Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs
- Autores
- Dapuez, Andres Francisco; Gavigan, Sabrina; Eger, Talita
- Año de publicación
- 2016
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Conditional Cash Transfers (CCTs) have been described as fundamental to the “post-neo-liberal” turn in Latin America. Through an analysis of the stated and unstated goals of three CCT development programs in Latin America, Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades, begun in 1997; Brazil’s Programa Bolsa Familia (PBF), started in 2003; and Argentina’s Asignacion Universal por Hijo (AUH), started in 2009, this paper suggests that CCTs portend the continuation of longestablished economic monetarist policies in the region, providing poor families with meager amounts of money, barely sufficient for their subsistence. Despite the fact that progressive populisms in Brazil and Argentina have imbued cash transfers with new discursive qualities, recent CCT programs’ goals replicate those set forth by Mexico’s 1997 Progresa program. Rather than signifying a new state protection from the market, we argue that CCTs ultimately push for the integration of poor children into an idealization of the market and situate poor mothers into a relationship of asymmetrical accountability with the state. Consequently, CCTs imply a deterioration of state responsibilities to the poor through a discourse of opportunities for the development of human capabilities. The assumption of a post-neoliberal present in Latin America, marked by the monetization of state services, does not account for the fact that the ultimate goal of these programs is the creation of citizens who are less inclined to demand state services.
Fil: Dapuez, Andres Francisco. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos; Argentina
Fil: Gavigan, Sabrina. American University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Eger, Talita. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Brasil - Materia
-
Cash transfers
Development
Money
Latin America - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/90710
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_a6a11968f2708024d21337de48463557 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/90710 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer ProgramsDapuez, Andres FranciscoGavigan, SabrinaEger, TalitaCash transfersDevelopmentMoneyLatin Americahttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Conditional Cash Transfers (CCTs) have been described as fundamental to the “post-neo-liberal” turn in Latin America. Through an analysis of the stated and unstated goals of three CCT development programs in Latin America, Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades, begun in 1997; Brazil’s Programa Bolsa Familia (PBF), started in 2003; and Argentina’s Asignacion Universal por Hijo (AUH), started in 2009, this paper suggests that CCTs portend the continuation of longestablished economic monetarist policies in the region, providing poor families with meager amounts of money, barely sufficient for their subsistence. Despite the fact that progressive populisms in Brazil and Argentina have imbued cash transfers with new discursive qualities, recent CCT programs’ goals replicate those set forth by Mexico’s 1997 Progresa program. Rather than signifying a new state protection from the market, we argue that CCTs ultimately push for the integration of poor children into an idealization of the market and situate poor mothers into a relationship of asymmetrical accountability with the state. Consequently, CCTs imply a deterioration of state responsibilities to the poor through a discourse of opportunities for the development of human capabilities. The assumption of a post-neoliberal present in Latin America, marked by the monetization of state services, does not account for the fact that the ultimate goal of these programs is the creation of citizens who are less inclined to demand state services.Fil: Dapuez, Andres Francisco. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos; ArgentinaFil: Gavigan, Sabrina. American University; Estados UnidosFil: Eger, Talita. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; BrasilLindenwood University2016-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/90710Dapuez, Andres Francisco; Gavigan, Sabrina; Eger, Talita; Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs; Lindenwood University; Journal of International and Global Studies; 7; 2; 2-2016; 1-212158-0669CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.lindenwood.edu/files/resources/1-21.pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:48:45Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/90710instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:48:45.764CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs |
title |
Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs |
spellingShingle |
Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs Dapuez, Andres Francisco Cash transfers Development Money Latin America |
title_short |
Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs |
title_full |
Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs |
title_fullStr |
Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs |
title_sort |
Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Dapuez, Andres Francisco Gavigan, Sabrina Eger, Talita |
author |
Dapuez, Andres Francisco |
author_facet |
Dapuez, Andres Francisco Gavigan, Sabrina Eger, Talita |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gavigan, Sabrina Eger, Talita |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Cash transfers Development Money Latin America |
topic |
Cash transfers Development Money Latin America |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Conditional Cash Transfers (CCTs) have been described as fundamental to the “post-neo-liberal” turn in Latin America. Through an analysis of the stated and unstated goals of three CCT development programs in Latin America, Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades, begun in 1997; Brazil’s Programa Bolsa Familia (PBF), started in 2003; and Argentina’s Asignacion Universal por Hijo (AUH), started in 2009, this paper suggests that CCTs portend the continuation of longestablished economic monetarist policies in the region, providing poor families with meager amounts of money, barely sufficient for their subsistence. Despite the fact that progressive populisms in Brazil and Argentina have imbued cash transfers with new discursive qualities, recent CCT programs’ goals replicate those set forth by Mexico’s 1997 Progresa program. Rather than signifying a new state protection from the market, we argue that CCTs ultimately push for the integration of poor children into an idealization of the market and situate poor mothers into a relationship of asymmetrical accountability with the state. Consequently, CCTs imply a deterioration of state responsibilities to the poor through a discourse of opportunities for the development of human capabilities. The assumption of a post-neoliberal present in Latin America, marked by the monetization of state services, does not account for the fact that the ultimate goal of these programs is the creation of citizens who are less inclined to demand state services. Fil: Dapuez, Andres Francisco. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos; Argentina Fil: Gavigan, Sabrina. American University; Estados Unidos Fil: Eger, Talita. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Brasil |
description |
Conditional Cash Transfers (CCTs) have been described as fundamental to the “post-neo-liberal” turn in Latin America. Through an analysis of the stated and unstated goals of three CCT development programs in Latin America, Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades, begun in 1997; Brazil’s Programa Bolsa Familia (PBF), started in 2003; and Argentina’s Asignacion Universal por Hijo (AUH), started in 2009, this paper suggests that CCTs portend the continuation of longestablished economic monetarist policies in the region, providing poor families with meager amounts of money, barely sufficient for their subsistence. Despite the fact that progressive populisms in Brazil and Argentina have imbued cash transfers with new discursive qualities, recent CCT programs’ goals replicate those set forth by Mexico’s 1997 Progresa program. Rather than signifying a new state protection from the market, we argue that CCTs ultimately push for the integration of poor children into an idealization of the market and situate poor mothers into a relationship of asymmetrical accountability with the state. Consequently, CCTs imply a deterioration of state responsibilities to the poor through a discourse of opportunities for the development of human capabilities. The assumption of a post-neoliberal present in Latin America, marked by the monetization of state services, does not account for the fact that the ultimate goal of these programs is the creation of citizens who are less inclined to demand state services. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-02 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/90710 Dapuez, Andres Francisco; Gavigan, Sabrina; Eger, Talita; Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs; Lindenwood University; Journal of International and Global Studies; 7; 2; 2-2016; 1-21 2158-0669 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/90710 |
identifier_str_mv |
Dapuez, Andres Francisco; Gavigan, Sabrina; Eger, Talita; Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs; Lindenwood University; Journal of International and Global Studies; 7; 2; 2-2016; 1-21 2158-0669 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.lindenwood.edu/files/resources/1-21.pdf |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Lindenwood University |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Lindenwood University |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1846083008758546432 |
score |
13.22299 |