Ánthropos peripateî: los argumentos del tercer hombre megáricos

Autores
Gardella, Mariana
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The Platonic Theory of Forms has received many critiques from many critics, among which stands out the well-known «third man argument». Although traditionally the studies about this subject only have considered the versions of the argument introduced by Plato and Aristotle, the Megarian philosophers also developed other versions of the same reasoning. In this paper I would like to analyze the argument which is attributed by Alexander of Aphrodisias to «the sophists» and to Polyxenus in his commentary on Aristotle´s Metaphysics. I will try to show that the main point of these objections is to criticize the homonymy of the universal terms, a problem that Plato evokes in his Parmenides, where he also points out some difficulties in relation to the semantics of his own theory.
Fil: Gardella, Mariana. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
Argumento del Tercer Hombre
Filósofos Megáricos
Políxeno
Eponimia y Homonmia
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/48001
Acceder
id CONICETDig_7d2712f4361555a4875868bc5f84d811
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/48001
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Ánthropos peripateî: los argumentos del tercer hombre megáricosGardella, MarianaArgumento del Tercer HombreFilósofos MegáricosPolíxenoEponimia y Homonmiahttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6The Platonic Theory of Forms has received many critiques from many critics, among which stands out the well-known «third man argument». Although traditionally the studies about this subject only have considered the versions of the argument introduced by Plato and Aristotle, the Megarian philosophers also developed other versions of the same reasoning. In this paper I would like to analyze the argument which is attributed by Alexander of Aphrodisias to «the sophists» and to Polyxenus in his commentary on Aristotle´s Metaphysics. I will try to show that the main point of these objections is to criticize the homonymy of the universal terms, a problem that Plato evokes in his Parmenides, where he also points out some difficulties in relation to the semantics of his own theory.Fil: Gardella, Mariana. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaBibliopolis2016-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/48001Gardella, Mariana; Ánthropos peripateî: los argumentos del tercer hombre megáricos; Bibliopolis; Elenchos. Rivista di studi sul pensiero antico; 37; 1-; 12-2016; 69-940392-7342CONICET DigitalCONICETspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5970723info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:52:52Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/48001instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:52:52.283CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ánthropos peripateî: los argumentos del tercer hombre megáricos
title Ánthropos peripateî: los argumentos del tercer hombre megáricos
spellingShingle Ánthropos peripateî: los argumentos del tercer hombre megáricos
Gardella, Mariana
Argumento del Tercer Hombre
Filósofos Megáricos
Políxeno
Eponimia y Homonmia
title_short Ánthropos peripateî: los argumentos del tercer hombre megáricos
title_full Ánthropos peripateî: los argumentos del tercer hombre megáricos
title_fullStr Ánthropos peripateî: los argumentos del tercer hombre megáricos
title_full_unstemmed Ánthropos peripateî: los argumentos del tercer hombre megáricos
title_sort Ánthropos peripateî: los argumentos del tercer hombre megáricos
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gardella, Mariana
author Gardella, Mariana
author_facet Gardella, Mariana
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Argumento del Tercer Hombre
Filósofos Megáricos
Políxeno
Eponimia y Homonmia
topic Argumento del Tercer Hombre
Filósofos Megáricos
Políxeno
Eponimia y Homonmia
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The Platonic Theory of Forms has received many critiques from many critics, among which stands out the well-known «third man argument». Although traditionally the studies about this subject only have considered the versions of the argument introduced by Plato and Aristotle, the Megarian philosophers also developed other versions of the same reasoning. In this paper I would like to analyze the argument which is attributed by Alexander of Aphrodisias to «the sophists» and to Polyxenus in his commentary on Aristotle´s Metaphysics. I will try to show that the main point of these objections is to criticize the homonymy of the universal terms, a problem that Plato evokes in his Parmenides, where he also points out some difficulties in relation to the semantics of his own theory.
Fil: Gardella, Mariana. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description The Platonic Theory of Forms has received many critiques from many critics, among which stands out the well-known «third man argument». Although traditionally the studies about this subject only have considered the versions of the argument introduced by Plato and Aristotle, the Megarian philosophers also developed other versions of the same reasoning. In this paper I would like to analyze the argument which is attributed by Alexander of Aphrodisias to «the sophists» and to Polyxenus in his commentary on Aristotle´s Metaphysics. I will try to show that the main point of these objections is to criticize the homonymy of the universal terms, a problem that Plato evokes in his Parmenides, where he also points out some difficulties in relation to the semantics of his own theory.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/48001
Gardella, Mariana; Ánthropos peripateî: los argumentos del tercer hombre megáricos; Bibliopolis; Elenchos. Rivista di studi sul pensiero antico; 37; 1-; 12-2016; 69-94
0392-7342
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/48001
identifier_str_mv Gardella, Mariana; Ánthropos peripateî: los argumentos del tercer hombre megáricos; Bibliopolis; Elenchos. Rivista di studi sul pensiero antico; 37; 1-; 12-2016; 69-94
0392-7342
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5970723
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Bibliopolis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Bibliopolis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269188012376064
score 13.13397

Publicaciones similares