Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis
- Autores
- Magni, Florencia Valentina; Michlig, Nicolás; Demonte, Luisina Delma; Michlig, Melina Paola; Repetti, María Rosa
- Año de publicación
- 2021
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- In routine analysis it is often necessary to introduce minor changes in protocols or extend the applicability of previously validated methods to similar matrices. The SANTE guidelines contemplate on-going validation as a quality control process to verify analytical performance through a reduced number of experiments1.In this work, a validated QuEChERS method for the determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in corn and alfalfa was used for the analysis of a large number of different types of feed samples (cereals, pastures, silages). Briefly, 2 g of sample were hydrated with 10 ml H2O (2% CH2O2), followed by extraction and partition with 10 ml acetonitrile, MgSO4/NaCl (4:1). An aliquot of the extract was then cleaned-up using d-SPE with MgSO4, C18 and PSA, prior to analysis by UHPLC-MS/MS2.A modification of the clean-up step had to be introduced due to the large number of samples to be processed and availability of sorbent salts at the time of analysis. Thus, for cereal-based samples only MgSO4/C18 was used while MgSO4/PSA was used for pasture-based samples.Following the concepts of the on-going validation, the mean recovery (Rec%) was evaluated at the same concentration level from validation (100 µg/kg). Precision was evaluated as repeatability and intermediate precision, repeating the test 2 and 3 consecutive days for corn and alfalfa, respectively. The recovery results obtained after the modifications were compared with those from the initial validation through statistical t-tests. Finally, an additional quality control test was done by applying the methodology to a European Union Proficiency Test (EUPT CF18-2014) in wheat flour.As a result, 80% of the studied compounds (117 pesticides and 2 mycotoxins) showed recoveries in the 60-140% range accepted for routine analysis by the SANTE guide, with RSDs <20% in both matrices.From the statistical tests, the Rec% of more than 85% of the studied compounds were not affected by the changes introduced. Moreover, for compounds such as acephate, chlorpyriphos methyl, clethodim, fenthion and metribuzin in corn, and methomyl, metribuzin, thiabendazole, profenofos, spinosad D and terbuphos in alfalfa their Rec% improved with respect to the initial validation. Finally, the results from the EUPT test were compared to the declared concentration through a z-score, verifying the aptitude of the method for the determination of azoxystrobin, epoxiconazole, linuron,pyraclostrobin and carbendazim.
Fil: Magni, Florencia Valentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina
Fil: Michlig, Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina
Fil: Demonte, Luisina Delma. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; Argentina
Fil: Michlig, Melina Paola. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina
Fil: Repetti, María Rosa. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina
8th Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop
Panamá
Panamá
Sociedad Latinoamericana sobre Residuos de Plaguicidas
Universidad Nacional del Litoral
Gobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo Agropecuario - Materia
-
FEED
PESTICIDE
ON-GOING VALIDATION - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/228681
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
CONICETDig_f5aa06ffc375ecfd5bc1e914d29cd615 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/228681 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
| repository_id_str |
3498 |
| network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| spelling |
Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysisMagni, Florencia ValentinaMichlig, NicolásDemonte, Luisina DelmaMichlig, Melina PaolaRepetti, María RosaFEEDPESTICIDEON-GOING VALIDATIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1In routine analysis it is often necessary to introduce minor changes in protocols or extend the applicability of previously validated methods to similar matrices. The SANTE guidelines contemplate on-going validation as a quality control process to verify analytical performance through a reduced number of experiments1.In this work, a validated QuEChERS method for the determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in corn and alfalfa was used for the analysis of a large number of different types of feed samples (cereals, pastures, silages). Briefly, 2 g of sample were hydrated with 10 ml H2O (2% CH2O2), followed by extraction and partition with 10 ml acetonitrile, MgSO4/NaCl (4:1). An aliquot of the extract was then cleaned-up using d-SPE with MgSO4, C18 and PSA, prior to analysis by UHPLC-MS/MS2.A modification of the clean-up step had to be introduced due to the large number of samples to be processed and availability of sorbent salts at the time of analysis. Thus, for cereal-based samples only MgSO4/C18 was used while MgSO4/PSA was used for pasture-based samples.Following the concepts of the on-going validation, the mean recovery (Rec%) was evaluated at the same concentration level from validation (100 µg/kg). Precision was evaluated as repeatability and intermediate precision, repeating the test 2 and 3 consecutive days for corn and alfalfa, respectively. The recovery results obtained after the modifications were compared with those from the initial validation through statistical t-tests. Finally, an additional quality control test was done by applying the methodology to a European Union Proficiency Test (EUPT CF18-2014) in wheat flour.As a result, 80% of the studied compounds (117 pesticides and 2 mycotoxins) showed recoveries in the 60-140% range accepted for routine analysis by the SANTE guide, with RSDs <20% in both matrices.From the statistical tests, the Rec% of more than 85% of the studied compounds were not affected by the changes introduced. Moreover, for compounds such as acephate, chlorpyriphos methyl, clethodim, fenthion and metribuzin in corn, and methomyl, metribuzin, thiabendazole, profenofos, spinosad D and terbuphos in alfalfa their Rec% improved with respect to the initial validation. Finally, the results from the EUPT test were compared to the declared concentration through a z-score, verifying the aptitude of the method for the determination of azoxystrobin, epoxiconazole, linuron,pyraclostrobin and carbendazim.Fil: Magni, Florencia Valentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; ArgentinaFil: Michlig, Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; ArgentinaFil: Demonte, Luisina Delma. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; ArgentinaFil: Michlig, Melina Paola. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; ArgentinaFil: Repetti, María Rosa. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina8th Latin American Pesticide Residue WorkshopPanamáPanamáSociedad Latinoamericana sobre Residuos de PlaguicidasUniversidad Nacional del LitoralGobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo AgropecuarioGobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo Agropecuario2021info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectWorkshopBookhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/228681Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis; 8th Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop; Panamá; Panamá; 2021; 67-67CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://heyzine.com/flip-book/7316f9aa59.html#page/12Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2026-02-26T09:59:58Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/228681instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982026-02-26 09:59:58.348CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis |
| title |
Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis |
| spellingShingle |
Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis Magni, Florencia Valentina FEED PESTICIDE ON-GOING VALIDATION |
| title_short |
Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis |
| title_full |
Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis |
| title_fullStr |
Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis |
| title_sort |
Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Magni, Florencia Valentina Michlig, Nicolás Demonte, Luisina Delma Michlig, Melina Paola Repetti, María Rosa |
| author |
Magni, Florencia Valentina |
| author_facet |
Magni, Florencia Valentina Michlig, Nicolás Demonte, Luisina Delma Michlig, Melina Paola Repetti, María Rosa |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Michlig, Nicolás Demonte, Luisina Delma Michlig, Melina Paola Repetti, María Rosa |
| author2_role |
author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
FEED PESTICIDE ON-GOING VALIDATION |
| topic |
FEED PESTICIDE ON-GOING VALIDATION |
| purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
In routine analysis it is often necessary to introduce minor changes in protocols or extend the applicability of previously validated methods to similar matrices. The SANTE guidelines contemplate on-going validation as a quality control process to verify analytical performance through a reduced number of experiments1.In this work, a validated QuEChERS method for the determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in corn and alfalfa was used for the analysis of a large number of different types of feed samples (cereals, pastures, silages). Briefly, 2 g of sample were hydrated with 10 ml H2O (2% CH2O2), followed by extraction and partition with 10 ml acetonitrile, MgSO4/NaCl (4:1). An aliquot of the extract was then cleaned-up using d-SPE with MgSO4, C18 and PSA, prior to analysis by UHPLC-MS/MS2.A modification of the clean-up step had to be introduced due to the large number of samples to be processed and availability of sorbent salts at the time of analysis. Thus, for cereal-based samples only MgSO4/C18 was used while MgSO4/PSA was used for pasture-based samples.Following the concepts of the on-going validation, the mean recovery (Rec%) was evaluated at the same concentration level from validation (100 µg/kg). Precision was evaluated as repeatability and intermediate precision, repeating the test 2 and 3 consecutive days for corn and alfalfa, respectively. The recovery results obtained after the modifications were compared with those from the initial validation through statistical t-tests. Finally, an additional quality control test was done by applying the methodology to a European Union Proficiency Test (EUPT CF18-2014) in wheat flour.As a result, 80% of the studied compounds (117 pesticides and 2 mycotoxins) showed recoveries in the 60-140% range accepted for routine analysis by the SANTE guide, with RSDs <20% in both matrices.From the statistical tests, the Rec% of more than 85% of the studied compounds were not affected by the changes introduced. Moreover, for compounds such as acephate, chlorpyriphos methyl, clethodim, fenthion and metribuzin in corn, and methomyl, metribuzin, thiabendazole, profenofos, spinosad D and terbuphos in alfalfa their Rec% improved with respect to the initial validation. Finally, the results from the EUPT test were compared to the declared concentration through a z-score, verifying the aptitude of the method for the determination of azoxystrobin, epoxiconazole, linuron,pyraclostrobin and carbendazim. Fil: Magni, Florencia Valentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina Fil: Michlig, Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina Fil: Demonte, Luisina Delma. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Fisicoquímicas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigación en Micología y Micotoxicología; Argentina Fil: Michlig, Melina Paola. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina Fil: Repetti, María Rosa. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ingeniería Química. Programa de Investigación y Análisis de Residuos y Contaminantes Químicos; Argentina 8th Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop Panamá Panamá Sociedad Latinoamericana sobre Residuos de Plaguicidas Universidad Nacional del Litoral Gobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo Agropecuario |
| description |
In routine analysis it is often necessary to introduce minor changes in protocols or extend the applicability of previously validated methods to similar matrices. The SANTE guidelines contemplate on-going validation as a quality control process to verify analytical performance through a reduced number of experiments1.In this work, a validated QuEChERS method for the determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in corn and alfalfa was used for the analysis of a large number of different types of feed samples (cereals, pastures, silages). Briefly, 2 g of sample were hydrated with 10 ml H2O (2% CH2O2), followed by extraction and partition with 10 ml acetonitrile, MgSO4/NaCl (4:1). An aliquot of the extract was then cleaned-up using d-SPE with MgSO4, C18 and PSA, prior to analysis by UHPLC-MS/MS2.A modification of the clean-up step had to be introduced due to the large number of samples to be processed and availability of sorbent salts at the time of analysis. Thus, for cereal-based samples only MgSO4/C18 was used while MgSO4/PSA was used for pasture-based samples.Following the concepts of the on-going validation, the mean recovery (Rec%) was evaluated at the same concentration level from validation (100 µg/kg). Precision was evaluated as repeatability and intermediate precision, repeating the test 2 and 3 consecutive days for corn and alfalfa, respectively. The recovery results obtained after the modifications were compared with those from the initial validation through statistical t-tests. Finally, an additional quality control test was done by applying the methodology to a European Union Proficiency Test (EUPT CF18-2014) in wheat flour.As a result, 80% of the studied compounds (117 pesticides and 2 mycotoxins) showed recoveries in the 60-140% range accepted for routine analysis by the SANTE guide, with RSDs <20% in both matrices.From the statistical tests, the Rec% of more than 85% of the studied compounds were not affected by the changes introduced. Moreover, for compounds such as acephate, chlorpyriphos methyl, clethodim, fenthion and metribuzin in corn, and methomyl, metribuzin, thiabendazole, profenofos, spinosad D and terbuphos in alfalfa their Rec% improved with respect to the initial validation. Finally, the results from the EUPT test were compared to the declared concentration through a z-score, verifying the aptitude of the method for the determination of azoxystrobin, epoxiconazole, linuron,pyraclostrobin and carbendazim. |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject Workshop Book http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| format |
conferenceObject |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/228681 Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis; 8th Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop; Panamá; Panamá; 2021; 67-67 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/228681 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in feed: Applicability of an analytical method in routine analysis; 8th Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop; Panamá; Panamá; 2021; 67-67 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://heyzine.com/flip-book/7316f9aa59.html#page/12 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Internacional |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Gobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo Agropecuario |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Gobierno de la República de Panamá. Ministerio de Desarrollo Agropecuario |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
| _version_ |
1858304891135459328 |
| score |
13.176822 |