Research through Collaborative Relationships: A Middle Ground for Reciprocal Transformations and Translations?

Autores
Briones, Claudia Noemi
Año de publicación
2017
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Joanne Rappaport’s article has two main virtues. On the one hand, she provides a thoughtful summary of very diverse experiences of collaborative research. On the other, she expands the fi eld of vision of our discussions by means of key displacements of focus: from collaborative research to research through collaborative relationships; and from products to processes. She does so by means of a very ethnographic contextualization and historization of the initiatives of La Rosca de Investigación y Acción Social (Circle of Social Research and Action), a group deeply related to Orlando Fals Borda’s appealing methodology of “action research.
Fil: Briones, Claudia Noemi. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio; Argentina
Materia
Investigación-Acción Participativa
Metodologías Colaborativas
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/58313

id CONICETDig_8db4143a1ee48aa54d0717876a84363b
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/58313
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Research through Collaborative Relationships: A Middle Ground for Reciprocal Transformations and Translations?Briones, Claudia NoemiInvestigación-Acción ParticipativaMetodologías Colaborativashttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.9https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Joanne Rappaport’s article has two main virtues. On the one hand, she provides a thoughtful summary of very diverse experiences of collaborative research. On the other, she expands the fi eld of vision of our discussions by means of key displacements of focus: from collaborative research to research through collaborative relationships; and from products to processes. She does so by means of a very ethnographic contextualization and historization of the initiatives of La Rosca de Investigación y Acción Social (Circle of Social Research and Action), a group deeply related to Orlando Fals Borda’s appealing methodology of “action research.Fil: Briones, Claudia Noemi. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio; ArgentinaUniversity of Nebraska Press2017-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/58313Briones, Claudia Noemi; Research through Collaborative Relationships: A Middle Ground for Reciprocal Transformations and Translations?; University of Nebraska Press; Collaborative Anthropologies; 9; 1-2; 4-2017; 32-391943-2550CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1353/cla.2016.0010info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://muse.jhu.edu/article/687781info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-11-12T09:38:01Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/58313instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-11-12 09:38:01.612CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Research through Collaborative Relationships: A Middle Ground for Reciprocal Transformations and Translations?
title Research through Collaborative Relationships: A Middle Ground for Reciprocal Transformations and Translations?
spellingShingle Research through Collaborative Relationships: A Middle Ground for Reciprocal Transformations and Translations?
Briones, Claudia Noemi
Investigación-Acción Participativa
Metodologías Colaborativas
title_short Research through Collaborative Relationships: A Middle Ground for Reciprocal Transformations and Translations?
title_full Research through Collaborative Relationships: A Middle Ground for Reciprocal Transformations and Translations?
title_fullStr Research through Collaborative Relationships: A Middle Ground for Reciprocal Transformations and Translations?
title_full_unstemmed Research through Collaborative Relationships: A Middle Ground for Reciprocal Transformations and Translations?
title_sort Research through Collaborative Relationships: A Middle Ground for Reciprocal Transformations and Translations?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Briones, Claudia Noemi
author Briones, Claudia Noemi
author_facet Briones, Claudia Noemi
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Investigación-Acción Participativa
Metodologías Colaborativas
topic Investigación-Acción Participativa
Metodologías Colaborativas
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.9
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Joanne Rappaport’s article has two main virtues. On the one hand, she provides a thoughtful summary of very diverse experiences of collaborative research. On the other, she expands the fi eld of vision of our discussions by means of key displacements of focus: from collaborative research to research through collaborative relationships; and from products to processes. She does so by means of a very ethnographic contextualization and historization of the initiatives of La Rosca de Investigación y Acción Social (Circle of Social Research and Action), a group deeply related to Orlando Fals Borda’s appealing methodology of “action research.
Fil: Briones, Claudia Noemi. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio; Argentina
description Joanne Rappaport’s article has two main virtues. On the one hand, she provides a thoughtful summary of very diverse experiences of collaborative research. On the other, she expands the fi eld of vision of our discussions by means of key displacements of focus: from collaborative research to research through collaborative relationships; and from products to processes. She does so by means of a very ethnographic contextualization and historization of the initiatives of La Rosca de Investigación y Acción Social (Circle of Social Research and Action), a group deeply related to Orlando Fals Borda’s appealing methodology of “action research.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/58313
Briones, Claudia Noemi; Research through Collaborative Relationships: A Middle Ground for Reciprocal Transformations and Translations?; University of Nebraska Press; Collaborative Anthropologies; 9; 1-2; 4-2017; 32-39
1943-2550
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/58313
identifier_str_mv Briones, Claudia Noemi; Research through Collaborative Relationships: A Middle Ground for Reciprocal Transformations and Translations?; University of Nebraska Press; Collaborative Anthropologies; 9; 1-2; 4-2017; 32-39
1943-2550
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1353/cla.2016.0010
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://muse.jhu.edu/article/687781
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv University of Nebraska Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv University of Nebraska Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1848597353147138048
score 13.24909