Influence of fruit maturity, maceration length, and Ethanol amount on chemical and sensory properties of Merlot wines

Autores
Casassa, Luis Federico; Beaver, Christopher W.; Mireles, María S.; Larsen, Richard C.; Hopfer, Helene; Heymann, Hildegarde; Harbertson, James F.
Año de publicación
2013
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Selected winemaking conditions were applied to fruit with ~20.3 and ~24.9 Brix over two seasons. Merlot grapes were harvested 33 (2011) and 34 (2012) days apart. At each harvest, half of the must was adjusted to emulate the other harvest’s soluble solids content to evaluate the effect of ethanol (EtOH) on phenolic extraction at different fruit maturities. Additionally, two maceration lengths of 10 days (control) and 30 days (extended maceration; EM) were tested. Control wines had significantly higher anthocyanin content, saturation, and red color component, whereas EM wines had enhanced tannin extraction from seeds, lower anthocyanin content, lower saturation, higher hue, and higher large polymeric pigment content. EtOH differences up to 2.7% (v/v) showed no significant effect on tannin and anthocyanin extraction, suggesting a minor role of this solvent under standard winemaking conditions. The later harvest date had a prevailing and positive effect on the sensory profile of the wines over winemaking factors such as maceration length and EtOH treatments. Wines from the early harvest fruit were defined by fresh vegetal character, acidity, and low color saturation. Wines from the late harvest fruit were defined by viscous mouthfeel, sweet taste, and fruit-derived aromas. Extended maceration shifted the sensory profile toward higher astringency, lighter and yellower color components, and cooked vegetal aromas. Chaptalization of early harvest fruit to 25 Brix shifted the sensory profile from cooked and fresh vegetable characters toward sweet taste, alcoholic, floral, chocolate/caramel attributes, astringency, and viscous mouthfeel. Overall, unripe fruit and the application of extended maceration had a negative impact on the sensory profile of the wines, whereas chaptalization of unripe fruit yielded wines with an improved sensory profile.
EEA Mendoza
Fil: Casassa, Luis Federico. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza. Centro de Estudios de Enología; Argentina. Washington State University. Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center. School of Food Science; Estados Unidos
Fil: Beaver, Christopher W. Washington State University. Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center. School of Food Science; Estados Unidos
Fil: Mireles, María S. Washington State University. Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center. School of Food Science; Estados Unidos
Fil: Larsen, Richard C. Washington State University. Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center. School of Food Science; Estados Unidos
Fil: Hopfer, Helene. University of California. Department of Viticulture and Enology; Estados Unidos
Fil: Heymann, Hildegarde. University of California. Department of Viticulture and Enology; Estados Unidos
Fil: Harbertson, James F. Washington State University. Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center. School of Food Science; Estados Unidos
Fuente
American journal of enology and viticulture 64 (4) : 437-449. (December 2013)
Materia
Vinos
Vino Tinto
Análisis Organoléptico
Maceración
Etanol
Wines
Red Wines
Organoleptic Analysis
Soaking
Ethanol
Vino Merlot
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2065

id INTADig_07319598bce88f173333293a316d3d51
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/2065
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Influence of fruit maturity, maceration length, and Ethanol amount on chemical and sensory properties of Merlot winesCasassa, Luis FedericoBeaver, Christopher W.Mireles, María S.Larsen, Richard C.Hopfer, HeleneHeymann, HildegardeHarbertson, James F.VinosVino TintoAnálisis OrganolépticoMaceraciónEtanolWinesRed WinesOrganoleptic AnalysisSoakingEthanolVino MerlotSelected winemaking conditions were applied to fruit with ~20.3 and ~24.9 Brix over two seasons. Merlot grapes were harvested 33 (2011) and 34 (2012) days apart. At each harvest, half of the must was adjusted to emulate the other harvest’s soluble solids content to evaluate the effect of ethanol (EtOH) on phenolic extraction at different fruit maturities. Additionally, two maceration lengths of 10 days (control) and 30 days (extended maceration; EM) were tested. Control wines had significantly higher anthocyanin content, saturation, and red color component, whereas EM wines had enhanced tannin extraction from seeds, lower anthocyanin content, lower saturation, higher hue, and higher large polymeric pigment content. EtOH differences up to 2.7% (v/v) showed no significant effect on tannin and anthocyanin extraction, suggesting a minor role of this solvent under standard winemaking conditions. The later harvest date had a prevailing and positive effect on the sensory profile of the wines over winemaking factors such as maceration length and EtOH treatments. Wines from the early harvest fruit were defined by fresh vegetal character, acidity, and low color saturation. Wines from the late harvest fruit were defined by viscous mouthfeel, sweet taste, and fruit-derived aromas. Extended maceration shifted the sensory profile toward higher astringency, lighter and yellower color components, and cooked vegetal aromas. Chaptalization of early harvest fruit to 25 Brix shifted the sensory profile from cooked and fresh vegetable characters toward sweet taste, alcoholic, floral, chocolate/caramel attributes, astringency, and viscous mouthfeel. Overall, unripe fruit and the application of extended maceration had a negative impact on the sensory profile of the wines, whereas chaptalization of unripe fruit yielded wines with an improved sensory profile.EEA MendozaFil: Casassa, Luis Federico. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza. Centro de Estudios de Enología; Argentina. Washington State University. Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center. School of Food Science; Estados UnidosFil: Beaver, Christopher W. Washington State University. Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center. School of Food Science; Estados UnidosFil: Mireles, María S. Washington State University. Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center. School of Food Science; Estados UnidosFil: Larsen, Richard C. Washington State University. Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center. School of Food Science; Estados UnidosFil: Hopfer, Helene. University of California. Department of Viticulture and Enology; Estados UnidosFil: Heymann, Hildegarde. University of California. Department of Viticulture and Enology; Estados UnidosFil: Harbertson, James F. Washington State University. Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center. School of Food Science; Estados Unidos2018-03-19T14:07:57Z2018-03-19T14:07:57Z2013-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://www.ajevonline.org/content/64/4/437http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/20650002-9254doi: 10.5344/ajev.2013.13059American journal of enology and viticulture 64 (4) : 437-449. (December 2013)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-04T09:47:10Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/2065instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:47:11.064INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of fruit maturity, maceration length, and Ethanol amount on chemical and sensory properties of Merlot wines
title Influence of fruit maturity, maceration length, and Ethanol amount on chemical and sensory properties of Merlot wines
spellingShingle Influence of fruit maturity, maceration length, and Ethanol amount on chemical and sensory properties of Merlot wines
Casassa, Luis Federico
Vinos
Vino Tinto
Análisis Organoléptico
Maceración
Etanol
Wines
Red Wines
Organoleptic Analysis
Soaking
Ethanol
Vino Merlot
title_short Influence of fruit maturity, maceration length, and Ethanol amount on chemical and sensory properties of Merlot wines
title_full Influence of fruit maturity, maceration length, and Ethanol amount on chemical and sensory properties of Merlot wines
title_fullStr Influence of fruit maturity, maceration length, and Ethanol amount on chemical and sensory properties of Merlot wines
title_full_unstemmed Influence of fruit maturity, maceration length, and Ethanol amount on chemical and sensory properties of Merlot wines
title_sort Influence of fruit maturity, maceration length, and Ethanol amount on chemical and sensory properties of Merlot wines
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Casassa, Luis Federico
Beaver, Christopher W.
Mireles, María S.
Larsen, Richard C.
Hopfer, Helene
Heymann, Hildegarde
Harbertson, James F.
author Casassa, Luis Federico
author_facet Casassa, Luis Federico
Beaver, Christopher W.
Mireles, María S.
Larsen, Richard C.
Hopfer, Helene
Heymann, Hildegarde
Harbertson, James F.
author_role author
author2 Beaver, Christopher W.
Mireles, María S.
Larsen, Richard C.
Hopfer, Helene
Heymann, Hildegarde
Harbertson, James F.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Vinos
Vino Tinto
Análisis Organoléptico
Maceración
Etanol
Wines
Red Wines
Organoleptic Analysis
Soaking
Ethanol
Vino Merlot
topic Vinos
Vino Tinto
Análisis Organoléptico
Maceración
Etanol
Wines
Red Wines
Organoleptic Analysis
Soaking
Ethanol
Vino Merlot
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Selected winemaking conditions were applied to fruit with ~20.3 and ~24.9 Brix over two seasons. Merlot grapes were harvested 33 (2011) and 34 (2012) days apart. At each harvest, half of the must was adjusted to emulate the other harvest’s soluble solids content to evaluate the effect of ethanol (EtOH) on phenolic extraction at different fruit maturities. Additionally, two maceration lengths of 10 days (control) and 30 days (extended maceration; EM) were tested. Control wines had significantly higher anthocyanin content, saturation, and red color component, whereas EM wines had enhanced tannin extraction from seeds, lower anthocyanin content, lower saturation, higher hue, and higher large polymeric pigment content. EtOH differences up to 2.7% (v/v) showed no significant effect on tannin and anthocyanin extraction, suggesting a minor role of this solvent under standard winemaking conditions. The later harvest date had a prevailing and positive effect on the sensory profile of the wines over winemaking factors such as maceration length and EtOH treatments. Wines from the early harvest fruit were defined by fresh vegetal character, acidity, and low color saturation. Wines from the late harvest fruit were defined by viscous mouthfeel, sweet taste, and fruit-derived aromas. Extended maceration shifted the sensory profile toward higher astringency, lighter and yellower color components, and cooked vegetal aromas. Chaptalization of early harvest fruit to 25 Brix shifted the sensory profile from cooked and fresh vegetable characters toward sweet taste, alcoholic, floral, chocolate/caramel attributes, astringency, and viscous mouthfeel. Overall, unripe fruit and the application of extended maceration had a negative impact on the sensory profile of the wines, whereas chaptalization of unripe fruit yielded wines with an improved sensory profile.
EEA Mendoza
Fil: Casassa, Luis Federico. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mendoza. Centro de Estudios de Enología; Argentina. Washington State University. Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center. School of Food Science; Estados Unidos
Fil: Beaver, Christopher W. Washington State University. Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center. School of Food Science; Estados Unidos
Fil: Mireles, María S. Washington State University. Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center. School of Food Science; Estados Unidos
Fil: Larsen, Richard C. Washington State University. Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center. School of Food Science; Estados Unidos
Fil: Hopfer, Helene. University of California. Department of Viticulture and Enology; Estados Unidos
Fil: Heymann, Hildegarde. University of California. Department of Viticulture and Enology; Estados Unidos
Fil: Harbertson, James F. Washington State University. Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center. School of Food Science; Estados Unidos
description Selected winemaking conditions were applied to fruit with ~20.3 and ~24.9 Brix over two seasons. Merlot grapes were harvested 33 (2011) and 34 (2012) days apart. At each harvest, half of the must was adjusted to emulate the other harvest’s soluble solids content to evaluate the effect of ethanol (EtOH) on phenolic extraction at different fruit maturities. Additionally, two maceration lengths of 10 days (control) and 30 days (extended maceration; EM) were tested. Control wines had significantly higher anthocyanin content, saturation, and red color component, whereas EM wines had enhanced tannin extraction from seeds, lower anthocyanin content, lower saturation, higher hue, and higher large polymeric pigment content. EtOH differences up to 2.7% (v/v) showed no significant effect on tannin and anthocyanin extraction, suggesting a minor role of this solvent under standard winemaking conditions. The later harvest date had a prevailing and positive effect on the sensory profile of the wines over winemaking factors such as maceration length and EtOH treatments. Wines from the early harvest fruit were defined by fresh vegetal character, acidity, and low color saturation. Wines from the late harvest fruit were defined by viscous mouthfeel, sweet taste, and fruit-derived aromas. Extended maceration shifted the sensory profile toward higher astringency, lighter and yellower color components, and cooked vegetal aromas. Chaptalization of early harvest fruit to 25 Brix shifted the sensory profile from cooked and fresh vegetable characters toward sweet taste, alcoholic, floral, chocolate/caramel attributes, astringency, and viscous mouthfeel. Overall, unripe fruit and the application of extended maceration had a negative impact on the sensory profile of the wines, whereas chaptalization of unripe fruit yielded wines with an improved sensory profile.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-12
2018-03-19T14:07:57Z
2018-03-19T14:07:57Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://www.ajevonline.org/content/64/4/437
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2065
0002-9254
doi: 10.5344/ajev.2013.13059
url http://www.ajevonline.org/content/64/4/437
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2065
identifier_str_mv 0002-9254
doi: 10.5344/ajev.2013.13059
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv American journal of enology and viticulture 64 (4) : 437-449. (December 2013)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1842341353304883200
score 12.623145