Against a metaphysical understanding of rejection

Autores
Rubín, Mariela; Roffé, Ariel Jonathan
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In this article, we defend that incorporating a rejection operator into a paraconsistent language involves fully specifying its inferential characteristics within the logic. To do this, we examine a recent proposal by Berto (2014) for a paraconsistent rejection, which - according to him - avoids paradox, even when introduced into a language that contains self-reference and a transparent truth predicate. We will show that this proposal is inadequate because it is too incomplete. We argue that the reason it avoids trouble is that the inferential characteristics of the new operator are left (mostly) unspecified, exporting the task of specifying them to metaphysicians. Additionally, we show that when completing this proposal with some plausible rules for the rejection operator, paradoxes do arise. Finally, we draw some more general implications from the study of this example.
Fil: Rubín, Mariela. Universidad Nacional de las Artes; Argentina
Fil: Roffé, Ariel Jonathan. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Departamento de Cs.sociales. Instituto de Estudios Sobre la Ciencia y la Tecnologia. Centro de Estudios de Filosofia E Historia de la Ciencia.; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; Argentina
Materia
PARACONSISTENT LOGIC
REJECTION
REVENGE PARADOXES
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/136047
Acceder
id CONICETDig_08345f44d71722df78255ecfbf039ee2
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/136047
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Against a metaphysical understanding of rejectionRubín, MarielaRoffé, Ariel JonathanPARACONSISTENT LOGICREJECTIONREVENGE PARADOXEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6In this article, we defend that incorporating a rejection operator into a paraconsistent language involves fully specifying its inferential characteristics within the logic. To do this, we examine a recent proposal by Berto (2014) for a paraconsistent rejection, which - according to him - avoids paradox, even when introduced into a language that contains self-reference and a transparent truth predicate. We will show that this proposal is inadequate because it is too incomplete. We argue that the reason it avoids trouble is that the inferential characteristics of the new operator are left (mostly) unspecified, exporting the task of specifying them to metaphysicians. Additionally, we show that when completing this proposal with some plausible rules for the rejection operator, paradoxes do arise. Finally, we draw some more general implications from the study of this example.Fil: Rubín, Mariela. Universidad Nacional de las Artes; ArgentinaFil: Roffé, Ariel Jonathan. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Departamento de Cs.sociales. Instituto de Estudios Sobre la Ciencia y la Tecnologia. Centro de Estudios de Filosofia E Historia de la Ciencia.; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; ArgentinaUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina2018-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/136047Rubín, Mariela; Roffé, Ariel Jonathan; Against a metaphysical understanding of rejection; Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Principia; 22; 1; 4-2018; 189-2021414-42471808-1711CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5007/1808-1711.2018v22n1p189info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2018v22n1p189info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:16:32Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/136047instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:16:32.424CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Against a metaphysical understanding of rejection
title Against a metaphysical understanding of rejection
spellingShingle Against a metaphysical understanding of rejection
Rubín, Mariela
PARACONSISTENT LOGIC
REJECTION
REVENGE PARADOXES
title_short Against a metaphysical understanding of rejection
title_full Against a metaphysical understanding of rejection
title_fullStr Against a metaphysical understanding of rejection
title_full_unstemmed Against a metaphysical understanding of rejection
title_sort Against a metaphysical understanding of rejection
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rubín, Mariela
Roffé, Ariel Jonathan
author Rubín, Mariela
author_facet Rubín, Mariela
Roffé, Ariel Jonathan
author_role author
author2 Roffé, Ariel Jonathan
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv PARACONSISTENT LOGIC
REJECTION
REVENGE PARADOXES
topic PARACONSISTENT LOGIC
REJECTION
REVENGE PARADOXES
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In this article, we defend that incorporating a rejection operator into a paraconsistent language involves fully specifying its inferential characteristics within the logic. To do this, we examine a recent proposal by Berto (2014) for a paraconsistent rejection, which - according to him - avoids paradox, even when introduced into a language that contains self-reference and a transparent truth predicate. We will show that this proposal is inadequate because it is too incomplete. We argue that the reason it avoids trouble is that the inferential characteristics of the new operator are left (mostly) unspecified, exporting the task of specifying them to metaphysicians. Additionally, we show that when completing this proposal with some plausible rules for the rejection operator, paradoxes do arise. Finally, we draw some more general implications from the study of this example.
Fil: Rubín, Mariela. Universidad Nacional de las Artes; Argentina
Fil: Roffé, Ariel Jonathan. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Departamento de Cs.sociales. Instituto de Estudios Sobre la Ciencia y la Tecnologia. Centro de Estudios de Filosofia E Historia de la Ciencia.; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; Argentina
description In this article, we defend that incorporating a rejection operator into a paraconsistent language involves fully specifying its inferential characteristics within the logic. To do this, we examine a recent proposal by Berto (2014) for a paraconsistent rejection, which - according to him - avoids paradox, even when introduced into a language that contains self-reference and a transparent truth predicate. We will show that this proposal is inadequate because it is too incomplete. We argue that the reason it avoids trouble is that the inferential characteristics of the new operator are left (mostly) unspecified, exporting the task of specifying them to metaphysicians. Additionally, we show that when completing this proposal with some plausible rules for the rejection operator, paradoxes do arise. Finally, we draw some more general implications from the study of this example.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/136047
Rubín, Mariela; Roffé, Ariel Jonathan; Against a metaphysical understanding of rejection; Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Principia; 22; 1; 4-2018; 189-202
1414-4247
1808-1711
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/136047
identifier_str_mv Rubín, Mariela; Roffé, Ariel Jonathan; Against a metaphysical understanding of rejection; Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Principia; 22; 1; 4-2018; 189-202
1414-4247
1808-1711
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5007/1808-1711.2018v22n1p189
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2018v22n1p189
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083314101780480
score 13.22299

Publicaciones similares