Pharmacological strategies and influence of initial mite load for controlling psoroptic mange in grazing beef cattle
- Autores
- Cantón, Candela; Moriones, Lucila; Dominguez, Maria Paula; Lanusse, Carlos Edmundo; Alvarez, Luis Ignacio; Lifschitz, Adrian Luis
- Año de publicación
- 2024
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Psoroptic mange causes relevant losses of productivity in cattle. Therefore, bovine mange control is necessary to ensure adequate production levels on beef cattle farms. Macrocyclic lactones are one of the main pharmacological tools recommended for controlling it. Considering that field reports on failures of ivermectin and doramectin (DRM) in the treatment of cattle mange have increased in recent years in some regions like Argentina, the aim of the current work was to evaluate the effectiveness of DRM following their administration as traditional or long-acting formulations in combination with an ancillary therapy of cypermethrin + chlorpyrifos to cattle naturally infested by P. ovis. Additionally, the relationship between the mite load and the effectiveness of the treatment was evaluated. The study was carried out on five (5) commercial beef cattle farms with a grazing system of meat production. On farms A and B ten (10) calves with active mange infection were treated with a single subcutaneous (SC) injection of DRM (1%) at 0.2 mg/kg. On farms C, D, and E, ten (10) calves with active mange infection were treated with a single SC injection of DRM-LA (3.15% or 3.5%) at 0.63 or 0.7 mg/kg. On all the farms, a pour-on treatment combining cypermethrin (500 mg/animal) and chlorpyrifos (250 mg /animal) was administered concurrently with the injectable treatment as ancillary therapy. The animals were weighed on a calibrated weighing scale to determine the dose prior to treatment. Skin scraping samples were collected from each animal and mites were counted at 14 and 21 days post-treatment on farms A and B; and 21 days post-treatment on farms C, D and E. Correlation between initial and post-treatment mite counts was performed by parametric analysis (Pearson’s r), and the number of negative and positive animals obtained after the different treatments were compared with the Fisher exact test. While the average mite count was 50 on farm A, it was 150 on farm B. DRM 1% + pour-on failed to achieve a 100% efficacy at day 14 on both farms. However, this classic DRM formulation + cypermethrin-chlorpyrifos obtained an acaricide efficacy of 100% at day 21 post-treatment on farm A (low initial mite count). The average mite counts on farms C, D and E were 126, 138 and 41, respectively. While the acaricide efficacies were 85% and 94% on farms C and D, DRM- LA + cypermethrin-chlorpyrifos pour-on treatment reached a 100% acaricide efficacy on farm E (low initial mite count). A positive correlation between initial and post- treatment mite counts were found (r 0.498, p<0.0001). In fact, a higher percentage of negative animals was observed in those with lower initial counts (p<0.0001). In conclusion, depending on the mite load the use of DRM in combination with an ancillary therapy of cypermethrin and chlorpyrifos can be useful to control Psoroptic mange in cattle. It is now crucial to accomplish adequate management of this disease and optimize mange control through early diagnosis and treatment strategies implementedon an individual cattle farm basis.
Fil: Cantón, Candela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina
Fil: Moriones, Lucila. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina
Fil: Dominguez, Maria Paula. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina
Fil: Lanusse, Carlos Edmundo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina
Fil: Alvarez, Luis Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina
Fil: Lifschitz, Adrian Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina
XXVII Congreso Panamericano de Ciencias Veterinarias
Montevideo
Uruguay
Colegio de Veterinarios del Uruguay
Universidad de la República. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias
Sociedad de Medicina Veterinaria del Uruguay - Materia
-
Beef
Psoroptic mange
Cattle - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/257750
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
CONICETDig_eb13c3a519eae685d8bca0d8b08fdfce |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/257750 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
| repository_id_str |
3498 |
| network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| spelling |
Pharmacological strategies and influence of initial mite load for controlling psoroptic mange in grazing beef cattleCantón, CandelaMoriones, LucilaDominguez, Maria PaulaLanusse, Carlos EdmundoAlvarez, Luis IgnacioLifschitz, Adrian LuisBeefPsoroptic mangeCattlehttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Psoroptic mange causes relevant losses of productivity in cattle. Therefore, bovine mange control is necessary to ensure adequate production levels on beef cattle farms. Macrocyclic lactones are one of the main pharmacological tools recommended for controlling it. Considering that field reports on failures of ivermectin and doramectin (DRM) in the treatment of cattle mange have increased in recent years in some regions like Argentina, the aim of the current work was to evaluate the effectiveness of DRM following their administration as traditional or long-acting formulations in combination with an ancillary therapy of cypermethrin + chlorpyrifos to cattle naturally infested by P. ovis. Additionally, the relationship between the mite load and the effectiveness of the treatment was evaluated. The study was carried out on five (5) commercial beef cattle farms with a grazing system of meat production. On farms A and B ten (10) calves with active mange infection were treated with a single subcutaneous (SC) injection of DRM (1%) at 0.2 mg/kg. On farms C, D, and E, ten (10) calves with active mange infection were treated with a single SC injection of DRM-LA (3.15% or 3.5%) at 0.63 or 0.7 mg/kg. On all the farms, a pour-on treatment combining cypermethrin (500 mg/animal) and chlorpyrifos (250 mg /animal) was administered concurrently with the injectable treatment as ancillary therapy. The animals were weighed on a calibrated weighing scale to determine the dose prior to treatment. Skin scraping samples were collected from each animal and mites were counted at 14 and 21 days post-treatment on farms A and B; and 21 days post-treatment on farms C, D and E. Correlation between initial and post-treatment mite counts was performed by parametric analysis (Pearson’s r), and the number of negative and positive animals obtained after the different treatments were compared with the Fisher exact test. While the average mite count was 50 on farm A, it was 150 on farm B. DRM 1% + pour-on failed to achieve a 100% efficacy at day 14 on both farms. However, this classic DRM formulation + cypermethrin-chlorpyrifos obtained an acaricide efficacy of 100% at day 21 post-treatment on farm A (low initial mite count). The average mite counts on farms C, D and E were 126, 138 and 41, respectively. While the acaricide efficacies were 85% and 94% on farms C and D, DRM- LA + cypermethrin-chlorpyrifos pour-on treatment reached a 100% acaricide efficacy on farm E (low initial mite count). A positive correlation between initial and post- treatment mite counts were found (r 0.498, p<0.0001). In fact, a higher percentage of negative animals was observed in those with lower initial counts (p<0.0001). In conclusion, depending on the mite load the use of DRM in combination with an ancillary therapy of cypermethrin and chlorpyrifos can be useful to control Psoroptic mange in cattle. It is now crucial to accomplish adequate management of this disease and optimize mange control through early diagnosis and treatment strategies implementedon an individual cattle farm basis.Fil: Cantón, Candela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; ArgentinaFil: Moriones, Lucila. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; ArgentinaFil: Dominguez, Maria Paula. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; ArgentinaFil: Lanusse, Carlos Edmundo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; ArgentinaFil: Alvarez, Luis Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; ArgentinaFil: Lifschitz, Adrian Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; ArgentinaXXVII Congreso Panamericano de Ciencias VeterinariasMontevideoUruguayColegio de Veterinarios del UruguayUniversidad de la República. Facultad de Ciencias VeterinariasSociedad de Medicina Veterinaria del UruguayColegio de Veterinarios del Uruguay2024info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectCongresoBookhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/257750Pharmacological strategies and influence of initial mite load for controlling psoroptic mange in grazing beef cattle; XXVII Congreso Panamericano de Ciencias Veterinarias; Montevideo; Uruguay; 2024; 104-104CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.panvet2024.uy/_files/ugd/d0b038_3e3bd8f2500f4eba967245d820276927.pdfInternacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:49:48Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/257750instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:49:48.713CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pharmacological strategies and influence of initial mite load for controlling psoroptic mange in grazing beef cattle |
| title |
Pharmacological strategies and influence of initial mite load for controlling psoroptic mange in grazing beef cattle |
| spellingShingle |
Pharmacological strategies and influence of initial mite load for controlling psoroptic mange in grazing beef cattle Cantón, Candela Beef Psoroptic mange Cattle |
| title_short |
Pharmacological strategies and influence of initial mite load for controlling psoroptic mange in grazing beef cattle |
| title_full |
Pharmacological strategies and influence of initial mite load for controlling psoroptic mange in grazing beef cattle |
| title_fullStr |
Pharmacological strategies and influence of initial mite load for controlling psoroptic mange in grazing beef cattle |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Pharmacological strategies and influence of initial mite load for controlling psoroptic mange in grazing beef cattle |
| title_sort |
Pharmacological strategies and influence of initial mite load for controlling psoroptic mange in grazing beef cattle |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Cantón, Candela Moriones, Lucila Dominguez, Maria Paula Lanusse, Carlos Edmundo Alvarez, Luis Ignacio Lifschitz, Adrian Luis |
| author |
Cantón, Candela |
| author_facet |
Cantón, Candela Moriones, Lucila Dominguez, Maria Paula Lanusse, Carlos Edmundo Alvarez, Luis Ignacio Lifschitz, Adrian Luis |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Moriones, Lucila Dominguez, Maria Paula Lanusse, Carlos Edmundo Alvarez, Luis Ignacio Lifschitz, Adrian Luis |
| author2_role |
author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Beef Psoroptic mange Cattle |
| topic |
Beef Psoroptic mange Cattle |
| purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4 |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Psoroptic mange causes relevant losses of productivity in cattle. Therefore, bovine mange control is necessary to ensure adequate production levels on beef cattle farms. Macrocyclic lactones are one of the main pharmacological tools recommended for controlling it. Considering that field reports on failures of ivermectin and doramectin (DRM) in the treatment of cattle mange have increased in recent years in some regions like Argentina, the aim of the current work was to evaluate the effectiveness of DRM following their administration as traditional or long-acting formulations in combination with an ancillary therapy of cypermethrin + chlorpyrifos to cattle naturally infested by P. ovis. Additionally, the relationship between the mite load and the effectiveness of the treatment was evaluated. The study was carried out on five (5) commercial beef cattle farms with a grazing system of meat production. On farms A and B ten (10) calves with active mange infection were treated with a single subcutaneous (SC) injection of DRM (1%) at 0.2 mg/kg. On farms C, D, and E, ten (10) calves with active mange infection were treated with a single SC injection of DRM-LA (3.15% or 3.5%) at 0.63 or 0.7 mg/kg. On all the farms, a pour-on treatment combining cypermethrin (500 mg/animal) and chlorpyrifos (250 mg /animal) was administered concurrently with the injectable treatment as ancillary therapy. The animals were weighed on a calibrated weighing scale to determine the dose prior to treatment. Skin scraping samples were collected from each animal and mites were counted at 14 and 21 days post-treatment on farms A and B; and 21 days post-treatment on farms C, D and E. Correlation between initial and post-treatment mite counts was performed by parametric analysis (Pearson’s r), and the number of negative and positive animals obtained after the different treatments were compared with the Fisher exact test. While the average mite count was 50 on farm A, it was 150 on farm B. DRM 1% + pour-on failed to achieve a 100% efficacy at day 14 on both farms. However, this classic DRM formulation + cypermethrin-chlorpyrifos obtained an acaricide efficacy of 100% at day 21 post-treatment on farm A (low initial mite count). The average mite counts on farms C, D and E were 126, 138 and 41, respectively. While the acaricide efficacies were 85% and 94% on farms C and D, DRM- LA + cypermethrin-chlorpyrifos pour-on treatment reached a 100% acaricide efficacy on farm E (low initial mite count). A positive correlation between initial and post- treatment mite counts were found (r 0.498, p<0.0001). In fact, a higher percentage of negative animals was observed in those with lower initial counts (p<0.0001). In conclusion, depending on the mite load the use of DRM in combination with an ancillary therapy of cypermethrin and chlorpyrifos can be useful to control Psoroptic mange in cattle. It is now crucial to accomplish adequate management of this disease and optimize mange control through early diagnosis and treatment strategies implementedon an individual cattle farm basis. Fil: Cantón, Candela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina Fil: Moriones, Lucila. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina Fil: Dominguez, Maria Paula. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina Fil: Lanusse, Carlos Edmundo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina Fil: Alvarez, Luis Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina Fil: Lifschitz, Adrian Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina XXVII Congreso Panamericano de Ciencias Veterinarias Montevideo Uruguay Colegio de Veterinarios del Uruguay Universidad de la República. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias Sociedad de Medicina Veterinaria del Uruguay |
| description |
Psoroptic mange causes relevant losses of productivity in cattle. Therefore, bovine mange control is necessary to ensure adequate production levels on beef cattle farms. Macrocyclic lactones are one of the main pharmacological tools recommended for controlling it. Considering that field reports on failures of ivermectin and doramectin (DRM) in the treatment of cattle mange have increased in recent years in some regions like Argentina, the aim of the current work was to evaluate the effectiveness of DRM following their administration as traditional or long-acting formulations in combination with an ancillary therapy of cypermethrin + chlorpyrifos to cattle naturally infested by P. ovis. Additionally, the relationship between the mite load and the effectiveness of the treatment was evaluated. The study was carried out on five (5) commercial beef cattle farms with a grazing system of meat production. On farms A and B ten (10) calves with active mange infection were treated with a single subcutaneous (SC) injection of DRM (1%) at 0.2 mg/kg. On farms C, D, and E, ten (10) calves with active mange infection were treated with a single SC injection of DRM-LA (3.15% or 3.5%) at 0.63 or 0.7 mg/kg. On all the farms, a pour-on treatment combining cypermethrin (500 mg/animal) and chlorpyrifos (250 mg /animal) was administered concurrently with the injectable treatment as ancillary therapy. The animals were weighed on a calibrated weighing scale to determine the dose prior to treatment. Skin scraping samples were collected from each animal and mites were counted at 14 and 21 days post-treatment on farms A and B; and 21 days post-treatment on farms C, D and E. Correlation between initial and post-treatment mite counts was performed by parametric analysis (Pearson’s r), and the number of negative and positive animals obtained after the different treatments were compared with the Fisher exact test. While the average mite count was 50 on farm A, it was 150 on farm B. DRM 1% + pour-on failed to achieve a 100% efficacy at day 14 on both farms. However, this classic DRM formulation + cypermethrin-chlorpyrifos obtained an acaricide efficacy of 100% at day 21 post-treatment on farm A (low initial mite count). The average mite counts on farms C, D and E were 126, 138 and 41, respectively. While the acaricide efficacies were 85% and 94% on farms C and D, DRM- LA + cypermethrin-chlorpyrifos pour-on treatment reached a 100% acaricide efficacy on farm E (low initial mite count). A positive correlation between initial and post- treatment mite counts were found (r 0.498, p<0.0001). In fact, a higher percentage of negative animals was observed in those with lower initial counts (p<0.0001). In conclusion, depending on the mite load the use of DRM in combination with an ancillary therapy of cypermethrin and chlorpyrifos can be useful to control Psoroptic mange in cattle. It is now crucial to accomplish adequate management of this disease and optimize mange control through early diagnosis and treatment strategies implementedon an individual cattle farm basis. |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject Congreso Book http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| format |
conferenceObject |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/257750 Pharmacological strategies and influence of initial mite load for controlling psoroptic mange in grazing beef cattle; XXVII Congreso Panamericano de Ciencias Veterinarias; Montevideo; Uruguay; 2024; 104-104 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/257750 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Pharmacological strategies and influence of initial mite load for controlling psoroptic mange in grazing beef cattle; XXVII Congreso Panamericano de Ciencias Veterinarias; Montevideo; Uruguay; 2024; 104-104 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.panvet2024.uy/_files/ugd/d0b038_3e3bd8f2500f4eba967245d820276927.pdf |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Internacional |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colegio de Veterinarios del Uruguay |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colegio de Veterinarios del Uruguay |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
| _version_ |
1842268995321856000 |
| score |
13.13397 |