Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs

Autores
Dapuez, Andres Francisco; Gavigan, Sabrina; Eger, Talita
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Conditional Cash Transfers (CCTs) have been described as fundamental to the “post-neo-liberal” turn in Latin America. Through an analysis of the stated and unstated goals of three CCT development programs in Latin America, Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades, begun in 1997; Brazil’s Programa Bolsa Familia (PBF), started in 2003; and Argentina’s Asignacion Universal por Hijo (AUH), started in 2009, this paper suggests that CCTs portend the continuation of longestablished economic monetarist policies in the region, providing poor families with meager amounts of money, barely sufficient for their subsistence. Despite the fact that progressive populisms in Brazil and Argentina have imbued cash transfers with new discursive qualities, recent CCT programs’ goals replicate those set forth by Mexico’s 1997 Progresa program. Rather than signifying a new state protection from the market, we argue that CCTs ultimately push for the integration of poor children into an idealization of the market and situate poor mothers into a relationship of asymmetrical accountability with the state. Consequently, CCTs imply a deterioration of state responsibilities to the poor through a discourse of opportunities for the development of human capabilities. The assumption of a post-neoliberal present in Latin America, marked by the monetization of state services, does not account for the fact that the ultimate goal of these programs is the creation of citizens who are less inclined to demand state services.
Fil: Dapuez, Andres Francisco. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos; Argentina
Fil: Gavigan, Sabrina. American University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Eger, Talita. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Brasil
Materia
Cash transfers
Development
Money
Latin America
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/90710

id CONICETDig_a6a11968f2708024d21337de48463557
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/90710
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer ProgramsDapuez, Andres FranciscoGavigan, SabrinaEger, TalitaCash transfersDevelopmentMoneyLatin Americahttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Conditional Cash Transfers (CCTs) have been described as fundamental to the “post-neo-liberal” turn in Latin America. Through an analysis of the stated and unstated goals of three CCT development programs in Latin America, Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades, begun in 1997; Brazil’s Programa Bolsa Familia (PBF), started in 2003; and Argentina’s Asignacion Universal por Hijo (AUH), started in 2009, this paper suggests that CCTs portend the continuation of longestablished economic monetarist policies in the region, providing poor families with meager amounts of money, barely sufficient for their subsistence. Despite the fact that progressive populisms in Brazil and Argentina have imbued cash transfers with new discursive qualities, recent CCT programs’ goals replicate those set forth by Mexico’s 1997 Progresa program. Rather than signifying a new state protection from the market, we argue that CCTs ultimately push for the integration of poor children into an idealization of the market and situate poor mothers into a relationship of asymmetrical accountability with the state. Consequently, CCTs imply a deterioration of state responsibilities to the poor through a discourse of opportunities for the development of human capabilities. The assumption of a post-neoliberal present in Latin America, marked by the monetization of state services, does not account for the fact that the ultimate goal of these programs is the creation of citizens who are less inclined to demand state services.Fil: Dapuez, Andres Francisco. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos; ArgentinaFil: Gavigan, Sabrina. American University; Estados UnidosFil: Eger, Talita. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; BrasilLindenwood University2016-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/90710Dapuez, Andres Francisco; Gavigan, Sabrina; Eger, Talita; Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs; Lindenwood University; Journal of International and Global Studies; 7; 2; 2-2016; 1-212158-0669CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.lindenwood.edu/files/resources/1-21.pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:48:45Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/90710instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:48:45.764CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs
title Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs
spellingShingle Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs
Dapuez, Andres Francisco
Cash transfers
Development
Money
Latin America
title_short Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs
title_full Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs
title_fullStr Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs
title_full_unstemmed Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs
title_sort Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Dapuez, Andres Francisco
Gavigan, Sabrina
Eger, Talita
author Dapuez, Andres Francisco
author_facet Dapuez, Andres Francisco
Gavigan, Sabrina
Eger, Talita
author_role author
author2 Gavigan, Sabrina
Eger, Talita
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Cash transfers
Development
Money
Latin America
topic Cash transfers
Development
Money
Latin America
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Conditional Cash Transfers (CCTs) have been described as fundamental to the “post-neo-liberal” turn in Latin America. Through an analysis of the stated and unstated goals of three CCT development programs in Latin America, Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades, begun in 1997; Brazil’s Programa Bolsa Familia (PBF), started in 2003; and Argentina’s Asignacion Universal por Hijo (AUH), started in 2009, this paper suggests that CCTs portend the continuation of longestablished economic monetarist policies in the region, providing poor families with meager amounts of money, barely sufficient for their subsistence. Despite the fact that progressive populisms in Brazil and Argentina have imbued cash transfers with new discursive qualities, recent CCT programs’ goals replicate those set forth by Mexico’s 1997 Progresa program. Rather than signifying a new state protection from the market, we argue that CCTs ultimately push for the integration of poor children into an idealization of the market and situate poor mothers into a relationship of asymmetrical accountability with the state. Consequently, CCTs imply a deterioration of state responsibilities to the poor through a discourse of opportunities for the development of human capabilities. The assumption of a post-neoliberal present in Latin America, marked by the monetization of state services, does not account for the fact that the ultimate goal of these programs is the creation of citizens who are less inclined to demand state services.
Fil: Dapuez, Andres Francisco. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos; Argentina
Fil: Gavigan, Sabrina. American University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Eger, Talita. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Brasil
description Conditional Cash Transfers (CCTs) have been described as fundamental to the “post-neo-liberal” turn in Latin America. Through an analysis of the stated and unstated goals of three CCT development programs in Latin America, Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades, begun in 1997; Brazil’s Programa Bolsa Familia (PBF), started in 2003; and Argentina’s Asignacion Universal por Hijo (AUH), started in 2009, this paper suggests that CCTs portend the continuation of longestablished economic monetarist policies in the region, providing poor families with meager amounts of money, barely sufficient for their subsistence. Despite the fact that progressive populisms in Brazil and Argentina have imbued cash transfers with new discursive qualities, recent CCT programs’ goals replicate those set forth by Mexico’s 1997 Progresa program. Rather than signifying a new state protection from the market, we argue that CCTs ultimately push for the integration of poor children into an idealization of the market and situate poor mothers into a relationship of asymmetrical accountability with the state. Consequently, CCTs imply a deterioration of state responsibilities to the poor through a discourse of opportunities for the development of human capabilities. The assumption of a post-neoliberal present in Latin America, marked by the monetization of state services, does not account for the fact that the ultimate goal of these programs is the creation of citizens who are less inclined to demand state services.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/90710
Dapuez, Andres Francisco; Gavigan, Sabrina; Eger, Talita; Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs; Lindenwood University; Journal of International and Global Studies; 7; 2; 2-2016; 1-21
2158-0669
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/90710
identifier_str_mv Dapuez, Andres Francisco; Gavigan, Sabrina; Eger, Talita; Monetizing State Services to the Poor: Intentional Analysis of Three Latin-American. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs; Lindenwood University; Journal of International and Global Studies; 7; 2; 2-2016; 1-21
2158-0669
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.lindenwood.edu/files/resources/1-21.pdf
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Lindenwood University
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Lindenwood University
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083008758546432
score 13.22299