Matriz del paisaje, escalas e interacciones en los sistemas silvopastoriles y agroforestales = Landscape matrix, scales and interactions in silvopastoral and agroforestry systems

Autores
Laclau, Pablo; Rusch, Veronica Elena
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Los Sistemas Silvopastoriles (SSP) brindan una serie de beneficios ambientales y economicos respecto de las monoculturas agrícolas. En general se han abordado a nivel predial, asiladamente del paisaje que los contiene con el cual intercambian materiales, energía e información. Para analizar su papel en el nivel regional, es necesario comprender conceptos de ecología del paisaje y reconocer sus componentes y sus procesos. En este articulo se comentan estos elementos y se discuten la ubicación de los SSP y otros sistemas agroforestales, que simplificadamente pueden localizarse en: (i) Paisajes predominantemente boscosos, (ii) agroecosistemas, (iii) áreas de transición entres bosques y otras regiones sin bosques, ya sea en bordes naturales o de avance agropecuario.
Silvopastoral systems (SPS) provide a series of environmental and economic benefits with respect to agricultural monocultures. In general, they have been addressed at the farm level, in isolation from the landscape that contains them, with which they exchange materials, energy and information. To analyze its role at the regional level it is necessary to understand concepts of landscape ecology and to recognize its components and related processes. This article considers these elements and debate about the location of SPS and other agroforestry systems, which can be located in: (i) predominant forest landscapes, (ii) agroecosystems, (iii) transition areas between forests and other regions without forests, either on natural borders or agricultural borders. SPS in native forest areas, historically affected by livestock and fires contribute to stop erosion and recover tree cover from degraded areas, restoring their connectivity and flows of matter and energy. In the agricultural regions, their greatest utility may reside in mitigating adverse environmental impacts of agriculture and urbanism, by means of recreating shelterbelts for some wild components -including biological pest controllers-, acting as a barrier against the drift of agrochemicals, or removing contaminants from the soil. In forest transition ecotones, they can restore the forest structure and the flows that might have been interrupted by degradation, as well as modify the edge/surface ratio of altered landscapes. Some functions that can be partially restored in any of these environments are underground connectivity, nutrient circulation, water balance, nitrogen fixation or tree regeneration, recovering biomass and biodiversity, and protecting the native elements of the matrix unable to live at their edges. For these and other positive effects to occur, SPS must be designed and managed in order to maintain a selective permeability that facilitates the flow of species or propagules, limiting the penetration of contaminating agents and the expansion of introduced species, and complementing those natural corridors that link local plant communities with other ecosystems and landscapes. In short, in order to evaluate the regional impact of the SPS, it is essential to look at multiple scales, which allows us to recognize ecosystem services for the common good beyond the private benefits they could provide.
Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche
Fil: Laclau, Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes; Argentina
Fil: Rusch, Verónica Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Área Forestal. Grupo de Ecología Forestal; Argentina
Fuente
IV Congreso Nacional de Sistemas Silvopastoriles. Libro de Actas. p. 26-41
Materia
Silvicultura
Ganadería
Ecosistemas Forestales
Silviculture
Animal Husbandry
Forest Ecosystems
Silvopastoral Systems
Sistemas Silvopascícolas
Sistemas Silvopastoriles
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/3820

id INTADig_260a152558f83ea4e38694b038879530
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/3820
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Matriz del paisaje, escalas e interacciones en los sistemas silvopastoriles y agroforestales = Landscape matrix, scales and interactions in silvopastoral and agroforestry systemsLaclau, PabloRusch, Veronica ElenaSilviculturaGanaderíaEcosistemas ForestalesSilvicultureAnimal HusbandryForest EcosystemsSilvopastoral SystemsSistemas SilvopascícolasSistemas SilvopastorilesLos Sistemas Silvopastoriles (SSP) brindan una serie de beneficios ambientales y economicos respecto de las monoculturas agrícolas. En general se han abordado a nivel predial, asiladamente del paisaje que los contiene con el cual intercambian materiales, energía e información. Para analizar su papel en el nivel regional, es necesario comprender conceptos de ecología del paisaje y reconocer sus componentes y sus procesos. En este articulo se comentan estos elementos y se discuten la ubicación de los SSP y otros sistemas agroforestales, que simplificadamente pueden localizarse en: (i) Paisajes predominantemente boscosos, (ii) agroecosistemas, (iii) áreas de transición entres bosques y otras regiones sin bosques, ya sea en bordes naturales o de avance agropecuario.Silvopastoral systems (SPS) provide a series of environmental and economic benefits with respect to agricultural monocultures. In general, they have been addressed at the farm level, in isolation from the landscape that contains them, with which they exchange materials, energy and information. To analyze its role at the regional level it is necessary to understand concepts of landscape ecology and to recognize its components and related processes. This article considers these elements and debate about the location of SPS and other agroforestry systems, which can be located in: (i) predominant forest landscapes, (ii) agroecosystems, (iii) transition areas between forests and other regions without forests, either on natural borders or agricultural borders. SPS in native forest areas, historically affected by livestock and fires contribute to stop erosion and recover tree cover from degraded areas, restoring their connectivity and flows of matter and energy. In the agricultural regions, their greatest utility may reside in mitigating adverse environmental impacts of agriculture and urbanism, by means of recreating shelterbelts for some wild components -including biological pest controllers-, acting as a barrier against the drift of agrochemicals, or removing contaminants from the soil. In forest transition ecotones, they can restore the forest structure and the flows that might have been interrupted by degradation, as well as modify the edge/surface ratio of altered landscapes. Some functions that can be partially restored in any of these environments are underground connectivity, nutrient circulation, water balance, nitrogen fixation or tree regeneration, recovering biomass and biodiversity, and protecting the native elements of the matrix unable to live at their edges. For these and other positive effects to occur, SPS must be designed and managed in order to maintain a selective permeability that facilitates the flow of species or propagules, limiting the penetration of contaminating agents and the expansion of introduced species, and complementing those natural corridors that link local plant communities with other ecosystems and landscapes. In short, in order to evaluate the regional impact of the SPS, it is essential to look at multiple scales, which allows us to recognize ecosystem services for the common good beyond the private benefits they could provide.Estación Experimental Agropecuaria BarilocheFil: Laclau, Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes; ArgentinaFil: Rusch, Verónica Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Área Forestal. Grupo de Ecología Forestal; ArgentinaEdiciones INTA2018-11-07T18:36:56Z2018-11-07T18:36:56Z2018-11info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3820IV Congreso Nacional de Sistemas Silvopastoriles. Libro de Actas. p. 26-41reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-04T09:47:40Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/3820instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:47:40.509INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Matriz del paisaje, escalas e interacciones en los sistemas silvopastoriles y agroforestales = Landscape matrix, scales and interactions in silvopastoral and agroforestry systems
title Matriz del paisaje, escalas e interacciones en los sistemas silvopastoriles y agroforestales = Landscape matrix, scales and interactions in silvopastoral and agroforestry systems
spellingShingle Matriz del paisaje, escalas e interacciones en los sistemas silvopastoriles y agroforestales = Landscape matrix, scales and interactions in silvopastoral and agroforestry systems
Laclau, Pablo
Silvicultura
Ganadería
Ecosistemas Forestales
Silviculture
Animal Husbandry
Forest Ecosystems
Silvopastoral Systems
Sistemas Silvopascícolas
Sistemas Silvopastoriles
title_short Matriz del paisaje, escalas e interacciones en los sistemas silvopastoriles y agroforestales = Landscape matrix, scales and interactions in silvopastoral and agroforestry systems
title_full Matriz del paisaje, escalas e interacciones en los sistemas silvopastoriles y agroforestales = Landscape matrix, scales and interactions in silvopastoral and agroforestry systems
title_fullStr Matriz del paisaje, escalas e interacciones en los sistemas silvopastoriles y agroforestales = Landscape matrix, scales and interactions in silvopastoral and agroforestry systems
title_full_unstemmed Matriz del paisaje, escalas e interacciones en los sistemas silvopastoriles y agroforestales = Landscape matrix, scales and interactions in silvopastoral and agroforestry systems
title_sort Matriz del paisaje, escalas e interacciones en los sistemas silvopastoriles y agroforestales = Landscape matrix, scales and interactions in silvopastoral and agroforestry systems
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Laclau, Pablo
Rusch, Veronica Elena
author Laclau, Pablo
author_facet Laclau, Pablo
Rusch, Veronica Elena
author_role author
author2 Rusch, Veronica Elena
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Silvicultura
Ganadería
Ecosistemas Forestales
Silviculture
Animal Husbandry
Forest Ecosystems
Silvopastoral Systems
Sistemas Silvopascícolas
Sistemas Silvopastoriles
topic Silvicultura
Ganadería
Ecosistemas Forestales
Silviculture
Animal Husbandry
Forest Ecosystems
Silvopastoral Systems
Sistemas Silvopascícolas
Sistemas Silvopastoriles
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Los Sistemas Silvopastoriles (SSP) brindan una serie de beneficios ambientales y economicos respecto de las monoculturas agrícolas. En general se han abordado a nivel predial, asiladamente del paisaje que los contiene con el cual intercambian materiales, energía e información. Para analizar su papel en el nivel regional, es necesario comprender conceptos de ecología del paisaje y reconocer sus componentes y sus procesos. En este articulo se comentan estos elementos y se discuten la ubicación de los SSP y otros sistemas agroforestales, que simplificadamente pueden localizarse en: (i) Paisajes predominantemente boscosos, (ii) agroecosistemas, (iii) áreas de transición entres bosques y otras regiones sin bosques, ya sea en bordes naturales o de avance agropecuario.
Silvopastoral systems (SPS) provide a series of environmental and economic benefits with respect to agricultural monocultures. In general, they have been addressed at the farm level, in isolation from the landscape that contains them, with which they exchange materials, energy and information. To analyze its role at the regional level it is necessary to understand concepts of landscape ecology and to recognize its components and related processes. This article considers these elements and debate about the location of SPS and other agroforestry systems, which can be located in: (i) predominant forest landscapes, (ii) agroecosystems, (iii) transition areas between forests and other regions without forests, either on natural borders or agricultural borders. SPS in native forest areas, historically affected by livestock and fires contribute to stop erosion and recover tree cover from degraded areas, restoring their connectivity and flows of matter and energy. In the agricultural regions, their greatest utility may reside in mitigating adverse environmental impacts of agriculture and urbanism, by means of recreating shelterbelts for some wild components -including biological pest controllers-, acting as a barrier against the drift of agrochemicals, or removing contaminants from the soil. In forest transition ecotones, they can restore the forest structure and the flows that might have been interrupted by degradation, as well as modify the edge/surface ratio of altered landscapes. Some functions that can be partially restored in any of these environments are underground connectivity, nutrient circulation, water balance, nitrogen fixation or tree regeneration, recovering biomass and biodiversity, and protecting the native elements of the matrix unable to live at their edges. For these and other positive effects to occur, SPS must be designed and managed in order to maintain a selective permeability that facilitates the flow of species or propagules, limiting the penetration of contaminating agents and the expansion of introduced species, and complementing those natural corridors that link local plant communities with other ecosystems and landscapes. In short, in order to evaluate the regional impact of the SPS, it is essential to look at multiple scales, which allows us to recognize ecosystem services for the common good beyond the private benefits they could provide.
Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche
Fil: Laclau, Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes; Argentina
Fil: Rusch, Verónica Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Área Forestal. Grupo de Ecología Forestal; Argentina
description Los Sistemas Silvopastoriles (SSP) brindan una serie de beneficios ambientales y economicos respecto de las monoculturas agrícolas. En general se han abordado a nivel predial, asiladamente del paisaje que los contiene con el cual intercambian materiales, energía e información. Para analizar su papel en el nivel regional, es necesario comprender conceptos de ecología del paisaje y reconocer sus componentes y sus procesos. En este articulo se comentan estos elementos y se discuten la ubicación de los SSP y otros sistemas agroforestales, que simplificadamente pueden localizarse en: (i) Paisajes predominantemente boscosos, (ii) agroecosistemas, (iii) áreas de transición entres bosques y otras regiones sin bosques, ya sea en bordes naturales o de avance agropecuario.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-11-07T18:36:56Z
2018-11-07T18:36:56Z
2018-11
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3820
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3820
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ediciones INTA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ediciones INTA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv IV Congreso Nacional de Sistemas Silvopastoriles. Libro de Actas. p. 26-41
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1842341360350265344
score 12.623145