A Sequential Integration between Optimal Flexible Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis and Control Structure Design
- Autores
- Braccia, Lautaro; Marchetti, Pablo Andres; Luppi, Patricio Alfredo; Zumoffen, David Alejandro Ramon
- Año de publicación
- 2018
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- In this work, the optimal synthesis and control structure design (CSD) problems for flexible heat exchanger networks (HENs) are integrated into a new sequential methodology. The proposed approach relies, on one hand, on a convexification and outer-approximation strategy to solve the synthesis stage and, on the other hand, on the sum of squared deviations (SSD) method for the optimal CSD. These methods guarantee the optimality of the synthesis process, as well as the proper operation of the HEN in several operating points. The first stage of the proposed approach, which focuses on the flexible HEN synthesis problem, considers both temperature and flow rate modifications in the inlet streams. A multiperiod synthesis formulation is proposed where critical points are iteratively incorporated to fulfill the flexibility requirements. Because the problem size and the nonconvexities increase when additional critical points are considered, both the convexification of nonlinear terms and an outer approximation strategy are used to guarantee the optimality of the solutions at this stage. The second stage handles the decisions associated with the design of the control structure. This stage is critical because the network is required to work in a wide range of operating points. If the classical CSD method based on the well-known relative gain array (RGA) is applied, and only the nominal operating point is considered, such requirements are not fullfiled. In fact, this work demonstrates that such classical CSD approaches are not sufficient to operate the HEN in the range of variation considered by the multiperiod synthesis phase. As an alternative method, the application of the SSD approach to multiple operating points is proposed. Thus, several optimal control structures are developed to ensure the operability of the HEN. Three academic case studies are presented to illustrate the application of the proposed methodology.
Fil: Braccia, Lautaro. Universidad Nacional de Rosario; Argentina
Fil: Marchetti, Pablo A.. Universidad Nacional del Litoral; Argentina
Fil: Luppi, Patricio. Universidad Nacional de Rosario; Argentina
Fil: Zumoffen, David. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional; Argentina - Materia
-
PROCESS SYNTHESIS
HEAT EXCHANGE NETWORKS
MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL DESIGN
MIXED INTEGER QUADRATIC PROGRAMMING - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/94024
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_68976e7185451c6adc9c63faf97e953c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/94024 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
A Sequential Integration between Optimal Flexible Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis and Control Structure DesignBraccia, LautaroMarchetti, Pablo AndresLuppi, Patricio AlfredoZumoffen, David Alejandro RamonPROCESS SYNTHESISHEAT EXCHANGE NETWORKSMULTIVARIABLE CONTROL DESIGNMIXED INTEGER QUADRATIC PROGRAMMINGhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2In this work, the optimal synthesis and control structure design (CSD) problems for flexible heat exchanger networks (HENs) are integrated into a new sequential methodology. The proposed approach relies, on one hand, on a convexification and outer-approximation strategy to solve the synthesis stage and, on the other hand, on the sum of squared deviations (SSD) method for the optimal CSD. These methods guarantee the optimality of the synthesis process, as well as the proper operation of the HEN in several operating points. The first stage of the proposed approach, which focuses on the flexible HEN synthesis problem, considers both temperature and flow rate modifications in the inlet streams. A multiperiod synthesis formulation is proposed where critical points are iteratively incorporated to fulfill the flexibility requirements. Because the problem size and the nonconvexities increase when additional critical points are considered, both the convexification of nonlinear terms and an outer approximation strategy are used to guarantee the optimality of the solutions at this stage. The second stage handles the decisions associated with the design of the control structure. This stage is critical because the network is required to work in a wide range of operating points. If the classical CSD method based on the well-known relative gain array (RGA) is applied, and only the nominal operating point is considered, such requirements are not fullfiled. In fact, this work demonstrates that such classical CSD approaches are not sufficient to operate the HEN in the range of variation considered by the multiperiod synthesis phase. As an alternative method, the application of the SSD approach to multiple operating points is proposed. Thus, several optimal control structures are developed to ensure the operability of the HEN. Three academic case studies are presented to illustrate the application of the proposed methodology.Fil: Braccia, Lautaro. Universidad Nacional de Rosario; ArgentinaFil: Marchetti, Pablo A.. Universidad Nacional del Litoral; ArgentinaFil: Luppi, Patricio. Universidad Nacional de Rosario; ArgentinaFil: Zumoffen, David. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional; ArgentinaAmerican Chemical Society2018-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/94024Braccia, Lautaro; Marchetti, Pablo Andres; Luppi, Patricio Alfredo; Zumoffen, David Alejandro Ramon; A Sequential Integration between Optimal Flexible Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis and Control Structure Design; American Chemical Society; Industrial & Engineering Chemical Research; 57; 32; 8-2018; 11094-111110888-5885CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b01611info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b01611info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:57:22Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/94024instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:57:22.547CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A Sequential Integration between Optimal Flexible Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis and Control Structure Design |
title |
A Sequential Integration between Optimal Flexible Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis and Control Structure Design |
spellingShingle |
A Sequential Integration between Optimal Flexible Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis and Control Structure Design Braccia, Lautaro PROCESS SYNTHESIS HEAT EXCHANGE NETWORKS MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL DESIGN MIXED INTEGER QUADRATIC PROGRAMMING |
title_short |
A Sequential Integration between Optimal Flexible Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis and Control Structure Design |
title_full |
A Sequential Integration between Optimal Flexible Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis and Control Structure Design |
title_fullStr |
A Sequential Integration between Optimal Flexible Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis and Control Structure Design |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Sequential Integration between Optimal Flexible Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis and Control Structure Design |
title_sort |
A Sequential Integration between Optimal Flexible Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis and Control Structure Design |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Braccia, Lautaro Marchetti, Pablo Andres Luppi, Patricio Alfredo Zumoffen, David Alejandro Ramon |
author |
Braccia, Lautaro |
author_facet |
Braccia, Lautaro Marchetti, Pablo Andres Luppi, Patricio Alfredo Zumoffen, David Alejandro Ramon |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Marchetti, Pablo Andres Luppi, Patricio Alfredo Zumoffen, David Alejandro Ramon |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
PROCESS SYNTHESIS HEAT EXCHANGE NETWORKS MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL DESIGN MIXED INTEGER QUADRATIC PROGRAMMING |
topic |
PROCESS SYNTHESIS HEAT EXCHANGE NETWORKS MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL DESIGN MIXED INTEGER QUADRATIC PROGRAMMING |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
In this work, the optimal synthesis and control structure design (CSD) problems for flexible heat exchanger networks (HENs) are integrated into a new sequential methodology. The proposed approach relies, on one hand, on a convexification and outer-approximation strategy to solve the synthesis stage and, on the other hand, on the sum of squared deviations (SSD) method for the optimal CSD. These methods guarantee the optimality of the synthesis process, as well as the proper operation of the HEN in several operating points. The first stage of the proposed approach, which focuses on the flexible HEN synthesis problem, considers both temperature and flow rate modifications in the inlet streams. A multiperiod synthesis formulation is proposed where critical points are iteratively incorporated to fulfill the flexibility requirements. Because the problem size and the nonconvexities increase when additional critical points are considered, both the convexification of nonlinear terms and an outer approximation strategy are used to guarantee the optimality of the solutions at this stage. The second stage handles the decisions associated with the design of the control structure. This stage is critical because the network is required to work in a wide range of operating points. If the classical CSD method based on the well-known relative gain array (RGA) is applied, and only the nominal operating point is considered, such requirements are not fullfiled. In fact, this work demonstrates that such classical CSD approaches are not sufficient to operate the HEN in the range of variation considered by the multiperiod synthesis phase. As an alternative method, the application of the SSD approach to multiple operating points is proposed. Thus, several optimal control structures are developed to ensure the operability of the HEN. Three academic case studies are presented to illustrate the application of the proposed methodology. Fil: Braccia, Lautaro. Universidad Nacional de Rosario; Argentina Fil: Marchetti, Pablo A.. Universidad Nacional del Litoral; Argentina Fil: Luppi, Patricio. Universidad Nacional de Rosario; Argentina Fil: Zumoffen, David. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional; Argentina |
description |
In this work, the optimal synthesis and control structure design (CSD) problems for flexible heat exchanger networks (HENs) are integrated into a new sequential methodology. The proposed approach relies, on one hand, on a convexification and outer-approximation strategy to solve the synthesis stage and, on the other hand, on the sum of squared deviations (SSD) method for the optimal CSD. These methods guarantee the optimality of the synthesis process, as well as the proper operation of the HEN in several operating points. The first stage of the proposed approach, which focuses on the flexible HEN synthesis problem, considers both temperature and flow rate modifications in the inlet streams. A multiperiod synthesis formulation is proposed where critical points are iteratively incorporated to fulfill the flexibility requirements. Because the problem size and the nonconvexities increase when additional critical points are considered, both the convexification of nonlinear terms and an outer approximation strategy are used to guarantee the optimality of the solutions at this stage. The second stage handles the decisions associated with the design of the control structure. This stage is critical because the network is required to work in a wide range of operating points. If the classical CSD method based on the well-known relative gain array (RGA) is applied, and only the nominal operating point is considered, such requirements are not fullfiled. In fact, this work demonstrates that such classical CSD approaches are not sufficient to operate the HEN in the range of variation considered by the multiperiod synthesis phase. As an alternative method, the application of the SSD approach to multiple operating points is proposed. Thus, several optimal control structures are developed to ensure the operability of the HEN. Three academic case studies are presented to illustrate the application of the proposed methodology. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-08 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/94024 Braccia, Lautaro; Marchetti, Pablo Andres; Luppi, Patricio Alfredo; Zumoffen, David Alejandro Ramon; A Sequential Integration between Optimal Flexible Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis and Control Structure Design; American Chemical Society; Industrial & Engineering Chemical Research; 57; 32; 8-2018; 11094-11111 0888-5885 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/94024 |
identifier_str_mv |
Braccia, Lautaro; Marchetti, Pablo Andres; Luppi, Patricio Alfredo; Zumoffen, David Alejandro Ramon; A Sequential Integration between Optimal Flexible Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis and Control Structure Design; American Chemical Society; Industrial & Engineering Chemical Research; 57; 32; 8-2018; 11094-11111 0888-5885 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b01611 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b01611 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Chemical Society |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Chemical Society |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269459239141376 |
score |
13.13397 |