How do faculty conceptions on reading, writing and their role in the teaching of academic literacies influence their inclusive attitude

Autores
Colombo, Laura Marina; Prior, Mónica
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This study explored faculty conceptions about reading and writing, the student body, reasons for student low-performance as well as their declared teaching practices aimed at helping students to better understand readings and write academic texts. The objective was to understand what type of professors' conceptions contributed with a more inclusive attitude towards first-year students. Content analysis from data gathered from in-depth interviews indicates that professors who acknowledged the complexity of the reading and writing processes tend to be more inclusive and to use reading and writing to teach and not just to evaluate. Those who taught writing courses tended to consider writing as a general skill, transferable to other contexts and spheres of knowledge. Less-inclusive teachers, explaining why they did not offer guidance or proposed remedial solutions, claimed that students should already have mastered academic reading and writing when entering the university and that teaching these skills implied being overprotective and not allowing them to mature.
Fil: Colombo, Laura Marina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Prior, Mónica. Centro Latinoamericano de Economía Humana; Uruguay
Materia
UNIVERSITY TEACHING
ACADEMIC LITERACIES
FIRST-YEAR STUDENTS
INCLUSIVE ATTITUDES
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/47013

id CONICETDig_cebb59473b9b1bd00b7a07bcb47e5701
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/47013
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling How do faculty conceptions on reading, writing and their role in the teaching of academic literacies influence their inclusive attitudeColombo, Laura MarinaPrior, MónicaUNIVERSITY TEACHINGACADEMIC LITERACIESFIRST-YEAR STUDENTSINCLUSIVE ATTITUDEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5This study explored faculty conceptions about reading and writing, the student body, reasons for student low-performance as well as their declared teaching practices aimed at helping students to better understand readings and write academic texts. The objective was to understand what type of professors' conceptions contributed with a more inclusive attitude towards first-year students. Content analysis from data gathered from in-depth interviews indicates that professors who acknowledged the complexity of the reading and writing processes tend to be more inclusive and to use reading and writing to teach and not just to evaluate. Those who taught writing courses tended to consider writing as a general skill, transferable to other contexts and spheres of knowledge. Less-inclusive teachers, explaining why they did not offer guidance or proposed remedial solutions, claimed that students should already have mastered academic reading and writing when entering the university and that teaching these skills implied being overprotective and not allowing them to mature.Fil: Colombo, Laura Marina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Prior, Mónica. Centro Latinoamericano de Economía Humana; UruguayUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina2016-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/47013Colombo, Laura Marina; Prior, Mónica; How do faculty conceptions on reading, writing and their role in the teaching of academic literacies influence their inclusive attitude; Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Ilha Do Desterro; 69; 3; 9-2016; 115-1242175-80260101-4846CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/2175-8026.2016v69n3p115/32641info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5007/2175-8026.2016v69n3p115info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://ref.scielo.org/j46wz5info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:52:50Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/47013instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:52:50.278CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How do faculty conceptions on reading, writing and their role in the teaching of academic literacies influence their inclusive attitude
title How do faculty conceptions on reading, writing and their role in the teaching of academic literacies influence their inclusive attitude
spellingShingle How do faculty conceptions on reading, writing and their role in the teaching of academic literacies influence their inclusive attitude
Colombo, Laura Marina
UNIVERSITY TEACHING
ACADEMIC LITERACIES
FIRST-YEAR STUDENTS
INCLUSIVE ATTITUDES
title_short How do faculty conceptions on reading, writing and their role in the teaching of academic literacies influence their inclusive attitude
title_full How do faculty conceptions on reading, writing and their role in the teaching of academic literacies influence their inclusive attitude
title_fullStr How do faculty conceptions on reading, writing and their role in the teaching of academic literacies influence their inclusive attitude
title_full_unstemmed How do faculty conceptions on reading, writing and their role in the teaching of academic literacies influence their inclusive attitude
title_sort How do faculty conceptions on reading, writing and their role in the teaching of academic literacies influence their inclusive attitude
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Colombo, Laura Marina
Prior, Mónica
author Colombo, Laura Marina
author_facet Colombo, Laura Marina
Prior, Mónica
author_role author
author2 Prior, Mónica
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv UNIVERSITY TEACHING
ACADEMIC LITERACIES
FIRST-YEAR STUDENTS
INCLUSIVE ATTITUDES
topic UNIVERSITY TEACHING
ACADEMIC LITERACIES
FIRST-YEAR STUDENTS
INCLUSIVE ATTITUDES
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This study explored faculty conceptions about reading and writing, the student body, reasons for student low-performance as well as their declared teaching practices aimed at helping students to better understand readings and write academic texts. The objective was to understand what type of professors' conceptions contributed with a more inclusive attitude towards first-year students. Content analysis from data gathered from in-depth interviews indicates that professors who acknowledged the complexity of the reading and writing processes tend to be more inclusive and to use reading and writing to teach and not just to evaluate. Those who taught writing courses tended to consider writing as a general skill, transferable to other contexts and spheres of knowledge. Less-inclusive teachers, explaining why they did not offer guidance or proposed remedial solutions, claimed that students should already have mastered academic reading and writing when entering the university and that teaching these skills implied being overprotective and not allowing them to mature.
Fil: Colombo, Laura Marina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Prior, Mónica. Centro Latinoamericano de Economía Humana; Uruguay
description This study explored faculty conceptions about reading and writing, the student body, reasons for student low-performance as well as their declared teaching practices aimed at helping students to better understand readings and write academic texts. The objective was to understand what type of professors' conceptions contributed with a more inclusive attitude towards first-year students. Content analysis from data gathered from in-depth interviews indicates that professors who acknowledged the complexity of the reading and writing processes tend to be more inclusive and to use reading and writing to teach and not just to evaluate. Those who taught writing courses tended to consider writing as a general skill, transferable to other contexts and spheres of knowledge. Less-inclusive teachers, explaining why they did not offer guidance or proposed remedial solutions, claimed that students should already have mastered academic reading and writing when entering the university and that teaching these skills implied being overprotective and not allowing them to mature.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/47013
Colombo, Laura Marina; Prior, Mónica; How do faculty conceptions on reading, writing and their role in the teaching of academic literacies influence their inclusive attitude; Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Ilha Do Desterro; 69; 3; 9-2016; 115-124
2175-8026
0101-4846
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/47013
identifier_str_mv Colombo, Laura Marina; Prior, Mónica; How do faculty conceptions on reading, writing and their role in the teaching of academic literacies influence their inclusive attitude; Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Ilha Do Desterro; 69; 3; 9-2016; 115-124
2175-8026
0101-4846
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/2175-8026.2016v69n3p115/32641
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5007/2175-8026.2016v69n3p115
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://ref.scielo.org/j46wz5
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269185396178944
score 13.13397