Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis

Autores
Magni, Florencia Valentina; Michlig, Nicolás; Demonte, Luisina Delma; Michlig, Melina Paola; Repetti, María Rosa
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In routine analysis it is often necessary to introduce minor changes in protocols or extend the applicability of previously validated methods to similar matrices. The SANTE guidelines contemplate on-going validation as a quality control process to verify analytical performance through a reduced number of experiments1.In this work, a validated QuEChERS method for the determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in corn and alfalfa was used for the analysis of a large number of different types of feed samples (cereals, pastures, silages). Briefly, 2 g of sample were hydrated with 10 ml H2O (2% CH2O2), followed by extraction and partition with 10 ml acetonitrile, MgSO4/NaCl (4:1). An aliquot of the extract was then cleaned-up using d-SPE with MgSO4, C18 and PSA, prior to analysis by UHPLC-MS/MS2.A modification of the clean-up step had to be introduced due to the large number of samples to be processed and availability of sorbent salts at the time of analysis. Thus, for cereal-based samples only MgSO4/C18 was used while MgSO4/PSA was used for pasture-based samples.Following the concepts of the on-going validation, the mean recovery (Rec%) was evaluated at the same concentration level from validation (100 µg/kg). Precision was evaluated as repeatability and intermediate precision, repeating the test 2 and 3 consecutive days for corn and alfalfa, respectively. The recovery results obtained after the modifications were compared with those from the initial validation through statistical t-tests. Finally, an additional quality control test was done by applying the methodology to a European Union Proficiency Test (EUPT CF18-2014) in wheat flour.As a result, 80% of the studied compounds (117 pesticides and 2 mycotoxins) showed recoveries in the 60-140% range accepted for routine analysis by the SANTE guide, with RSDs <20% in both matrices.From the statistical tests, the Rec% of more than 85% of the studied compounds were not affected by the changes introduced. Moreover, for compounds such as acephate, chlorpyriphos methyl, clethodim, fenthion and metribuzin in corn, and methomyl, metribuzin, thiabendazole, profenofos, spinosad D and terbuphos in alfalfa their Rec% improved with respect to the initial validation. Finally, the results from the EUPT test were compared to the declared concentration through a z-score, verifying the aptitude of the method for the determination of azoxystrobin, epoxiconazole, linuron,pyraclostrobin and carbendazim.
Fil: Magni, Florencia Valentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina
Fil: Michlig, Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina
Fil: Demonte, Luisina Delma. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; Argentina
Fil: Michlig, Melina Paola. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina
Fil: Repetti, María Rosa. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina
8th Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop
Panamá
Panamá
Sociedad Latinoamericana sobre Residuos de Plaguicidas
Universidad Nacional del Litoral
Gobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo Agropecuario
Materia
FEED
PESTICIDE
ON-GOING VALIDATION
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/228681

id CONICETDig_f5aa06ffc375ecfd5bc1e914d29cd615
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/228681
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysisMagni, Florencia ValentinaMichlig, NicolásDemonte, Luisina DelmaMichlig, Melina PaolaRepetti, María RosaFEEDPESTICIDEON-GOING VALIDATIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1In routine analysis it is often necessary to introduce minor changes in protocols or extend the applicability of previously validated methods to similar matrices. The SANTE guidelines contemplate on-going validation as a quality control process to verify analytical performance through a reduced number of experiments1.In this work, a validated QuEChERS method for the determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in corn and alfalfa was used for the analysis of a large number of different types of feed samples (cereals, pastures, silages). Briefly, 2 g of sample were hydrated with 10 ml H2O (2% CH2O2), followed by extraction and partition with 10 ml acetonitrile, MgSO4/NaCl (4:1). An aliquot of the extract was then cleaned-up using d-SPE with MgSO4, C18 and PSA, prior to analysis by UHPLC-MS/MS2.A modification of the clean-up step had to be introduced due to the large number of samples to be processed and availability of sorbent salts at the time of analysis. Thus, for cereal-based samples only MgSO4/C18 was used while MgSO4/PSA was used for pasture-based samples.Following the concepts of the on-going validation, the mean recovery (Rec%) was evaluated at the same concentration level from validation (100 µg/kg). Precision was evaluated as repeatability and intermediate precision, repeating the test 2 and 3 consecutive days for corn and alfalfa, respectively. The recovery results obtained after the modifications were compared with those from the initial validation through statistical t-tests. Finally, an additional quality control test was done by applying the methodology to a European Union Proficiency Test (EUPT CF18-2014) in wheat flour.As a result, 80% of the studied compounds (117 pesticides and 2 mycotoxins) showed recoveries in the 60-140% range accepted for routine analysis by the SANTE guide, with RSDs <20% in both matrices.From the statistical tests, the Rec% of more than 85% of the studied compounds were not affected by the changes introduced. Moreover, for compounds such as acephate, chlorpyriphos methyl, clethodim, fenthion and metribuzin in corn, and methomyl, metribuzin, thiabendazole, profenofos, spinosad D and terbuphos in alfalfa their Rec% improved with respect to the initial validation. Finally, the results from the EUPT test were compared to the declared concentration through a z-score, verifying the aptitude of the method for the determination of azoxystrobin, epoxiconazole, linuron,pyraclostrobin and carbendazim.Fil: Magni, Florencia Valentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; ArgentinaFil: Michlig, Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; ArgentinaFil: Demonte, Luisina Delma. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; ArgentinaFil: Michlig, Melina Paola. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; ArgentinaFil: Repetti, María Rosa. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina8th Latin American Pesticide Residue WorkshopPanamáPanamáSociedad Latinoamericana sobre Residuos de PlaguicidasUniversidad Nacional del LitoralGobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo AgropecuarioGobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo Agropecuario2021info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectWorkshopBookhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/228681Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis; 8th Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop; Panamá; Panamá; 2021; 67-67CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://heyzine.com/flip-book/7316f9aa59.html#page/12Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2026-02-26T09:59:58Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/228681instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982026-02-26 09:59:58.348CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis
title Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis
spellingShingle Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis
Magni, Florencia Valentina
FEED
PESTICIDE
ON-GOING VALIDATION
title_short Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis
title_full Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis
title_fullStr Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis
title_full_unstemmed Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis
title_sort Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Magni, Florencia Valentina
Michlig, Nicolás
Demonte, Luisina Delma
Michlig, Melina Paola
Repetti, María Rosa
author Magni, Florencia Valentina
author_facet Magni, Florencia Valentina
Michlig, Nicolás
Demonte, Luisina Delma
Michlig, Melina Paola
Repetti, María Rosa
author_role author
author2 Michlig, Nicolás
Demonte, Luisina Delma
Michlig, Melina Paola
Repetti, María Rosa
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv FEED
PESTICIDE
ON-GOING VALIDATION
topic FEED
PESTICIDE
ON-GOING VALIDATION
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In routine analysis it is often necessary to introduce minor changes in protocols or extend the applicability of previously validated methods to similar matrices. The SANTE guidelines contemplate on-going validation as a quality control process to verify analytical performance through a reduced number of experiments1.In this work, a validated QuEChERS method for the determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in corn and alfalfa was used for the analysis of a large number of different types of feed samples (cereals, pastures, silages). Briefly, 2 g of sample were hydrated with 10 ml H2O (2% CH2O2), followed by extraction and partition with 10 ml acetonitrile, MgSO4/NaCl (4:1). An aliquot of the extract was then cleaned-up using d-SPE with MgSO4, C18 and PSA, prior to analysis by UHPLC-MS/MS2.A modification of the clean-up step had to be introduced due to the large number of samples to be processed and availability of sorbent salts at the time of analysis. Thus, for cereal-based samples only MgSO4/C18 was used while MgSO4/PSA was used for pasture-based samples.Following the concepts of the on-going validation, the mean recovery (Rec%) was evaluated at the same concentration level from validation (100 µg/kg). Precision was evaluated as repeatability and intermediate precision, repeating the test 2 and 3 consecutive days for corn and alfalfa, respectively. The recovery results obtained after the modifications were compared with those from the initial validation through statistical t-tests. Finally, an additional quality control test was done by applying the methodology to a European Union Proficiency Test (EUPT CF18-2014) in wheat flour.As a result, 80% of the studied compounds (117 pesticides and 2 mycotoxins) showed recoveries in the 60-140% range accepted for routine analysis by the SANTE guide, with RSDs <20% in both matrices.From the statistical tests, the Rec% of more than 85% of the studied compounds were not affected by the changes introduced. Moreover, for compounds such as acephate, chlorpyriphos methyl, clethodim, fenthion and metribuzin in corn, and methomyl, metribuzin, thiabendazole, profenofos, spinosad D and terbuphos in alfalfa their Rec% improved with respect to the initial validation. Finally, the results from the EUPT test were compared to the declared concentration through a z-score, verifying the aptitude of the method for the determination of azoxystrobin, epoxiconazole, linuron,pyraclostrobin and carbendazim.
Fil: Magni, Florencia Valentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina
Fil: Michlig, Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina
Fil: Demonte, Luisina Delma. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; Argentina
Fil: Michlig, Melina Paola. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina
Fil: Repetti, María Rosa. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina
8th Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop
Panamá
Panamá
Sociedad Latinoamericana sobre Residuos de Plaguicidas
Universidad Nacional del Litoral
Gobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo Agropecuario
description In routine analysis it is often necessary to introduce minor changes in protocols or extend the applicability of previously validated methods to similar matrices. The SANTE guidelines contemplate on-going validation as a quality control process to verify analytical performance through a reduced number of experiments1.In this work, a validated QuEChERS method for the determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in corn and alfalfa was used for the analysis of a large number of different types of feed samples (cereals, pastures, silages). Briefly, 2 g of sample were hydrated with 10 ml H2O (2% CH2O2), followed by extraction and partition with 10 ml acetonitrile, MgSO4/NaCl (4:1). An aliquot of the extract was then cleaned-up using d-SPE with MgSO4, C18 and PSA, prior to analysis by UHPLC-MS/MS2.A modification of the clean-up step had to be introduced due to the large number of samples to be processed and availability of sorbent salts at the time of analysis. Thus, for cereal-based samples only MgSO4/C18 was used while MgSO4/PSA was used for pasture-based samples.Following the concepts of the on-going validation, the mean recovery (Rec%) was evaluated at the same concentration level from validation (100 µg/kg). Precision was evaluated as repeatability and intermediate precision, repeating the test 2 and 3 consecutive days for corn and alfalfa, respectively. The recovery results obtained after the modifications were compared with those from the initial validation through statistical t-tests. Finally, an additional quality control test was done by applying the methodology to a European Union Proficiency Test (EUPT CF18-2014) in wheat flour.As a result, 80% of the studied compounds (117 pesticides and 2 mycotoxins) showed recoveries in the 60-140% range accepted for routine analysis by the SANTE guide, with RSDs <20% in both matrices.From the statistical tests, the Rec% of more than 85% of the studied compounds were not affected by the changes introduced. Moreover, for compounds such as acephate, chlorpyriphos methyl, clethodim, fenthion and metribuzin in corn, and methomyl, metribuzin, thiabendazole, profenofos, spinosad D and terbuphos in alfalfa their Rec% improved with respect to the initial validation. Finally, the results from the EUPT test were compared to the declared concentration through a z-score, verifying the aptitude of the method for the determination of azoxystrobin, epoxiconazole, linuron,pyraclostrobin and carbendazim.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
Workshop
Book
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
status_str publishedVersion
format conferenceObject
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/228681
Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis; 8th Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop; Panamá; Panamá; 2021; 67-67
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/228681
identifier_str_mv Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis; 8th Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop; Panamá; Panamá; 2021; 67-67
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://heyzine.com/flip-book/7316f9aa59.html#page/12
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Internacional
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Gobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo Agropecuario
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Gobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo Agropecuario
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1858304891135459328
score 13.176822