Is the argentine postharvest system ready to handle more and better grains?

Autores
Abadia, María Bernadette; Urcola, Hernan Alejandro; Ferrari, María Cecilia; Bartosik, Ricardo Enrique
Año de publicación
2019
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This is the first comprehensive study of the grain postharvest system of Argentina with the following objectives: 1) to group the grain elevators according to structural, technological, and insect control characteristics; 2) to analyze how the groups are positioned to take advantage of the expected increase in the country grain production; 3) to study how the different groups are positioned to adopt Best Management Practices (BMPs); and 4) to identify the main challenges of each group to implement Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs under the new context of dichlorvos (DDVP) prohibition. A survey was conducted in 86 elevators in the main grain producing area of Argentina. Multiple correspondence and cluster analyses were used to study the relationships amongst the variables and to establish a typology of grain elevators. Three groups of facilities were identified, which mainly differed in size and grain reception capacity, turnover ratios, and fumigation modalities. Large and intermediate scale facilities emerged as the best positioned to profit the projected scenario of crop increase, because of their high reception capacity and their potential to increase the turnover ratios (these two groups handled 95% of the grain volume). Small elevators presented important constraints in their current equipment for grain reception. Large facilities appeared also as the best positioned to implement BMPs, because they would only require minor investments in aeration automation. Intermediate size facilities would also need to incorporate temperature cables for grain monitoring. BMP incorporation seems less feasible in small facilities, given the limitations in drying, aeration, and stored grain monitoring technologies. All the groups will have to make equal efforts to incorporate IPM programs after the banning of DDVP. The detection of group-specific constraints is expected to serve as an input for developing targeted technologies and more efficient sector policies.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: Abadía, Maria Bernadette. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fil: Urcola, Hernán Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fil: Ferrari, María Cecilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concepción del Uruguay; Argentina.
Fil: Bartosik, Ricardo Enrique. INTA. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.
Fuente
Journal of Stored Products Research 83 : 218-226 (2019)
Materia
Granos
Elevadores
Calidad
Seguridad
Control de Plagas (postcosecha)
Buenas Prácticas
Tecnología de Poscosecha
Argentina
Grain
Elevators
Quality
Safety
Postharvest Control
Postharvest Technology
Good Practices
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/8062

id INTADig_07585275c7118aab818f1a3032292f59
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/8062
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Is the argentine postharvest system ready to handle more and better grains?Abadia, María BernadetteUrcola, Hernan AlejandroFerrari, María CeciliaBartosik, Ricardo EnriqueGranosElevadoresCalidadSeguridadControl de Plagas (postcosecha)Buenas PrácticasTecnología de PoscosechaArgentinaGrainElevatorsQualitySafetyPostharvest ControlPostharvest TechnologyGood PracticesThis is the first comprehensive study of the grain postharvest system of Argentina with the following objectives: 1) to group the grain elevators according to structural, technological, and insect control characteristics; 2) to analyze how the groups are positioned to take advantage of the expected increase in the country grain production; 3) to study how the different groups are positioned to adopt Best Management Practices (BMPs); and 4) to identify the main challenges of each group to implement Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs under the new context of dichlorvos (DDVP) prohibition. A survey was conducted in 86 elevators in the main grain producing area of Argentina. Multiple correspondence and cluster analyses were used to study the relationships amongst the variables and to establish a typology of grain elevators. Three groups of facilities were identified, which mainly differed in size and grain reception capacity, turnover ratios, and fumigation modalities. Large and intermediate scale facilities emerged as the best positioned to profit the projected scenario of crop increase, because of their high reception capacity and their potential to increase the turnover ratios (these two groups handled 95% of the grain volume). Small elevators presented important constraints in their current equipment for grain reception. Large facilities appeared also as the best positioned to implement BMPs, because they would only require minor investments in aeration automation. Intermediate size facilities would also need to incorporate temperature cables for grain monitoring. BMP incorporation seems less feasible in small facilities, given the limitations in drying, aeration, and stored grain monitoring technologies. All the groups will have to make equal efforts to incorporate IPM programs after the banning of DDVP. The detection of group-specific constraints is expected to serve as an input for developing targeted technologies and more efficient sector policies.EEA BalcarceFil: Abadía, Maria Bernadette. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.Fil: Urcola, Hernán Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.Fil: Ferrari, María Cecilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concepción del Uruguay; Argentina.Fil: Bartosik, Ricardo Enrique. INTA. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.Elsevier2020-10-15T19:06:20Z2020-10-15T19:06:20Z2019-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8062https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022474X193024500022-474Xhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2019.07.012Journal of Stored Products Research 83 : 218-226 (2019)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-04T09:48:39Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/8062instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:48:39.875INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is the argentine postharvest system ready to handle more and better grains?
title Is the argentine postharvest system ready to handle more and better grains?
spellingShingle Is the argentine postharvest system ready to handle more and better grains?
Abadia, María Bernadette
Granos
Elevadores
Calidad
Seguridad
Control de Plagas (postcosecha)
Buenas Prácticas
Tecnología de Poscosecha
Argentina
Grain
Elevators
Quality
Safety
Postharvest Control
Postharvest Technology
Good Practices
title_short Is the argentine postharvest system ready to handle more and better grains?
title_full Is the argentine postharvest system ready to handle more and better grains?
title_fullStr Is the argentine postharvest system ready to handle more and better grains?
title_full_unstemmed Is the argentine postharvest system ready to handle more and better grains?
title_sort Is the argentine postharvest system ready to handle more and better grains?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Abadia, María Bernadette
Urcola, Hernan Alejandro
Ferrari, María Cecilia
Bartosik, Ricardo Enrique
author Abadia, María Bernadette
author_facet Abadia, María Bernadette
Urcola, Hernan Alejandro
Ferrari, María Cecilia
Bartosik, Ricardo Enrique
author_role author
author2 Urcola, Hernan Alejandro
Ferrari, María Cecilia
Bartosik, Ricardo Enrique
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Granos
Elevadores
Calidad
Seguridad
Control de Plagas (postcosecha)
Buenas Prácticas
Tecnología de Poscosecha
Argentina
Grain
Elevators
Quality
Safety
Postharvest Control
Postharvest Technology
Good Practices
topic Granos
Elevadores
Calidad
Seguridad
Control de Plagas (postcosecha)
Buenas Prácticas
Tecnología de Poscosecha
Argentina
Grain
Elevators
Quality
Safety
Postharvest Control
Postharvest Technology
Good Practices
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This is the first comprehensive study of the grain postharvest system of Argentina with the following objectives: 1) to group the grain elevators according to structural, technological, and insect control characteristics; 2) to analyze how the groups are positioned to take advantage of the expected increase in the country grain production; 3) to study how the different groups are positioned to adopt Best Management Practices (BMPs); and 4) to identify the main challenges of each group to implement Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs under the new context of dichlorvos (DDVP) prohibition. A survey was conducted in 86 elevators in the main grain producing area of Argentina. Multiple correspondence and cluster analyses were used to study the relationships amongst the variables and to establish a typology of grain elevators. Three groups of facilities were identified, which mainly differed in size and grain reception capacity, turnover ratios, and fumigation modalities. Large and intermediate scale facilities emerged as the best positioned to profit the projected scenario of crop increase, because of their high reception capacity and their potential to increase the turnover ratios (these two groups handled 95% of the grain volume). Small elevators presented important constraints in their current equipment for grain reception. Large facilities appeared also as the best positioned to implement BMPs, because they would only require minor investments in aeration automation. Intermediate size facilities would also need to incorporate temperature cables for grain monitoring. BMP incorporation seems less feasible in small facilities, given the limitations in drying, aeration, and stored grain monitoring technologies. All the groups will have to make equal efforts to incorporate IPM programs after the banning of DDVP. The detection of group-specific constraints is expected to serve as an input for developing targeted technologies and more efficient sector policies.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: Abadía, Maria Bernadette. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fil: Urcola, Hernán Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.
Fil: Ferrari, María Cecilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concepción del Uruguay; Argentina.
Fil: Bartosik, Ricardo Enrique. INTA. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.
description This is the first comprehensive study of the grain postharvest system of Argentina with the following objectives: 1) to group the grain elevators according to structural, technological, and insect control characteristics; 2) to analyze how the groups are positioned to take advantage of the expected increase in the country grain production; 3) to study how the different groups are positioned to adopt Best Management Practices (BMPs); and 4) to identify the main challenges of each group to implement Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs under the new context of dichlorvos (DDVP) prohibition. A survey was conducted in 86 elevators in the main grain producing area of Argentina. Multiple correspondence and cluster analyses were used to study the relationships amongst the variables and to establish a typology of grain elevators. Three groups of facilities were identified, which mainly differed in size and grain reception capacity, turnover ratios, and fumigation modalities. Large and intermediate scale facilities emerged as the best positioned to profit the projected scenario of crop increase, because of their high reception capacity and their potential to increase the turnover ratios (these two groups handled 95% of the grain volume). Small elevators presented important constraints in their current equipment for grain reception. Large facilities appeared also as the best positioned to implement BMPs, because they would only require minor investments in aeration automation. Intermediate size facilities would also need to incorporate temperature cables for grain monitoring. BMP incorporation seems less feasible in small facilities, given the limitations in drying, aeration, and stored grain monitoring technologies. All the groups will have to make equal efforts to incorporate IPM programs after the banning of DDVP. The detection of group-specific constraints is expected to serve as an input for developing targeted technologies and more efficient sector policies.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09
2020-10-15T19:06:20Z
2020-10-15T19:06:20Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8062
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022474X19302450
0022-474X
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2019.07.012
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8062
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022474X19302450
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2019.07.012
identifier_str_mv 0022-474X
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Stored Products Research 83 : 218-226 (2019)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1842341381870190592
score 12.623145