Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation
- Autores
- Jorgensen, Salvador J.; Micheli, Fiorenza; White, Timothy D.; Van Houtan, Kyle S.; Alfaro Shigueto, Joanna; Andrzejaczek, Samantha; Arnoldi, Natalie S.; Baum, Julia K.; Block, Barbara; Britten, Gregory L.; Butner, Cheryl; Caballero, Susana; Cardeñosa, Diego; Chapple, Taylor K.; Clarke, Shelley; Cortés, Eric; Dulvy, Nicholas K.; Fowler, Sarah; Gallagher, Austin J.; Gilman, Eric; Godley, Brendan J.; Graham, Rachel T.; Hammerschlag, Neil; Harry, Alastair V.; Heithaus, Michael R.; Lucifora, Luis Omar; Simpfendorfer, Colin A.; Sims, David W.; Ward Paige, Christine; Worm, Boris; Ferretti, Francesco
- Año de publicación
- 2022
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Over the past 4 decades there has been a growing concern for the conservation status of elasmobranchs (sharks and rays). In 2002, the first elasmobranch species were added to Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). Less than 20 yr later, there were 39 species on Appendix II and 5 on Appendix I. Despite growing concern, effective conservation and management remain challenged by a lack of data on population status for many species, human−wildlife interactions, threats to population viability, and the efficacy of conservation approaches. We surveyed 100 of the most frequently published and cited experts on elasmobranchs and, based on ranked responses, prioritized 20 research questions on elasmobranch conservation. To address these questions, we then convened a group of 47 experts from 35 institutions and 12 countries. The 20 questions were organized into the following broad categories: (1) status and threats, (2) population and ecology, and (3) conservation and management. For each section, we sought to synthesize existing knowledge, describe consensus or diverging views, identify gaps, and suggest promising future directions and research priorities. The resulting synthesis aggregates an array of perspectives on emergent research and priority directions for elasmobranch conservation.
Fil: Jorgensen, Salvador J.. Monterey Bay Aquarium; Estados Unidos. University of California at Santa Cruz; Estados Unidos
Fil: Micheli, Fiorenza. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos. Stanford Center for Ocean Solutions; Estados Unidos
Fil: White, Timothy D.. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos. Global Fishing Watch; Estados Unidos
Fil: Van Houtan, Kyle S.. University of Duke; Estados Unidos. Monterey Bay Aquarium; Estados Unidos
Fil: Alfaro Shigueto, Joanna. Universidad Científica del Sur; Perú
Fil: Andrzejaczek, Samantha. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos
Fil: Arnoldi, Natalie S.. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos
Fil: Baum, Julia K.. University Of Victoria. Dept.of Biology; Canadá
Fil: Block, Barbara. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos
Fil: Britten, Gregory L.. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Estados Unidos
Fil: Butner, Cheryl. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos
Fil: Caballero, Susana. Universidad de los Andes; Colombia
Fil: Cardeñosa, Diego. Stony Brook University ; State University Of New York;
Fil: Chapple, Taylor K.. State University of Oregon; Estados Unidos
Fil: Clarke, Shelley. Sasama Consulting; Japón
Fil: Cortés, Eric. National Ocean And Atmospheric Administration; Estados Unidos
Fil: Dulvy, Nicholas K.. University Fraser Simon; Canadá
Fil: Fowler, Sarah. Save Our Seas Foundation; Suiza
Fil: Gallagher, Austin J.. Beneath The Waves; Estados Unidos
Fil: Gilman, Eric. Heriot-watt University; Reino Unido
Fil: Godley, Brendan J.. University of Exeter; Reino Unido
Fil: Graham, Rachel T.. Maralliance; Panamá
Fil: Hammerschlag, Neil. University Of Miami. Rosenstiel School Of Marine Atmospheric Science; Estados Unidos
Fil: Harry, Alastair V.. Murdoch University; Australia
Fil: Heithaus, Michael R.. Florida International University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Lucifora, Luis Omar. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto Nacional de Limnología. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto Nacional de Limnología; Argentina
Fil: Simpfendorfer, Colin A.. James Cook University; Australia
Fil: Sims, David W.. University of Southampton; Reino Unido. Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom; Reino Unido
Fil: Ward Paige, Christine. Eoceans; Canadá
Fil: Worm, Boris. University of California at Santa Cruz; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ferretti, Francesco. Virginia Tech University; Estados Unidos - Materia
-
Elasmobranch
Conservation priorities
Sharks
Rays - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/256988
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_fdb639ee439fd93c2fa3b691a6781395 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/256988 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservationJorgensen, Salvador J.Micheli, FiorenzaWhite, Timothy D.Van Houtan, Kyle S.Alfaro Shigueto, JoannaAndrzejaczek, SamanthaArnoldi, Natalie S.Baum, Julia K.Block, BarbaraBritten, Gregory L.Butner, CherylCaballero, SusanaCardeñosa, DiegoChapple, Taylor K.Clarke, ShelleyCortés, EricDulvy, Nicholas K.Fowler, SarahGallagher, Austin J.Gilman, EricGodley, Brendan J.Graham, Rachel T.Hammerschlag, NeilHarry, Alastair V.Heithaus, Michael R.Lucifora, Luis OmarSimpfendorfer, Colin A.Sims, David W.Ward Paige, ChristineWorm, BorisFerretti, FrancescoElasmobranchConservation prioritiesSharksRayshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Over the past 4 decades there has been a growing concern for the conservation status of elasmobranchs (sharks and rays). In 2002, the first elasmobranch species were added to Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). Less than 20 yr later, there were 39 species on Appendix II and 5 on Appendix I. Despite growing concern, effective conservation and management remain challenged by a lack of data on population status for many species, human−wildlife interactions, threats to population viability, and the efficacy of conservation approaches. We surveyed 100 of the most frequently published and cited experts on elasmobranchs and, based on ranked responses, prioritized 20 research questions on elasmobranch conservation. To address these questions, we then convened a group of 47 experts from 35 institutions and 12 countries. The 20 questions were organized into the following broad categories: (1) status and threats, (2) population and ecology, and (3) conservation and management. For each section, we sought to synthesize existing knowledge, describe consensus or diverging views, identify gaps, and suggest promising future directions and research priorities. The resulting synthesis aggregates an array of perspectives on emergent research and priority directions for elasmobranch conservation.Fil: Jorgensen, Salvador J.. Monterey Bay Aquarium; Estados Unidos. University of California at Santa Cruz; Estados UnidosFil: Micheli, Fiorenza. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos. Stanford Center for Ocean Solutions; Estados UnidosFil: White, Timothy D.. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos. Global Fishing Watch; Estados UnidosFil: Van Houtan, Kyle S.. University of Duke; Estados Unidos. Monterey Bay Aquarium; Estados UnidosFil: Alfaro Shigueto, Joanna. Universidad Científica del Sur; PerúFil: Andrzejaczek, Samantha. University of Stanford; Estados UnidosFil: Arnoldi, Natalie S.. University of Stanford; Estados UnidosFil: Baum, Julia K.. University Of Victoria. Dept.of Biology; CanadáFil: Block, Barbara. University of Stanford; Estados UnidosFil: Britten, Gregory L.. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Estados UnidosFil: Butner, Cheryl. University of Stanford; Estados UnidosFil: Caballero, Susana. Universidad de los Andes; ColombiaFil: Cardeñosa, Diego. Stony Brook University ; State University Of New York;Fil: Chapple, Taylor K.. State University of Oregon; Estados UnidosFil: Clarke, Shelley. Sasama Consulting; JapónFil: Cortés, Eric. National Ocean And Atmospheric Administration; Estados UnidosFil: Dulvy, Nicholas K.. University Fraser Simon; CanadáFil: Fowler, Sarah. Save Our Seas Foundation; SuizaFil: Gallagher, Austin J.. Beneath The Waves; Estados UnidosFil: Gilman, Eric. Heriot-watt University; Reino UnidoFil: Godley, Brendan J.. University of Exeter; Reino UnidoFil: Graham, Rachel T.. Maralliance; PanamáFil: Hammerschlag, Neil. University Of Miami. Rosenstiel School Of Marine Atmospheric Science; Estados UnidosFil: Harry, Alastair V.. Murdoch University; AustraliaFil: Heithaus, Michael R.. Florida International University; Estados UnidosFil: Lucifora, Luis Omar. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto Nacional de Limnología. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto Nacional de Limnología; ArgentinaFil: Simpfendorfer, Colin A.. James Cook University; AustraliaFil: Sims, David W.. University of Southampton; Reino Unido. Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom; Reino UnidoFil: Ward Paige, Christine. Eoceans; CanadáFil: Worm, Boris. University of California at Santa Cruz; Estados UnidosFil: Ferretti, Francesco. Virginia Tech University; Estados UnidosInter Research2022-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/256988Jorgensen, Salvador J.; Micheli, Fiorenza; White, Timothy D.; Van Houtan, Kyle S.; Alfaro Shigueto, Joanna; et al.; Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation; Inter Research; Endangered Species Research; 47; 2-2022; 171-2031863-54071613-4796CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esr/v47/p171-203/info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3354/esr01169info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:50:52Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/256988instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:50:52.781CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation |
title |
Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation |
spellingShingle |
Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation Jorgensen, Salvador J. Elasmobranch Conservation priorities Sharks Rays |
title_short |
Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation |
title_full |
Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation |
title_fullStr |
Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation |
title_sort |
Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Jorgensen, Salvador J. Micheli, Fiorenza White, Timothy D. Van Houtan, Kyle S. Alfaro Shigueto, Joanna Andrzejaczek, Samantha Arnoldi, Natalie S. Baum, Julia K. Block, Barbara Britten, Gregory L. Butner, Cheryl Caballero, Susana Cardeñosa, Diego Chapple, Taylor K. Clarke, Shelley Cortés, Eric Dulvy, Nicholas K. Fowler, Sarah Gallagher, Austin J. Gilman, Eric Godley, Brendan J. Graham, Rachel T. Hammerschlag, Neil Harry, Alastair V. Heithaus, Michael R. Lucifora, Luis Omar Simpfendorfer, Colin A. Sims, David W. Ward Paige, Christine Worm, Boris Ferretti, Francesco |
author |
Jorgensen, Salvador J. |
author_facet |
Jorgensen, Salvador J. Micheli, Fiorenza White, Timothy D. Van Houtan, Kyle S. Alfaro Shigueto, Joanna Andrzejaczek, Samantha Arnoldi, Natalie S. Baum, Julia K. Block, Barbara Britten, Gregory L. Butner, Cheryl Caballero, Susana Cardeñosa, Diego Chapple, Taylor K. Clarke, Shelley Cortés, Eric Dulvy, Nicholas K. Fowler, Sarah Gallagher, Austin J. Gilman, Eric Godley, Brendan J. Graham, Rachel T. Hammerschlag, Neil Harry, Alastair V. Heithaus, Michael R. Lucifora, Luis Omar Simpfendorfer, Colin A. Sims, David W. Ward Paige, Christine Worm, Boris Ferretti, Francesco |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Micheli, Fiorenza White, Timothy D. Van Houtan, Kyle S. Alfaro Shigueto, Joanna Andrzejaczek, Samantha Arnoldi, Natalie S. Baum, Julia K. Block, Barbara Britten, Gregory L. Butner, Cheryl Caballero, Susana Cardeñosa, Diego Chapple, Taylor K. Clarke, Shelley Cortés, Eric Dulvy, Nicholas K. Fowler, Sarah Gallagher, Austin J. Gilman, Eric Godley, Brendan J. Graham, Rachel T. Hammerschlag, Neil Harry, Alastair V. Heithaus, Michael R. Lucifora, Luis Omar Simpfendorfer, Colin A. Sims, David W. Ward Paige, Christine Worm, Boris Ferretti, Francesco |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Elasmobranch Conservation priorities Sharks Rays |
topic |
Elasmobranch Conservation priorities Sharks Rays |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Over the past 4 decades there has been a growing concern for the conservation status of elasmobranchs (sharks and rays). In 2002, the first elasmobranch species were added to Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). Less than 20 yr later, there were 39 species on Appendix II and 5 on Appendix I. Despite growing concern, effective conservation and management remain challenged by a lack of data on population status for many species, human−wildlife interactions, threats to population viability, and the efficacy of conservation approaches. We surveyed 100 of the most frequently published and cited experts on elasmobranchs and, based on ranked responses, prioritized 20 research questions on elasmobranch conservation. To address these questions, we then convened a group of 47 experts from 35 institutions and 12 countries. The 20 questions were organized into the following broad categories: (1) status and threats, (2) population and ecology, and (3) conservation and management. For each section, we sought to synthesize existing knowledge, describe consensus or diverging views, identify gaps, and suggest promising future directions and research priorities. The resulting synthesis aggregates an array of perspectives on emergent research and priority directions for elasmobranch conservation. Fil: Jorgensen, Salvador J.. Monterey Bay Aquarium; Estados Unidos. University of California at Santa Cruz; Estados Unidos Fil: Micheli, Fiorenza. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos. Stanford Center for Ocean Solutions; Estados Unidos Fil: White, Timothy D.. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos. Global Fishing Watch; Estados Unidos Fil: Van Houtan, Kyle S.. University of Duke; Estados Unidos. Monterey Bay Aquarium; Estados Unidos Fil: Alfaro Shigueto, Joanna. Universidad Científica del Sur; Perú Fil: Andrzejaczek, Samantha. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos Fil: Arnoldi, Natalie S.. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos Fil: Baum, Julia K.. University Of Victoria. Dept.of Biology; Canadá Fil: Block, Barbara. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos Fil: Britten, Gregory L.. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Estados Unidos Fil: Butner, Cheryl. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos Fil: Caballero, Susana. Universidad de los Andes; Colombia Fil: Cardeñosa, Diego. Stony Brook University ; State University Of New York; Fil: Chapple, Taylor K.. State University of Oregon; Estados Unidos Fil: Clarke, Shelley. Sasama Consulting; Japón Fil: Cortés, Eric. National Ocean And Atmospheric Administration; Estados Unidos Fil: Dulvy, Nicholas K.. University Fraser Simon; Canadá Fil: Fowler, Sarah. Save Our Seas Foundation; Suiza Fil: Gallagher, Austin J.. Beneath The Waves; Estados Unidos Fil: Gilman, Eric. Heriot-watt University; Reino Unido Fil: Godley, Brendan J.. University of Exeter; Reino Unido Fil: Graham, Rachel T.. Maralliance; Panamá Fil: Hammerschlag, Neil. University Of Miami. Rosenstiel School Of Marine Atmospheric Science; Estados Unidos Fil: Harry, Alastair V.. Murdoch University; Australia Fil: Heithaus, Michael R.. Florida International University; Estados Unidos Fil: Lucifora, Luis Omar. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto Nacional de Limnología. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto Nacional de Limnología; Argentina Fil: Simpfendorfer, Colin A.. James Cook University; Australia Fil: Sims, David W.. University of Southampton; Reino Unido. Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom; Reino Unido Fil: Ward Paige, Christine. Eoceans; Canadá Fil: Worm, Boris. University of California at Santa Cruz; Estados Unidos Fil: Ferretti, Francesco. Virginia Tech University; Estados Unidos |
description |
Over the past 4 decades there has been a growing concern for the conservation status of elasmobranchs (sharks and rays). In 2002, the first elasmobranch species were added to Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). Less than 20 yr later, there were 39 species on Appendix II and 5 on Appendix I. Despite growing concern, effective conservation and management remain challenged by a lack of data on population status for many species, human−wildlife interactions, threats to population viability, and the efficacy of conservation approaches. We surveyed 100 of the most frequently published and cited experts on elasmobranchs and, based on ranked responses, prioritized 20 research questions on elasmobranch conservation. To address these questions, we then convened a group of 47 experts from 35 institutions and 12 countries. The 20 questions were organized into the following broad categories: (1) status and threats, (2) population and ecology, and (3) conservation and management. For each section, we sought to synthesize existing knowledge, describe consensus or diverging views, identify gaps, and suggest promising future directions and research priorities. The resulting synthesis aggregates an array of perspectives on emergent research and priority directions for elasmobranch conservation. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-02 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/256988 Jorgensen, Salvador J.; Micheli, Fiorenza; White, Timothy D.; Van Houtan, Kyle S.; Alfaro Shigueto, Joanna; et al.; Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation; Inter Research; Endangered Species Research; 47; 2-2022; 171-203 1863-5407 1613-4796 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/256988 |
identifier_str_mv |
Jorgensen, Salvador J.; Micheli, Fiorenza; White, Timothy D.; Van Houtan, Kyle S.; Alfaro Shigueto, Joanna; et al.; Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation; Inter Research; Endangered Species Research; 47; 2-2022; 171-203 1863-5407 1613-4796 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esr/v47/p171-203/ info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3354/esr01169 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Inter Research |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Inter Research |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613567006900224 |
score |
13.070432 |