Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation

Autores
Jorgensen, Salvador J.; Micheli, Fiorenza; White, Timothy D.; Van Houtan, Kyle S.; Alfaro Shigueto, Joanna; Andrzejaczek, Samantha; Arnoldi, Natalie S.; Baum, Julia K.; Block, Barbara; Britten, Gregory L.; Butner, Cheryl; Caballero, Susana; Cardeñosa, Diego; Chapple, Taylor K.; Clarke, Shelley; Cortés, Eric; Dulvy, Nicholas K.; Fowler, Sarah; Gallagher, Austin J.; Gilman, Eric; Godley, Brendan J.; Graham, Rachel T.; Hammerschlag, Neil; Harry, Alastair V.; Heithaus, Michael R.; Lucifora, Luis Omar; Simpfendorfer, Colin A.; Sims, David W.; Ward Paige, Christine; Worm, Boris; Ferretti, Francesco
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Over the past 4 decades there has been a growing concern for the conservation status of elasmobranchs (sharks and rays). In 2002, the first elasmobranch species were added to Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). Less than 20 yr later, there were 39 species on Appendix II and 5 on Appendix I. Despite growing concern, effective conservation and management remain challenged by a lack of data on population status for many species, human−wildlife interactions, threats to population viability, and the efficacy of conservation approaches. We surveyed 100 of the most frequently published and cited experts on elasmobranchs and, based on ranked responses, prioritized 20 research questions on elasmobranch conservation. To address these questions, we then convened a group of 47 experts from 35 institutions and 12 countries. The 20 questions were organized into the following broad categories: (1) status and threats, (2) population and ecology, and (3) conservation and management. For each section, we sought to synthesize existing knowledge, describe consensus or diverging views, identify gaps, and suggest promising future directions and research priorities. The resulting synthesis aggregates an array of perspectives on emergent research and priority directions for elasmobranch conservation.
Fil: Jorgensen, Salvador J.. Monterey Bay Aquarium; Estados Unidos. University of California at Santa Cruz; Estados Unidos
Fil: Micheli, Fiorenza. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos. Stanford Center for Ocean Solutions; Estados Unidos
Fil: White, Timothy D.. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos. Global Fishing Watch; Estados Unidos
Fil: Van Houtan, Kyle S.. University of Duke; Estados Unidos. Monterey Bay Aquarium; Estados Unidos
Fil: Alfaro Shigueto, Joanna. Universidad Científica del Sur; Perú
Fil: Andrzejaczek, Samantha. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos
Fil: Arnoldi, Natalie S.. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos
Fil: Baum, Julia K.. University Of Victoria. Dept.of Biology; Canadá
Fil: Block, Barbara. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos
Fil: Britten, Gregory L.. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Estados Unidos
Fil: Butner, Cheryl. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos
Fil: Caballero, Susana. Universidad de los Andes; Colombia
Fil: Cardeñosa, Diego. Stony Brook University ; State University Of New York;
Fil: Chapple, Taylor K.. State University of Oregon; Estados Unidos
Fil: Clarke, Shelley. Sasama Consulting; Japón
Fil: Cortés, Eric. National Ocean And Atmospheric Administration; Estados Unidos
Fil: Dulvy, Nicholas K.. University Fraser Simon; Canadá
Fil: Fowler, Sarah. Save Our Seas Foundation; Suiza
Fil: Gallagher, Austin J.. Beneath The Waves; Estados Unidos
Fil: Gilman, Eric. Heriot-watt University; Reino Unido
Fil: Godley, Brendan J.. University of Exeter; Reino Unido
Fil: Graham, Rachel T.. Maralliance; Panamá
Fil: Hammerschlag, Neil. University Of Miami. Rosenstiel School Of Marine Atmospheric Science; Estados Unidos
Fil: Harry, Alastair V.. Murdoch University; Australia
Fil: Heithaus, Michael R.. Florida International University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Lucifora, Luis Omar. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto Nacional de Limnología. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto Nacional de Limnología; Argentina
Fil: Simpfendorfer, Colin A.. James Cook University; Australia
Fil: Sims, David W.. University of Southampton; Reino Unido. Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom; Reino Unido
Fil: Ward Paige, Christine. Eoceans; Canadá
Fil: Worm, Boris. University of California at Santa Cruz; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ferretti, Francesco. Virginia Tech University; Estados Unidos
Materia
Elasmobranch
Conservation priorities
Sharks
Rays
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/256988

id CONICETDig_fdb639ee439fd93c2fa3b691a6781395
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/256988
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservationJorgensen, Salvador J.Micheli, FiorenzaWhite, Timothy D.Van Houtan, Kyle S.Alfaro Shigueto, JoannaAndrzejaczek, SamanthaArnoldi, Natalie S.Baum, Julia K.Block, BarbaraBritten, Gregory L.Butner, CherylCaballero, SusanaCardeñosa, DiegoChapple, Taylor K.Clarke, ShelleyCortés, EricDulvy, Nicholas K.Fowler, SarahGallagher, Austin J.Gilman, EricGodley, Brendan J.Graham, Rachel T.Hammerschlag, NeilHarry, Alastair V.Heithaus, Michael R.Lucifora, Luis OmarSimpfendorfer, Colin A.Sims, David W.Ward Paige, ChristineWorm, BorisFerretti, FrancescoElasmobranchConservation prioritiesSharksRayshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Over the past 4 decades there has been a growing concern for the conservation status of elasmobranchs (sharks and rays). In 2002, the first elasmobranch species were added to Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). Less than 20 yr later, there were 39 species on Appendix II and 5 on Appendix I. Despite growing concern, effective conservation and management remain challenged by a lack of data on population status for many species, human−wildlife interactions, threats to population viability, and the efficacy of conservation approaches. We surveyed 100 of the most frequently published and cited experts on elasmobranchs and, based on ranked responses, prioritized 20 research questions on elasmobranch conservation. To address these questions, we then convened a group of 47 experts from 35 institutions and 12 countries. The 20 questions were organized into the following broad categories: (1) status and threats, (2) population and ecology, and (3) conservation and management. For each section, we sought to synthesize existing knowledge, describe consensus or diverging views, identify gaps, and suggest promising future directions and research priorities. The resulting synthesis aggregates an array of perspectives on emergent research and priority directions for elasmobranch conservation.Fil: Jorgensen, Salvador J.. Monterey Bay Aquarium; Estados Unidos. University of California at Santa Cruz; Estados UnidosFil: Micheli, Fiorenza. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos. Stanford Center for Ocean Solutions; Estados UnidosFil: White, Timothy D.. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos. Global Fishing Watch; Estados UnidosFil: Van Houtan, Kyle S.. University of Duke; Estados Unidos. Monterey Bay Aquarium; Estados UnidosFil: Alfaro Shigueto, Joanna. Universidad Científica del Sur; PerúFil: Andrzejaczek, Samantha. University of Stanford; Estados UnidosFil: Arnoldi, Natalie S.. University of Stanford; Estados UnidosFil: Baum, Julia K.. University Of Victoria. Dept.of Biology; CanadáFil: Block, Barbara. University of Stanford; Estados UnidosFil: Britten, Gregory L.. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Estados UnidosFil: Butner, Cheryl. University of Stanford; Estados UnidosFil: Caballero, Susana. Universidad de los Andes; ColombiaFil: Cardeñosa, Diego. Stony Brook University ; State University Of New York;Fil: Chapple, Taylor K.. State University of Oregon; Estados UnidosFil: Clarke, Shelley. Sasama Consulting; JapónFil: Cortés, Eric. National Ocean And Atmospheric Administration; Estados UnidosFil: Dulvy, Nicholas K.. University Fraser Simon; CanadáFil: Fowler, Sarah. Save Our Seas Foundation; SuizaFil: Gallagher, Austin J.. Beneath The Waves; Estados UnidosFil: Gilman, Eric. Heriot-watt University; Reino UnidoFil: Godley, Brendan J.. University of Exeter; Reino UnidoFil: Graham, Rachel T.. Maralliance; PanamáFil: Hammerschlag, Neil. University Of Miami. Rosenstiel School Of Marine Atmospheric Science; Estados UnidosFil: Harry, Alastair V.. Murdoch University; AustraliaFil: Heithaus, Michael R.. Florida International University; Estados UnidosFil: Lucifora, Luis Omar. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto Nacional de Limnología. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto Nacional de Limnología; ArgentinaFil: Simpfendorfer, Colin A.. James Cook University; AustraliaFil: Sims, David W.. University of Southampton; Reino Unido. Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom; Reino UnidoFil: Ward Paige, Christine. Eoceans; CanadáFil: Worm, Boris. University of California at Santa Cruz; Estados UnidosFil: Ferretti, Francesco. Virginia Tech University; Estados UnidosInter Research2022-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/256988Jorgensen, Salvador J.; Micheli, Fiorenza; White, Timothy D.; Van Houtan, Kyle S.; Alfaro Shigueto, Joanna; et al.; Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation; Inter Research; Endangered Species Research; 47; 2-2022; 171-2031863-54071613-4796CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esr/v47/p171-203/info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3354/esr01169info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:50:52Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/256988instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:50:52.781CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation
title Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation
spellingShingle Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation
Jorgensen, Salvador J.
Elasmobranch
Conservation priorities
Sharks
Rays
title_short Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation
title_full Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation
title_fullStr Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation
title_full_unstemmed Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation
title_sort Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Jorgensen, Salvador J.
Micheli, Fiorenza
White, Timothy D.
Van Houtan, Kyle S.
Alfaro Shigueto, Joanna
Andrzejaczek, Samantha
Arnoldi, Natalie S.
Baum, Julia K.
Block, Barbara
Britten, Gregory L.
Butner, Cheryl
Caballero, Susana
Cardeñosa, Diego
Chapple, Taylor K.
Clarke, Shelley
Cortés, Eric
Dulvy, Nicholas K.
Fowler, Sarah
Gallagher, Austin J.
Gilman, Eric
Godley, Brendan J.
Graham, Rachel T.
Hammerschlag, Neil
Harry, Alastair V.
Heithaus, Michael R.
Lucifora, Luis Omar
Simpfendorfer, Colin A.
Sims, David W.
Ward Paige, Christine
Worm, Boris
Ferretti, Francesco
author Jorgensen, Salvador J.
author_facet Jorgensen, Salvador J.
Micheli, Fiorenza
White, Timothy D.
Van Houtan, Kyle S.
Alfaro Shigueto, Joanna
Andrzejaczek, Samantha
Arnoldi, Natalie S.
Baum, Julia K.
Block, Barbara
Britten, Gregory L.
Butner, Cheryl
Caballero, Susana
Cardeñosa, Diego
Chapple, Taylor K.
Clarke, Shelley
Cortés, Eric
Dulvy, Nicholas K.
Fowler, Sarah
Gallagher, Austin J.
Gilman, Eric
Godley, Brendan J.
Graham, Rachel T.
Hammerschlag, Neil
Harry, Alastair V.
Heithaus, Michael R.
Lucifora, Luis Omar
Simpfendorfer, Colin A.
Sims, David W.
Ward Paige, Christine
Worm, Boris
Ferretti, Francesco
author_role author
author2 Micheli, Fiorenza
White, Timothy D.
Van Houtan, Kyle S.
Alfaro Shigueto, Joanna
Andrzejaczek, Samantha
Arnoldi, Natalie S.
Baum, Julia K.
Block, Barbara
Britten, Gregory L.
Butner, Cheryl
Caballero, Susana
Cardeñosa, Diego
Chapple, Taylor K.
Clarke, Shelley
Cortés, Eric
Dulvy, Nicholas K.
Fowler, Sarah
Gallagher, Austin J.
Gilman, Eric
Godley, Brendan J.
Graham, Rachel T.
Hammerschlag, Neil
Harry, Alastair V.
Heithaus, Michael R.
Lucifora, Luis Omar
Simpfendorfer, Colin A.
Sims, David W.
Ward Paige, Christine
Worm, Boris
Ferretti, Francesco
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Elasmobranch
Conservation priorities
Sharks
Rays
topic Elasmobranch
Conservation priorities
Sharks
Rays
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Over the past 4 decades there has been a growing concern for the conservation status of elasmobranchs (sharks and rays). In 2002, the first elasmobranch species were added to Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). Less than 20 yr later, there were 39 species on Appendix II and 5 on Appendix I. Despite growing concern, effective conservation and management remain challenged by a lack of data on population status for many species, human−wildlife interactions, threats to population viability, and the efficacy of conservation approaches. We surveyed 100 of the most frequently published and cited experts on elasmobranchs and, based on ranked responses, prioritized 20 research questions on elasmobranch conservation. To address these questions, we then convened a group of 47 experts from 35 institutions and 12 countries. The 20 questions were organized into the following broad categories: (1) status and threats, (2) population and ecology, and (3) conservation and management. For each section, we sought to synthesize existing knowledge, describe consensus or diverging views, identify gaps, and suggest promising future directions and research priorities. The resulting synthesis aggregates an array of perspectives on emergent research and priority directions for elasmobranch conservation.
Fil: Jorgensen, Salvador J.. Monterey Bay Aquarium; Estados Unidos. University of California at Santa Cruz; Estados Unidos
Fil: Micheli, Fiorenza. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos. Stanford Center for Ocean Solutions; Estados Unidos
Fil: White, Timothy D.. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos. Global Fishing Watch; Estados Unidos
Fil: Van Houtan, Kyle S.. University of Duke; Estados Unidos. Monterey Bay Aquarium; Estados Unidos
Fil: Alfaro Shigueto, Joanna. Universidad Científica del Sur; Perú
Fil: Andrzejaczek, Samantha. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos
Fil: Arnoldi, Natalie S.. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos
Fil: Baum, Julia K.. University Of Victoria. Dept.of Biology; Canadá
Fil: Block, Barbara. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos
Fil: Britten, Gregory L.. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Estados Unidos
Fil: Butner, Cheryl. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos
Fil: Caballero, Susana. Universidad de los Andes; Colombia
Fil: Cardeñosa, Diego. Stony Brook University ; State University Of New York;
Fil: Chapple, Taylor K.. State University of Oregon; Estados Unidos
Fil: Clarke, Shelley. Sasama Consulting; Japón
Fil: Cortés, Eric. National Ocean And Atmospheric Administration; Estados Unidos
Fil: Dulvy, Nicholas K.. University Fraser Simon; Canadá
Fil: Fowler, Sarah. Save Our Seas Foundation; Suiza
Fil: Gallagher, Austin J.. Beneath The Waves; Estados Unidos
Fil: Gilman, Eric. Heriot-watt University; Reino Unido
Fil: Godley, Brendan J.. University of Exeter; Reino Unido
Fil: Graham, Rachel T.. Maralliance; Panamá
Fil: Hammerschlag, Neil. University Of Miami. Rosenstiel School Of Marine Atmospheric Science; Estados Unidos
Fil: Harry, Alastair V.. Murdoch University; Australia
Fil: Heithaus, Michael R.. Florida International University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Lucifora, Luis Omar. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto Nacional de Limnología. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto Nacional de Limnología; Argentina
Fil: Simpfendorfer, Colin A.. James Cook University; Australia
Fil: Sims, David W.. University of Southampton; Reino Unido. Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom; Reino Unido
Fil: Ward Paige, Christine. Eoceans; Canadá
Fil: Worm, Boris. University of California at Santa Cruz; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ferretti, Francesco. Virginia Tech University; Estados Unidos
description Over the past 4 decades there has been a growing concern for the conservation status of elasmobranchs (sharks and rays). In 2002, the first elasmobranch species were added to Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). Less than 20 yr later, there were 39 species on Appendix II and 5 on Appendix I. Despite growing concern, effective conservation and management remain challenged by a lack of data on population status for many species, human−wildlife interactions, threats to population viability, and the efficacy of conservation approaches. We surveyed 100 of the most frequently published and cited experts on elasmobranchs and, based on ranked responses, prioritized 20 research questions on elasmobranch conservation. To address these questions, we then convened a group of 47 experts from 35 institutions and 12 countries. The 20 questions were organized into the following broad categories: (1) status and threats, (2) population and ecology, and (3) conservation and management. For each section, we sought to synthesize existing knowledge, describe consensus or diverging views, identify gaps, and suggest promising future directions and research priorities. The resulting synthesis aggregates an array of perspectives on emergent research and priority directions for elasmobranch conservation.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/256988
Jorgensen, Salvador J.; Micheli, Fiorenza; White, Timothy D.; Van Houtan, Kyle S.; Alfaro Shigueto, Joanna; et al.; Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation; Inter Research; Endangered Species Research; 47; 2-2022; 171-203
1863-5407
1613-4796
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/256988
identifier_str_mv Jorgensen, Salvador J.; Micheli, Fiorenza; White, Timothy D.; Van Houtan, Kyle S.; Alfaro Shigueto, Joanna; et al.; Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation; Inter Research; Endangered Species Research; 47; 2-2022; 171-203
1863-5407
1613-4796
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esr/v47/p171-203/
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3354/esr01169
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Inter Research
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Inter Research
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613567006900224
score 13.070432