-653-Asn acetolactate synthase (ALS) substitution, which confers resistance to imidazolinone herbicides, was present in the FS population. However, this does not explain the lack of response to the sulfonylurea herbicide, chlorimuron-ethyl. Sequencing of a portion of the PPX2L gene did not show the ΔG210 mutation that confers resistance to protoporphyrinogen oxidase–inhibiting herbicides, suggesting that other factors were responsible for waterhemp survival after lactofen application. The FS population was confirmed to be at least 30-fold resistant to 2,4-D relative to the susceptible populations. In addition, it was at least 3-fold less sensitive to aminopyralid and picloram, two other TIR1 auxin receptor herbicides, than the 2,4-D-susceptible populations were. These data indicated that the FS population contains both target and non–target site mechanisms conferring resistance to herbicides spanning at least three mechanisms of action: TIR1 auxin receptors, ALS inhibitors, and photosystem II inhibitors.EEA ParanáFil: Crespo, Roberto J. University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Department of Agronomy and Horticulture; Estados UnidosFil: Wingeyer, Ana Beatriz. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Kruger, Greg R. University of Nebraska–Lincoln. West Central Research and Extension Center; Estados UnidosFil: Riggins, Chance W. University of Illinois. Department of Crop Sciences; Estados UnidosFil: Tranel, Patrick J. University of Illinois. Department of Crop Sciences; Estados UnidosFil: Bernards, Mark L. University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Department of Agronomy and Horticulture; Estados UnidosCambridge University Press; Weed Science Society of America2019-08-27T12:35:08Z2019-08-27T12:35:08Z2017-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5698https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/weed-science/article/multipleherbicide-resistance-in-a-24dresistant-waterhemp-amaranthus-tuberculatus-population-from-nebraska/9309AB3614CF11C833C658CE65CA11140043-17451550-2759 (Online)https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2017.39Weed Science 65 (6) :743–754. (November 2017)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-04T09:48:08Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/5698instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:48:09.225INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Multiple-Herbicide resistance in a 2,4-D–Resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population from Nebraska
title Multiple-Herbicide resistance in a 2,4-D–Resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population from Nebraska
spellingShingle Multiple-Herbicide resistance in a 2,4-D–Resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population from Nebraska
Crespo, Roberto J.
Resistencia a los Herbicidas
Resistencia Cruzada
Atrazina
Mesotriona
Glufosinato
Glifosato
Resistance to Herbicides
Cross Resistance
Atrazine
Mesotrione
Glufosinate
Glyphosate
Amaranthus Tuberculatus
Nebraska, Estados Unidos
Cáñamo de Agua
2,4-D
Waterhemp
Imazethapyr
Lactofen
Aminocyclopyrachlor
title_short Multiple-Herbicide resistance in a 2,4-D–Resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population from Nebraska
title_full Multiple-Herbicide resistance in a 2,4-D–Resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population from Nebraska
title_fullStr Multiple-Herbicide resistance in a 2,4-D–Resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population from Nebraska
title_full_unstemmed Multiple-Herbicide resistance in a 2,4-D–Resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population from Nebraska
title_sort Multiple-Herbicide resistance in a 2,4-D–Resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population from Nebraska
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Crespo, Roberto J.
Wingeyer, Ana Beatriz
Kruger, Greg R.
Riggins, Chance W.
Tranel, Patrick J.
Bernards, Mark L.
author Crespo, Roberto J.
author_facet Crespo, Roberto J.
Wingeyer, Ana Beatriz
Kruger, Greg R.
Riggins, Chance W.
Tranel, Patrick J.
Bernards, Mark L.
author_role author
author2 Wingeyer, Ana Beatriz
Kruger, Greg R.
Riggins, Chance W.
Tranel, Patrick J.
Bernards, Mark L.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Resistencia a los Herbicidas
Resistencia Cruzada
Atrazina
Mesotriona
Glufosinato
Glifosato
Resistance to Herbicides
Cross Resistance
Atrazine
Mesotrione
Glufosinate
Glyphosate
Amaranthus Tuberculatus
Nebraska, Estados Unidos
Cáñamo de Agua
2,4-D
Waterhemp
Imazethapyr
Lactofen
Aminocyclopyrachlor
topic Resistencia a los Herbicidas
Resistencia Cruzada
Atrazina
Mesotriona
Glufosinato
Glifosato
Resistance to Herbicides
Cross Resistance
Atrazine
Mesotrione
Glufosinate
Glyphosate
Amaranthus Tuberculatus
Nebraska, Estados Unidos
Cáñamo de Agua
2,4-D
Waterhemp
Imazethapyr
Lactofen
Aminocyclopyrachlor
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv A 2,4-D-resistant tall waterhemp population (FS) from Nebraska was evaluated for resistance to other TIR1 auxin receptor herbicides and to herbicides having alternative mechanisms of action using greenhouse bioassays and genetic markers. Atrazine, imazethapyr, lactofen, mesotrione, glufosinate, and glyphosate were applied in a single-dose bioassay, and tissue was collected from marked plants for genetic analysis. The FS population was not injured by atrazine or by imazethapyr. Approximately 50% of the plants survived lactofen and were actively growing 28 d after treatment. The population was susceptible to mesotrione, glufosinate, and glyphosate. Ametryn, chlorimuron-ethyl, 2,4-D, aminocyclopyraclor, aminopyralid, and picloram were applied in dose–response studies. The FS population was sensitive to ametryn, and the Ser-264-Gly substitution in the D1 protein was not detected, suggesting the lack of response to atrazine is not due to a target-site mutation. The FS population exhibited less than 50% injury to chlorimuron-ethyl at application rates 20 times the labeled use rate. The Ser-653-Asn acetolactate synthase (ALS) substitution, which confers resistance to imidazolinone herbicides, was present in the FS population. However, this does not explain the lack of response to the sulfonylurea herbicide, chlorimuron-ethyl. Sequencing of a portion of the PPX2L gene did not show the ΔG210 mutation that confers resistance to protoporphyrinogen oxidase–inhibiting herbicides, suggesting that other factors were responsible for waterhemp survival after lactofen application. The FS population was confirmed to be at least 30-fold resistant to 2,4-D relative to the susceptible populations. In addition, it was at least 3-fold less sensitive to aminopyralid and picloram, two other TIR1 auxin receptor herbicides, than the 2,4-D-susceptible populations were. These data indicated that the FS population contains both target and non–target site mechanisms conferring resistance to herbicides spanning at least three mechanisms of action: TIR1 auxin receptors, ALS inhibitors, and photosystem II inhibitors.
EEA Paraná
Fil: Crespo, Roberto J. University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Department of Agronomy and Horticulture; Estados Unidos
Fil: Wingeyer, Ana Beatriz. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Kruger, Greg R. University of Nebraska–Lincoln. West Central Research and Extension Center; Estados Unidos
Fil: Riggins, Chance W. University of Illinois. Department of Crop Sciences; Estados Unidos
Fil: Tranel, Patrick J. University of Illinois. Department of Crop Sciences; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bernards, Mark L. University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Department of Agronomy and Horticulture; Estados Unidos
description A 2,4-D-resistant tall waterhemp population (FS) from Nebraska was evaluated for resistance to other TIR1 auxin receptor herbicides and to herbicides having alternative mechanisms of action using greenhouse bioassays and genetic markers. Atrazine, imazethapyr, lactofen, mesotrione, glufosinate, and glyphosate were applied in a single-dose bioassay, and tissue was collected from marked plants for genetic analysis. The FS population was not injured by atrazine or by imazethapyr. Approximately 50% of the plants survived lactofen and were actively growing 28 d after treatment. The population was susceptible to mesotrione, glufosinate, and glyphosate. Ametryn, chlorimuron-ethyl, 2,4-D, aminocyclopyraclor, aminopyralid, and picloram were applied in dose–response studies. The FS population was sensitive to ametryn, and the Ser-264-Gly substitution in the D1 protein was not detected, suggesting the lack of response to atrazine is not due to a target-site mutation. The FS population exhibited less than 50% injury to chlorimuron-ethyl at application rates 20 times the labeled use rate. The Ser-653-Asn acetolactate synthase (ALS) substitution, which confers resistance to imidazolinone herbicides, was present in the FS population. However, this does not explain the lack of response to the sulfonylurea herbicide, chlorimuron-ethyl. Sequencing of a portion of the PPX2L gene did not show the ΔG210 mutation that confers resistance to protoporphyrinogen oxidase–inhibiting herbicides, suggesting that other factors were responsible for waterhemp survival after lactofen application. The FS population was confirmed to be at least 30-fold resistant to 2,4-D relative to the susceptible populations. In addition, it was at least 3-fold less sensitive to aminopyralid and picloram, two other TIR1 auxin receptor herbicides, than the 2,4-D-susceptible populations were. These data indicated that the FS population contains both target and non–target site mechanisms conferring resistance to herbicides spanning at least three mechanisms of action: TIR1 auxin receptors, ALS inhibitors, and photosystem II inhibitors.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-11
2019-08-27T12:35:08Z
2019-08-27T12:35:08Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5698
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/weed-science/article/multipleherbicide-resistance-in-a-24dresistant-waterhemp-amaranthus-tuberculatus-population-from-nebraska/9309AB3614CF11C833C658CE65CA1114
0043-1745
1550-2759 (Online)
https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2017.39
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5698
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/weed-science/article/multipleherbicide-resistance-in-a-24dresistant-waterhemp-amaranthus-tuberculatus-population-from-nebraska/9309AB3614CF11C833C658CE65CA1114
https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2017.39
identifier_str_mv 0043-1745
1550-2759 (Online)
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cambridge University Press; Weed Science Society of America
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cambridge University Press; Weed Science Society of America
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Weed Science 65 (6) :743–754. (November 2017)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1842341368807030784
score 12.623145