Development of a regional soil productivity index using an artificial neural network approach
- Autores
- de Paepe, Josefina; Alvarez, Roberto
- Año de publicación
- 2013
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Soil productivity indices represent ratings of the potential plant biomass production of soils. Inductive approaches determine productivity based on inferred effects of soil properties on yield. Conversely, deductive approaches use yield information to estimate productivity. Our objective was to compare the performance of both types of productivity indices for assessing regional soil productivity for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield in the Pampas. Soil data from soil surveys and interpolated climate information were utilized. Wheat yield data from a 40-yr period and representing ?45 Mha were used. Inductive productivity indices showed a low correlation with observed yield (R2 < 0.45, P = 0.05). The best performance of deductive empirical methods was attained using a blind guess option, but soils could only be rated when yield data were available. Yield models based on the neural network approach had good performance (R2 = 0.614, root mean square error [RMSE] = 548 kg ha–1) and was used for regional productivity index development. This index could be extrapolated to soils for which yield data are not available, and its validation with yield averages was optimal (R2 = 0.728, P = 0.05). Regional high productivity was achieved for combinations of medium to high levels of soil organic C and soil available water storage capacity variables, which showed a positive interaction. This methodology for assessing soil productivity based on an empirical yield-based model may be applied in other regions of the world and for different crops.
Fil: de Paepe, Josefina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Alvarez, Roberto. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina - Materia
-
Suelos
Productividad
Materia Orgánica
Redes Neuronales - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/26265
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_97c6016e04e00df8d5f610b512f14559 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/26265 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Development of a regional soil productivity index using an artificial neural network approachde Paepe, JosefinaAlvarez, RobertoSuelosProductividadMateria OrgánicaRedes Neuronaleshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Soil productivity indices represent ratings of the potential plant biomass production of soils. Inductive approaches determine productivity based on inferred effects of soil properties on yield. Conversely, deductive approaches use yield information to estimate productivity. Our objective was to compare the performance of both types of productivity indices for assessing regional soil productivity for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield in the Pampas. Soil data from soil surveys and interpolated climate information were utilized. Wheat yield data from a 40-yr period and representing ?45 Mha were used. Inductive productivity indices showed a low correlation with observed yield (R2 < 0.45, P = 0.05). The best performance of deductive empirical methods was attained using a blind guess option, but soils could only be rated when yield data were available. Yield models based on the neural network approach had good performance (R2 = 0.614, root mean square error [RMSE] = 548 kg ha–1) and was used for regional productivity index development. This index could be extrapolated to soils for which yield data are not available, and its validation with yield averages was optimal (R2 = 0.728, P = 0.05). Regional high productivity was achieved for combinations of medium to high levels of soil organic C and soil available water storage capacity variables, which showed a positive interaction. This methodology for assessing soil productivity based on an empirical yield-based model may be applied in other regions of the world and for different crops.Fil: de Paepe, Josefina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Alvarez, Roberto. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaAmer Soc Agronomy2013-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/26265de Paepe, Josefina; Alvarez, Roberto; Development of a regional soil productivity index using an artificial neural network approach; Amer Soc Agronomy; Agronomy Journal; 105; 6; 10-2013; 1803-18130002-1962CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2134/agronj2013.0070info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/aj/abstracts/105/6/1803info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:54:11Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/26265instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:54:11.587CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Development of a regional soil productivity index using an artificial neural network approach |
title |
Development of a regional soil productivity index using an artificial neural network approach |
spellingShingle |
Development of a regional soil productivity index using an artificial neural network approach de Paepe, Josefina Suelos Productividad Materia Orgánica Redes Neuronales |
title_short |
Development of a regional soil productivity index using an artificial neural network approach |
title_full |
Development of a regional soil productivity index using an artificial neural network approach |
title_fullStr |
Development of a regional soil productivity index using an artificial neural network approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
Development of a regional soil productivity index using an artificial neural network approach |
title_sort |
Development of a regional soil productivity index using an artificial neural network approach |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
de Paepe, Josefina Alvarez, Roberto |
author |
de Paepe, Josefina |
author_facet |
de Paepe, Josefina Alvarez, Roberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Alvarez, Roberto |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Suelos Productividad Materia Orgánica Redes Neuronales |
topic |
Suelos Productividad Materia Orgánica Redes Neuronales |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Soil productivity indices represent ratings of the potential plant biomass production of soils. Inductive approaches determine productivity based on inferred effects of soil properties on yield. Conversely, deductive approaches use yield information to estimate productivity. Our objective was to compare the performance of both types of productivity indices for assessing regional soil productivity for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield in the Pampas. Soil data from soil surveys and interpolated climate information were utilized. Wheat yield data from a 40-yr period and representing ?45 Mha were used. Inductive productivity indices showed a low correlation with observed yield (R2 < 0.45, P = 0.05). The best performance of deductive empirical methods was attained using a blind guess option, but soils could only be rated when yield data were available. Yield models based on the neural network approach had good performance (R2 = 0.614, root mean square error [RMSE] = 548 kg ha–1) and was used for regional productivity index development. This index could be extrapolated to soils for which yield data are not available, and its validation with yield averages was optimal (R2 = 0.728, P = 0.05). Regional high productivity was achieved for combinations of medium to high levels of soil organic C and soil available water storage capacity variables, which showed a positive interaction. This methodology for assessing soil productivity based on an empirical yield-based model may be applied in other regions of the world and for different crops. Fil: de Paepe, Josefina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Alvarez, Roberto. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina |
description |
Soil productivity indices represent ratings of the potential plant biomass production of soils. Inductive approaches determine productivity based on inferred effects of soil properties on yield. Conversely, deductive approaches use yield information to estimate productivity. Our objective was to compare the performance of both types of productivity indices for assessing regional soil productivity for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield in the Pampas. Soil data from soil surveys and interpolated climate information were utilized. Wheat yield data from a 40-yr period and representing ?45 Mha were used. Inductive productivity indices showed a low correlation with observed yield (R2 < 0.45, P = 0.05). The best performance of deductive empirical methods was attained using a blind guess option, but soils could only be rated when yield data were available. Yield models based on the neural network approach had good performance (R2 = 0.614, root mean square error [RMSE] = 548 kg ha–1) and was used for regional productivity index development. This index could be extrapolated to soils for which yield data are not available, and its validation with yield averages was optimal (R2 = 0.728, P = 0.05). Regional high productivity was achieved for combinations of medium to high levels of soil organic C and soil available water storage capacity variables, which showed a positive interaction. This methodology for assessing soil productivity based on an empirical yield-based model may be applied in other regions of the world and for different crops. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-10 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/26265 de Paepe, Josefina; Alvarez, Roberto; Development of a regional soil productivity index using an artificial neural network approach; Amer Soc Agronomy; Agronomy Journal; 105; 6; 10-2013; 1803-1813 0002-1962 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/26265 |
identifier_str_mv |
de Paepe, Josefina; Alvarez, Roberto; Development of a regional soil productivity index using an artificial neural network approach; Amer Soc Agronomy; Agronomy Journal; 105; 6; 10-2013; 1803-1813 0002-1962 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2134/agronj2013.0070 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/aj/abstracts/105/6/1803 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Amer Soc Agronomy |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Amer Soc Agronomy |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613648008347648 |
score |
13.070432 |