Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model
- Autores
- Barrera Lemarchand, Federico Ulises; Semeshenko, Viktoriya; Navajas, Joaquín; Balenzuela, Pablo
- Año de publicación
- 2020
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Understanding the opinion formation dynamics in social systems is of vast relevance in diverse aspects of society. In particular, it is relevant for political deliberation and other group decision-making processes. Although previous research has reported different approaches to model social dynamics, most of them focused on interaction mechanisms where individuals modify their opinions in line with the opinions of others, without invoking a latent mechanism of argumentation. In this paper, we present a model where changes of opinion are due to explicit exchanges of arguments, and we analyze the emerging collective states in terms of simple dynamic rules. We find that, when interactions are equiprobable and symmetrical, the model only shows consensus solutions. However, when either homophily, confirmation bias, or both are included, we observe the emergence and dominance of bipolarization, which appears due to the fact that individuals are not able to accept the contrary information from their opponents during exchanges of arguments. In all cases, the predominance of each stable state depends on the relation between the number of agents and the number of available arguments in the discussion. Overall, this paper describes the dynamics and shows the conditions wherein deliberative agents are expected to construct polarized societies.
Fil: Barrera Lemarchand, Federico Ulises. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Semeshenko, Viktoriya. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto Interdisciplinario de Economía Política de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Instituto Interdisciplinario de Economía Política de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Navajas, Joaquín. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; Argentina
Fil: Balenzuela, Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; Argentina - Materia
-
Formacion de opinion
Modelos de agentes
Intercambio de argumentos - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/146153
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_40eee6ae911a45fd65dba239dca76bca |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/146153 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments modelBarrera Lemarchand, Federico UlisesSemeshenko, ViktoriyaNavajas, JoaquínBalenzuela, PabloFormacion de opinionModelos de agentesIntercambio de argumentoshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Understanding the opinion formation dynamics in social systems is of vast relevance in diverse aspects of society. In particular, it is relevant for political deliberation and other group decision-making processes. Although previous research has reported different approaches to model social dynamics, most of them focused on interaction mechanisms where individuals modify their opinions in line with the opinions of others, without invoking a latent mechanism of argumentation. In this paper, we present a model where changes of opinion are due to explicit exchanges of arguments, and we analyze the emerging collective states in terms of simple dynamic rules. We find that, when interactions are equiprobable and symmetrical, the model only shows consensus solutions. However, when either homophily, confirmation bias, or both are included, we observe the emergence and dominance of bipolarization, which appears due to the fact that individuals are not able to accept the contrary information from their opponents during exchanges of arguments. In all cases, the predominance of each stable state depends on the relation between the number of agents and the number of available arguments in the discussion. Overall, this paper describes the dynamics and shows the conditions wherein deliberative agents are expected to construct polarized societies.Fil: Barrera Lemarchand, Federico Ulises. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Semeshenko, Viktoriya. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto Interdisciplinario de Economía Política de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Instituto Interdisciplinario de Economía Política de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Navajas, Joaquín. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; ArgentinaFil: Balenzuela, Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaAmerican Institute of Physics2020-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/146153Barrera Lemarchand, Federico Ulises; Semeshenko, Viktoriya; Navajas, Joaquín; Balenzuela, Pablo; Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model; American Institute of Physics; Chaos; 30; 6; 6-2020; 1-121054-1500CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0004504info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1063/5.0004504info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:26:33Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/146153instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:26:34.016CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model |
title |
Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model |
spellingShingle |
Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model Barrera Lemarchand, Federico Ulises Formacion de opinion Modelos de agentes Intercambio de argumentos |
title_short |
Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model |
title_full |
Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model |
title_fullStr |
Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model |
title_full_unstemmed |
Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model |
title_sort |
Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Barrera Lemarchand, Federico Ulises Semeshenko, Viktoriya Navajas, Joaquín Balenzuela, Pablo |
author |
Barrera Lemarchand, Federico Ulises |
author_facet |
Barrera Lemarchand, Federico Ulises Semeshenko, Viktoriya Navajas, Joaquín Balenzuela, Pablo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Semeshenko, Viktoriya Navajas, Joaquín Balenzuela, Pablo |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Formacion de opinion Modelos de agentes Intercambio de argumentos |
topic |
Formacion de opinion Modelos de agentes Intercambio de argumentos |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Understanding the opinion formation dynamics in social systems is of vast relevance in diverse aspects of society. In particular, it is relevant for political deliberation and other group decision-making processes. Although previous research has reported different approaches to model social dynamics, most of them focused on interaction mechanisms where individuals modify their opinions in line with the opinions of others, without invoking a latent mechanism of argumentation. In this paper, we present a model where changes of opinion are due to explicit exchanges of arguments, and we analyze the emerging collective states in terms of simple dynamic rules. We find that, when interactions are equiprobable and symmetrical, the model only shows consensus solutions. However, when either homophily, confirmation bias, or both are included, we observe the emergence and dominance of bipolarization, which appears due to the fact that individuals are not able to accept the contrary information from their opponents during exchanges of arguments. In all cases, the predominance of each stable state depends on the relation between the number of agents and the number of available arguments in the discussion. Overall, this paper describes the dynamics and shows the conditions wherein deliberative agents are expected to construct polarized societies. Fil: Barrera Lemarchand, Federico Ulises. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Semeshenko, Viktoriya. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto Interdisciplinario de Economía Política de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Instituto Interdisciplinario de Economía Política de Buenos Aires; Argentina Fil: Navajas, Joaquín. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; Argentina Fil: Balenzuela, Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; Argentina |
description |
Understanding the opinion formation dynamics in social systems is of vast relevance in diverse aspects of society. In particular, it is relevant for political deliberation and other group decision-making processes. Although previous research has reported different approaches to model social dynamics, most of them focused on interaction mechanisms where individuals modify their opinions in line with the opinions of others, without invoking a latent mechanism of argumentation. In this paper, we present a model where changes of opinion are due to explicit exchanges of arguments, and we analyze the emerging collective states in terms of simple dynamic rules. We find that, when interactions are equiprobable and symmetrical, the model only shows consensus solutions. However, when either homophily, confirmation bias, or both are included, we observe the emergence and dominance of bipolarization, which appears due to the fact that individuals are not able to accept the contrary information from their opponents during exchanges of arguments. In all cases, the predominance of each stable state depends on the relation between the number of agents and the number of available arguments in the discussion. Overall, this paper describes the dynamics and shows the conditions wherein deliberative agents are expected to construct polarized societies. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/146153 Barrera Lemarchand, Federico Ulises; Semeshenko, Viktoriya; Navajas, Joaquín; Balenzuela, Pablo; Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model; American Institute of Physics; Chaos; 30; 6; 6-2020; 1-12 1054-1500 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/146153 |
identifier_str_mv |
Barrera Lemarchand, Federico Ulises; Semeshenko, Viktoriya; Navajas, Joaquín; Balenzuela, Pablo; Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model; American Institute of Physics; Chaos; 30; 6; 6-2020; 1-12 1054-1500 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0004504 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1063/5.0004504 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Institute of Physics |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Institute of Physics |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614267194572800 |
score |
13.070432 |