Field wind erosion measurements with Big Spring Number Eight (BSNE) and Modified Wilson and Cook (MWAC) samplers

Autores
Mendez, Mariano Javier; Funk, Roger; Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo
Año de publicación
2011
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The aim of this study was to compare the horizontal mass flux (HMF) of Aeolian sediment obtained from field wind erosion measurements with the Modified Wilson and Cook (MWAC) and Big Spring Number Eight (BSNE) and to analyze the effectiveness of exponential, power, logarithmic and rational equations to calculate the horizontal mass transport (HMT) for each sampler type. With this purpose wind erosion was measured on fine sandy loam soil in 10 erosion events between December 4, 2008 and July 1, 2009. The relative efficiency of the MWAC related to BSNE (REW/B, quotient between the HMF of MWAC and the HMF of BSNE multiplied by 100) was 247% while REW/B obtained from the absolute efficiency of the BSNE (85% to 95%) and MWAC (44% to 120%) found in previous studies, was between 51% and 141%. The REW/B increased with height, as a consequence of the wind speed increase and particle size decrease, which reduces the efficiency of the BSNE while the efficiency of the MWAC remains constant. Depending on the equation used, the HMT of MWAC was from 2.1 to 2.53 times higher than the HMT of BSNE indicating that if the HMF is corrected by the REW/B, found in this study, the HMT obtained with the MWAC and BSNE is similar. The HMT obtained from exponential equations was 16% higher than the power equation and, 62% and 11% lower than logarithmic and rational equations respectively. In spite of this, the HMT obtained with different equations presented a good relationship with each other (p<0.05), indicating that the HMT can be corrected and compared between equations. This study shows that the HMF and HMT data obtained from field measurements with the BSNE and MWAC are different. Nevertheless, comparable measurements of wind erosion can be obtained with both samplers taking into account the relative efficiency and the relationship between equations found in this study. © 2011 Elsevier B.V.
Fil: Mendez, Mariano Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa; Argentina
Fil: Funk, Roger. Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research; Alemania
Fil: Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina
Materia
Big Spring Number Eight (Bsne)
Field Measurement
Modified Wilson And Cook (Mwac)
Wind Erosion
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/81593
Acceder
id CONICETDig_c396b9877bd297ad02de9bf05b0f7d9a
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/81593
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Field wind erosion measurements with Big Spring Number Eight (BSNE) and Modified Wilson and Cook (MWAC) samplersMendez, Mariano JavierFunk, RogerBuschiazzo, Daniel EduardoBig Spring Number Eight (Bsne)Field MeasurementModified Wilson And Cook (Mwac)Wind ErosionThe aim of this study was to compare the horizontal mass flux (HMF) of Aeolian sediment obtained from field wind erosion measurements with the Modified Wilson and Cook (MWAC) and Big Spring Number Eight (BSNE) and to analyze the effectiveness of exponential, power, logarithmic and rational equations to calculate the horizontal mass transport (HMT) for each sampler type. With this purpose wind erosion was measured on fine sandy loam soil in 10 erosion events between December 4, 2008 and July 1, 2009. The relative efficiency of the MWAC related to BSNE (REW/B, quotient between the HMF of MWAC and the HMF of BSNE multiplied by 100) was 247% while REW/B obtained from the absolute efficiency of the BSNE (85% to 95%) and MWAC (44% to 120%) found in previous studies, was between 51% and 141%. The REW/B increased with height, as a consequence of the wind speed increase and particle size decrease, which reduces the efficiency of the BSNE while the efficiency of the MWAC remains constant. Depending on the equation used, the HMT of MWAC was from 2.1 to 2.53 times higher than the HMT of BSNE indicating that if the HMF is corrected by the REW/B, found in this study, the HMT obtained with the MWAC and BSNE is similar. The HMT obtained from exponential equations was 16% higher than the power equation and, 62% and 11% lower than logarithmic and rational equations respectively. In spite of this, the HMT obtained with different equations presented a good relationship with each other (p<0.05), indicating that the HMT can be corrected and compared between equations. This study shows that the HMF and HMT data obtained from field measurements with the BSNE and MWAC are different. Nevertheless, comparable measurements of wind erosion can be obtained with both samplers taking into account the relative efficiency and the relationship between equations found in this study. © 2011 Elsevier B.V.Fil: Mendez, Mariano Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa; ArgentinaFil: Funk, Roger. Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research; AlemaniaFil: Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Agronomía; ArgentinaElsevier Science2011-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/81593Mendez, Mariano Javier; Funk, Roger; Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo; Field wind erosion measurements with Big Spring Number Eight (BSNE) and Modified Wilson and Cook (MWAC) samplers; Elsevier Science; Geomorphology; 129; 1-2; 6-2011; 43-480169-555XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.01.011info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169555X11000390info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:42:24Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/81593instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:42:24.837CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Field wind erosion measurements with Big Spring Number Eight (BSNE) and Modified Wilson and Cook (MWAC) samplers
title Field wind erosion measurements with Big Spring Number Eight (BSNE) and Modified Wilson and Cook (MWAC) samplers
spellingShingle Field wind erosion measurements with Big Spring Number Eight (BSNE) and Modified Wilson and Cook (MWAC) samplers
Mendez, Mariano Javier
Big Spring Number Eight (Bsne)
Field Measurement
Modified Wilson And Cook (Mwac)
Wind Erosion
title_short Field wind erosion measurements with Big Spring Number Eight (BSNE) and Modified Wilson and Cook (MWAC) samplers
title_full Field wind erosion measurements with Big Spring Number Eight (BSNE) and Modified Wilson and Cook (MWAC) samplers
title_fullStr Field wind erosion measurements with Big Spring Number Eight (BSNE) and Modified Wilson and Cook (MWAC) samplers
title_full_unstemmed Field wind erosion measurements with Big Spring Number Eight (BSNE) and Modified Wilson and Cook (MWAC) samplers
title_sort Field wind erosion measurements with Big Spring Number Eight (BSNE) and Modified Wilson and Cook (MWAC) samplers
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Mendez, Mariano Javier
Funk, Roger
Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo
author Mendez, Mariano Javier
author_facet Mendez, Mariano Javier
Funk, Roger
Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo
author_role author
author2 Funk, Roger
Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Big Spring Number Eight (Bsne)
Field Measurement
Modified Wilson And Cook (Mwac)
Wind Erosion
topic Big Spring Number Eight (Bsne)
Field Measurement
Modified Wilson And Cook (Mwac)
Wind Erosion
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The aim of this study was to compare the horizontal mass flux (HMF) of Aeolian sediment obtained from field wind erosion measurements with the Modified Wilson and Cook (MWAC) and Big Spring Number Eight (BSNE) and to analyze the effectiveness of exponential, power, logarithmic and rational equations to calculate the horizontal mass transport (HMT) for each sampler type. With this purpose wind erosion was measured on fine sandy loam soil in 10 erosion events between December 4, 2008 and July 1, 2009. The relative efficiency of the MWAC related to BSNE (REW/B, quotient between the HMF of MWAC and the HMF of BSNE multiplied by 100) was 247% while REW/B obtained from the absolute efficiency of the BSNE (85% to 95%) and MWAC (44% to 120%) found in previous studies, was between 51% and 141%. The REW/B increased with height, as a consequence of the wind speed increase and particle size decrease, which reduces the efficiency of the BSNE while the efficiency of the MWAC remains constant. Depending on the equation used, the HMT of MWAC was from 2.1 to 2.53 times higher than the HMT of BSNE indicating that if the HMF is corrected by the REW/B, found in this study, the HMT obtained with the MWAC and BSNE is similar. The HMT obtained from exponential equations was 16% higher than the power equation and, 62% and 11% lower than logarithmic and rational equations respectively. In spite of this, the HMT obtained with different equations presented a good relationship with each other (p<0.05), indicating that the HMT can be corrected and compared between equations. This study shows that the HMF and HMT data obtained from field measurements with the BSNE and MWAC are different. Nevertheless, comparable measurements of wind erosion can be obtained with both samplers taking into account the relative efficiency and the relationship between equations found in this study. © 2011 Elsevier B.V.
Fil: Mendez, Mariano Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa; Argentina
Fil: Funk, Roger. Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research; Alemania
Fil: Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina
description The aim of this study was to compare the horizontal mass flux (HMF) of Aeolian sediment obtained from field wind erosion measurements with the Modified Wilson and Cook (MWAC) and Big Spring Number Eight (BSNE) and to analyze the effectiveness of exponential, power, logarithmic and rational equations to calculate the horizontal mass transport (HMT) for each sampler type. With this purpose wind erosion was measured on fine sandy loam soil in 10 erosion events between December 4, 2008 and July 1, 2009. The relative efficiency of the MWAC related to BSNE (REW/B, quotient between the HMF of MWAC and the HMF of BSNE multiplied by 100) was 247% while REW/B obtained from the absolute efficiency of the BSNE (85% to 95%) and MWAC (44% to 120%) found in previous studies, was between 51% and 141%. The REW/B increased with height, as a consequence of the wind speed increase and particle size decrease, which reduces the efficiency of the BSNE while the efficiency of the MWAC remains constant. Depending on the equation used, the HMT of MWAC was from 2.1 to 2.53 times higher than the HMT of BSNE indicating that if the HMF is corrected by the REW/B, found in this study, the HMT obtained with the MWAC and BSNE is similar. The HMT obtained from exponential equations was 16% higher than the power equation and, 62% and 11% lower than logarithmic and rational equations respectively. In spite of this, the HMT obtained with different equations presented a good relationship with each other (p<0.05), indicating that the HMT can be corrected and compared between equations. This study shows that the HMF and HMT data obtained from field measurements with the BSNE and MWAC are different. Nevertheless, comparable measurements of wind erosion can be obtained with both samplers taking into account the relative efficiency and the relationship between equations found in this study. © 2011 Elsevier B.V.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/81593
Mendez, Mariano Javier; Funk, Roger; Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo; Field wind erosion measurements with Big Spring Number Eight (BSNE) and Modified Wilson and Cook (MWAC) samplers; Elsevier Science; Geomorphology; 129; 1-2; 6-2011; 43-48
0169-555X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/81593
identifier_str_mv Mendez, Mariano Javier; Funk, Roger; Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo; Field wind erosion measurements with Big Spring Number Eight (BSNE) and Modified Wilson and Cook (MWAC) samplers; Elsevier Science; Geomorphology; 129; 1-2; 6-2011; 43-48
0169-555X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.01.011
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169555X11000390
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613336624267264
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares