Biodiversity targets after 2010

Autores
Mace, Georgina M.; Cramer, Wolfgang; Diaz, Sandra Myrna; Faith, Daniel; Larigauderie, Anne; Le Preste, Philippe; Palmer, Margaret; Perrings, Charles; Scholes, Robert J.; Walpole, Matt; Walther, Bruno A.; Watson, James E. M.; Mooney, Harold A.
Año de publicación
2010
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The bold commitment made by the world´s govermments to reduce the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010 will soon be tested. On the basis of the continuing declines measured by most indicators, it now seems inevitable that the aoutcome will be that it has not been achieved. Here, in order to build on the momentum created by the 2010 target, we propose a shift away from a large set of static targets towards a smaller number of specific targets. Specifically, we present three categories of targets (red, green and blue) with examples of each. These relte respectively to (1) tose biodiversity outcomes that must be avoided to avert situations that are deleterious for people, (2) the highly valued biodiversity conservation priorities, and (3) an improved scientific understanding necessary for adaptive management now and into the future.
Fil: Mace, Georgina M.. Imperial College London. Centre for Population Biology; Reino Unido
Fil: Cramer, Wolfgang. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research; Alemania
Fil: Diaz, Sandra Myrna. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (p); Argentina; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Faith, Daniel. The Australian Museum; Australia
Fil: Larigauderie, Anne. Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle. DIVERSITAS; Francia
Fil: Le Preste, Philippe. Université Laval. Institut Hydro-Québec en environnement, développement et société; Canadá
Fil: Palmer, Margaret. University of Maryland. Center for Environmental Science. Chesapeake Biological Lab; Estados Unidos
Fil: Perrings, Charles. Arizona State University. School of Life Sciences. ecoSERVICES Group; Estados Unidos
Fil: Scholes, Robert J.. CSIR Natural Resources and Environment; Sudáfrica
Fil: Walpole, Matt. UNEP-WCMC; Reino Unido
Fil: Walther, Bruno A.. UNEP-WCMC; Reino Unido
Fil: Watson, James E. M.. The University of Queensland. The Ecology Centre; Australia
Fil: Mooney, Harold A.. Stanford University. Department of Biology; Estados Unidos
Materia
Biodiversity
Conservation Priorities
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/14517
Acceder
id CONICETDig_e640c34e855b141d6c4e2caffeb93d3f
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/14517
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Biodiversity targets after 2010Mace, Georgina M.Cramer, WolfgangDiaz, Sandra MyrnaFaith, DanielLarigauderie, AnneLe Preste, PhilippePalmer, MargaretPerrings, CharlesScholes, Robert J.Walpole, MattWalther, Bruno A.Watson, James E. M.Mooney, Harold A.BiodiversityConservation Prioritieshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1The bold commitment made by the world´s govermments to reduce the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010 will soon be tested. On the basis of the continuing declines measured by most indicators, it now seems inevitable that the aoutcome will be that it has not been achieved. Here, in order to build on the momentum created by the 2010 target, we propose a shift away from a large set of static targets towards a smaller number of specific targets. Specifically, we present three categories of targets (red, green and blue) with examples of each. These relte respectively to (1) tose biodiversity outcomes that must be avoided to avert situations that are deleterious for people, (2) the highly valued biodiversity conservation priorities, and (3) an improved scientific understanding necessary for adaptive management now and into the future.Fil: Mace, Georgina M.. Imperial College London. Centre for Population Biology; Reino UnidoFil: Cramer, Wolfgang. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research; AlemaniaFil: Diaz, Sandra Myrna. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (p); Argentina; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; ArgentinaFil: Faith, Daniel. The Australian Museum; AustraliaFil: Larigauderie, Anne. Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle. DIVERSITAS; FranciaFil: Le Preste, Philippe. Université Laval. Institut Hydro-Québec en environnement, développement et société; CanadáFil: Palmer, Margaret. University of Maryland. Center for Environmental Science. Chesapeake Biological Lab; Estados UnidosFil: Perrings, Charles. Arizona State University. School of Life Sciences. ecoSERVICES Group; Estados UnidosFil: Scholes, Robert J.. CSIR Natural Resources and Environment; SudáfricaFil: Walpole, Matt. UNEP-WCMC; Reino UnidoFil: Walther, Bruno A.. UNEP-WCMC; Reino UnidoFil: Watson, James E. M.. The University of Queensland. The Ecology Centre; AustraliaFil: Mooney, Harold A.. Stanford University. Department of Biology; Estados UnidosElsevier2010-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/14517Mace, Georgina M.; Cramer, Wolfgang; Diaz, Sandra Myrna; Faith, Daniel; Larigauderie, Anne; et al.; Biodiversity targets after 2010; Elsevier; Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability; 2; 1-2; 1-2010; 3-81877-34351877-3443enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343510000114info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.03.003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:55:39Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/14517instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:55:39.522CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Biodiversity targets after 2010
title Biodiversity targets after 2010
spellingShingle Biodiversity targets after 2010
Mace, Georgina M.
Biodiversity
Conservation Priorities
title_short Biodiversity targets after 2010
title_full Biodiversity targets after 2010
title_fullStr Biodiversity targets after 2010
title_full_unstemmed Biodiversity targets after 2010
title_sort Biodiversity targets after 2010
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Mace, Georgina M.
Cramer, Wolfgang
Diaz, Sandra Myrna
Faith, Daniel
Larigauderie, Anne
Le Preste, Philippe
Palmer, Margaret
Perrings, Charles
Scholes, Robert J.
Walpole, Matt
Walther, Bruno A.
Watson, James E. M.
Mooney, Harold A.
author Mace, Georgina M.
author_facet Mace, Georgina M.
Cramer, Wolfgang
Diaz, Sandra Myrna
Faith, Daniel
Larigauderie, Anne
Le Preste, Philippe
Palmer, Margaret
Perrings, Charles
Scholes, Robert J.
Walpole, Matt
Walther, Bruno A.
Watson, James E. M.
Mooney, Harold A.
author_role author
author2 Cramer, Wolfgang
Diaz, Sandra Myrna
Faith, Daniel
Larigauderie, Anne
Le Preste, Philippe
Palmer, Margaret
Perrings, Charles
Scholes, Robert J.
Walpole, Matt
Walther, Bruno A.
Watson, James E. M.
Mooney, Harold A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Biodiversity
Conservation Priorities
topic Biodiversity
Conservation Priorities
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The bold commitment made by the world´s govermments to reduce the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010 will soon be tested. On the basis of the continuing declines measured by most indicators, it now seems inevitable that the aoutcome will be that it has not been achieved. Here, in order to build on the momentum created by the 2010 target, we propose a shift away from a large set of static targets towards a smaller number of specific targets. Specifically, we present three categories of targets (red, green and blue) with examples of each. These relte respectively to (1) tose biodiversity outcomes that must be avoided to avert situations that are deleterious for people, (2) the highly valued biodiversity conservation priorities, and (3) an improved scientific understanding necessary for adaptive management now and into the future.
Fil: Mace, Georgina M.. Imperial College London. Centre for Population Biology; Reino Unido
Fil: Cramer, Wolfgang. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research; Alemania
Fil: Diaz, Sandra Myrna. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (p); Argentina; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Faith, Daniel. The Australian Museum; Australia
Fil: Larigauderie, Anne. Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle. DIVERSITAS; Francia
Fil: Le Preste, Philippe. Université Laval. Institut Hydro-Québec en environnement, développement et société; Canadá
Fil: Palmer, Margaret. University of Maryland. Center for Environmental Science. Chesapeake Biological Lab; Estados Unidos
Fil: Perrings, Charles. Arizona State University. School of Life Sciences. ecoSERVICES Group; Estados Unidos
Fil: Scholes, Robert J.. CSIR Natural Resources and Environment; Sudáfrica
Fil: Walpole, Matt. UNEP-WCMC; Reino Unido
Fil: Walther, Bruno A.. UNEP-WCMC; Reino Unido
Fil: Watson, James E. M.. The University of Queensland. The Ecology Centre; Australia
Fil: Mooney, Harold A.. Stanford University. Department of Biology; Estados Unidos
description The bold commitment made by the world´s govermments to reduce the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010 will soon be tested. On the basis of the continuing declines measured by most indicators, it now seems inevitable that the aoutcome will be that it has not been achieved. Here, in order to build on the momentum created by the 2010 target, we propose a shift away from a large set of static targets towards a smaller number of specific targets. Specifically, we present three categories of targets (red, green and blue) with examples of each. These relte respectively to (1) tose biodiversity outcomes that must be avoided to avert situations that are deleterious for people, (2) the highly valued biodiversity conservation priorities, and (3) an improved scientific understanding necessary for adaptive management now and into the future.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/14517
Mace, Georgina M.; Cramer, Wolfgang; Diaz, Sandra Myrna; Faith, Daniel; Larigauderie, Anne; et al.; Biodiversity targets after 2010; Elsevier; Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability; 2; 1-2; 1-2010; 3-8
1877-3435
1877-3443
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/14517
identifier_str_mv Mace, Georgina M.; Cramer, Wolfgang; Diaz, Sandra Myrna; Faith, Daniel; Larigauderie, Anne; et al.; Biodiversity targets after 2010; Elsevier; Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability; 2; 1-2; 1-2010; 3-8
1877-3435
1877-3443
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343510000114
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.03.003
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846782260151320576
score 12.982451

Publicaciones similares