A model of faulty and faultless disagreement for post-hoc assessments of knowledge utilization in evidence-based policymaking
- Autores
- Heesen, Remco; Rubin, Hannah; Schneider, Mike D.; Woolaston, Katie; Bortolus, Alejandro; Chukwu, Emelda E.; Kaufer, Ricardo; Mitova, Veli; Schwenkenbecher, Anne; Schwindt, Evangelina; Slanickova, Helena; Sogbanmu, Temitope O.; Hewitt, Chad L.
- Año de publicación
- 2024
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- When evidence-based policymaking is so often mired in disagreement and controversy, how can we know if the process is meeting its stated goals? We develop a novel mathematical model to study disagreements about adequate knowledge utilization, like those regarding wild horse culling, shark drumlines and facemask policies during pandemics. We find that, when stakeholders disagree, it is frequently impossible to tell whether any party is at fault. We demonstrate the need for a distinctive kind of transparency in evidence-based policymaking, which we call transparency of reasoning. Such transparency is critical to the success of the evidence-based policy movement, as without it, we will be unable to tell whether in any instance a policy was in fact based on evidence.
Fil: Heesen, Remco. The London School of Economics and Political Science; Reino Unido
Fil: Rubin, Hannah. University of Missouri; Estados Unidos
Fil: Schneider, Mike D.. University of Missouri; Estados Unidos
Fil: Woolaston, Katie. Queensland University of Technology; Australia
Fil: Bortolus, Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto Patagónico para el Estudio de los Ecosistemas Continentales; Argentina
Fil: Chukwu, Emelda E.. Nigerian Institute Of Medical Research; Nigeria
Fil: Kaufer, Ricardo. Bielefeld University; Alemania
Fil: Mitova, Veli. University of Johannesburg; Sudáfrica
Fil: Schwenkenbecher, Anne. Murdoch University; Australia
Fil: Schwindt, Evangelina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto de Biología de Organismos Marinos; Argentina
Fil: Slanickova, Helena. University of Groningen; Países Bajos
Fil: Sogbanmu, Temitope O.. University of Lagos; Nigeria
Fil: Hewitt, Chad L.. Murdoch University; Australia - Materia
-
EVIDENCE-BASED POLICY
DISGREEMENT
TRANSPARENCY
EPISTEMOLOGY - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/267404
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_ab19a3942a94af7bf8b62b00dfb0a3b5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/267404 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
A model of faulty and faultless disagreement for post-hoc assessments of knowledge utilization in evidence-based policymakingHeesen, RemcoRubin, HannahSchneider, Mike D.Woolaston, KatieBortolus, AlejandroChukwu, Emelda E.Kaufer, RicardoMitova, VeliSchwenkenbecher, AnneSchwindt, EvangelinaSlanickova, HelenaSogbanmu, Temitope O.Hewitt, Chad L.EVIDENCE-BASED POLICYDISGREEMENTTRANSPARENCYEPISTEMOLOGYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.7https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1When evidence-based policymaking is so often mired in disagreement and controversy, how can we know if the process is meeting its stated goals? We develop a novel mathematical model to study disagreements about adequate knowledge utilization, like those regarding wild horse culling, shark drumlines and facemask policies during pandemics. We find that, when stakeholders disagree, it is frequently impossible to tell whether any party is at fault. We demonstrate the need for a distinctive kind of transparency in evidence-based policymaking, which we call transparency of reasoning. Such transparency is critical to the success of the evidence-based policy movement, as without it, we will be unable to tell whether in any instance a policy was in fact based on evidence.Fil: Heesen, Remco. The London School of Economics and Political Science; Reino UnidoFil: Rubin, Hannah. University of Missouri; Estados UnidosFil: Schneider, Mike D.. University of Missouri; Estados UnidosFil: Woolaston, Katie. Queensland University of Technology; AustraliaFil: Bortolus, Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto Patagónico para el Estudio de los Ecosistemas Continentales; ArgentinaFil: Chukwu, Emelda E.. Nigerian Institute Of Medical Research; NigeriaFil: Kaufer, Ricardo. Bielefeld University; AlemaniaFil: Mitova, Veli. University of Johannesburg; SudáfricaFil: Schwenkenbecher, Anne. Murdoch University; AustraliaFil: Schwindt, Evangelina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto de Biología de Organismos Marinos; ArgentinaFil: Slanickova, Helena. University of Groningen; Países BajosFil: Sogbanmu, Temitope O.. University of Lagos; NigeriaFil: Hewitt, Chad L.. Murdoch University; AustraliaNature Portfolio2024-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/267404Heesen, Remco; Rubin, Hannah; Schneider, Mike D.; Woolaston, Katie; Bortolus, Alejandro; et al.; A model of faulty and faultless disagreement for post-hoc assessments of knowledge utilization in evidence-based policymaking; Nature Portfolio; Scientific Reports; 14; 1; 8-2024; 1-102045-2322CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-69012-3info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1038/s41598-024-69012-3info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:31:35Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/267404instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:31:35.553CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A model of faulty and faultless disagreement for post-hoc assessments of knowledge utilization in evidence-based policymaking |
title |
A model of faulty and faultless disagreement for post-hoc assessments of knowledge utilization in evidence-based policymaking |
spellingShingle |
A model of faulty and faultless disagreement for post-hoc assessments of knowledge utilization in evidence-based policymaking Heesen, Remco EVIDENCE-BASED POLICY DISGREEMENT TRANSPARENCY EPISTEMOLOGY |
title_short |
A model of faulty and faultless disagreement for post-hoc assessments of knowledge utilization in evidence-based policymaking |
title_full |
A model of faulty and faultless disagreement for post-hoc assessments of knowledge utilization in evidence-based policymaking |
title_fullStr |
A model of faulty and faultless disagreement for post-hoc assessments of knowledge utilization in evidence-based policymaking |
title_full_unstemmed |
A model of faulty and faultless disagreement for post-hoc assessments of knowledge utilization in evidence-based policymaking |
title_sort |
A model of faulty and faultless disagreement for post-hoc assessments of knowledge utilization in evidence-based policymaking |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Heesen, Remco Rubin, Hannah Schneider, Mike D. Woolaston, Katie Bortolus, Alejandro Chukwu, Emelda E. Kaufer, Ricardo Mitova, Veli Schwenkenbecher, Anne Schwindt, Evangelina Slanickova, Helena Sogbanmu, Temitope O. Hewitt, Chad L. |
author |
Heesen, Remco |
author_facet |
Heesen, Remco Rubin, Hannah Schneider, Mike D. Woolaston, Katie Bortolus, Alejandro Chukwu, Emelda E. Kaufer, Ricardo Mitova, Veli Schwenkenbecher, Anne Schwindt, Evangelina Slanickova, Helena Sogbanmu, Temitope O. Hewitt, Chad L. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rubin, Hannah Schneider, Mike D. Woolaston, Katie Bortolus, Alejandro Chukwu, Emelda E. Kaufer, Ricardo Mitova, Veli Schwenkenbecher, Anne Schwindt, Evangelina Slanickova, Helena Sogbanmu, Temitope O. Hewitt, Chad L. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
EVIDENCE-BASED POLICY DISGREEMENT TRANSPARENCY EPISTEMOLOGY |
topic |
EVIDENCE-BASED POLICY DISGREEMENT TRANSPARENCY EPISTEMOLOGY |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.7 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
When evidence-based policymaking is so often mired in disagreement and controversy, how can we know if the process is meeting its stated goals? We develop a novel mathematical model to study disagreements about adequate knowledge utilization, like those regarding wild horse culling, shark drumlines and facemask policies during pandemics. We find that, when stakeholders disagree, it is frequently impossible to tell whether any party is at fault. We demonstrate the need for a distinctive kind of transparency in evidence-based policymaking, which we call transparency of reasoning. Such transparency is critical to the success of the evidence-based policy movement, as without it, we will be unable to tell whether in any instance a policy was in fact based on evidence. Fil: Heesen, Remco. The London School of Economics and Political Science; Reino Unido Fil: Rubin, Hannah. University of Missouri; Estados Unidos Fil: Schneider, Mike D.. University of Missouri; Estados Unidos Fil: Woolaston, Katie. Queensland University of Technology; Australia Fil: Bortolus, Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto Patagónico para el Estudio de los Ecosistemas Continentales; Argentina Fil: Chukwu, Emelda E.. Nigerian Institute Of Medical Research; Nigeria Fil: Kaufer, Ricardo. Bielefeld University; Alemania Fil: Mitova, Veli. University of Johannesburg; Sudáfrica Fil: Schwenkenbecher, Anne. Murdoch University; Australia Fil: Schwindt, Evangelina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto de Biología de Organismos Marinos; Argentina Fil: Slanickova, Helena. University of Groningen; Países Bajos Fil: Sogbanmu, Temitope O.. University of Lagos; Nigeria Fil: Hewitt, Chad L.. Murdoch University; Australia |
description |
When evidence-based policymaking is so often mired in disagreement and controversy, how can we know if the process is meeting its stated goals? We develop a novel mathematical model to study disagreements about adequate knowledge utilization, like those regarding wild horse culling, shark drumlines and facemask policies during pandemics. We find that, when stakeholders disagree, it is frequently impossible to tell whether any party is at fault. We demonstrate the need for a distinctive kind of transparency in evidence-based policymaking, which we call transparency of reasoning. Such transparency is critical to the success of the evidence-based policy movement, as without it, we will be unable to tell whether in any instance a policy was in fact based on evidence. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-08 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/267404 Heesen, Remco; Rubin, Hannah; Schneider, Mike D.; Woolaston, Katie; Bortolus, Alejandro; et al.; A model of faulty and faultless disagreement for post-hoc assessments of knowledge utilization in evidence-based policymaking; Nature Portfolio; Scientific Reports; 14; 1; 8-2024; 1-10 2045-2322 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/267404 |
identifier_str_mv |
Heesen, Remco; Rubin, Hannah; Schneider, Mike D.; Woolaston, Katie; Bortolus, Alejandro; et al.; A model of faulty and faultless disagreement for post-hoc assessments of knowledge utilization in evidence-based policymaking; Nature Portfolio; Scientific Reports; 14; 1; 8-2024; 1-10 2045-2322 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-69012-3 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1038/s41598-024-69012-3 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Nature Portfolio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Nature Portfolio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614326804021248 |
score |
13.070432 |