Winning! Election returns and engagement in social media

Autores
Calvo, Ernesto; Ventura, Tiago; Aruguete, Natalia; Waisbord, Silvio Ricardo
Año de publicación
2023
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This article analyzes social media engagement when elections are adjudicated to one of the contending parties. We extend existing models of political dialogue to explain differences in social media engagement (i.e. time-to-retweet) when users support the winner or losers of an election. We show that users who support the winning candidate are more engaged and have a lower time-to-retweet. We also show heterogeneity in Twitter engagement conditional on the number of followers, with accounts with more followers being less sensitive to the election result. We measure the effect of electoral adjudication using a regression discontinuity design, with estimates by winning or losing status, and for accounts with many followers (high authority) or with few followers (low authority). Analyses use Twitter data collected in Argentina (2019), Brazil (2018), the United Kingdom (2019), and the United States (2016).
Fil: Calvo, Ernesto. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ventura, Tiago. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos. University of New York; Estados Unidos
Fil: Aruguete, Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes; Argentina
Fil: Waisbord, Silvio Ricardo. The George Washington University; Estados Unidos
Materia
SOCIAL MEDIA
ENGAGEMENT
TWITTER
ELECCIONES
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/219677

id CONICETDig_6b9a28b61a1d38ea4b175777cdcb0f8b
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/219677
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Winning! Election returns and engagement in social mediaCalvo, ErnestoVentura, TiagoAruguete, NataliaWaisbord, Silvio RicardoSOCIAL MEDIAENGAGEMENTTWITTERELECCIONEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.8https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5This article analyzes social media engagement when elections are adjudicated to one of the contending parties. We extend existing models of political dialogue to explain differences in social media engagement (i.e. time-to-retweet) when users support the winner or losers of an election. We show that users who support the winning candidate are more engaged and have a lower time-to-retweet. We also show heterogeneity in Twitter engagement conditional on the number of followers, with accounts with more followers being less sensitive to the election result. We measure the effect of electoral adjudication using a regression discontinuity design, with estimates by winning or losing status, and for accounts with many followers (high authority) or with few followers (low authority). Analyses use Twitter data collected in Argentina (2019), Brazil (2018), the United Kingdom (2019), and the United States (2016).Fil: Calvo, Ernesto. University of Maryland; Estados UnidosFil: Ventura, Tiago. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos. University of New York; Estados UnidosFil: Aruguete, Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes; ArgentinaFil: Waisbord, Silvio Ricardo. The George Washington University; Estados UnidosPublic Library of Science2023-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/219677Calvo, Ernesto; Ventura, Tiago; Aruguete, Natalia; Waisbord, Silvio Ricardo; Winning! Election returns and engagement in social media; Public Library of Science; Plos One; 18; 3; 3-2023; 1-251932-6203CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0281475info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0281475info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:50:22Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/219677instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:50:23.75CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Winning! Election returns and engagement in social media
title Winning! Election returns and engagement in social media
spellingShingle Winning! Election returns and engagement in social media
Calvo, Ernesto
SOCIAL MEDIA
ENGAGEMENT
TWITTER
ELECCIONES
title_short Winning! Election returns and engagement in social media
title_full Winning! Election returns and engagement in social media
title_fullStr Winning! Election returns and engagement in social media
title_full_unstemmed Winning! Election returns and engagement in social media
title_sort Winning! Election returns and engagement in social media
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Calvo, Ernesto
Ventura, Tiago
Aruguete, Natalia
Waisbord, Silvio Ricardo
author Calvo, Ernesto
author_facet Calvo, Ernesto
Ventura, Tiago
Aruguete, Natalia
Waisbord, Silvio Ricardo
author_role author
author2 Ventura, Tiago
Aruguete, Natalia
Waisbord, Silvio Ricardo
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv SOCIAL MEDIA
ENGAGEMENT
TWITTER
ELECCIONES
topic SOCIAL MEDIA
ENGAGEMENT
TWITTER
ELECCIONES
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.8
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This article analyzes social media engagement when elections are adjudicated to one of the contending parties. We extend existing models of political dialogue to explain differences in social media engagement (i.e. time-to-retweet) when users support the winner or losers of an election. We show that users who support the winning candidate are more engaged and have a lower time-to-retweet. We also show heterogeneity in Twitter engagement conditional on the number of followers, with accounts with more followers being less sensitive to the election result. We measure the effect of electoral adjudication using a regression discontinuity design, with estimates by winning or losing status, and for accounts with many followers (high authority) or with few followers (low authority). Analyses use Twitter data collected in Argentina (2019), Brazil (2018), the United Kingdom (2019), and the United States (2016).
Fil: Calvo, Ernesto. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ventura, Tiago. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos. University of New York; Estados Unidos
Fil: Aruguete, Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes; Argentina
Fil: Waisbord, Silvio Ricardo. The George Washington University; Estados Unidos
description This article analyzes social media engagement when elections are adjudicated to one of the contending parties. We extend existing models of political dialogue to explain differences in social media engagement (i.e. time-to-retweet) when users support the winner or losers of an election. We show that users who support the winning candidate are more engaged and have a lower time-to-retweet. We also show heterogeneity in Twitter engagement conditional on the number of followers, with accounts with more followers being less sensitive to the election result. We measure the effect of electoral adjudication using a regression discontinuity design, with estimates by winning or losing status, and for accounts with many followers (high authority) or with few followers (low authority). Analyses use Twitter data collected in Argentina (2019), Brazil (2018), the United Kingdom (2019), and the United States (2016).
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/219677
Calvo, Ernesto; Ventura, Tiago; Aruguete, Natalia; Waisbord, Silvio Ricardo; Winning! Election returns and engagement in social media; Public Library of Science; Plos One; 18; 3; 3-2023; 1-25
1932-6203
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/219677
identifier_str_mv Calvo, Ernesto; Ventura, Tiago; Aruguete, Natalia; Waisbord, Silvio Ricardo; Winning! Election returns and engagement in social media; Public Library of Science; Plos One; 18; 3; 3-2023; 1-25
1932-6203
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0281475
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0281475
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Public Library of Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Public Library of Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269027556130816
score 13.13397