A Note on Goddard and Routley's Significance Logic

Autores
Szmuc, Damián Enrique; Omori, Hitoshi
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The present note revisits the joint work of Leonard Goddard and Richard Routley on significance logics with the aim of shedding new light on their understanding by studying them under the lens of recent semantic developments, such as the plurivalent semantics developed by Graham Priest. These semantics allow sentences to receive one, more than one, or no truth-value at all from a given carrier set. Since nonsignificant sentences are taken to be neither true nor false, i.e. truth-value gaps, in this essay we show that with the aid of plurivalent semantics it is possible to straightforwardly instantiate Goddard and Routley's understanding of how the connectives should work within significance logics.
Fil: Szmuc, Damián Enrique. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas - Sadaf; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina
Fil: Omori, Hitoshi. Kyoto University; Japón
Materia
SIGNIFICANCE LOGIC
MANY-VALUED LOGIC
PARACONSISTENT LOGIC
INFECTIOUS LOGIC
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/96940
Acceder
id CONICETDig_b2a5ffee731dbcf5e36b5b268e4533f8
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/96940
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling A Note on Goddard and Routley's Significance LogicSzmuc, Damián EnriqueOmori, HitoshiSIGNIFICANCE LOGICMANY-VALUED LOGICPARACONSISTENT LOGICINFECTIOUS LOGIChttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6The present note revisits the joint work of Leonard Goddard and Richard Routley on significance logics with the aim of shedding new light on their understanding by studying them under the lens of recent semantic developments, such as the plurivalent semantics developed by Graham Priest. These semantics allow sentences to receive one, more than one, or no truth-value at all from a given carrier set. Since nonsignificant sentences are taken to be neither true nor false, i.e. truth-value gaps, in this essay we show that with the aid of plurivalent semantics it is possible to straightforwardly instantiate Goddard and Routley's understanding of how the connectives should work within significance logics.Fil: Szmuc, Damián Enrique. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas - Sadaf; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; ArgentinaFil: Omori, Hitoshi. Kyoto University; JapónVictoria University of Wellington2018-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/96940Szmuc, Damián Enrique; Omori, Hitoshi; A Note on Goddard and Routley's Significance Logic; Victoria University of Wellington; The Australasian Journal of Logic; 15; 2; 7-2018; 431-4481448-5052CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ojs.victoria.ac.nz/ajl/article/view/4867info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.26686/ajl.v15i2.4867info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:01:00Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/96940instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:01:00.533CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A Note on Goddard and Routley's Significance Logic
title A Note on Goddard and Routley's Significance Logic
spellingShingle A Note on Goddard and Routley's Significance Logic
Szmuc, Damián Enrique
SIGNIFICANCE LOGIC
MANY-VALUED LOGIC
PARACONSISTENT LOGIC
INFECTIOUS LOGIC
title_short A Note on Goddard and Routley's Significance Logic
title_full A Note on Goddard and Routley's Significance Logic
title_fullStr A Note on Goddard and Routley's Significance Logic
title_full_unstemmed A Note on Goddard and Routley's Significance Logic
title_sort A Note on Goddard and Routley's Significance Logic
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Szmuc, Damián Enrique
Omori, Hitoshi
author Szmuc, Damián Enrique
author_facet Szmuc, Damián Enrique
Omori, Hitoshi
author_role author
author2 Omori, Hitoshi
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv SIGNIFICANCE LOGIC
MANY-VALUED LOGIC
PARACONSISTENT LOGIC
INFECTIOUS LOGIC
topic SIGNIFICANCE LOGIC
MANY-VALUED LOGIC
PARACONSISTENT LOGIC
INFECTIOUS LOGIC
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The present note revisits the joint work of Leonard Goddard and Richard Routley on significance logics with the aim of shedding new light on their understanding by studying them under the lens of recent semantic developments, such as the plurivalent semantics developed by Graham Priest. These semantics allow sentences to receive one, more than one, or no truth-value at all from a given carrier set. Since nonsignificant sentences are taken to be neither true nor false, i.e. truth-value gaps, in this essay we show that with the aid of plurivalent semantics it is possible to straightforwardly instantiate Goddard and Routley's understanding of how the connectives should work within significance logics.
Fil: Szmuc, Damián Enrique. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas - Sadaf; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina
Fil: Omori, Hitoshi. Kyoto University; Japón
description The present note revisits the joint work of Leonard Goddard and Richard Routley on significance logics with the aim of shedding new light on their understanding by studying them under the lens of recent semantic developments, such as the plurivalent semantics developed by Graham Priest. These semantics allow sentences to receive one, more than one, or no truth-value at all from a given carrier set. Since nonsignificant sentences are taken to be neither true nor false, i.e. truth-value gaps, in this essay we show that with the aid of plurivalent semantics it is possible to straightforwardly instantiate Goddard and Routley's understanding of how the connectives should work within significance logics.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/96940
Szmuc, Damián Enrique; Omori, Hitoshi; A Note on Goddard and Routley's Significance Logic; Victoria University of Wellington; The Australasian Journal of Logic; 15; 2; 7-2018; 431-448
1448-5052
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/96940
identifier_str_mv Szmuc, Damián Enrique; Omori, Hitoshi; A Note on Goddard and Routley's Significance Logic; Victoria University of Wellington; The Australasian Journal of Logic; 15; 2; 7-2018; 431-448
1448-5052
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ojs.victoria.ac.nz/ajl/article/view/4867
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.26686/ajl.v15i2.4867
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Victoria University of Wellington
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Victoria University of Wellington
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842979919650357248
score 12.48226

Publicaciones similares