The importance of evaluating performance to understand changes

Autores
Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel
Año de publicación
2019
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Recently, the journal published two papers that described findings on the evaluation of performance in different clinical conditions and settings but with the same goal: to give explanation to findings observed after the placement systemic interventions or established programs in real world environments. The first one from Aron et al. explores the issue of the results of fighting overtreatment in diabetic patients, resulting in undertreatment as an unintended consequence and haven’t used balancing measures to detect so during the implementation of the strategy. The second one from Hillen et al. describes the frequency of appropriate usage of medication in a vulnerable population such as the ones in residential care, which shows huge gaps in adequate use. The clinical situations described in the two studies are not the main point to comment on. The case I like to highlight is the importance of evaluating performance to detect opportunities for improvement. Both studies take profit from the retrospective review of administrative databases usually available in mature health systems as frequently observed in developed countries. This is huge asset and is a cornerstone of health services research, what constitutes the base for further research to confirm or reject hypothesis to and develop solutions in reaction to problems.
Fil: Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Políticas de Salud; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
Evaluating performance
Health
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/135351

id CONICETDig_8f2b897f171bf109a7f5e3a46c679929
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/135351
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The importance of evaluating performance to understand changesGarcia Elorrio, EzequielEvaluating performanceHealthhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Recently, the journal published two papers that described findings on the evaluation of performance in different clinical conditions and settings but with the same goal: to give explanation to findings observed after the placement systemic interventions or established programs in real world environments. The first one from Aron et al. explores the issue of the results of fighting overtreatment in diabetic patients, resulting in undertreatment as an unintended consequence and haven’t used balancing measures to detect so during the implementation of the strategy. The second one from Hillen et al. describes the frequency of appropriate usage of medication in a vulnerable population such as the ones in residential care, which shows huge gaps in adequate use. The clinical situations described in the two studies are not the main point to comment on. The case I like to highlight is the importance of evaluating performance to detect opportunities for improvement. Both studies take profit from the retrospective review of administrative databases usually available in mature health systems as frequently observed in developed countries. This is huge asset and is a cornerstone of health services research, what constitutes the base for further research to confirm or reject hypothesis to and develop solutions in reaction to problems.Fil: Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Políticas de Salud; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaOxford University Press2019-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/135351Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel; The importance of evaluating performance to understand changes; Oxford University Press; International Journal For Quality In Health Care; 31; 4; 5-2019; 245-2451353-45051464-3677CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/intqhc/mzz038info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/intqhc/article/31/4/245/5479946info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:02:17Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/135351instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:02:17.711CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The importance of evaluating performance to understand changes
title The importance of evaluating performance to understand changes
spellingShingle The importance of evaluating performance to understand changes
Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel
Evaluating performance
Health
title_short The importance of evaluating performance to understand changes
title_full The importance of evaluating performance to understand changes
title_fullStr The importance of evaluating performance to understand changes
title_full_unstemmed The importance of evaluating performance to understand changes
title_sort The importance of evaluating performance to understand changes
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel
author Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel
author_facet Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Evaluating performance
Health
topic Evaluating performance
Health
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Recently, the journal published two papers that described findings on the evaluation of performance in different clinical conditions and settings but with the same goal: to give explanation to findings observed after the placement systemic interventions or established programs in real world environments. The first one from Aron et al. explores the issue of the results of fighting overtreatment in diabetic patients, resulting in undertreatment as an unintended consequence and haven’t used balancing measures to detect so during the implementation of the strategy. The second one from Hillen et al. describes the frequency of appropriate usage of medication in a vulnerable population such as the ones in residential care, which shows huge gaps in adequate use. The clinical situations described in the two studies are not the main point to comment on. The case I like to highlight is the importance of evaluating performance to detect opportunities for improvement. Both studies take profit from the retrospective review of administrative databases usually available in mature health systems as frequently observed in developed countries. This is huge asset and is a cornerstone of health services research, what constitutes the base for further research to confirm or reject hypothesis to and develop solutions in reaction to problems.
Fil: Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Políticas de Salud; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description Recently, the journal published two papers that described findings on the evaluation of performance in different clinical conditions and settings but with the same goal: to give explanation to findings observed after the placement systemic interventions or established programs in real world environments. The first one from Aron et al. explores the issue of the results of fighting overtreatment in diabetic patients, resulting in undertreatment as an unintended consequence and haven’t used balancing measures to detect so during the implementation of the strategy. The second one from Hillen et al. describes the frequency of appropriate usage of medication in a vulnerable population such as the ones in residential care, which shows huge gaps in adequate use. The clinical situations described in the two studies are not the main point to comment on. The case I like to highlight is the importance of evaluating performance to detect opportunities for improvement. Both studies take profit from the retrospective review of administrative databases usually available in mature health systems as frequently observed in developed countries. This is huge asset and is a cornerstone of health services research, what constitutes the base for further research to confirm or reject hypothesis to and develop solutions in reaction to problems.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/135351
Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel; The importance of evaluating performance to understand changes; Oxford University Press; International Journal For Quality In Health Care; 31; 4; 5-2019; 245-245
1353-4505
1464-3677
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/135351
identifier_str_mv Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel; The importance of evaluating performance to understand changes; Oxford University Press; International Journal For Quality In Health Care; 31; 4; 5-2019; 245-245
1353-4505
1464-3677
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/intqhc/mzz038
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/intqhc/article/31/4/245/5479946
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford University Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford University Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269749146288128
score 13.13397