Agrippan pyrrhonism and the challenge of disagreement

Autores
Machuca, Diego Emanuel
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This paper argues for the following three claims. First, the Agrippan mode from disagreement does not play a secondary role in inducing suspension of judgment. Second, the Pyrrhonist is not committed to the criteria of justification underlying the Five Modes of Agrippa, which nonetheless does not prevent him from non-doxastically assenting to them. And third, some recent objections to Agrippan Pyrrhonism raised by analytic epistemologists and experimental philosophers fail to appreciate the Pyrrhonist's ad hominem style of argumentation and the real challenge posed by the mode from disagreement.
Fil: Machuca, Diego Emanuel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
Pyrrhonism
Agrippa
Disagreement
Epistemology
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/70460
Acceder
id CONICETDig_25fcb417dabf0625575fe88d842d325c
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/70460
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Agrippan pyrrhonism and the challenge of disagreementMachuca, Diego EmanuelPyrrhonismAgrippaDisagreementEpistemologyhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6This paper argues for the following three claims. First, the Agrippan mode from disagreement does not play a secondary role in inducing suspension of judgment. Second, the Pyrrhonist is not committed to the criteria of justification underlying the Five Modes of Agrippa, which nonetheless does not prevent him from non-doxastically assenting to them. And third, some recent objections to Agrippan Pyrrhonism raised by analytic epistemologists and experimental philosophers fail to appreciate the Pyrrhonist's ad hominem style of argumentation and the real challenge posed by the mode from disagreement.Fil: Machuca, Diego Emanuel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaPhilosophy Documentation Center2015-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/70460Machuca, Diego Emanuel; Agrippan pyrrhonism and the challenge of disagreement; Philosophy Documentation Center; Journal of Philosophical Research; 40; 12-2015; 23-391053-8364CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5840/jpr2015102631info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.pdcnet.org/jpr/content/jpr_2015_0040_0000_0023_0039info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:10:35Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/70460instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:10:35.909CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Agrippan pyrrhonism and the challenge of disagreement
title Agrippan pyrrhonism and the challenge of disagreement
spellingShingle Agrippan pyrrhonism and the challenge of disagreement
Machuca, Diego Emanuel
Pyrrhonism
Agrippa
Disagreement
Epistemology
title_short Agrippan pyrrhonism and the challenge of disagreement
title_full Agrippan pyrrhonism and the challenge of disagreement
title_fullStr Agrippan pyrrhonism and the challenge of disagreement
title_full_unstemmed Agrippan pyrrhonism and the challenge of disagreement
title_sort Agrippan pyrrhonism and the challenge of disagreement
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Machuca, Diego Emanuel
author Machuca, Diego Emanuel
author_facet Machuca, Diego Emanuel
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Pyrrhonism
Agrippa
Disagreement
Epistemology
topic Pyrrhonism
Agrippa
Disagreement
Epistemology
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This paper argues for the following three claims. First, the Agrippan mode from disagreement does not play a secondary role in inducing suspension of judgment. Second, the Pyrrhonist is not committed to the criteria of justification underlying the Five Modes of Agrippa, which nonetheless does not prevent him from non-doxastically assenting to them. And third, some recent objections to Agrippan Pyrrhonism raised by analytic epistemologists and experimental philosophers fail to appreciate the Pyrrhonist's ad hominem style of argumentation and the real challenge posed by the mode from disagreement.
Fil: Machuca, Diego Emanuel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description This paper argues for the following three claims. First, the Agrippan mode from disagreement does not play a secondary role in inducing suspension of judgment. Second, the Pyrrhonist is not committed to the criteria of justification underlying the Five Modes of Agrippa, which nonetheless does not prevent him from non-doxastically assenting to them. And third, some recent objections to Agrippan Pyrrhonism raised by analytic epistemologists and experimental philosophers fail to appreciate the Pyrrhonist's ad hominem style of argumentation and the real challenge posed by the mode from disagreement.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/70460
Machuca, Diego Emanuel; Agrippan pyrrhonism and the challenge of disagreement; Philosophy Documentation Center; Journal of Philosophical Research; 40; 12-2015; 23-39
1053-8364
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/70460
identifier_str_mv Machuca, Diego Emanuel; Agrippan pyrrhonism and the challenge of disagreement; Philosophy Documentation Center; Journal of Philosophical Research; 40; 12-2015; 23-39
1053-8364
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5840/jpr2015102631
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.pdcnet.org/jpr/content/jpr_2015_0040_0000_0023_0039
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Philosophy Documentation Center
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Philosophy Documentation Center
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842270126026522624
score 13.13397

Publicaciones similares