Matriz del paisaje, escalas e interacciones en los sistemas silvopastoriles y agroforestales = Landscape matrix, scales and interactions in silvopastoral and agroforestry systems
- Autores
- Laclau, Pablo; Rusch, Veronica Elena
- Año de publicación
- 2018
- Idioma
- español castellano
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Los Sistemas Silvopastoriles (SSP) brindan una serie de beneficios ambientales y economicos respecto de las monoculturas agrícolas. En general se han abordado a nivel predial, asiladamente del paisaje que los contiene con el cual intercambian materiales, energía e información. Para analizar su papel en el nivel regional, es necesario comprender conceptos de ecología del paisaje y reconocer sus componentes y sus procesos. En este articulo se comentan estos elementos y se discuten la ubicación de los SSP y otros sistemas agroforestales, que simplificadamente pueden localizarse en: (i) Paisajes predominantemente boscosos, (ii) agroecosistemas, (iii) áreas de transición entres bosques y otras regiones sin bosques, ya sea en bordes naturales o de avance agropecuario.
Silvopastoral systems (SPS) provide a series of environmental and economic benefits with respect to agricultural monocultures. In general, they have been addressed at the farm level, in isolation from the landscape that contains them, with which they exchange materials, energy and information. To analyze its role at the regional level it is necessary to understand concepts of landscape ecology and to recognize its components and related processes. This article considers these elements and debate about the location of SPS and other agroforestry systems, which can be located in: (i) predominant forest landscapes, (ii) agroecosystems, (iii) transition areas between forests and other regions without forests, either on natural borders or agricultural borders. SPS in native forest areas, historically affected by livestock and fires contribute to stop erosion and recover tree cover from degraded areas, restoring their connectivity and flows of matter and energy. In the agricultural regions, their greatest utility may reside in mitigating adverse environmental impacts of agriculture and urbanism, by means of recreating shelterbelts for some wild components -including biological pest controllers-, acting as a barrier against the drift of agrochemicals, or removing contaminants from the soil. In forest transition ecotones, they can restore the forest structure and the flows that might have been interrupted by degradation, as well as modify the edge/surface ratio of altered landscapes. Some functions that can be partially restored in any of these environments are underground connectivity, nutrient circulation, water balance, nitrogen fixation or tree regeneration, recovering biomass and biodiversity, and protecting the native elements of the matrix unable to live at their edges. For these and other positive effects to occur, SPS must be designed and managed in order to maintain a selective permeability that facilitates the flow of species or propagules, limiting the penetration of contaminating agents and the expansion of introduced species, and complementing those natural corridors that link local plant communities with other ecosystems and landscapes. In short, in order to evaluate the regional impact of the SPS, it is essential to look at multiple scales, which allows us to recognize ecosystem services for the common good beyond the private benefits they could provide.
Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche
Fil: Laclau, Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes; Argentina
Fil: Rusch, Verónica Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Área Forestal. Grupo de Ecología Forestal; Argentina - Fuente
- IV Congreso Nacional de Sistemas Silvopastoriles. Libro de Actas. p. 26-41
- Materia
-
Silvicultura
Ganadería
Ecosistemas Forestales
Silviculture
Animal Husbandry
Forest Ecosystems
Silvopastoral Systems
Sistemas Silvopascícolas
Sistemas Silvopastoriles - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/3820
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_260a152558f83ea4e38694b038879530 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/3820 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Matriz del paisaje, escalas e interacciones en los sistemas silvopastoriles y agroforestales = Landscape matrix, scales and interactions in silvopastoral and agroforestry systemsLaclau, PabloRusch, Veronica ElenaSilviculturaGanaderíaEcosistemas ForestalesSilvicultureAnimal HusbandryForest EcosystemsSilvopastoral SystemsSistemas SilvopascícolasSistemas SilvopastorilesLos Sistemas Silvopastoriles (SSP) brindan una serie de beneficios ambientales y economicos respecto de las monoculturas agrícolas. En general se han abordado a nivel predial, asiladamente del paisaje que los contiene con el cual intercambian materiales, energía e información. Para analizar su papel en el nivel regional, es necesario comprender conceptos de ecología del paisaje y reconocer sus componentes y sus procesos. En este articulo se comentan estos elementos y se discuten la ubicación de los SSP y otros sistemas agroforestales, que simplificadamente pueden localizarse en: (i) Paisajes predominantemente boscosos, (ii) agroecosistemas, (iii) áreas de transición entres bosques y otras regiones sin bosques, ya sea en bordes naturales o de avance agropecuario.Silvopastoral systems (SPS) provide a series of environmental and economic benefits with respect to agricultural monocultures. In general, they have been addressed at the farm level, in isolation from the landscape that contains them, with which they exchange materials, energy and information. To analyze its role at the regional level it is necessary to understand concepts of landscape ecology and to recognize its components and related processes. This article considers these elements and debate about the location of SPS and other agroforestry systems, which can be located in: (i) predominant forest landscapes, (ii) agroecosystems, (iii) transition areas between forests and other regions without forests, either on natural borders or agricultural borders. SPS in native forest areas, historically affected by livestock and fires contribute to stop erosion and recover tree cover from degraded areas, restoring their connectivity and flows of matter and energy. In the agricultural regions, their greatest utility may reside in mitigating adverse environmental impacts of agriculture and urbanism, by means of recreating shelterbelts for some wild components -including biological pest controllers-, acting as a barrier against the drift of agrochemicals, or removing contaminants from the soil. In forest transition ecotones, they can restore the forest structure and the flows that might have been interrupted by degradation, as well as modify the edge/surface ratio of altered landscapes. Some functions that can be partially restored in any of these environments are underground connectivity, nutrient circulation, water balance, nitrogen fixation or tree regeneration, recovering biomass and biodiversity, and protecting the native elements of the matrix unable to live at their edges. For these and other positive effects to occur, SPS must be designed and managed in order to maintain a selective permeability that facilitates the flow of species or propagules, limiting the penetration of contaminating agents and the expansion of introduced species, and complementing those natural corridors that link local plant communities with other ecosystems and landscapes. In short, in order to evaluate the regional impact of the SPS, it is essential to look at multiple scales, which allows us to recognize ecosystem services for the common good beyond the private benefits they could provide.Estación Experimental Agropecuaria BarilocheFil: Laclau, Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes; ArgentinaFil: Rusch, Verónica Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Área Forestal. Grupo de Ecología Forestal; ArgentinaEdiciones INTA2018-11-07T18:36:56Z2018-11-07T18:36:56Z2018-11info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3820IV Congreso Nacional de Sistemas Silvopastoriles. Libro de Actas. p. 26-41reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-04T09:47:40Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/3820instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:47:40.509INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Matriz del paisaje, escalas e interacciones en los sistemas silvopastoriles y agroforestales = Landscape matrix, scales and interactions in silvopastoral and agroforestry systems |
title |
Matriz del paisaje, escalas e interacciones en los sistemas silvopastoriles y agroforestales = Landscape matrix, scales and interactions in silvopastoral and agroforestry systems |
spellingShingle |
Matriz del paisaje, escalas e interacciones en los sistemas silvopastoriles y agroforestales = Landscape matrix, scales and interactions in silvopastoral and agroforestry systems Laclau, Pablo Silvicultura Ganadería Ecosistemas Forestales Silviculture Animal Husbandry Forest Ecosystems Silvopastoral Systems Sistemas Silvopascícolas Sistemas Silvopastoriles |
title_short |
Matriz del paisaje, escalas e interacciones en los sistemas silvopastoriles y agroforestales = Landscape matrix, scales and interactions in silvopastoral and agroforestry systems |
title_full |
Matriz del paisaje, escalas e interacciones en los sistemas silvopastoriles y agroforestales = Landscape matrix, scales and interactions in silvopastoral and agroforestry systems |
title_fullStr |
Matriz del paisaje, escalas e interacciones en los sistemas silvopastoriles y agroforestales = Landscape matrix, scales and interactions in silvopastoral and agroforestry systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Matriz del paisaje, escalas e interacciones en los sistemas silvopastoriles y agroforestales = Landscape matrix, scales and interactions in silvopastoral and agroforestry systems |
title_sort |
Matriz del paisaje, escalas e interacciones en los sistemas silvopastoriles y agroforestales = Landscape matrix, scales and interactions in silvopastoral and agroforestry systems |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Laclau, Pablo Rusch, Veronica Elena |
author |
Laclau, Pablo |
author_facet |
Laclau, Pablo Rusch, Veronica Elena |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rusch, Veronica Elena |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Silvicultura Ganadería Ecosistemas Forestales Silviculture Animal Husbandry Forest Ecosystems Silvopastoral Systems Sistemas Silvopascícolas Sistemas Silvopastoriles |
topic |
Silvicultura Ganadería Ecosistemas Forestales Silviculture Animal Husbandry Forest Ecosystems Silvopastoral Systems Sistemas Silvopascícolas Sistemas Silvopastoriles |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Los Sistemas Silvopastoriles (SSP) brindan una serie de beneficios ambientales y economicos respecto de las monoculturas agrícolas. En general se han abordado a nivel predial, asiladamente del paisaje que los contiene con el cual intercambian materiales, energía e información. Para analizar su papel en el nivel regional, es necesario comprender conceptos de ecología del paisaje y reconocer sus componentes y sus procesos. En este articulo se comentan estos elementos y se discuten la ubicación de los SSP y otros sistemas agroforestales, que simplificadamente pueden localizarse en: (i) Paisajes predominantemente boscosos, (ii) agroecosistemas, (iii) áreas de transición entres bosques y otras regiones sin bosques, ya sea en bordes naturales o de avance agropecuario. Silvopastoral systems (SPS) provide a series of environmental and economic benefits with respect to agricultural monocultures. In general, they have been addressed at the farm level, in isolation from the landscape that contains them, with which they exchange materials, energy and information. To analyze its role at the regional level it is necessary to understand concepts of landscape ecology and to recognize its components and related processes. This article considers these elements and debate about the location of SPS and other agroforestry systems, which can be located in: (i) predominant forest landscapes, (ii) agroecosystems, (iii) transition areas between forests and other regions without forests, either on natural borders or agricultural borders. SPS in native forest areas, historically affected by livestock and fires contribute to stop erosion and recover tree cover from degraded areas, restoring their connectivity and flows of matter and energy. In the agricultural regions, their greatest utility may reside in mitigating adverse environmental impacts of agriculture and urbanism, by means of recreating shelterbelts for some wild components -including biological pest controllers-, acting as a barrier against the drift of agrochemicals, or removing contaminants from the soil. In forest transition ecotones, they can restore the forest structure and the flows that might have been interrupted by degradation, as well as modify the edge/surface ratio of altered landscapes. Some functions that can be partially restored in any of these environments are underground connectivity, nutrient circulation, water balance, nitrogen fixation or tree regeneration, recovering biomass and biodiversity, and protecting the native elements of the matrix unable to live at their edges. For these and other positive effects to occur, SPS must be designed and managed in order to maintain a selective permeability that facilitates the flow of species or propagules, limiting the penetration of contaminating agents and the expansion of introduced species, and complementing those natural corridors that link local plant communities with other ecosystems and landscapes. In short, in order to evaluate the regional impact of the SPS, it is essential to look at multiple scales, which allows us to recognize ecosystem services for the common good beyond the private benefits they could provide. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche Fil: Laclau, Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Agencia de Extensión Rural San Martín de los Andes; Argentina Fil: Rusch, Verónica Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Área Forestal. Grupo de Ecología Forestal; Argentina |
description |
Los Sistemas Silvopastoriles (SSP) brindan una serie de beneficios ambientales y economicos respecto de las monoculturas agrícolas. En general se han abordado a nivel predial, asiladamente del paisaje que los contiene con el cual intercambian materiales, energía e información. Para analizar su papel en el nivel regional, es necesario comprender conceptos de ecología del paisaje y reconocer sus componentes y sus procesos. En este articulo se comentan estos elementos y se discuten la ubicación de los SSP y otros sistemas agroforestales, que simplificadamente pueden localizarse en: (i) Paisajes predominantemente boscosos, (ii) agroecosistemas, (iii) áreas de transición entres bosques y otras regiones sin bosques, ya sea en bordes naturales o de avance agropecuario. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-11-07T18:36:56Z 2018-11-07T18:36:56Z 2018-11 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3820 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3820 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ediciones INTA |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ediciones INTA |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
IV Congreso Nacional de Sistemas Silvopastoriles. Libro de Actas. p. 26-41 reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1842341360350265344 |
score |
12.623145 |