Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model

Autores
Barrera Lemarchand, Federico Ulises; Semeshenko, Viktoriya; Navajas, Joaquín; Balenzuela, Pablo
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Understanding the opinion formation dynamics in social systems is of vast relevance in diverse aspects of society. In particular, it is relevant for political deliberation and other group decision-making processes. Although previous research has reported different approaches to model social dynamics, most of them focused on interaction mechanisms where individuals modify their opinions in line with the opinions of others, without invoking a latent mechanism of argumentation. In this paper, we present a model where changes of opinion are due to explicit exchanges of arguments, and we analyze the emerging collective states in terms of simple dynamic rules. We find that, when interactions are equiprobable and symmetrical, the model only shows consensus solutions. However, when either homophily, confirmation bias, or both are included, we observe the emergence and dominance of bipolarization, which appears due to the fact that individuals are not able to accept the contrary information from their opponents during exchanges of arguments. In all cases, the predominance of each stable state depends on the relation between the number of agents and the number of available arguments in the discussion. Overall, this paper describes the dynamics and shows the conditions wherein deliberative agents are expected to construct polarized societies.
Fil: Barrera Lemarchand, Federico Ulises. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Semeshenko, Viktoriya. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto Interdisciplinario de Economía Política de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Instituto Interdisciplinario de Economía Política de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Navajas, Joaquín. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; Argentina
Fil: Balenzuela, Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Materia
Formacion de opinion
Modelos de agentes
Intercambio de argumentos
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/146153
Acceder
id CONICETDig_40eee6ae911a45fd65dba239dca76bca
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/146153
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments modelBarrera Lemarchand, Federico UlisesSemeshenko, ViktoriyaNavajas, JoaquínBalenzuela, PabloFormacion de opinionModelos de agentesIntercambio de argumentoshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Understanding the opinion formation dynamics in social systems is of vast relevance in diverse aspects of society. In particular, it is relevant for political deliberation and other group decision-making processes. Although previous research has reported different approaches to model social dynamics, most of them focused on interaction mechanisms where individuals modify their opinions in line with the opinions of others, without invoking a latent mechanism of argumentation. In this paper, we present a model where changes of opinion are due to explicit exchanges of arguments, and we analyze the emerging collective states in terms of simple dynamic rules. We find that, when interactions are equiprobable and symmetrical, the model only shows consensus solutions. However, when either homophily, confirmation bias, or both are included, we observe the emergence and dominance of bipolarization, which appears due to the fact that individuals are not able to accept the contrary information from their opponents during exchanges of arguments. In all cases, the predominance of each stable state depends on the relation between the number of agents and the number of available arguments in the discussion. Overall, this paper describes the dynamics and shows the conditions wherein deliberative agents are expected to construct polarized societies.Fil: Barrera Lemarchand, Federico Ulises. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Semeshenko, Viktoriya. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto Interdisciplinario de Economía Política de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Instituto Interdisciplinario de Economía Política de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Navajas, Joaquín. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; ArgentinaFil: Balenzuela, Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaAmerican Institute of Physics2020-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/146153Barrera Lemarchand, Federico Ulises; Semeshenko, Viktoriya; Navajas, Joaquín; Balenzuela, Pablo; Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model; American Institute of Physics; Chaos; 30; 6; 6-2020; 1-121054-1500CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0004504info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1063/5.0004504info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:59:13Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/146153instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:59:13.575CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model
title Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model
spellingShingle Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model
Barrera Lemarchand, Federico Ulises
Formacion de opinion
Modelos de agentes
Intercambio de argumentos
title_short Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model
title_full Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model
title_fullStr Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model
title_full_unstemmed Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model
title_sort Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Barrera Lemarchand, Federico Ulises
Semeshenko, Viktoriya
Navajas, Joaquín
Balenzuela, Pablo
author Barrera Lemarchand, Federico Ulises
author_facet Barrera Lemarchand, Federico Ulises
Semeshenko, Viktoriya
Navajas, Joaquín
Balenzuela, Pablo
author_role author
author2 Semeshenko, Viktoriya
Navajas, Joaquín
Balenzuela, Pablo
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Formacion de opinion
Modelos de agentes
Intercambio de argumentos
topic Formacion de opinion
Modelos de agentes
Intercambio de argumentos
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Understanding the opinion formation dynamics in social systems is of vast relevance in diverse aspects of society. In particular, it is relevant for political deliberation and other group decision-making processes. Although previous research has reported different approaches to model social dynamics, most of them focused on interaction mechanisms where individuals modify their opinions in line with the opinions of others, without invoking a latent mechanism of argumentation. In this paper, we present a model where changes of opinion are due to explicit exchanges of arguments, and we analyze the emerging collective states in terms of simple dynamic rules. We find that, when interactions are equiprobable and symmetrical, the model only shows consensus solutions. However, when either homophily, confirmation bias, or both are included, we observe the emergence and dominance of bipolarization, which appears due to the fact that individuals are not able to accept the contrary information from their opponents during exchanges of arguments. In all cases, the predominance of each stable state depends on the relation between the number of agents and the number of available arguments in the discussion. Overall, this paper describes the dynamics and shows the conditions wherein deliberative agents are expected to construct polarized societies.
Fil: Barrera Lemarchand, Federico Ulises. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Semeshenko, Viktoriya. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto Interdisciplinario de Economía Política de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Instituto Interdisciplinario de Economía Política de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Navajas, Joaquín. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; Argentina
Fil: Balenzuela, Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; Argentina
description Understanding the opinion formation dynamics in social systems is of vast relevance in diverse aspects of society. In particular, it is relevant for political deliberation and other group decision-making processes. Although previous research has reported different approaches to model social dynamics, most of them focused on interaction mechanisms where individuals modify their opinions in line with the opinions of others, without invoking a latent mechanism of argumentation. In this paper, we present a model where changes of opinion are due to explicit exchanges of arguments, and we analyze the emerging collective states in terms of simple dynamic rules. We find that, when interactions are equiprobable and symmetrical, the model only shows consensus solutions. However, when either homophily, confirmation bias, or both are included, we observe the emergence and dominance of bipolarization, which appears due to the fact that individuals are not able to accept the contrary information from their opponents during exchanges of arguments. In all cases, the predominance of each stable state depends on the relation between the number of agents and the number of available arguments in the discussion. Overall, this paper describes the dynamics and shows the conditions wherein deliberative agents are expected to construct polarized societies.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/146153
Barrera Lemarchand, Federico Ulises; Semeshenko, Viktoriya; Navajas, Joaquín; Balenzuela, Pablo; Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model; American Institute of Physics; Chaos; 30; 6; 6-2020; 1-12
1054-1500
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/146153
identifier_str_mv Barrera Lemarchand, Federico Ulises; Semeshenko, Viktoriya; Navajas, Joaquín; Balenzuela, Pablo; Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model; American Institute of Physics; Chaos; 30; 6; 6-2020; 1-12
1054-1500
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0004504
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1063/5.0004504
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Institute of Physics
publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Institute of Physics
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846782310830047232
score 12.982451

Publicaciones similares